Articles | Volume 17, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13645-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13645-2017
Research article
 | 
16 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 16 Nov 2017

Overview and preliminary results of the Surface Ocean Aerosol Production (SOAP) campaign

Cliff S. Law, Murray J. Smith, Mike J. Harvey, Thomas G. Bell, Luke T. Cravigan, Fiona C. Elliott, Sarah J. Lawson, Martine Lizotte, Andrew Marriner, John McGregor, Zoran Ristovski, Karl A. Safi, Eric S. Saltzman, Petri Vaattovaara, and Carolyn F. Walker

Viewed

Total article views: 4,536 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,984 1,383 169 4,536 382 82 87
  • HTML: 2,984
  • PDF: 1,383
  • XML: 169
  • Total: 4,536
  • Supplement: 382
  • BibTeX: 82
  • EndNote: 87
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,536 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,433 with geography defined and 103 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 06 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We carried out a multidisciplinary study to examine how aerosol production is influenced by the production and emission of trace gases and particles in the surface ocean. Phytoplankton blooms of different species composition in frontal waters southeast of New Zealand were a significant source of dimethylsulfide and other aerosol precursors. The relationships between surface ocean biogeochemistry and aerosol composition will inform the understanding of aerosol production over the remote ocean.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint