Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-753-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-753-2015
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
21 Jan 2015
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 21 Jan 2015

Comment on "Reduced efficacy of marine cloud brightening geoengineering due to in-plume aerosol coagulation: parameterization and global implications" by Stuart et al. (2013)

S. Anand and Y. S. Mayya

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Anand Srinivasan on behalf of the Authors (01 Dec 2014)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (10 Dec 2014) by Veli-Matti Kerminen
RR by Jeffrey Pierce (10 Dec 2014)
ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (11 Dec 2014) by Veli-Matti Kerminen
AR by Anand Srinivasan on behalf of the Authors (11 Dec 2014)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (11 Dec 2014) by Veli-Matti Kerminen
Download
Short summary
This study examines the parameterized model of Stuart et al. (2013) vis-a-vis a diffusion based model proposed by Anand and Mayya (2011) to estimate the fraction of aerosol particles surviving coagulation in a dispersing plume. Results show that the two models agree with each other within a difference of 10%, and suggest either of the two models might be suitable for incorporation into global-/regional-scale air pollution models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint