Articles | Volume 16, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2843-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2843-2016
Research article
 | 
04 Mar 2016
Research article |  | 04 Mar 2016

Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection

Anthony C. Jones, James M. Haywood, and Andy Jones

Viewed

Total article views: 10,626 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,443 4,819 364 10,626 963 192 251
  • HTML: 5,443
  • PDF: 4,819
  • XML: 364
  • Total: 10,626
  • Supplement: 963
  • BibTeX: 192
  • EndNote: 251
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Nov 2015)
Latest update: 02 Mar 2026
Download
Short summary
In this paper we assess the potential climatic impacts of geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection strategies. We find that black carbon injection results in severe stratospheric warming and precipitation impacts, and therefore black carbon is unsuitable for geoengineering purposes. As the injection rates and climatic impacts for titania are close to those for sulfate, there appears little benefit of using titania when compared to injection of sulfur dioxide.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint