Articles | Volume 17, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13283-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13283-2017
Research article
 | 
09 Nov 2017
Research article |  | 09 Nov 2017

Contributions of the troposphere and stratosphere to CH4 model biases

Zhiting Wang, Thorsten Warneke, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Justus Notholt, Ute Karstens, Marielle Saunois, Matthias Schneider, Ralf Sussmann, Harjinder Sembhi, David W. T. Griffith, Dave F. Pollard, Rigel Kivi, Christof Petri, Voltaire A. Velazco, Michel Ramonet, and Huilin Chen

Viewed

Total article views: 3,046 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,022 892 132 3,046 92 118
  • HTML: 2,022
  • PDF: 892
  • XML: 132
  • Total: 3,046
  • BibTeX: 92
  • EndNote: 118
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,046 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,055 with geography defined and -9 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
In this paper we separate the biases of atmospheric methane models into stratospheric and tropospheric parts. It is observed in other studies that simulated total columns of atmospheric methane present a latitudinal bias compared to measurements. The latitudinal gradients are considered to be from the stratosphere. However, our results show that the latitudinal biases could come from the troposphere in two of three models evaluated in this study.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint