Articles | Volume 16, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13399-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13399-2016
Review article
 | 
31 Oct 2016
Review article |  | 31 Oct 2016

Overview of mercury dry deposition, litterfall, and throughfall studies

L. Paige Wright, Leiming Zhang, and Frank J. Marsik

Viewed

Total article views: 2,300 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,223 994 83 2,300 479 66 77
  • HTML: 1,223
  • PDF: 994
  • XML: 83
  • Total: 2,300
  • Supplement: 479
  • BibTeX: 66
  • EndNote: 77
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 28 May 2023
Download
Short summary
The current knowledge concerning mercury dry deposition is reviewed, including dry deposition algorithms used in chemical transport models and at monitoring sites, measurement methods and studies for quantifying dry deposition of oxidized mercury, and measurement studies of litterfall and throughfall mercury. Over all the regions, dry deposition, estimated as the sum of litterfall and throughfall minus open-field wet deposition, is more dominant than wet deposition for Hg deposition.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint