See suggestions for technical corrections from the reviewers.

While the reviewers are widely satisfied with the comments, I would observe that the rationale for the design of the experiment still isn't explicitly stated, which was something that was requested. Note that this is not the same as the motivation for the experiment, but more to do with why it was executed in the way it was. While this may seem obvious given the precedent in previous multi-platform studies (e.g MILAGRO), I feel that the manuscript would benefit enormously from the simple inclusion of this this being stated explictly in the first paragraph of section 2 (it's kind of inferred in section 1, but only very loosely). This doesn't have to be anything too big, just a statement to the effect of "the guiding principle for the use of the multiple platforms was to characterise the Amazonian atmosphere under varying degrees of urban influence and photochemical ageing..." or something.

While this may seem like pointing out the obvious, such a statement would help provide the frame of reference for the subsequent publications that I would regard as part of the funciton of an introduction paper. Note that it is not necessary to state whether the measurements were sucessful in this regard; this will be up to the individual papers and/or a subsequent overview paper.