49 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Optimizing stratospheric aerosol lifetime and albedo through particle morphology and refractive index B. Vennes et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00026B
2. Air quality impacts of stratospheric aerosol injections are likely small and mainly driven by changes in climate, not aerosol settling C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1339-2026
3. How marine cloud brightening could also affect stratospheric ozone E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adu4038
4. Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target D. MacMartin et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0454
5. Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 2: Stratospheric and free-tropospheric response E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-687-2023
6. Impact of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai Volcanic Eruption on Stratospheric Water Vapour, Temperature, and Ozone G. Basha et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143602
7. A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security J. Jägermeyr et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919049117
8. Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate aerosol and solar dimming climate interventions based on the G6 Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations S. Tilmes​​​​​​​ et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4557-2022
9. Energetic constraints on tropical precipitation changes under stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: a topical review A. Xavier et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae6714
10. Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth P. Zarnetske et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921854118
11. Heterogeneous Reactivity of HCl on CaCO3 Aerosols at Stratospheric Temperature H. Huynh & V. McNeill https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00151
12. Practical paths to risk-risk analysis of solar radiation modification T. Felgenhauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgaf012
13. Upper tropospheric ice sensitivity to sulfate geoengineering D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14867-2018
14. World Climate Research Programme lighthouse activity: an assessment of major research gaps in solar radiation modification research J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1507479
15. Improving risk governance strategies via learning: a comparative analysis of solar radiation modification and gene drives K. Grieger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-024-09979-6
16. A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031883
17. Sulfur deposition changes under sulfate geoengineering conditions: quasi-biennial oscillation effects on the transport and lifetime of stratospheric aerosols D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2787-2018
18. Key Gaps in Models' Physical Representation of Climate Intervention and Its Impacts S. Eastham et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024MS004872
19. Impact of solar geoengineering on wildfires in the 21st century in CESM2/WACCM6 W. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5467-2023
20. Earth system interventions as technologies of the Anthropocene J. Reynolds https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.010
21. Sensitivity of Total Column Ozone to Stratospheric Sulfur Injection Strategies S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094058
22. An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
23. Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering D. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018
24. Influence of relative humidity on SO2 oxidation by O3 and NO2 on the surface of TiO2 particles: Potential for formation of secondary sulfate aerosol X. He & Y. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2019.04.046
25. The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00134B
26. Assessing the impact of solar climate intervention on future U.S. weather using a convection-permitting WRF model L. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2239-2026
27. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
28. Engineering and logistical concerns add practical limitations to stratospheric aerosol injection strategies M. Hack et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20447-2
29. The Regional Hydroclimate Response to Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering and the Role of Stratospheric Heating I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031093
30. Formation and driving factors of sulfate in PM2.5 at a high-level atmospheric SO2 city of Yangquan in China C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00953-0
31. The Overlooked Role of the Stratosphere Under a Solar Constant Reduction E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098773
32. Kinetics study of heterogeneous reactions of O3 and SO2 with sea salt single droplets using micro-FTIR spectroscopy: Potential for formation of sulfate aerosol in atmospheric environment X. He & Y. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.118219
33. Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity J. Moch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023AV000911
34. Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure S. Eastham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.047
35. Solar Geoengineering: History, Methods, Governance, Prospects E. Parson & D. Keith https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-081911
36. Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
37. Effects of Different Stratospheric SO2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028146
38. Afro-Asian climate response to future solar radiation management T. Adeliyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106825
39. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report A. Archibald et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034
40. Aerosol formation pathways from aviation emissions P. Prashanth et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac5229
41. Response of Surface Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation to Stratospheric SO2 Injections S. Madronich et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110432
42. A computationally efficient method to model similar and alternate stratospheric aerosol injection experiments using prescribed aerosols in a lower-complexity version of the same model: a case study using CESM(CAM) and CESM(WACCM) J. de Jong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8679-2025
43. An investigation of the relationship between tropical monsoon precipitation changes and stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical depth A. Xavier et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgae016
44. Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality A. Harding et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13957-x
45. Investigation of water-soluble organic constituents and their spatio-temporal heterogeneity over the Tibetan Plateau H. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119093
46. Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
47. Extreme Ozone Loss Following Nuclear War Results in Enhanced Surface Ultraviolet Radiation C. Bardeen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035079
48. Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
49. Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00047