Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15413–15424, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15413-2016
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15413–15424, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15413-2016

Research article 13 Dec 2016

Research article | 13 Dec 2016

The source of discrepancies in aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions between GCM and A-Train retrievals

Takuro Michibata et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Takuro Michibata on behalf of the Authors (18 Nov 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (25 Nov 2016) by Philip Stier
Download
Short summary
This study identifies a fundamental flaw of a GCM in aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. The model predicts a monotonic increase in the LWP in response to increased aerosols, which is in stark contrast to satellite retrievals that show a regional variation in the sign of the LWP response. The model also fails to represent the observed dependency of the LWP response on macrophysical regimes. The model biases are attributed to the autoconversion process, with a lack of buffering mechanisms.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint