39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
2. North Atlantic Oscillation response in GeoMIP experiments G6solar and G6sulfur: why detailed modelling is needed for understanding regional implications of solar radiation management A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1287-2021
3. Stratospheric aerosol injection can weaken the carbon dioxide greenhouse effect H. He et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02466-z
4. The impact of stratospheric aerosol intervention on the North Atlantic and Quasi-Biennial Oscillations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G6sulfur experiment A. Jones et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2999-2022
5. Sensitivity of volcanic aerosol dispersion to meteorological conditions: A Pinatubo case study A. Jones et al. 10.1002/2016JD025001
6. Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO2 Injections J. Richter et al. 10.1002/2017JD026912
7. Radiative Forcing of Climate: The Historical Evolution of the Radiative Forcing Concept, the Forcing Agents and their Quantification, and Applications V. Ramaswamy et al. 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-19-0001.1
8. The potential environmental and climate impacts of stratospheric aerosol injection: a review H. Huynh & V. McNeill 10.1039/D3EA00134B
9. World Climate Research Programme lighthouse activity: an assessment of major research gaps in solar radiation modification research J. Haywood et al. 10.3389/fclim.2025.1507479
10. Assessing the consequences of including aerosol absorption in potential stratospheric aerosol injection climate intervention strategies J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-22-6135-2022
11. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
12. Radiative forcing geoengineering under high CO2 levels leads to higher risk of Arctic wildfires and permafrost thaw than a targeted mitigation scenario R. Müller et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01329-3
13. Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
14. The cost of stratospheric climate engineering revisited R. Moriyama et al. 10.1007/s11027-016-9723-y
15. Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss D. Keith et al. 10.1073/pnas.1615572113
16. How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations A. Talberg et al. 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
17. Climate engineering by mimicking natural dust climate control: the iron salt aerosol method F. Oeste et al. 10.5194/esd-8-1-2017
18. Future changes in atmospheric rivers over East Asia under stratospheric aerosol intervention J. Liang & J. Haywood 10.5194/acp-23-1687-2023
19. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
20. Anomalous trends in global ocean carbon concentrations following the 2022 eruptions of Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai B. Franz et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01421-8
21. Solar radiation management and ecosystem functional responses A. Ito 10.1007/s10584-017-1930-3
22. Annual Solar Geoengineering: Mitigating Yearly Global Warming Increases A. Feinberg 10.3390/cli12020026
23. Regional Climate Impacts of Stabilizing Global Warming at 1.5 K Using Solar Geoengineering A. Jones et al. 10.1002/2017EF000720
24. Best Scale for Detecting the Effects of Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering on Surface Temperature Y. Lo et al. 10.1029/2018EF000933
25. Optimal Control of Aerosol Emissions into the Stratosphere to Stabilize the Earth’s Climate S. Soldatenko & R. Yusupov 10.1134/S0001433818050122
26. Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling: a systematic literature review A. Määttänen et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae007
27. Improved aerosol radiative properties as a foundation for solar geoengineering risk assessment J. Dykema et al. 10.1002/2016GL069258
28. Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario H. Kashimura et al. 10.5194/acp-17-3339-2017
29. Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency A. Jones et al. 10.1038/s41467-017-01606-0
30. A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
31. Mie scattering from optically levitated mixed sulfuric acid–silica core–shell aerosols: observation of core–shell morphology for atmospheric science M. McGrory et al. 10.1039/D1CP04068E
32. Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
33. Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1038/s43247-020-00058-7
34. Radiative and chemical implications of the size and composition of aerosol particles in the existing or modified global stratosphere D. Murphy et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8915-2021
35. Stratospheric Response in the First Geoengineering Simulation Meeting Multiple Surface Climate Objectives J. Richter et al. 10.1029/2018JD028285
36. Atmospheric Aerosols: Clouds, Chemistry, and Climate V. McNeill 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101538
37. Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO2 with TiO2 and SiO2 aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering M. Tang et al. 10.5194/acp-16-15397-2016
38. Differing responses of the quasi-biennial oscillation to artificial SO2 injections in two global models U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8975-2020
39. An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/wcc.423