70 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modelling of the urban concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> on a high resolution for a period of 35 years, for the assessment of lifetime exposure and health effects J. Kukkonen et al. 10.5194/acp-18-8041-2018
2. Air pollutant emissions from Piraeus port: External costs and air quality levels A. Progiou et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102586
3. Contributions of Nordic anthropogenic emissions on air pollution and premature mortality over the Nordic region and the Arctic U. Im et al. 10.5194/acp-19-12975-2019
4. Airborne nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea: Past trends, source allocation and future projections M. Gauss et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118377
5. An evaluation of the photochemical air quality modeling using CMAQ in the industrial area of Quintero-Puchuncavi-Concon, Chile E. Pino-Cortés et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2022.101336
6. Global air quality and health impacts of domestic and international shipping Y. Zhang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac146b
7. Effects of strengthening the Baltic Sea ECA regulations J. Jonson et al. 10.5194/acp-19-13469-2019
8. Anthropogenic emission inventories in China: a review M. Li et al. 10.1093/nsr/nwx150
9. Total life cycle emissions of post-Panamax containerships powered by conventional fuel or natural gas J. Hua et al. 10.1080/10962247.2018.1505675
10. The significance of incorporating unidentified vessels into AIS-based ship emission inventory Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.055
11. The enforcement of ECA regulations: inspection strategy for on-board fuel sampling L. Li et al. 10.1007/s10878-021-00756-8
12. Decarbonization of Maritime Transport: Analysis of External Costs E. Czermański et al. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00028
13. Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions X. Wang et al. 10.1038/s41558-021-01176-6
14. Emission control areas: More or fewer? Y. Sun et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102349
15. Shipping emissions over Europe: A state-of-the-art and comparative analysis M. Russo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.025
16. Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: Evidence from Italy A. Di Vaio et al. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.046
17. Global assessment of shipping emissions in 2015 on a high spatial and temporal resolution L. Johansson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.042
18. Spatial and temporal allocation of ship exhaust emissions in Australian coastal waters using AIS data: Analysis and treatment of data gaps B. Goldsworthy 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.028
19. Effect of Seasonal Flow Field on Inland Ship Emission Assessment: A Case Study of Ferry H. Huang et al. 10.3390/su12187484
20. Health and climate impacts of ocean-going vessels in East Asia H. Liu et al. 10.1038/nclimate3083
21. Urban natural capital accounts: developing a novel approach to quantify air pollution removal by vegetation L. Jones et al. 10.1080/21606544.2019.1597772
22. Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel: a cruise campaign Z. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-18-14445-2018
23. Trends of nutrients and metals in precipitation in northern Germany: the role of emissions and meteorology M. Lorenz & M. Brunke 10.1007/s10661-021-09094-y
24. Decadal evolution of ship emissions in China from 2004 to 2013 by using an integrated AIS-based approach and projection to 2040 C. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-18-6075-2018
25. Ozone source apportionment during peak summer events over southwestern Europe M. Pay et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5467-2019
26. The UrbEm Hybrid Method to Derive High-Resolution Emissions for City-Scale Air Quality Modeling M. Ramacher et al. 10.3390/atmos12111404
27. The environmental performance of a fossil-free ship propulsion system with onboard carbon capture – a life cycle assessment of the HyMethShip concept E. Malmgren et al. 10.1039/D1SE00105A
28. An empirical analysis on the operational profile of liquefied natural gas carriers with steam propulsion plants C. González Gutiérrez et al. 10.1017/S0373463320000612
29. Maritime NOx Emissions Over Chinese Seas Derived From Satellite Observations J. Ding et al. 10.1002/2017GL076788
30. Technical note: Intermittent reduction of the stratospheric ozone over northern Europe caused by a storm in the Atlantic Ocean M. Sofiev et al. 10.5194/acp-20-1839-2020
31. Temporal and spatial trends in aerosols near the English Channel – An air quality success story? M. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100074
32. Attribution of atmospheric sulfur dioxide over the English Channel to dimethyl sulfide and changing ship emissions M. Yang et al. 10.5194/acp-16-4771-2016
33. A New Perspective at the Ship-Air-Sea-Interface: The Environmental Impacts of Exhaust Gas Scrubber Discharge S. Endres et al. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00139
34. A New Separation Methodology for the Maritime Sector Emissions over the Mediterranean and Black Sea Regions A. Pseftogkas et al. 10.3390/atmos12111478
35. Assessment and improvement of EPA's penalty policy: From the perspective of governments' and ships' behaviors L. Li et al. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.02.004
36. Monitoring the compliance of sailing ships with fuel sulfur content regulations using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) measurements of ship emissions in open water F. Zhou et al. 10.5194/amt-13-4899-2020
37. Atmospheric impact of ship traffic in four Adriatic-Ionian port-cities: Comparison and harmonization of different approaches E. Merico et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.016
38. Comparison of Inland Ship Emission Results from a Real-World Test and an AIS-Based Model H. Jiang et al. 10.3390/atmos12121611
39. Impact of emission control areas on atmospheric pollutant emissions from major ocean-going ships entering the Shanghai Port, China Z. Wan et al. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.053
40. Detection of NO2 pollution plumes from individual ships with the TROPOMI/S5P satellite sensor A. Georgoulias et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abc445
41. Modelling of Ship Originated Exhaust Gas Emissions in the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus) İ. BAYIRHAN et al. 10.30897/ijegeo.641397
42. Air emissions from ships in port: Does regulation make a difference? M. Tichavska et al. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.003
43. Effects of global ship emissions on European air pollution levels J. Jonson et al. 10.5194/acp-20-11399-2020
44. Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching regulation: a field observation campaign, SEISO-Bohai Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019
45. Regulating GHG Emissions from shipping: Local, global, or polycentric approach? D. Gritsenko 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.07.010
46. The impact of the Sino-US trade conflict on global shipping carbon emissions J. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128381
47. The influence of residential and workday population mobility on exposure to air pollution in the UK S. Reis et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.005
48. Model for Estimation of Fuel Consumption of Cruise Ships M. Simonsen et al. 10.3390/en11051059
49. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs M. Sofiev et al. 10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9
50. Light-level geolocators reveal spatial variations in interactions between northern fulmars and fisheries B. Dupuis et al. 10.3354/meps13673
51. Emissions from container vessels in the port of Singapore N. Tran et al. 10.1080/03088839.2021.1980236
52. Estimation and dispersion analysis of shipping emissions in Bandirma Port, Turkey S. Kuzu et al. 10.1007/s10668-020-01057-6
53. Real-time chemical characterization of single ambient particles at a port city in Chinese domestic emission control area — Impacts of ship emissions on urban air quality L. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153117
54. Emission performance of major ship classes: An estimation based on a new set of emission factors and realistic activity profile data A. Grigoriadis et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/899/1/012005
55. Investigation of reactive gases and methane variability in the coastal boundary layer of the central Mediterranean basin P. Cristofanelli et al. 10.1525/elementa.216
56. Developing a new green ship approach for flue gas emission estimation of bulk carriers L. Bilgili & U. Celebi 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.002
57. Monitoring Sulfur Content in Marine Fuel Oil Using Ultraviolet Imaging Technology Z. Zhang et al. 10.3390/atmos12091182
58. Use of AIS data for the environmental characterization of world cruise ship traffic I. Vicente-Cera et al. 10.1080/15568318.2019.1575494
59. Analyzing cruise ship itineraries patterns and vessels diversity in ports of the European maritime region: A hierarchical clustering approach I. Vicente-Cera et al. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102731
60. National- to port-level inventories of shipping emissions in China M. Fu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aa897a
61. A multi-year source apportionment of PM2.5 at multiple sites in the southern Po Valley (Italy) F. Scotto et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101192
62. Voyage-based statistical fuel consumption models of ocean-going container ships in Korea L. Le et al. 10.1080/03088839.2019.1684591
63. The Carbon Footprint of Valencia Port: A Case Study of the Port Authority of Valencia (Spain) V. Cloquell Ballester et al. 10.3390/ijerph17218157
64. Surveillance of ship emissions and fuel sulfur content based on imaging detection and multi-task deep learning K. Cao et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117698
65. Trends in Vessel Atmospheric Emissions in the Central Mediterranean over the Last 10 Years and during the COVID-19 Outbreak M. Saliba et al. 10.3390/jmse9070762
66. Sustainability of cruise ship fuel systems: Comparison among LNG and diesel technologies T. Iannaccone et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121069
67. Comparison of large-scale ship exhaust emissions across multiple resolutions: From annual to hourly data B. Goldsworthy et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116829
68. Container ship emission estimation model for the concept of green port in Turkey A. Ekmekçioğlu et al. 10.1177/14750902211024453
69. Compositional changes of PM2.5 in NE Spain during 2009–2018: A trend analysis of the chemical composition and source apportionment M. Veld et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148728
70. Assessment of atmospheric pollutant emissions with maritime energy strategies using bayesian simulations and time series forecasting J. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116068