Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-753-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-753-2015
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
21 Jan 2015
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 21 Jan 2015

Comment on "Reduced efficacy of marine cloud brightening geoengineering due to in-plume aerosol coagulation: parameterization and global implications" by Stuart et al. (2013)

S. Anand and Y. S. Mayya

Viewed

Total article views: 2,601 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,711 799 91 2,601 75 72
  • HTML: 1,711
  • PDF: 799
  • XML: 91
  • Total: 2,601
  • BibTeX: 75
  • EndNote: 72
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study examines the parameterized model of Stuart et al. (2013) vis-a-vis a diffusion based model proposed by Anand and Mayya (2011) to estimate the fraction of aerosol particles surviving coagulation in a dispersing plume. Results show that the two models agree with each other within a difference of 10%, and suggest either of the two models might be suitable for incorporation into global-/regional-scale air pollution models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint