Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14979-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14979-2016
Research article
 | 
05 Dec 2016
Research article |  | 05 Dec 2016

Gridded uncertainty in fossil fuel carbon dioxide emission maps, a CDIAC example

Robert J. Andres, Thomas A. Boden, and David M. Higdon

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by R.J. Andres on behalf of the Authors (22 Sep 2016)  Author's response 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (28 Sep 2016) by Qiang Zhang
RR by Ray Nassar (10 Nov 2016)
ED: Publish as is (13 Nov 2016) by Qiang Zhang
AR by R.J. Andres on behalf of the Authors (15 Nov 2016)
Download
Short summary
Due to a lack of physical measurements at appropriate spatial and temporal scales, all current global maps of fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions use one or more proxies to distribute those emissions. These proxies and distribution schemes introduce additional uncertainty into the maps. This paper examines the uncertainty associated with the magnitude of gridded FFCO2 emissions and includes uncertainty contributions from the spatial, temporal, proxy, and magnitude components.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint