Articles | Volume 17, issue 5
Research article
07 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 07 Mar 2017

Sensitivity of the interannual variability of mineral aerosol simulations to meteorological forcing dataset

Molly B. Smith, Natalie M. Mahowald, Samuel Albani, Aaron Perry, Remi Losno, Zihan Qu, Beatrice Marticorena, David A. Ridley, and Colette L. Heald


Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Molly Smith on behalf of the Authors (24 Dec 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (19 Jan 2017) by Bernhard Vogel
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (03 Feb 2017)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (09 Feb 2017) by Bernhard Vogel
AR by Molly Smith on behalf of the Authors (16 Feb 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Short summary
Using different meteorology reanalyses to drive dust in climate modeling can produce dissimilar global dust distributions, especially in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). It may therefore not be advisable for SH dust studies to base results on simulations driven by one reanalysis. Northern Hemisphere dust varies mostly on seasonal timescales, while SH dust varies on interannual timescales. Dust is an important part of climate modeling, and we hope this contributes to understanding these simulations.
Final-revised paper