63 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Source identification and ambient trace element concentrations of PM10 using receptor modeling in an urban area of Chhattisgarh, India P. Khobragade & A. Ahirwar https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2066201
2. M-TraCE: a new tool for high-resolution computation and statistical elaboration of backward trajectories on the Italian domain L. Vitali et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-016-0491-8
3. Enhanced natural releases of mercury in response to the reduction in anthropogenic emissions during the COVID-19 lockdown by explainable machine learning X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15851-2022
4. A review of current knowledge concerning PM2. 5 chemical composition, aerosol optical properties and their relationships across China J. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017
5. Tracing the transboundary transport of atmospheric Particulate Bound Mercury driven by the East Asian monsoon X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130678
6. Characteristics of total gaseous mercury at a tropical megacity in Vietnam and influence of tropical cyclones L. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2023.101813
7. A multi-year source apportionment of PM2.5 at multiple sites in the southern Po Valley (Italy) F. Scotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101192
8. Daily tourist flow forecasting using SPCA and CNN‐LSTM neural network T. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5980
9. Characteristics Variation of Atmospheric CO2 and CH4 in Yongxing Island, South China Sea H. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-024-5528-x
10. Development of a vehicle emission inventory with high temporal–spatial resolution based on NRT traffic data and its impact on air pollution in Beijing – Part 2: Impact of vehicle emission on urban air quality J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3171-2016
11. Diurnal variation and source analysis of NMHCs at a background site of Nam Co (4,730 m a.s.l.) in the interior area of Tibetan Plateau Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101520
12. Natural surface emissions dominate anthropogenic emissions contributions to total gaseous mercury at Canadian rural sites I. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8591-2025
13. Determination of the Main Factors Influencing the Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Deposition in the Territory of the Southern Baikal Region (Eastern Siberia, Russia) Y. Molozhnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136062
14. Air synthesis review: polycyclic aromatic compounds in the oil sands region T. Harner et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0039
15. Isotopic Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer of East China Sea X. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028671
16. Impact of Measurement Uncertainties on Receptor Modeling of Speciated Atmospheric Mercury I. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20676
17. Distribution, sources, and transport pathways of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury: interhemispheric differences during a transatlantic cruise from the Baltic Sea to the Southern Ocean in 2019–2020 V. Kalinchuk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128287
18. Atmospheric distribution, source apportionment, and sea-air fluxes of gaseous elemental mercury over the Barents, Kara, Laptev and East Siberian Seas V. Kalinchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128996
19. Potential sources, scavenging processes, and source regions of mercury in the wet deposition of South Korea S. Eom et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143934
20. Potential sources and processes affecting speciated atmospheric mercury at Kejimkujik National Park, Canada: comparison of receptor models and data treatment methods X. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1381-2017
21. Distribution of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (Hg(0)) from the Sea of Japan to the Arctic, and Hg(0) evasion fluxes in the Eastern Arctic Seas: Results from a joint Russian-Chinese cruise in fall 2018 V. Kalinchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142003
22. Domestic and Transboundary Sources of Atmospheric Particulate Bound Mercury in Remote Areas of China: Evidence from Mercury Isotopes X. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06736
23. First field-based atmospheric observation of the reduction of reactive mercury driven by sunlight B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.028
24. Speciated atmospheric mercury during haze and non-haze periods in winter at an urban site in Beijing, China: Pollution characteristics, sources, and causes analyses C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105209
25. Atmospheric Mercury Variability at a High-Altitude Site in East China: The Significant Role of Temperature-Driven Natural Source Contributions G. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00184
26. Aerosol vertical distribution and sources estimation at a site of the Yangtze River Delta region of China W. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.11.002
27. Atmospheric mercury speciation at the Monte Curcio GAW/GMOS high-altitude observatory: A multi-year (2015–2023) assessment of long-range transport and regional dynamics in the Central Mediterranean basin M. Bencardino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.129088
28. Source Characteristics of Atmospheric CO2 and CH4 in a Northeastern Highland Area of South Korea H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050509
29. A synthesis of research needs for improving the understanding of atmospheric mercury cycling L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9133-2017
30. Changed mercury speciation in clouds driven by changing cloud water chemistry and impacts on photoreduction: Field evidence at Mt. Tai in eastern China J. Zhen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120402
31. Seasonal Variation and Source Identification of PM10 in an Industrialized City P. Khobragade & A. Ahirwar https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.202100217
32. PM10 source identification using the trajectory based potential source apportionment (TraPSA) toolkit at Kochi, India A. Shanavas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.06.019
33. Continental export efficiencies and delineation of sources for trace gases and black carbon in North-East India: Seasonal variability B. Pathak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.020
34. Characteristics of atmospheric mercury in a suburban area of east China: sources, formation mechanisms, and regional transport X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5923-2019
35. The first simultaneous and continuous underway measurements of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury, carbon dioxide and methane in the marine boundary layer: Results of cruise study in the Sea of Japan in May 2018 V. Kalinchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101458
36. Observations of aerosol optical properties at a coastal site in Hong Kong, South China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2653-2017
37. Identifying Changes in Source Regions Impacting Speciated Atmospheric Mercury at a Rural Site in the Eastern United States I. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0086.1
38. Assessing contributions of natural surface and anthropogenic emissions to atmospheric mercury in a fast-developing region of eastern China from 2015 to 2018 X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10985-2020
39. Gaseous elemental mercury and its evasion fluxes in the marine boundary layer of the marginal seas of the northwestern Pacific: Results from two cruises in September–December 2019 V. Kalinchuk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159711
40. Isotopic composition of total gaseous mercury at a high-altitude tropical forest site influenced by air masses from the East Asia continent and the Pacific Ocean L. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118110
41. Characteristics of atmospheric total gaseous mercury concentrations (TGM) and meteorological parameters observed in Chennai metropolis, South India R. Ayyamperumal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07803-y
42. Aerosol spatiotemporal dynamics, source analysis and influence mechanisms over typical drylands Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101958
43. Identification of potential sources of elevated PM2.5-Hg using mercury isotopes during haze events Y. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118203
44. PM Origin or Exposure Duration? Health Hazards from PM-Bound Mercury and PM-Bound PAHs among Students and Lecturers G. Majewski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020316
45. Latest observations of total gaseous mercury in a megacity (Lanzhou) in northwest China X. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137494
46. Overview of the Trajectory-Ensemble Potential Source Apportionment Web (TraPSA-Web) Toolkit for Atmospheric Pollutant Source Identification C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15020176
47. Comparative study of chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in South China by filter-based and single particle analysis J. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00046
48. Accurate identification of key VOCs sources contributing to O3 formation along the Liaodong Bay based on emission inventories and ambient observations Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156998
49. Sources, transport pathways, seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury on the Russian coast of the sea of Japan: Findings from 2021 to 2022 observations V. Kalinchuk https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180831
50. Environmental geochemical behavior and monitoring techniques of atmospheric mercury: A critical review X. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2026.102993
51. Two years measurement of speciated atmospheric mercury in a typical area of the north coast of China: Sources, temporal variations, and influence of regional and long-range transport C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117235
52. Source contribution analysis of mercury deposition using an enhanced CALPUFF-Hg in the central Pearl River Delta, China H. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.008
53. Identification of source areas of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Ulsan, South Korea, using hybrid receptor models and the conditional bivariate probability function T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00320H
54. Atmospheric mercury: recent advances in theoretical, computational, experimental, observational, and isotopic understanding to decipher its redox transformations in the upper and lower atmosphere and interactions with Earth surface reservoirs J. Sommar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12233-2025
55. Airborne particles in the city center of Kuala Lumpur: Origin, potential driving factors, and deposition flux in human respiratory airways M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.072
56. Investigating regional source and sink patterns of Alpine CO2 and CH4 concentrations based on a back trajectory receptor model E. Giemsa et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-019-0233-x
57. Soil mercury pollution caused by typical anthropogenic sources in China: Evidence from stable mercury isotope measurement and receptor model analysis Z. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125687
58. Mercury stable isotopes revealing the atmospheric mercury circulation: A review of particulate bound mercury in China X. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104681
59. Drivers of ozone episodes during clean and polluted days in eastern China: Insights into precursor characterization, source apportionment, and associated health risks H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110318
60. Atmospheric mercury speciation dynamics at the high-altitude Pic du Midi Observatory, southern France X. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5623-2016
61. Sources and outflows of atmospheric mercury at Mt. Changbai, northeastern China C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.332
62. Ambient mercury source identification at a New York State urban site: Rochester, NY H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.040
63. High enrichment of heavy metals in fine particulate matter through dust aerosol generation Q. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13049-2023