Articles | Volume 17, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14253-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14253-2017
Research article
 | 
01 Dec 2017
Research article |  | 01 Dec 2017

Multifractal evaluation of simulated precipitation intensities from the COSMO NWP model

Daniel Wolfensberger, Auguste Gires, Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia, Daniel Schertzer, and Alexis Berne

Related authors

Drone-based photogrammetry combined with deep learning to estimate hail size distributions and melting of hail on the ground
Martin Lainer, Killian P. Brennan, Alessandro Hering, Jérôme Kopp, Samuel Monhart, Daniel Wolfensberger, and Urs Germann
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2539–2557, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2539-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the polarimetric backscatter by a still or quasi-still wind turbine
Marco Gabella, Martin Lainer, Daniel Wolfensberger, and Jacopo Grazioli
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 4409–4422, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4409-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-4409-2023, 2023
Short summary
RainForest: a random forest algorithm for quantitative precipitation estimation over Switzerland
Daniel Wolfensberger, Marco Gabella, Marco Boscacci, Urs Germann, and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3169–3193, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3169-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3169-2021, 2021
Short summary
From model to radar variables: a new forward polarimetric radar operator for COSMO
Daniel Wolfensberger and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3883–3916, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3883-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3883-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Impact of wildfire smoke on Arctic cirrus formation – Part 2: Simulation of MOSAiC 2019–2020 cases
Albert Ansmann, Cristofer Jimenez, Daniel A. Knopf, Johanna Roschke, Johannes Bühl, Kevin Ohneiser, and Ronny Engelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4867–4884, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4867-2025, 2025
Short summary
Constraining aerosol–cloud adjustments by uniting surface observations with a perturbed parameter ensemble
August Mikkelsen, Daniel T. McCoy, Trude Eidhammer, Andrew Gettelman, Ci Song, Hamish Gordon, and Isabel L. McCoy
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4547–4570, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4547-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4547-2025, 2025
Short summary
Investigating ice formation pathways using a novel two-moment multi-class cloud microphysics scheme
Tim Lüttmer, Peter Spichtinger, and Axel Seifert
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4505–4529, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4505-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4505-2025, 2025
Short summary
Microphysics regimes due to haze–cloud interactions: cloud oscillation and cloud collapse
Fan Yang, Hamed Fahandezh Sadi, Raymond A. Shaw, Fabian Hoffmann, Pei Hou, Aaron Wang, and Mikhail Ovchinnikov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3785–3806, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3785-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3785-2025, 2025
Short summary
Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions
Shiye Huang, Jing Yang, Jiaojiao Li, Qian Chen, Qilin Zhang, and Fengxia Guo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1831–1850, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Baldauf, M., Seifert, A., Förstner, J., Majewski, D., Raschendorfer, M., and Reinhardt, T.: Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: description and sensitivities, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3887–3905, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1, 2011.
Bohme, T., Van Lipzig, N., Delobbe, L., and Seifert, A.: Precipitation patterns above Belgium using weather radar and COSMO model reflectivity data, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling, Delft, the Netherlands, available at: http://www.ch2011.ch/pdf/CH2011reportHIGH.pdf (last access: 13 August 2017), 2009.
COSMO: COSMO namelists and variables, available at: http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/tasks/operational/nmlDoc/cosmoDefault.htm?ver=3&mode=printerFriendly (last access: 8 July 2017), 2015.
Davis, C., Brown, B., and Bullock, R.: Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. part i: methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 1772–1784, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3145.1, 2006.
Deidda, R.: Rainfall downscaling in a space-time multifractal framework, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1779–1794, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900038, 2000.
Download
Short summary
Precipitation intensities simulated by the COSMO weather prediction model are compared to radar observations over a range of spatial and temporal scales using the universal multifractal framework. Our results highlight the strong influence of meteorological and topographical features on the multifractal characteristics of precipitation. Moreover, the influence of the subgrid parameterizations of COSMO is clearly visible by a break in the scaling properties that is absent from the radar data.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint