Articles | Volume 14, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
Research article
 | 
12 Dec 2014
Research article |  | 12 Dec 2014

Comparison of the HadGEM2 climate-chemistry model against in situ and SCIAMACHY atmospheric methane data

G. D. Hayman, F. M. O'Connor, M. Dalvi, D. B. Clark, N. Gedney, C. Huntingford, C. Prigent, M. Buchwitz, O. Schneising, J. P. Burrows, C. Wilson, N. Richards, and M. Chipperfield

Viewed

Total article views: 5,028 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,923 1,829 276 5,028 134 133
  • HTML: 2,923
  • PDF: 1,829
  • XML: 276
  • Total: 5,028
  • BibTeX: 134
  • EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 May 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Globally, wetlands are a major source of methane, which is the second most important greenhouse gas. We find the JULES wetland methane scheme to perform well in general, although there is a tendency for it to overpredict emissions in the tropics and underpredict them in northern latitudes. Our study highlights novel uses of satellite data as a major tool to constrain land-atmosphere methane flux models in a warming world.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint