Articles | Volume 13, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11643-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11643-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Technical Note: Comparison of ensemble Kalman filter and variational approaches for CO2 data assimilation
A. Chatterjee
now at: Data Assimilation Research Section, The National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
A. M. Michalak
Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 6,126 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 May 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,380 | 2,537 | 209 | 6,126 | 213 | 212 |
- HTML: 3,380
- PDF: 2,537
- XML: 209
- Total: 6,126
- BibTeX: 213
- EndNote: 212
Total article views: 5,007 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Dec 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,753 | 2,065 | 189 | 5,007 | 198 | 199 |
- HTML: 2,753
- PDF: 2,065
- XML: 189
- Total: 5,007
- BibTeX: 198
- EndNote: 199
Total article views: 1,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 May 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 627 | 472 | 20 | 1,119 | 15 | 13 |
- HTML: 627
- PDF: 472
- XML: 20
- Total: 1,119
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 13
Cited
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A CO2–Δ14CO2 inversion setup for estimating European fossil CO2 emissions C. Gómez-Ortiz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-397-2025
- Computationally efficient methods for large-scale atmospheric inverse modeling T. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5547-2022
- Fundamentals of data assimilation applied to biogeochemistry P. Rayner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019
- Quantitative comparison of variational and sequential data assimilation techniques for one-dimensional initial-value problems of ideal MHD J. Arnal & C. Groth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106373
- Geostatistical inverse modeling with very large datasets: an example from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1771-2020
- Impacts of Horizontal Resolution on Global Data Assimilation of Satellite Measurements for Tropospheric Chemistry Analysis T. Sekiya et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002180
- Using atmospheric trace gas vertical profiles to evaluate model fluxes: a case study of Arctic-CAP observations and GEOS simulations for the ABoVE domain C. Sweeney et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6347-2022
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO2 fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- Effect of Data Assimilation Parameters on The Optimized Surface CO2 Flux in Asia H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-017-0049-9
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025100
- Comparing the CarbonTracker and TM5-4DVar data assimilation systems for CO2 surface flux inversions A. Babenhauserheide et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9747-2015
- Length Scale Analyses of Background Error Covariances for EnKF and EnSRF Data Assimilation S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020160
- Global and regional carbon budget for 2015–2020 inferred from OCO-2 based on an ensemble Kalman filter coupled with GEOS-Chem Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022
13 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A CO2–Δ14CO2 inversion setup for estimating European fossil CO2 emissions C. Gómez-Ortiz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-397-2025
- Computationally efficient methods for large-scale atmospheric inverse modeling T. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5547-2022
- Fundamentals of data assimilation applied to biogeochemistry P. Rayner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019
- Quantitative comparison of variational and sequential data assimilation techniques for one-dimensional initial-value problems of ideal MHD J. Arnal & C. Groth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106373
- Geostatistical inverse modeling with very large datasets: an example from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1771-2020
- Impacts of Horizontal Resolution on Global Data Assimilation of Satellite Measurements for Tropospheric Chemistry Analysis T. Sekiya et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002180
- Using atmospheric trace gas vertical profiles to evaluate model fluxes: a case study of Arctic-CAP observations and GEOS simulations for the ABoVE domain C. Sweeney et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6347-2022
- A global synthesis inversion analysis of recent variability in CO2 fluxes using GOSAT and in situ observations J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11097-2018
- Effect of Data Assimilation Parameters on The Optimized Surface CO2 Flux in Asia H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-017-0049-9
- Comparison between the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter (LETKF) and 4D‐Var in atmospheric CO2 flux inversion with the Goddard Earth Observing System‐Chem model and the observation impact diagnostics from the LETKF J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025100
- Comparing the CarbonTracker and TM5-4DVar data assimilation systems for CO2 surface flux inversions A. Babenhauserheide et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9747-2015
- Length Scale Analyses of Background Error Covariances for EnKF and EnSRF Data Assimilation S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020160
- Global and regional carbon budget for 2015–2020 inferred from OCO-2 based on an ensemble Kalman filter coupled with GEOS-Chem Y. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 08 Jun 2026
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint