Articles | Volume 16, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8511-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.Why did the storm ex-Gaston (2010) fail to redevelop during the PREDICT experiment?
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 13 Jul 2016)
- Preprint (discussion started on 19 Jan 2016)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/039f6/039f6da721b86099c29e4868aec817f8c53462ec" alt="Printer-friendly Version"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3a5d/e3a5d2bbe99ae74ab92156d27b7280e707784b46" alt="Supplement"
-
RC1: 'Review of acp-2015-692', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Feb 2016
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 1', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
-
AC1: 'Response to reviewer 1', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
-
RC2: 'Referee Comments', Anonymous Referee #3, 16 Feb 2016
-
AC2: 'Response to reviewer 2', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
-
AC2: 'Response to reviewer 2', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
-
RC3: 'Review', David Raymond, 23 Feb 2016
-
AC3: 'Response to D. Raymond', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
-
AC3: 'Response to D. Raymond', Michael Montgomery, 25 Apr 2016
Peer-review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Michael Montgomery on behalf of the Authors (25 Apr 2016)
ED: Publish as is (16 Jun 2016) by Timothy J. Dunkerton
AR by Michael Montgomery on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2016)