109 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Enhancement of Nighttime Fire Detection and Combustion Efficiency Characterization Using Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20 VIIRS Instruments M. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3261664
2. Emission Factors From Wildfires in the Western US: An Investigation of Burning State, Ground Versus Air, and Diurnal Dependencies During the FIREX‐AQ 2019 Campaign M. Fiddler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038460
3. CO2, CO, hydrocarbon gases and PM2.5 emissions on dry season by deforestation fires in the Brazilian Amazonia S. Amaral et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.023
4. Zebrafish irritant responses to wildland fire-related biomass smoke are influenced by fuel type, combustion phase, and byproduct chemistry W. Martin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2021.1925608
5. Remote Sensing Measurements at a Rural Site in China: Implications for Satellite NO2 and HCHO Measurement Uncertainty and Emissions From Fires K. Chong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039310
6. Global wildfire emissions and health impacts Y. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2026.100158
7. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Emitted from Open Burning and Stove Burning of Biomass: A Brief Review H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073944
8. Primary emissions and secondary aerosol production potential from woodstoves for residential heating: Influence of the stove technology and combustion efficiency A. Bertrand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.005
9. Feux de forêt et impact respiratoire D. Charpin & O. Brun https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2024.12.002
10. Near Real-Time Biomass Burning PM2.5 Emission Estimation to Support Environmental Health Risk Management in Northern Thailand Using FINNv2.5 C. Chotamonsak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010084
11. Emissions from the Open Laboratory Combustion of Cheatgrass (Bromus Tectorum) M. Rennie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040406
12. A Multipollutant Smoke Emissions Sensing and Sampling Instrument Package for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Development and Testing K. Nelson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2020032
13. Limiting conditions of smoldering-to-flaming transition of cellulose powder P. Garg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103936
14. A scoping review on the health effects of smoke haze from vegetation and peatland fires in Southeast Asia: Issues with study approaches and interpretation V. Phung et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274433
15. Emission of atmospheric pollutants during forest fire in boreal region of China L. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114709
16. Wildfire smoke exposure and human health: Significant gaps in research for a growing public health issue C. Black et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.08.022
17. Comprehensive analysis of emissions from wood and cow dung burning using chemometrics and two-dimensional gas chromatography M. Loebel Roson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143445
18. Cascading Impacts of Wildfire Emissions on Air Quality, Human Health, and Climate Change Based on Literature Review E. Hadiwijoyo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8120471
19. Models meet data: Challenges and opportunities in implementing land management in Earth system models J. Pongratz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13988
20. In situ measurements of trace gases, PM, and aerosol optical properties during the 2017 NW US wildfire smoke event V. Selimovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3905-2019
21. Wildfire Smoke Particle Properties and Evolution, From Space-Based Multi-Angle Imaging II: The Williams Flats Fire during the FIREX-AQ Campaign K. Junghenn Noyes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223823
22. Development and application of a supervised pattern recognition algorithm for identification of fuel-specific emissions profiles C. Stamatis & K. Barsanti https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2591-2022
23. Vertical profiling of Canadian wildfire smoke in the Baltimore-Washington Corridor – interactions with the planetary boundary layer and impact on surface air quality N. Karle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6727-2025
24. Wildfires and climate justice: future wildfire events predicted to disproportionally impact socioeconomically vulnerable communities in North Carolina R. Winker et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339700
25. Ground‐Based Field Measurements of PM2.5 Emission Factors From Flaming and Smoldering Combustion in Eucalypt Forests F. Reisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028488
26. Emission Factors for the Burning of Decking Slabs Made of Wood and Thermoplastic with a Cone Calorimeter B. Martinent et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6040162
27. Emissions from prescribed burning of agricultural fields in the Pacific Northwest A. Holder et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.043
28. Effect of moisture content and fuel type on emissions from vegetation using a steady state combustion apparatus P. Garg et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20118
29. Associations Between Wildfire‐Related PM2.5 and Intensive Care Unit Admissions in the United States, 2006–2015 C. Sorensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000385
30. Formation and emission characteristics of intermediate volatile organic compounds (IVOCs) from the combustion of biomass and their cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin X. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119217
31. Root disease can rival fire and harvest in reducing forest carbon storage S. Healey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1569
32. Performance comparison of charcoal cookstoves for Haiti: Laboratory testing with Water Boiling and Controlled Cooking Tests K. Lask et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.02.002
33. The impact of the 2016 Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire on ambient air pollution levels in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.008
34. Emission characteristics of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from the combustion of Echinops kebericho and Otostegia integrifolia in an experimental chamber S. Kebede et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-026-00411-x
35. Temporal investigation of effects of wildfires and aerosols on air pollution changes in Nigeria: a multivariate modelling approach T. Igbawua https://doi.org/10.61298/rans.2025.3.2.212
36. Estimates of greenhouse gas and black carbon emissions from a major Australian wildfire with high spatiotemporal resolution N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025087
37. Detection and attribution of wildfire pollution in the Arctic and northern midlatitudes using a network of Fourier-transform infrared spectrometers and GEOS-Chem E. Lutsch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12813-2020
38. Brown carbon emissions from laboratory combustion of Eurasian arctic-boreal and South African savanna biomass A. Mukherjee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16747-2025
39. Optical properties of biomass burning aerosol during the 2021 Oregon fire season: comparison between wild and prescribed fires A. Marsavin et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00118G
40. Dynamics of pollutant emissions from wildfires in Mainland China Q. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115499
41. Experimental wildfire induced mobility of radiocesium in a boreal forest environment J. Martinsson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148310
42. Canadian and Alaskan wildfire smoke particle properties, their evolution, and controlling factors, from satellite observations K. Junghenn Noyes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10267-2022
43. Variations in gaseous and particulate emissions from flaming and smoldering combustion of Douglas fir and lodgepole pine under different fuel moisture conditions P. Garg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113386
44. Comparison of the Combustion of Pine Species with Two Sizes of Calorimeter: 10 g vs. 100 g N. Chiaramonti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0595-1
45. APIFLAME v1.0: high-resolution fire emission model and application to the Euro-Mediterranean region S. Turquety et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-587-2014
46. Performance evaluation of commercially available non-regulatory instruments and sensors in smoke for PM, CO, CO 2 , NO 2, and SO 2 M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2026.2629562
47. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Emission factors S. Urbanski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.045
48. Trace gas emissions from laboratory combustion of leaves typically consumed in forest fires in Southwest China Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157282
49. Chemical complexity and enrichment in wildland–urban interface fire emissions: A case study of particulate matter, gas-phase pollutants, and ash from the 2025 Los Angeles fires J. Cedeño-Laurent et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142357
50. Summary of PM2.5 measurement artifacts associated with the Teledyne T640 PM Mass Monitor under controlled chamber experimental conditions using polydisperse ammonium sulfate aerosols and biomass smoke R. Long et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2023.2171156
51. Ground solar absorption observations of total column CO, CO2, CH4, and aerosol optical depth from California's Sequoia Lightning Complex Fire: emission factors and modified combustion efficiency at regional scales I. Frausto-Vicencio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023
52. Quantifying the flammability of living plants at the branch scale: which metrics to use? J. Cawson et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF23007
53. Ponderosa Pine Regeneration, Wildland Fuels Management, and Habitat Conservation: Identifying Trade-Offs Following Wildfire V. Donovan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10030286
54. Burning Characteristics and Smoke Emission from Mixed Fuel Cribs A. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00275
55. Characterizing emissions from open burning of military food waste and ration packaging compositions T. Dominguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0652-y
56. Chemical characterization of prescribed burn emissions from a mixed forest in Northern Michigan J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00069E
57. Grassland and forest understorey biomass emissions from prescribed fires in the south-eastern United States – RxCADRE 2012 T. Strand et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14166
58. Unprecedented Atmospheric Ammonia Concentrations Detected in the High Arctic From the 2017 Canadian Wildfires E. Lutsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030419
59. Stable carbon isotopic composition of biomass burning emissions – implications for estimating the contribution of C3 and C4 plants R. Vernooij et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2871-2022
60. Sources of atmospheric fine and ultrafine particulate matter and novel PAH diagnostic ratios from northern Thailand forest fires N. Nim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102770
61. Impacts of upwind wildfire emissions on CO, CO2, and PM2.5 concentrations in Salt Lake City, Utah D. Mallia et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022472
62. Widespread paleowildfire records in the Middle-Late Pennsylvanian and their implications for environmental change during the late Paleozoic Ice Age Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.105075
63. Gridded 1 km × 1 km emission inventory for paddy stubble burning emissions over north-west India constrained by measured emission factors of 77 VOCs and district-wise crop yield data A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148064
64. Emission Factor from Small Scale Tropical Peat Combustion W. Setyawati et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/180/1/012113
65. Using Low-Cost Sensors for Fenceline Monitoring to Measure Emissions from Prescribed Fires A. Guth et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020745
66. Molecular composition and the impact of fuel moisture content on fresh primary organic aerosol emissions during laboratory combustion of ponderosa pine needles M. Jaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN23013
67. Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire E. Yates et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038
68. Wildland fire emission factors in North America: synthesis of existing data, measurement needs and management applications S. Prichard et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19066
69. Aerosols and carbonaceous and nitrogenous compounds emitted during the combustion of dead shrubs according to twigs’ diameter and combustion phases T. Barboni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102988
70. Simplifying emissions modelling from wildland fires: laboratory-scale emission factors are independent of fine woody debris fuel load É. Guérette et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24117
71. Where there is smoke there is mercury: Assessing boreal forest fire mercury emissions using aircraft and highlighting uncertainties associated with upscaling emissions estimates D. McLagan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5635-2021
72. Comparison of particulate-matter emissions from liquid-fueled pool fires and fire whirls S. Hariharan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.033
73. The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
74. Wildfire Smoke Influence on Cloud Water Chemical Composition at Whiteface Mountain, New York J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037177
75. A small, lightweight multipollutant sensor system for ground-mobile and aerial emission sampling from open area sources X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.029
76. Highly controlled, reproducible measurements of aerosol emissions from combustion of a common African biofuel source S. Haslett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-385-2018
77. California wildfire smoke contributes to a positive atmospheric temperature anomaly over the western United States J. Gomez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6937-2024
78. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment M. Andreae https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019
79. Carbon dioxide and particulate emissions from the 2013 Tasmanian firestorm: implications for Australian carbon accounting M. Ndalila et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-022-00207-9
80. Aerosolomics based approach to discover source molecular markers: A case study for discriminating residential wood heating vs garden green waste burning emission sources C. Noblet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141242
81. Large unexplained suite of chemically reactive compounds present in ambient air due to biomass fires V. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19139-3
82. A novel representation of time-resolved particle emissions from pyrolyzing wood M. Fawaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107054
83. Disentangling effects of key coarse woody debris fuel properties on its combustion, consumption and carbon gas emissions during experimental laboratory fire W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.016
84. Greenhouse gas emissions from laboratory-scale fires in wildland fuels depend on fire spread mode and phase of combustion N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5259-2015
85. Gas-phase pyrolysis products emitted by prescribed fires in pine forests with a shrub understory in the southeastern United States N. Scharko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9681-2019
86. Emission Factors for Selected Semivolatile Organic Chemicals from Burning of Tropical Biomass Fuels and Estimation of Annual Australian Emissions X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01392
87. Evidence of widespread wildfires in coal seams from the Middle Jurassic of Northwest China and its impact on paleoclimate Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2020.109819
88. Thermochemical Properties of PM2.5 as Indicator of Combustion Phase of Fires Y. Hsieh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9060230
89. Can the remote sensing of combustion phase improve estimates of landscape fire smoke emission rate and composition? F. Owsley-Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6247-2024
90. Responses of wildfire-induced global black carbon pollution and radiative forcing to climate change X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acff7a
91. Siberian wildfire smoke observations from space-based multi-angle imaging: a multi-year regional analysis of smoke particle properties, their evolution, and comparisons with North American boreal fire plumes K. Junghenn Noyes & R. Kahn https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13879-2025
92. Smoke emissions from the extreme wildfire events in central Portugal in October 2017 A. Fernandes et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21097
93. Designing a conceptual framework for strategic selection of Bushfire mitigation approaches S. Tayari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118486
94. Aerosol emissions from prescribed fires in the United States: A synthesis of laboratory and aircraft measurements A. May et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021848
95. Prescribed Fire Smoke: A Review of Composition, Measurement Methods, and Analysis K. Fesomade & R. Walker https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8070241
96. Wildland fire emission sampling at Fishlake National Forest, Utah using an unmanned aircraft system J. Aurell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118193
97. Observations and analysis of organic aerosol evolution in some prescribed fire smoke plumes A. May et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015
98. Ozone Production in the Soberanes Smoke Haze: Implications for Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley During the California Baseline Ozone Transport Study A. Langford et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031777
99. Intraseasonal variability of greenhouse gas emission factors from biomass burning in the Brazilian Cerrado R. Vernooij et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1375-2021
100. Fuel layer specific pollutant emission factors for fire prone forest ecosystems of the western U.S. and Canada S. Urbanski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100188
101. Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.048
102. Effects of fuel types and fire severity on atmospheric pollutant emissions in an extreme wind-driven wildfire A. Alvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-026-01988-2
103. Review and update on the applications of inertinite macerals in coal geology, paleoclimatology, and paleoecology Y. Sun https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2024.03.003
104. Observation of Wildfire Smoke Particles That Accumulated Secondary Aerosol during Long-Range Transport J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.5c00172
105. Biomass burning at Cape Grim: exploring photochemistry using multi-scale modelling S. Lawson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11707-2017
106. Gaseous, particulate matter, carbonaceous compound, water-soluble ion, and trace metal emissions measured from 2019 peatland fires in Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan P. Lestari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120171
107. Impacts of the 2021 Northwestern Ontario and Manitoba Wildfires on the Chemical Composition and Oxidative Potential of Airborne Particulate Matter in Montréal, Canada N. Trieu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00319
108. Social status and susceptibility to wildfire smoke among outdoor-housed female rhesus monkeys: A natural experiment H. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08333
109. Wildfires correlate with reductions in aboveground tree carbon stocks and sequestration capacity on forest land in the Western United States P. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164832