Articles | Volume 16, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016
Research article
 | 
15 Apr 2016
Research article |  | 15 Apr 2016

Interferences in photolytic NO2 measurements: explanation for an apparent missing oxidant?

Chris Reed, Mathew J. Evans, Piero Di Carlo, James D. Lee, and Lucy J. Carpenter

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Chris Reed on behalf of the Authors (01 Apr 2016)  Author's response 
ED: Publish as is (06 Apr 2016) by V. Faye McNeill
AR by Chris Reed on behalf of the Authors (06 Apr 2016)
Download
Short summary
The self-cleaning capacity of the atmosphere in places like Antarctica can be measured by quantifying very low amounts of combustion products that exist in a well-known ratio. When this ratio deviates from 1 it points to the existence of unknown compounds. Several unknown compounds have been theorized to exist but never measured. We have found the method for measuring the ratio of combustion products suffers a bias in remote places, which when taken into account disproves any unknown compounds.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint