Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 21–29, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-21-2017
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 21–29, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-21-2017
Research article
02 Jan 2017
Research article | 02 Jan 2017

Why do general circulation models overestimate the aerosol cloud lifetime effect? A case study comparing CAM5 and a CRM

Cheng Zhou and Joyce E. Penner

Viewed

Total article views: 2,549 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,632 824 93 2,549 262 56 97
  • HTML: 1,632
  • PDF: 824
  • XML: 93
  • Total: 2,549
  • Supplement: 262
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 97
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 04 Dec 2022
Download
Short summary
Observation-based studies have shown that the aerosol cloud lifetime effect or the increase of cloud liquid water with increased aerosol loading may have been overestimated in climate models. Here, by simulating the same shallow, warm clouds using a global climate model (CAM5) and a cloud resolving model (CRM) which has more complete and detailed cloud physics, we show how a climate model can overestimate the aerosol cloud lifetime effect due to its simplified representation of cloud processes.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint