1445 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Contribution of garbage burning to chloride and PM2.5 in Mexico City G. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8751-2012
2. Quantifying Contributions of Biomass Burning to Air Quality in Africa R. Damoah et al. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijema.20261401.13
3. Enhanced concentrations of reactive nitrogen species in wildfire smoke K. Benedict et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.030
4. Light Absorption and Chemical Composition of Brown Carbon Organic Aerosol Produced from Burning of Selected Biofuels K. Siemens et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00056
5. A new non-resonant laser-induced fluorescence instrument for the airborne in situ measurement of formaldehyde J. St. Clair et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4833-2017
6. Characterizing a landmark biomass-burning event and its implication for aging processes during long-range transport L. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117766
7. Wireless sensors linked to climate financing for globally affordable clean cooking T. Ramanathan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3141
8. An Earth Observation-based Tier 3 framework for monitoring greenhouse gas emissions from forest fires in Italy C. Aquino et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55318-x
9. An Integrated Assessment of GIS-MCA with Logistics Analysis for an Assessment of a Potential Decentralized Bioethanol Production System Using Distributed Agricultural Residues in Thailand P. Jusakulvijit et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169885
10. Photochemical environment over Southeast Asia primed for hazardous ozone levels with influx of nitrogen oxides from seasonal biomass burning M. Marvin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1917-2021
11. Measurement report: Regional characteristics of seasonal and long-term variations in greenhouse gases at Nainital, India, and Comilla, Bangladesh S. Nomura et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16427-2021
12. Investigating the impacts of satellite fire observation accuracy on the top-down nitrogen oxides emission estimation in northeastern Asia Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107498
13. Estimating the economic value of carbon losses from wildfires using publicly available data sources: Eagle Creek Fire, Oregon 2017 K. Sweeney et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-023-00206-2
14. Understanding green house gases emission dynamics from forest fires in Thailand using predictive models F. Shahzad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.105236
15. A novel method of identifying and analysing oil smoke plumes based on MODIS and CALIPSO satellite data A. Mereuţă et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5071-2022
16. Evaluation of WRF-Chem PM2.5 simulations in Thailand with different anthropogenic and biomass-burning emissions W. Thongsame et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100282
17. Atmospheric H2 variability over the past 1,100 years J. Patterson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10099-1
18. Laboratory measurements of emission factors of nonmethane volatile organic compounds from burning of Chinese crop residues S. Inomata et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022761
19. Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power J. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012
20. Emission factors of some common grass species in West Africa K. Abdulraheem et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08725-0
21. The importance of combustion science to unravel complex processes for informal settlement fires, urban fires, and wildland-urban interface (WUI) fires S. Manzello & S. Suzuki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122805
22. Effects of long-distance transport on O3 and secondary inorganic aerosols formation in Qingdao, China Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105729
23. Neutralization of Anthropogenic Acidic Particles by NH3 From Wildfire Over Tropical Peatland S. Budisulistiorini et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039873
24. Highly controlled, reproducible measurements of aerosol emissions from combustion of a common African biofuel source S. Haslett et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-385-2018
25. Interactions between isocyanic acid and atmospheric acidic, neutral and basic species H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113384
26. Investigating dominant characteristics of fires across the Amazon during 2005–2014 through satellite data synthesis of combustion signatures W. Tang & A. Arellano https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025216
27. Source Profiles of Particle‐Bound Phenolic Compounds and Aromatic Acids From Fresh and Aged Solid Fuel Combustion: Implication for the Aging Mechanism and Newly Proposed Source Tracers B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039758
28. Vertical distributions of non-methane hydrocarbons and halocarbons in the lower troposphere over northeast China L. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.072
29. Prescribed moorland burning in Great Britain exposes 2.3 million people to PM2.5 levels exceeding the WHO 24 h guideline limit A. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae5de3
30. Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models H. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021
31. Uncontrolled combustion of shredded tires in a landfill – Part 1: Characterization of gaseous and particulate emissions J. Downard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.059
32. A review of the airborne and waterborne emissions from uncontrolled solid waste disposal sites J. Levis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1342513
33. A critical review of pollutant emission factors from fuel combustion in home stoves H. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106841
34. Estimates of Wildfire Emissions in Boreal Forests of China K. Yi & Y. Bao https://doi.org/10.3390/f7080158
35. First estimation and evaluation of hourly biomass burning emissions in north American high latitudes F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114814
36. Assessment of fire emission inventories for simulating particulate matter in Upper Southeast Asia using WRF-CMAQ P. Vongruang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.03.004
37. Clustering Pollutants Concentration from Sumatra Peat Fire using Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm H. Rahmat & I. Sukaesih Sitanggang https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/528/1/012054
38. Impact of Biomass Burning Plumes on Photolysis Rates and Ozone Formation at the Mount Bachelor Observatory P. Baylon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027341
39. Comparing particulate morphology generated from human-made cellulosic fuels to natural vegetative fuels S. Suzuki & S. Manzello https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22093
40. VOC emissions of smouldering combustion from Mediterranean wildfires in central Portugal M. Evtyugina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.001
41. Effects of aerosol–radiation interaction on precipitation during biomass-burning season in East China X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10063-2016
42. Smoking and Lung Cancer: A Geo-Regional Perspective Z. Rahal et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00194
43. Characterization, sources and reactivity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Seoul and surrounding regions during KORUS-AQ I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.434
44. Quantification of organic aerosol and brown carbon evolution in fresh wildfire plumes B. Palm et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012218117
45. Estimación de emisiones atmosféricas de CO₂, NO₂, CO, NH₃ y Black Carbon vía bottom up, generados por quema de biomasa en el norte de América del Sur G. Valencia et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2022.15594
46. Development of a PM2.5 Emission Factor Prediction Model for Shrubs in the Xiao Xing’an Mountains Based on Coupling Effects of Physical Factors T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17020199
47. Volatile and semivolatile organic compounds in laboratory peat fire emissions I. George et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.025
48. Introductory lecture: air quality in megacities L. Molina https://doi.org/10.1039/D0FD00123F
49. Continental and Ecoregion‐Specific Drivers of Atmospheric NO2 and NH3 Seasonality Over Africa Revealed by Satellite Observations J. Hickman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006916
50. Road-Salt Aerosol Reacts More Efficiently with N2O5 than Sea Spray Aerosol to Produce ClNO2 J. Christie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.6c00042
51. Distribution and stable carbon isotopic composition of dicarboxylic acids, ketocarboxylic acids and α-dicarbonyls in fresh and aged biomass burning aerosols M. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7489-2022
52. Climate and Fuel Controls on North American Paleofires: Smoldering to Flaming in the Late-glacial-Holocene Transition Y. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20719
53. Organic aerosol emission ratios from the laboratory combustion of biomass fuels M. Jolleys et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021589
54. Reductions in NO 2 burden over north equatorial Africa from decline in biomass burning in spite of growing fossil fuel use, 2005 to 2017 J. Hickman et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002579118
55. Relationships between atmospheric mercury and optical properties of spring outflow aerosols from Southeast Asia L. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101178
56. Emission Factors From Wildfires in the Western US: An Investigation of Burning State, Ground Versus Air, and Diurnal Dependencies During the FIREX‐AQ 2019 Campaign M. Fiddler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038460
57. Exceptional emissions of NH3 and HCOOH in the 2010 Russian wildfires Y. R'Honi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4171-2013
58. Size-resolved aerosol and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties in the remote marine South China Sea – Part 1: Observations and source classification S. Atwood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1105-2017
59. Development and implementation of a new biomass burning emissions injection height scheme (BBEIH v1.0) for the GEOS-Chem model (v9-01-01) L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4103-2018
60. Atmosphere self-cleaning under humidity conditions and influence of the snowflakes and artificial light interaction for water dissociation simulated by the means of COMSOL A. Cocean et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.156
61. Long-term variability of air quality and greenhouse gas emissions from rice crop burning in Punjab during 2012–2020 H. Romana et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA09439A
62. Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations M. Bauwens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10133-2016
63. Interannual variability of nitrogen oxides emissions from boreal fires in Siberia and Alaska during 1996–2011 as observed from space H. Tanimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/6/065004
64. Mitigating underestimation of fire emissions from the Advanced Himawari Imager: A machine learning and multi-satellite ensemble approach Y. Kang & J. Im https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103784
65. Advancing new metrics for wildfire smoke exposure: case study in Alaska to bridge public health, climate adaptation, and fire management M. Hahn et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adeff6
66. Wildland fire emission factors in North America: synthesis of existing data, measurement needs and management applications S. Prichard et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19066
67. First MAX‐DOAS Observations of Formaldehyde and Glyoxal in Phimai, Thailand H. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028480
68. Source influence on emission pathways and ambient PM2.5 pollution over India (2015–2050) C. Venkataraman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8017-2018
69. Products and Secondary Organic Aerosol Yields from the OH and NO3 Radical-Initiated Oxidation of Resorcinol Z. Finewax et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00112
70. Interannual changes in atmospheric oxidation over forests determined from space J. Shutter et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn1115
71. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006065
72. Estimating annual GHG and particulate matter emissions from rural and forest fires based on an integrated modelling approach C. Scarpa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167960
73. Wildfire-emitted aerosols modulate lightning occurrence and ignition potential in the boreal forest of Northeast China Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae74ea
74. CHIMERE 2013: a model for regional atmospheric composition modelling L. Menut et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-981-2013
75. Characterization and Sources of VOCs during PM2.5 Pollution Periods in a Typical City of the Yangtze River Delta D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101162
76. Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide J. Stinecipher et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085567
77. Understanding interannual variations of biomass burning from Peninsular Southeast Asia, part I: Model evaluation and analysis of systematic bias X. Dong & J. Fu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.026
78. Size distribution and chemical composition of primary particles emitted during open biomass burning processes: Impacts on cloud condensation nuclei activation L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.419
79. Characterization of Wildfire Smoke over Complex Terrain Using Satellite Observations, Ground-Based Observations, and Meteorological Models M. Nakata et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102344
80. Global population exposure to landscape fire air pollution from 2000 to 2019 R. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06398-6
81. Increasing soil nitrous acid emissions driven by climate and fertilization change aggravate global ozone pollution Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57161-6
82. Impact of Southeast Asian smoke on aerosol properties in Southwest China: First comparison of model simulations with satellite and ground observations J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025793
83. Evolution in physiochemical and cloud condensation nuclei activation properties of crop residue burning particles during photochemical aging Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.06.004
84. Ethylene industrial emitters seen from space B. Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34098-8
85. The contribution of wood burning and other pollution sources to wintertime organic aerosol levels in two Greek cities K. Florou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3145-2017
86. Observations of Manaus urban plume evolution and interaction with biogenic emissions in GoAmazon 2014/5 G. Cirino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.031
87. Empirical Insights Into the Fate of Ammonia in Western U.S. Wildfire Smoke Plumes J. Lindaas et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033730
88. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from the OH Oxidation of Phenol, Catechol, Styrene, Furfural, and Methyl Furfural M. Schueneman et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00361
89. Nitrogen isotopic composition of NOx from residential biomass burning and coal combustion in North China Z. Zong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119238
90. Estimating sources of elemental and organic carbon and their temporal emission patterns using a least squares inverse model and hourly measurements from the St. Louis–Midwest supersite B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2405-2015
91. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from maize residue open burning in the northern region of Thailand D. Sirithian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.12.032
92. Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX‐AQ) C. Warneke et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037758
93. Spatiotemporal Variation of Burnt Area Detected from High-Resolution Sentinel-2 Observation During the Post-Monsoon Fire Seasons of 2022–2024 in Punjab, India A. Arbain & R. Imasu https://doi.org/10.3390/s25175588
94. Prescribed Fire Smoke: A Review of Composition, Measurement Methods, and Analysis K. Fesomade & R. Walker https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8070241
95. Open burning of rice, corn and wheat straws: primary emissions, photochemical aging, and secondary organic aerosol formation Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14821-2017
96. Secondary organic aerosols produced from photochemical oxidation of secondarily evaporated biomass burning organic gases: Chemical composition, toxicity, optical properties, and climate effect Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106801
97. Emission factors of CO₂, CO and CH₄ from Sumatran peatland fires in 2013 based on shipboard measurements H. Nara et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1399047
98. Light absorption of organic carbon emitted from burning wood, charcoal, and kerosene in household cookstoves M. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.04.085
99. Estimation of the Elemental to Organic Carbon Ratio in Biomass Burning Aerosol Using AERONET Retrievals I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8070122
100. CIMS Detection of Hydroxymethyl Hydroperoxide: Insights into Alkene Ozonolysis in a Variety of Environments A. Lindsay et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.6c00053
101. Emission factors and chemical characterization of particulate emissions from garden green waste burning C. Noblet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149367
102. Smoke in the City: How Often and Where Does Smoke Impact Summertime Ozone in the United States? S. Brey & E. Fischer https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05218
103. Effect of Peatland Rewetting on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Peat Fires in Moscow Oblast M. Medvedeva & V. Korotkov https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373926010097
104. Towards sector-based attribution using intra-city variations in satellite-based emission ratios between CO2 and CO D. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14547-2022
105. Development of a REgion‐Specific Ecosystem Feedback Fire (RESFire) Model in the Community Earth System Model Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001368
106. VOC emissions from residential combustion of Southern and mid-European woods M. Evtyugina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.050
107. Hazardous Air Pollutants in Fresh and Aged Western US Wildfire Smoke and Implications for Long-Term Exposure K. O’Dell et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04497
108. Fire environment effects on particulate matter emission factors in southeastern U.S. pine-grasslands K. Robertson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.058
109. Trends and spatial shifts in lightning fires and smoke concentrations in response to 21st century climate over the national forests and parks of the western United States Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8827-2020
110. Ammonia emissions from biomass burning in the continental United States C. Bray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.052
111. Emission Ratios of the Tropospheric Ozone Precursors Nitrogen Dioxide and Formaldehyde from Australia’s Black Saturday Fires E. Young & C. Paton-Walsh https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2040617
112. Emission Measurements from Traditional Biomass Cookstoves in South Asia and Tibet C. Weyant et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05199
113. Aerosolomics based approach to discover source molecular markers: A case study for discriminating residential wood heating vs garden green waste burning emission sources C. Noblet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141242
114. Satellite-observed relationships between land cover, burned area, and atmospheric composition over the southern Amazon E. Sands et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11081-2024
115. The Influence of Australian Bushfire on the Upper Tropospheric CO and Hydrocarbon Distribution in the South Pacific D. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17122092
116. Projection of Future Fire Emissions Over the Contiguous US Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence and CMIP6 Models S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039154
117. Nanoplastic Particle Emissions from Plastic Smoldering Combustion H. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c05852
118. Spatial Predictive Modeling of the Burning of Sugarcane Plots in Northeast Thailand with Selection of Factor Sets Using a GWR Model and Machine Learning Based on an ANN-CA P. Littidej et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14101989
119. In situ vertical profiles of aerosol extinction, mass, and composition over the southeast United States during SENEX and SEAC4RS: observations of a modest aerosol enhancement aloft N. Wagner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7085-2015
120. ACE-FTS measurements of trace species in the characterization of biomass burning plumes K. Tereszchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12169-2011
121. Assessing the carbon dioxide balance of a degraded tropical peat swamp forest following multiple fire events of different intensities S. Ohkubo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108448
122. Monthly and spatially resolved black carbon emission inventory of India: uncertainty analysis U. Paliwal et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12457-2016
123. Influence of wildfire emissions to carbon dioxide (CO2) observed at the Mt. Cimone station (Italy, 2165 m asl): A multi-year investigation P. Cristofanelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120577
124. Contribution of biogenic and photochemical sources to ambient VOCs during winter to summer transition at a semi-arid urban site in India L. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.091
125. Vast ecosystem disturbance in a warming climate may jeopardize our climate goal of reducing CO2: a case study for megafires in the Australian ‘black summer’ X. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161387
126. Effects of near-source coagulation of biomass burning aerosols on global predictions of aerosol size distributions and implications for aerosol radiative effects E. Ramnarine et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6561-2019
127. Striking impacts of biomass burning on PM2.5 concentrations in Northeast China through the emission inventory improvement L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120835
128. The complex composition of organic aerosols emitted during burning varies between Arctic and boreal peat E. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01304-y
129. Dynamics of PM2.5 pollution in the vicinity of the old municipal solid waste dumpsite A. Peter & S. Nagendra https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09052-8
130. Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015) M. van Marle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017
131. Wildfire-Related Catastrophes: The Need for a Modern International Safety Investigation Procedure A. Vuorio et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.659437
132. Photochemical evolution of the 2013 California Rim Fire: synergistic impacts of reactive hydrocarbons and enhanced oxidants G. Wolfe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4253-2022
133. Insights into the formation of secondary organic aerosols from agricultural residue burning emissions: A review of chamber-based studies S. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175932
134. Observations and analysis of organic aerosol evolution in some prescribed fire smoke plumes A. May et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6323-2015
135. Global impact of smoke aerosols from landscape fires on climate and the Hadley circulation M. Tosca et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5227-2013
136. Ubiquitous atmospheric production of organic acids mediated by cloud droplets B. Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03462-x
137. Benzene production from fires involving composite natural and synthetic fuel loads via laser spectroscopy N. Jaeger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2026.106102
138. Influence of combined hydric and thermal stresses on Rosmarinus officinalis and Cistus albidus R. Jamaladdeen et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22146
139. Determination of enhancement ratios of HCOOH relative to CO in biomass burning plumes by the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) M. Pommier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11089-2017
140. Municipal solid waste open burning: an overview of inventory and dispersion modelling of emerging pollutant emissions O. Ogunkunle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-026-00280-7
141. Field determination of biomass burning emission ratios and factors via open-path FTIR spectroscopy and fire radiative power assessment: headfire, backfire and residual smouldering combustion in African savannahs M. Wooster et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11591-2011
142. Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions A. Josephson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110704
143. Substantial discrepancies across global fire emissions inventories: a systematic intercomparison J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2026.105563
144. The Controlling Factors of Atmospheric Formaldehyde (HCHO) in Amazon as Seen From Satellite Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000627
145. Daytime Oxidized Reactive Nitrogen Partitioning in Western U.S. Wildfire Smoke Plumes J. Juncosa Calahorrano et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033484
146. Characterisation of African biomass burning plumes and impacts on the atmospheric composition over the south-west Indian Ocean B. Verreyken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14821-2020
147. The aerosol radiative effects of uncontrolled combustion of domestic waste J. Kodros et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6771-2016
148. Impact of satellite AOD data on top-down estimation of biomass burning particulate matter emission X. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161055
149. Improved rice residue burning emissions estimates: Accounting for practice-specific emission factors in air pollution assessments of Vietnam K. Lasko & K. Vadrevu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.098
150. Bias correction of OMI HCHO columns based on FTIR and aircraft measurements and impact on top-down emission estimates J. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2207-2024
151. Fire evolution in the radioactive forests of Ukraine and Belarus: future risks for the population and the environment N. Evangeliou et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1227.1
152. Trace gas emissions from laboratory combustion of leaves typically consumed in forest fires in Southwest China Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157282
153. Laboratory studies of fresh and aged biomass burning aerosol emitted from east African biomass fuels – Part 2: Chemical properties and characterization D. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10169-2020
154. Natural and continental influence on aerosol distributions over the northwestern Pacific Ocean in the late winter and early spring of 2021 T. Miyakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00752-0
155. The Impact of Fire Emission Inputs on Smoke Plume Dispersion Modeling Results S. Faulstich et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8080331
156. Prescribed burning of logging slash in the boreal forest of Finland: emissions and effects on meteorological quantities and soil properties A. Virkkula et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4473-2014
157. Mechanistic and Kinetic Investigations on the Ozonolysis of Biomass Burning Products: Guaiacol, Syringol and Creosol X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184492
158. Air Quality Impacts of Smoke from Hazard Reduction Burns and Domestic Wood Heating in Western Sydney M. Desservettaz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10090557
159. Fine fuels consumption and CO2 emissions from surface fire experiments in maritime pine stands in northern Portugal P. Fernandes & C. Loureiro https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.037
160. Laboratory studies on the optical, physical, and chemical properties of fresh and aged biomass burning aerosols Z. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11051-2025
161. Photochemistry of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Yellow River Delta, China: Formation of O3 and Peroxyacyl Nitrates Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035296
162. A new top-down approach for directly estimating biomass burning emissions and fuel consumption rates and totals from geostationary satellite fire radiative power (FRP) B. Mota & M. Wooster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.016
163. Ten years of global burned area products from spaceborne remote sensing—A review: Analysis of user needs and recommendations for future developments F. Mouillot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.05.014
164. Infrared cross-sections and integrated band intensities of propylene: Temperature-dependent studies E. Es-sebbar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.09.019
165. Stable Carbon Isotope Signatures of Carbonaceous Aerosol Endmembers in the Tibetan Plateau C. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09357
166. A small, lightweight multipollutant sensor system for ground-mobile and aerial emission sampling from open area sources X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.029
167. Assessing the Impact of Amazonian Fires on Atmospheric NO2 Using Satellite Data H. Barbosa & C. Buriti https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030482
168. New water-soluble, toxic tracers of wood burning identified in fine brown carbon aerosol using a non-target approach V. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10965-2025
169. An examination of fuel moisture, energy release and emissions during laboratory burning of live wildland fuels N. May et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18084
170. Saccharides Emissions from Biomass and Coal Burning in Northwest China and Their Application in Source Contribution Estimation K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12070821
171. Production of molecularly imprinted polymer particles with amide-decorated cavities for CO 2 capture using membrane emulsification/suspension polymerisation S. Nabavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.05.033
172. Understanding nighttime methane signals at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) S. Botía et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6583-2020
173. Simplifying emissions modelling from wildland fires: laboratory-scale emission factors are independent of fine woody debris fuel load É. Guérette et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24117
174. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes A. Eldering et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5745
175. Size and mass distributions of ground-level sub-micrometer biomass burning aerosol from small wildfires R. Okoshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.024
176. Biomass burning in the northern peninsular Southeast Asia: Aerosol chemical profile and potential exposure S. Pani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.03.031
177. 24 h Evolution of an Exceptional HONO Plume Emitted by the Record-Breaking 2019/2020 Australian Wildfire Tracked from Space G. Dufour et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13091485
178. Impacts of Siberian Biomass Burning on Organic Aerosols over the North Pacific Ocean and the Arctic: Primary and Secondary Organic Tracers X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3037093
179. Gaseous pollutant emissions from solid fuel combustion: Comparative study of real-world and simulated chamber-based experiments D. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102798
180. Impact of the New South Wales fires during October 2013 on regional air quality in eastern Australia G. Rea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.034
181. Characterising Brazilian biomass burning emissions using WRF-Chem with MOSAIC sectional aerosol S. Archer-Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-549-2015
182. On-line CO, CO2 emissions evaluation and (benzene, toluene, xylene) determination from experimental burn of tropical biomass M. Tawfiq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.01.015
183. Evidence for cytotoxicity and mitochondrial dysfunction in human lung cells exposed to biomass burning aerosol constituents: Levoglucosan and 4-nitrocatechol F. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125173
184. Characterization of the origin of fine particulate matter in a medium size urban area in the Mediterranean M. Pikridas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.070
185. Interactions between biomass-burning aerosols and clouds over Southeast Asia: Current status, challenges, and perspectives N. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.06.036
186. Atmospheric chemical source signatures from proton-transfer reaction mass spectrometry aid in the interpretation of ambient aerosol distributions M. Striednig et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ada18f
187. Estimates of reactive trace gases (NMVOCs, CO and NOx) and their ozone forming potentials during forest fire over Southern Himalayan region A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.04.028
188. Formation and Evolution of Catechol-Derived SOA Mass, Composition, Volatility, and Light Absorption C. Fredrickson et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00007
189. In situ measurements and modeling of reactive trace gases in a small biomass burning plume M. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3813-2016
190. Modeling Daily Plume Specific Smoke Concentrations for Health Effects Studies with Estimates of Fire Size, Plume Age, and Fuel Type S. Faulstich et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00033
191. The wildland fire emission inventory: western United States emission estimates and an evaluation of uncertainty S. Urbanski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12973-2011
192. Dimethyl sulfide in the summertime Arctic atmosphere: measurements and source sensitivity simulations E. Mungall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6665-2016
193. Systematic Mapping and Review of Landscape Fire Smoke (LFS) Exposure Impacts on Insects Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvac069
194. Effect of biomass burning on premature mortality associated with long-term exposure to PM2.5 in Equatorial Asia S. Yin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117154
195. Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions in Fine Particulate Emission During Forest Fires in Chinese Boreal and Subtropical Forests: An Indoor Experiment Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10110994
196. Adjoint inversion of Chinese non-methane volatile organic compound emissions using space-based observations of formaldehyde and glyoxal H. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15017-2018
197. Systematising experts’ understanding of traditional burning in Portugal: a mental model approach M. Souza et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22141
198. Atmospheric deposition across the Atacama Desert, Chile: Compositions, source distributions, and interannual comparisons J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.07.037
199. Characterization of biomass burning emissions from cooking fires, peat, crop residue, and other fuels with high-resolution proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry C. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-845-2015
200. Annual nonmethane hydrocarbon trends in Beijing from 2000 to 2019 D. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.04.017
201. Estimating air pollutant emissions from the 2024 wildfires in Canada and the impact on air quality M. Filonchyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.12.012
202. Aircraft observations of biomass burning pollutants in the equatorial lower stratosphere over the tropical western Pacific during boreal winter J. Pittman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7543-2025
203. A comparative life cycle assessment of municipal wastewater treatment plants in Thailand under variable power schemes and effluent management programs S. Polruang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.183
204. Particles emitted from smouldering peat: size-resolved composition and emission factors A. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00124A
205. Cascading Impacts of Wildfire Emissions on Air Quality, Human Health, and Climate Change Based on Literature Review E. Hadiwijoyo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8120471
206. Greenhouse gas emissions from laboratory-scale fires in wildland fuels depend on fire spread mode and phase of combustion N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5259-2015
207. Ozone production and precursor emission from wildfires in Africa J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00041A
208. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: U.S. emissions inventories N. Larkin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.012
209. Sources and processes that control the submicron organic aerosol composition in an urban Mediterranean environment (Athens): a high temporal-resolution chemical composition measurement study I. Stavroulas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-901-2019
210. Constraining emissions of volatile organic compounds from western US wildfires with WE-CAN and FIREX-AQ airborne observations L. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5969-2023
211. Secondary organic aerosol formation from the laboratory oxidation of biomass burning emissions C. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12797-2019
212. Spatiotemporal Evaluation of Biomass Burning Emissions in Equatorial Southeast Asia (ESEA) for 2013 and 2021 C. Hui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44408-025-00057-3
213. Reconciling the total carbon budget for boreal forest wildfire emissions using airborne observations K. Hayden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12493-2022
214. Occupational exposure of firefighters to hazardous pollutants during prescribed fires in Portugal J. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141355
215. Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric emissions from crop residue burning constrained by satellite observations in China during 2016–2020 X. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161237
216. Comparing two methods to measure oxidative pyrolysis gases in a wind tunnel and in prescribed burns D. Weise et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22079
217. Fires and their key drivers in Mexico L. Montoya et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22154
218. Biomass burning combustion efficiency observed from space using measurements of CO and NO2 by the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) I. van der Velde et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-597-2021
219. Atmospheric impacts of the 2010 Russian wildfires: integrating modelling and measurements of an extreme air pollution episode in the Moscow region I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10031-2011
220. Carbonaceous aerosol composition in air masses influenced by large-scale biomass burning: a case study in northwestern Vietnam D. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8293-2021
221. Modeling Novel Aqueous Particle and Cloud Chemistry Processes of Biomass Burning Phenols and Their Potential to Form Secondary Organic Aerosols J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07762
222. Impacts of the July 2012 Siberian fire plume on air quality in the Pacific Northwest A. Teakles et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2593-2017
223. Observations of ozone formation in southern African savanna and grassland fire plumes V. Vakkari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117256
224. Quantifying the contribution of long-range transport to particulate matter (PM) mass loadings at a suburban site in the north-western Indo-Gangetic Plain (NW-IGP) H. Pawar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9501-2015
225. Global and Brazilian Carbon Response to El Niño Modoki 2011–2010 K. Bowman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000204
226. Relation between Pyrogenic NO2 Emissions from Wildfires in Russia and Atmospheric Blocking Events I. Mokhov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856021050146
227. The impact of oxygen content in the primary air supply on fuel burning rate and pollutant emissions in a forced-draft biomass stove M. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124129
228. Evaluation and impact factors of indoor and outdoor gas-phase nitrous acid under different environmental conditions Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.03.048
229. Biomass combustion produces ice-active minerals in biomass-burning aerosol and bottom ash L. Jahn et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922128117
230. Emissions from the Open Laboratory Combustion of Cheatgrass (Bromus Tectorum) M. Rennie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11040406
231. Measurement of gaseous and particulate formaldehyde in the Yangtze River Delta, China R. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117114
232. Quantifying effects of long-range transport of NO2 over Delhi using back trajectories and satellite data A. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-789-2024
233. Pollution source tracing and health impact of PM10 elements using DN-PMF in sub-urban sites of the Indian Himalayan Region S. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02692-6
234. Atmospheric Aging Alters the Toxicity Mechanisms of Residential Wood Combustion Aerosol: A Parallel In Vivo and In Vitro Study S. Offer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02543
235. Biomass burning emissions and potential air quality impacts of volatile organic compounds and other trace gases from fuels common in the US J. Gilman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13915-2015
236. Measurement report: Observation-based formaldehyde production rates and their relation to OH reactivity around the Arabian Peninsula D. Dienhart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17373-2021
237. Sulfate Formation in Incense Burning Particles: A Single-Particle Mass Spectrometric Study Z. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00492
238. Coupled treatment of lignocellulosic agricultural residues for augmented biomethanation M. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.142
239. Weekend‐Weekday Implications and the Impact of Wildfire Smoke on Ozone and Its Precursors at Boulder Reservoir, Colorado Between 2017 and 2019 I. Pollack et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035221
240. Downwind Ozone Changes of the 2019 Williams Flats Wildfire: Insights From WRF‐Chem/DART Assimilation of OMI NO2, HCHO, and MODIS AOD Retrievals A. Pouyaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038019
241. Highly Speciated Measurements of Terpenoids Emitted from Laboratory and Mixed-Conifer Forest Prescribed Fires L. Hatch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02612
242. Quantitative analysis of sulfate formation from crop burning in Northeast China: Unveiling the primary processes and transboundary transport to South Korea D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107303
243. Experimental study of smouldering combustion and transient emissions from forest duff with dual layers J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2024.105354
244. A global simulation of brown carbon: implications for photochemistry and direct radiative effect D. Jo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3413-2016
245. The interactive global fire module pyrE (v1.0) K. Mezuman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3091-2020
246. Gas‐aerosol partitioning of ammonia in biomass burning plumes: Implications for the interpretation of spaceborne observations of ammonia and the radiative forcing of ammonium nitrate F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074215
247. Boreal fire records in Northern Hemisphere ice cores: a review M. Legrand et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2033-2016
248. Sequestered Carbon in the Above-ground Phytomass of Forests Affected by Fires of Different Intensity S. Matveev et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413624602999
249. Impact of Wildfires on Ozone Exceptional Events in the Western U.S. D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402164f
250. Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing H. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
251. The CU Airborne Solar Occultation Flux Instrument: Performance Evaluation during BB-FLUX N. Kille et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00281
252. Uncovering the dominant contribution of intermediate volatility compounds in secondary organic aerosol formation from biomass-burning emissions K. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae014
253. Primary emissions of glyoxal and methylglyoxal from laboratory measurements of open biomass burning K. Zarzana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15451-2018
254. Rapid evolution of aerosol particles and their optical properties downwind of wildfires in the western US L. Kleinman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13319-2020
255. Formaldehyde in the Tropical Western Pacific: Chemical Sources and Sinks, Convective Transport, and Representation in CAM‐Chem and the CCMI Models D. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026121
256. Satellite-Based Estimation of Carbon Dioxide Budget in Tropical Peatland Ecosystems H. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020250
257. Characteristics of fresh and aged volatile organic compounds from open burning of crop residues X. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138545
258. A quadcopter unmanned aerial system (UAS)-based methodology for measuring biomass burning emission factors R. Vernooij et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4271-2022
259. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Agro-Energy Districts in Northern Greece: a Life Cycle Assessment Approach E. Tziolas & T. Bournaris https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10020-x
260. Satellite observations of ethylene (C2H4) from the Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer: A scoping study W. Dolan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.009
261. The Fire and Smoke Model Evaluation Experiment—A Plan for Integrated, Large Fire–Atmosphere Field Campaigns S. Prichard et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10020066
262. Assessment of light absorbing carbonaceous aerosol and its absorption properties from forest fire in Himalayan Critical Zone Observatory P. Tiwary et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178878
263. Characteristics of an open-cut coal mine fire pollution event F. Reisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.015
264. Particulate-phase mercury emissions from biomass burning and impact on resulting deposition: a modelling assessment F. De Simone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1881-2017
265. Air pollution knowledge assessments (APnA) for 20 Indian cities S. Guttikunda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2018.11.005
266. Spatiotemporal distribution of air pollutants during a heat wave–induced forest fire event in Uttarakhand A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29906-7
267. Garbage Burning in South Asia: How Important Is It to Regional Air Quality? E. Saikawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02830
268. Temporal comparison of global inventories of CO2 emissions from biomass burning during 2002–2011 derived from remotely sensed data Y. Shi & T. Matsunaga https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9141-z
269. Space-Based Observations of Ozone Precursors within California Wildfire Plumes and the Impacts on Ozone-NOx-VOC Chemistry X. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04411
270. Investigating the dependence of light-absorption properties of combustion carbonaceous aerosols on combustion conditions Z. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1566593
271. Monitoring of fire incidences in vegetation types and Protected Areas of India: Implications on carbon emissions C. REDDY et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0791-x
272. Comparative analysis of biomass burning tracers over Equatorial Africa: FTIR measurements, model simulations, and source attribution (2009–2011) A. Alemu & G. Tsidu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2026.106834
273. Chemical Fingerprinting of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosols from Sugar Cane Combustion: Complementary Findings from Field and Laboratory Studies E. Hartner et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00301
274. Quantifying anthropogenic impacts on CO₂ and CH₄ emissions: statistical insights and hotspot detection in East Africa A. Okrah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14361-3
275. Emissions factors from distributed, small-scale biomass gasification power generation: Comparison to open burning and large-scale biomass power generation O. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.024
276. Revisiting Acetonitrile as Tracer of Biomass Burning in Anthropogenic‐Influenced Environments Y. Huangfu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092322
277. Investigation on VOC Emissions from Automobile Sources by Means of Online Mass Spectrometry S. Inomata et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0032-6
278. The moving of high emission for biomass burning in China: View from multi-year emission estimation and human-driven forces J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105812
279. Understanding the emission pattern and source contribution of hazardous air pollutants from open burning of municipal solid waste in China K. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114417
280. Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations K. Travis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020
281. Chemically distinct particle-phase emissions from highly controlled pyrolysis of three wood types A. Avery et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8837-2023
282. Secondary Brown Carbon Formation From Photooxidation of Furans From Biomass Burning T. Joo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104900
283. The 2018 fire season in North America as seen by TROPOMI: aerosol layer height intercomparisons and evaluation of model-derived plume heights D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1427-2020
284. Understanding the mechanism and importance of brown carbon bleaching across the visible spectrum in biomass burning plumes from the WE-CAN campaign Y. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12881-2024
285. Subtropical southern Africa fire emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia obtained with satellite observations and GEOS-Chem E. Marais et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00041F
286. Optimization of a Method for the Detection of Biomass-Burning Relevant VOCs in Urban Areas Using Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry B. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11030276
287. Importance of transboundary transport of biomass burning emissions to regional air quality in Southeast Asia during a high fire event B. Aouizerats et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-363-2015
288. Assessment of emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants in Indonesia and impacts of national policy for elimination of kerosene use in cooking D. Permadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.041
289. Influence of Application Method on Disinfectant Byproduct Formation during Indoor Bleach Cleaning: A Case Study on Phenol Chlorination L. Jahn et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00011
290. Reevaluating the contribution of sulfuric acid and the origin of organic compounds in atmospheric nanoparticle growth V. Vakkari et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066459
291. Emissions of carboxylic acids, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and isocyanic acid (HNCO) from vehicle exhaust T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118218
292. Assessing Vertical Allocation of Wildfire Smoke Emissions Using Observational Constraints From Airborne Lidar in the Western U.S. X. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036808
293. Parameterizations of US wildfire and prescribed fire emission ratios and emission factors based on FIREX-AQ aircraft measurements G. Gkatzelis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-929-2024
294. A Correlation-based Inversion Approach for Satellite-borne Aerosol Remote Sensing T. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2026.110054
295. Modified biomass burning emission in modeling system with fire radiative power: Simulation of particulate matter in Mainland Southeast Asia during smog episode S. Pimonsree et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.08.002
296. Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) observations of biomass burning products in the stratosphere from Canadian forest fires in August 2017 H. Pumphrey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16645-2021
297. Multisize particulate matter and volatile organic compounds in arid and semiarid areas of Northwest China X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118875
298. Aerosol‐nutrient‐induced picoplankton growth in Lake Tahoe K. Mackey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20084
299. Gas-phase pyrolysis products emitted by prescribed fires in pine forests with a shrub understory in the southeastern United States N. Scharko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9681-2019
300. Nitrogen isotope characteristics and importance of NOx from biomass burning in China Z. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175430
301. Intercomparison of MODIS AQUA and VIIRS I-Band Fires and Emissions in an Agricultural Landscape—Implications for Air Pollution Research K. Vadrevu & K. Lasko https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10070978
302. Understanding the Land Carbon Cycle with Space Data: Current Status and Prospects J. Exbrayat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09506-2
303. Tropical and Boreal Forest – Atmosphere Interactions: A Review P. Artaxo et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.34
304. Emissions relationships in western forest fire plumes – Part 1: Reducing the effect of mixing errors on emission factors R. Chatfield & M. Andreae https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-7069-2020
305. Profiling of formaldehyde, glyoxal, methylglyoxal, and CO over the Amazon: normalized excess mixing ratios and related emission factors in biomass burning plumes F. Kluge et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12363-2020
306. Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits? E. Floess et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb501
307. Regional influence of wildfires on aerosol chemistry in the western US and insights into atmospheric aging of biomass burning organic aerosol S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2477-2017
308. Estimating stratospheric carbon from fires during a regional nuclear exchange A. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103877
309. Atmospheric peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): a global budget and source attribution E. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2679-2014
310. Impact of fuel variability on wildfire emission estimates G. Lasslop & S. Kloster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.040
311. Seasonality and interannual variability of CH4 fluxes from the eastern Amazon Basin inferred from atmospheric mole fraction profiles L. Basso et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023874
312. Emissions of air pollutants from primary crop residue burning in India and their mitigation strategies for cleaner emissions K. Ravindra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.031
313. Observed Relationship between Ozone and Temperature for Urban Nonattainment Areas in the United States M. Ninneman & D. Jaffe https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101235
314. Trace Organic Gas Analyzer Time-of-Flight mass spectrometer (TOGA-TOF) system for airborne observations of formaldehyde D. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-2985-2026
315. Analysis of the Impact of the 2019–20 Australian Bushfire Season on the Atmospheric Environment J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.566891
316. Estimation of gases emitted by forest fires based on remote sensing data Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0162-5
317. First Simultaneous Observations of Formaldehyde and Glyoxal by MAX-DOAS in the Indo-Gangetic Plain Region H. Hoque et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2018-028
318. Estimating air pollutant emissions from crop residue open burning through a calculation of open burning proportion based on satellite-derived fire radiative energy Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117477
319. Assessing Burned Areas in Wildfires and Prescribed Fires with Spectral Indices and SAR Images in the Margalla Hills of Pakistan A. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12101371
320. Drivers and implications of declining fossil fuel CO2 concentrations in Chinese cities revealed by radiocarbon measurements P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5085-2026
321. Sensitivity of biomass burning emissions estimates to land surface information M. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2059-2022
322. Combustion efficiency and emission factors for wildfire-season fires in mixed conifer forests of the northern Rocky Mountains, US S. Urbanski https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7241-2013
323. Assessment of environmental impact of open waste burning activity in Asia and Pacific: A methodological update B. Ramadan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121747
324. The influence of daily meteorology on boreal fire emissions and regional trace gas variability E. Wiggins et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003434
325. Aging Effects on Biomass Burning Aerosol Mass and Composition: A Critical Review of Field and Laboratory Studies A. Hodshire et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02588
326. Radiative forcing due to shifting southern African fire regimes T. Eames et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17429-2025
327. In-situ measurement of pyrolysis and combustion gases from biomass burning using swept wavelength external cavity quantum cascade lasers M. Phillips et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.386072
328. Simulating the forest fire plume dispersion, chemistry, and aerosol formation using SAM-ASP version 1.0 C. Lonsdale et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4579-2020
329. Effects of biomass burning and photochemical oxidation on the black carbon mixing state and light absorption in summer season T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118230
330. Aerosol emissions from prescribed fires in the United States: A synthesis of laboratory and aircraft measurements A. May et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021848
331. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2019 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023
332. Airborne glyoxal measurements in the marine and continental atmosphere: comparison with TROPOMI observations and EMAC simulations F. Kluge et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1369-2023
333. Simulating the Impact of Bushfires in Australia on Local Air Quality and Aerosol Burden in the Southern Hemisphere K. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/sola.2023-003
334. Differential response of human lung epithelial cells to particulate matter in fresh and photochemically aged biomass-burning smoke K. Atwi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118929
335. Unprecedented Atmospheric Ammonia Concentrations Detected in the High Arctic From the 2017 Canadian Wildfires E. Lutsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030419
336. Implementing microscopic charcoal particles into a global aerosol–climate model A. Gilgen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11813-2018
337. Anomalous Wildfires in Siberia in Summer 2019 O. Voronova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143382009025X
338. Particle and VOC emission factor measurements for anthropogenic sources in West Africa S. Keita et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7691-2018
339. Atmospheric evolution of emissions from a boreal forest fire: the formation of highly functionalized oxygen-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-containing organic compounds J. Ditto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-255-2021
340. The global methane budget 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016
341. Using Satellite‐Derived Fire Arrival Times for Coupled Wildfire‐Air Quality Simulations at Regional Scales of the 2020 California Wildfire Season W. Lassman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037062
342. Biomass burning-agriculture coupling in the Orinoco savannas—Particulate matter emission scenarios R. Jimenez et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.689844
343. The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0 K. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024
344. Mesoscale modeling of smoke transport over the Southeast Asian Maritime Continent: coupling of smoke direct radiative effect below and above the low-level clouds C. Ge et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-159-2014
345. Biomass & Bio-waste Supply Chain Sustainability for Bio-energy and Bio-fuel Production S. Ghosh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.02.005
346. Properties and evolution of biomass burning organic aerosol from Canadian boreal forest fires M. Jolleys et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3077-2015
347. Role of advection in atmospheric ammonia: A case study at a Japanese lake basin influenced by agricultural ammonia sources T. Kubota et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117856
348. Estimation of Biomass Burning Emissions in South and Southeast Asia Based on FY-4A Satellite Observations Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16050582
349. Hyper-fast gas chromatography and single-photon ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry with integrated electrical modulator-based sampling for headspace and online VOC analyses C. Gehm et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AN00114K
350. Measurement report: Assessing the impacts of emission uncertainty on aerosol optical properties and radiative forcing from biomass burning in peninsular Southeast Asia Y. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-367-2024
351. The Comprehensive Fire Information Reconciled Emissions (CFIRE) inventory: Wildland fire emissions developed for the 2011 and 2014 U.S. National Emissions Inventory N. Larkin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1802365
352. Emissions and characteristics of particulate matter from rainforest burning in the Southeast Asia M. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.062
353. Towards a global assessment of pyrogenic carbon from vegetation fires C. Santín et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12985
354. Chemical composition and light absorption of carbonaceous aerosols emitted from crop residue burning: influence of combustion efficiency Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13721-2020
355. Gold folding screen (red copper leaf) dissolved by the "Black Rain" generated by the Hiroshima atomic bombing T. Mukai et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-025-00784-6
356. Global Warming Potential of the Change in Land Use from Citrus Fields to Solar Parks M. Benitez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol8040106
357. Composition and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds in organic aerosols from laboratory biomass burning M. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2899-2019
358. A pervasive role for biomass burning in tropical high ozone/low water structures D. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10267
359. Volatile organic compounds from residential solid fuel burning in Guanzhong Plain, China: Source-related profiles and risks J. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.002
360. Direct radiative forcing of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols in China L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107396
361. Improved estimates of preindustrial biomass burning reduce the magnitude of aerosol climate forcing in the Southern Hemisphere P. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1379
362. Does chronic nitrogen deposition during biomass growth affect atmospheric emissions from biomass burning? M. Giordano et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034007
363. Emissions of intermediate-volatility and semi-volatile organic compounds from domestic fuels used in Delhi, India G. Stewart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2407-2021
364. Impact of Mosquito-Repellent Incense Emissions and Aging Processes in the Indoor Environment W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00268
365. Emission of volatile organic compounds from religious and ritual activities in India S. Dewangan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3250-z
366. Fourier transform infrared time series of tropospheric HCN in eastern China: seasonality, interannual variability, and source attribution Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5437-2020
367. Emission Factors for the Burning of Decking Slabs Made of Wood and Thermoplastic with a Cone Calorimeter B. Martinent et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6040162
368. Temporal variability and sources of VOCs in urban areas of the eastern Mediterranean C. Kaltsonoudis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14825-2016
369. Criteria-Based Identification of Important Fuels for Wildland Fire Emission Research A. Watts et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060640
370. Evolution of PM2.5 from biomass high-temperature pyrolysis in an entrained flow reactor Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.07.019
371. Doubling of annual ammonia emissions from the peat fires in Indonesia during the 2015 El Niño S. Whitburn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070620
372. Biomass burning CO, PM and fuel consumption per unit burned area estimates derived across Africa using geostationary SEVIRI fire radiative power and Sentinel-5P CO data H. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2089-2023
373. Environmental sustainability of renewable hydrogen in comparison with conventional cooking fuels X. Schmidt Rivera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.033
374. Application of compositional data analysis to determine the effects of heating mode, moisture status and plant species on pyrolysates D. Weise et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF20126
375. First satellite measurements of carbon dioxide and methane emission ratios in wildfire plumes A. Ross et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50733
376. Electronically excited states of formic acid investigated by theoretical and experimental methods P. Randi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.122237
377. Chemical Composition and Emissions Factors for Cookstove Startup (Ignition) Materials K. Fedak et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02218
378. Characterization of Aerosol Properties from the Burning Emissions of Typical Residential Fuels on the Tibetan Plateau X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04211
379. The multi-year contribution of Indo-China peninsula fire emissions to aerosol radiation forcing in southern China during 2013–2019 J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172337
380. Region-dependent seasonal pattern of methane over Indian region as observed by SCIAMACHY M. Kavitha & P. Nair https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.008
381. Substantial Underestimation of Post-Harvest Burning Emissions in the North China Plain Revealed by Multi-Species Space Observations T. Stavrakou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32307
382. Emissions from Structure Fires: Overview of BHASMA and Results for CO2 and Select Pollutants by Fuel, Combustion Mode, and Scale K. Ridgway et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c04682
383. Fire Influences on Atmospheric Composition, Air Quality and Climate A. Voulgarakis & R. Field https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-015-0007-z
384. Siberian Arctic black carbon: gas flaring and wildfire impact O. Popovicheva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5983-2022
385. Molecular Characterization of Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Humic-like Substances Emitted from Straw Residue Burning Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b00248
386. Emission Factors and Energy Properties of Agro and Forest Biomass in Aspect of Sustainability of Energy Sector G. Maj https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061516
387. Regional Climate Effects of Biomass Burning and Dust in East Asia: Evidence From Modeling and Observation X. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083894
388. Variations in oxygenated and nitrogen-containing primary organic compounds based on the fuel type and burning condition in stove emissions O. Oghama et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00080G
389. Overview of VOC emissions and chemistry from PTR-TOF-MS measurements during the SusKat-ABC campaign: high acetaldehyde, isoprene and isocyanic acid in wintertime air of the Kathmandu Valley C. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3979-2016
390. Emissions of Trace Organic Gases From Western U.S. Wildfires Based on WE‐CAN Aircraft Measurements W. Permar et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033838
391. Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Atmospheric Deposition of Dissolved Organic Carbon D. Liptzin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GB007393
392. Identification and Quantitative Analysis of Smoldering and Flaming Combustion of Radiata Pine H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00314
393. Influence of transport from urban sources and domestic biomass combustion on the air quality of a mountain area F. Petracchini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8111-1
394. Evaluation of environmental impacts of harvest residue-based bioenergy using radiative forcing analysis F. Pierobon et al. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2014-120
395. Large air quality and human health impacts due to Amazon forest and vegetation fires E. Butt et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/abb0db
396. Study of Formic and Acetic Acids in the Air of Humid Savannah Case of Lamto (C&#244te d’Ivoire) P. Touré et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2016.62021
397. Comparison of ultraviolet absorbance and NO-chemiluminescence for ozone measurement in wildfire plumes at the Mount Bachelor Observatory H. Gao & D. Jaffe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.007
398. Impact of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol Volatility on Smoke Concentrations Downwind of Fires D. Pagonis et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05017
399. Wildfire smoke and public health risk F. Reisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15034
400. Emissions of methane from offshore oil and gas platforms in Southeast Asia H. Nara et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06503
401. Inverse Modeling of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from the 2010 Russian Wildfires by Using Satellite Measurements of Nitrogen Dioxide E. Berezin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7100132
402. Regional Influence of Aerosol Emissions from Wildfires Driven by Combustion Efficiency: Insights from the BBOP Campaign S. Collier et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01617
403. Constraining the Emission of Particulate Matter From Indonesian Peatland Burning Using Continuous Observation Data M. Kuwata et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028564
404. Improved assignments of the vibrational fundamental modes of ortho-, meta-, and para-xylene using gas- and liquid-phase infrared and Raman spectra combined with ab initio calculations: Quantitative gas-phase infrared spectra for detection R. Lindenmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.07.053
405. Speciated online PM1 from South Asian combustion sources – Part 1: Fuel-based emission factors and size distributions J. Goetz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14653-2018
406. Pre-Harvest Sugarcane Burning: Determination of Emission Factors through Laboratory Measurements D. França et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos3010164
407. Emission of organic carbon, elemental carbon and water-soluble ions from crop straw burning under flaming and smoldering conditions L. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.09.002
408. Spatial and seasonal variability of measured anthropogenic non-methane hydrocarbons in urban atmospheres: Implication on emission ratios A. Boynard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.039
409. Wildfire air pollution hazard during the 21st century W. Knorr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9223-2017
410. The Relevance of Pyrogenic Carbon for Carbon Budgets From Fires: Insights From the FIREX Experiment C. Santin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006647
411. Seasonal Variability in Local Carbon Dioxide Biomass Burning Sources Over Central and Eastern US Using Airborne In Situ Enhancement Ratios J. DiGangi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034525
412. Combining POLDER-3 satellite observations and WRF-Chem numerical simulations to derive biomass burning aerosol properties over the southeast Atlantic region A. Siméon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17775-2021
413. Formation of highly absorptive secondary brown carbon through nighttime multiphase chemistry of biomass burning emissions Y. Kuang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3737-2025
414. Severe rapid indian monsoon weakening due to emissions from extreme Canadian wildfires I. Roșu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00184-w
415. Advanced visualisation of biomass charcoal combustion dynamics using MWIR hyperspectral and LWIR thermal imaging under varied airflow conditions Y. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132901
416. NEIVAv1.0: Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi et al. (2011) version 1.0 S. Binte Shahid et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024
417. Differential In Vitro Lung Cell Toxicity of Fresh and Photochemically Aged Smoke Aerosol Emissions from Simulated Wildland Fires of Duff and Surface Fuels A. Noël et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00207
418. Modeling Long-Term Dynamics of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOCs) in Germany Based on Major Precursors A. Moradi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c14418
419. Long-term brown carbon and smoke tracer observations in Bogotá, Colombia: association with medium-range transport of biomass burning plumes J. Rincón-Riveros et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7459-2020
420. Secondary organic aerosol formation in biomass-burning plumes: theoretical analysis of lab studies and ambient plumes Q. Bian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5459-2017
421. Black carbon transport between Santiago de Chile and glaciers in the Andes Mountains E. Gramsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117546
422. New estimate of particulate emissions from Indonesian peat fires in 2015 L. Kiely et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11105-2019
423. Effect of dramatic land use change on gaseous pollutant emissions from biomass burning in Northeastern China H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.008
424. Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen From Western U.S. Wildfires During Summer 2018 J. Lindaas et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032657
425. Highly anomalous fire emissions from the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac2e6f
426. Global Wildland Fire Emissions of Full-Volatility Organic Compounds from 1997 to 2023 L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c10217
427. In Situ Tropical Peatland Fire Emission Factors and Their Variability, as Determined by Field Measurements in Peninsula Malaysia T. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GB005709
428. A comprehensive biomass burning emission inventory with high spatial and temporal resolution in China Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2839-2017
429. Protecting Brazilian Amazon Indigenous territories reduces atmospheric particulates and avoids associated health impacts and costs P. Prist et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00704-w
430. Estimating the open biomass burning emissions in central and eastern China from 2003 to 2015 based on satellite observation J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11623-2018
431. Measurements of NO2, SO2, NH3, HNO3 and O3 in West African urban environments M. Adon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.050
432. The Global Atmospheric Pollution Forum (GAPF) emission inventory preparation tool and its application to Côte d’Ivoire H. Vallack et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.05.023
433. Characterization of VOCs and their related atmospheric processes in a central Chinese city during severe ozone pollution periods B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-617-2019
434. Indoor acids and bases W. Nazaroff & C. Weschler https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12670
435. Carbon emissions from forest harvest and fire offset approximately half of carbon sequestration of forestation in China during 1986-2020 J. Mai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110830
436. Investigation of high ozone events due to wildfire smoke in an urban area C. McClure & D. Jaffe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.021
437. Indirect contributions of global fires to surface ozone through ozone–vegetation feedback Y. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11531-2021
438. Study of the burning of Pteridium aquilinum L. and risk for the personnel involved: Thermal properties and chemical risk T. Barboni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102904
439. Uncertainties of wild-land fires emission in AQMEII phase 2 case study J. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.068
440. Molecular characteristics of organic compositions in fresh and aged biomass burning aerosols J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140247
441. Amplified Arctic–boreal fire regimes from permafrost thaw feedbacks J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01894-y
442. Modeling biogenic and anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol in China J. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-77-2017
443. Levoglucosan and phenols in Antarctic marine, coastal and plateau aerosols R. Zangrando et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.166
444. Findings from Biomass Burning Field Campaigns Set Directions for Future Research on Atmospheric Impacts K. Barsanti et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00276
445. Estimation of Black Carbon Emissions from Dry Dipterocarp Forest Fires in Thailand U. Chaiyo & S. Garivait https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos5041002
446. Large changes in biomass burning over the last millennium inferred from paleoatmospheric ethane in polar ice cores M. Nicewonger et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807172115
447. The Effect of Combustion Conditions on Emissions of Elemental Carbon and Organic Carbon and Formation of Secondary Organic Carbon in Simulated Wildland Fires R. Penland et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00300
448. A Large Underestimate of Formic Acid from Tropical Fires: Constraints from Space-Borne Measurements S. Chaliyakunnel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b06385
449. Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning – an updated assessment M. Andreae https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8523-2019
450. Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols Q. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi3568
451. The sources of atmospheric black carbon at a European gateway to the Arctic P. Winiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12776
452. Burning-derived vanillic acid in an Arctic ice core from Tunu, northeastern Greenland M. Grieman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1625-2018
453. Spherical tarball particles form through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in biomass-burning smoke K. Adachi et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900129116
454. Distributed Sensors for Wildfire Early Warnings M. Findlay et al. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac5344
455. Time‐Resolved Measurements of PM2.5 Chemical Composition and Brown Carbon Absorption in Nanjing, East China: Diurnal Variations and Organic Tracer‐Based PMF Analysis W. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039092
456. Bushfire smoke plume composition and toxicological assessment from the 2019–2020 Australian Black Summer J. Simmons et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01237-5
457. An Estimation Model of Emissions from Burning Areas Based on the Tier Method B. Dobosz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071264
458. Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem J. Schmale et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000952
459. Long-term (2003–2018) trends in aerosol chemical components at a high-altitude background station in the western North Pacific: Impact of long-range transport from continental Asia A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114813
460. Estimates of Global Forest Fire Carbon Emissions Using FY-3 Active Fires Product Y. Liu & Y. Shi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14101575
461. Peatland Wildfires Enhance Nitrogen-Containing Organic Compounds in Marine Aerosols over the Western Pacific S. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10125
462. The Impact of Biomass-Fired Stoves on Air Pollution in Urban Areas V. Vukašinović et al. https://doi.org/10.46793/EEE24-2.31V
463. Climate impacts of hydrogen emissions M. Sand et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00792-0
464. Designing a conceptual framework for strategic selection of Bushfire mitigation approaches S. Tayari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118486
465. Estimation of fuel mass and its loss during a forest fire in peat swamp forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia J. Toriyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.034
466. Spatial and temporal distributions of air pollutant emissions from open crop straw and biomass burnings in China from 2002 to 2016 K. Mehmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0675-6
467. Volatile organic compounds and ozone at four national parks in the southwestern United States K. Benedict et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117783
468. Effect of Stove Technology and Combustion Conditions on Gas and Particulate Emissions from Residential Biomass Combustion D. Bhattu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05020
469. Methane budget of East Asia, 1990–2015: A bottom-up evaluation A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.263
470. The dispersion of smoke haze from peatland fires over South Sumatra during the moderate El Niño of 2023 S. Hamdi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06857-x
471. Human-induced fire regime shifts during 19th century industrialization: A robust fire regime reconstruction using northern Polish lake sediments E. Dietze et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222011
472. More Than Emissions and Chemistry: Fire Size, Dilution, and Background Aerosol Also Greatly Influence Near‐Field Biomass Burning Aerosol Aging A. Hodshire et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029674
473. How alkaline compounds control atmospheric aerosol particle acidity V. Karydis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14983-2021
474. Black and brown carbon over central Amazonia: long-term aerosol measurements at the ATTO site J. Saturno et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12817-2018
475. Anthropogenic Perturbations to the Atmospheric Molybdenum Cycle M. Wong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006787
476. On the Design of Novel Biofoams Using Lignin, Wheat Straw, and Sugar Beet Pulp as Precursor Material S. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00721
477. Vegetation fires in the himalayan region – Aerosol load, black carbon emissions and smoke plume heights K. Vadrevu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.009
478. Understanding drivers and biases of simulated CO emissions from the INFERNO fire model over South America M. Velásquez-García et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1341-2026
479. Severe Wildfires Near Moscow, Russia in 2010: Modeling of Carbon Monoxide Pollution and Comparisons with Observations A. Safronov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70100395
480. Emission inventory of inorganic trace gases from solid residential fuels over the National Capital Territory of India R. Arya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31278-x
481. Molecular Composition and the Optical Properties of Brown Carbon Generated by the Ethane Flame C. West et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00095
482. Atmospheric Evolution of Brown Carbon from Wildfires in North America J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c09020
483. Wildfire influences on the variability and trend of summer surface ozone in the mountainous western United States X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14687-2016
484. Airborne Emission Rate Measurements Validate Remote Sensing Observations and Emission Inventories of Western U.S. Wildfires C. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07121
485. Vast CO2 release from Australian fires in 2019–2020 constrained by satellite I. van der Velde et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03712-y
486. Influence of springtime biomass burning in South Asia on regional ozone (O 3 ): A model based case study C. Jena et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.027
487. Emission Factors for Selected Semivolatile Organic Chemicals from Burning of Tropical Biomass Fuels and Estimation of Annual Australian Emissions X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01392
488. Oxidation of low-molecular-weight organic compounds in cloud droplets: global impact on tropospheric oxidants S. Rosanka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9909-2021
489. Determinants of quantification of tourism waste in the hilly terrain of Himalayas: A spatial approach R. Sharma & A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.039
490. Speciated and total emission factors of particulate organics from burning western US wildland fuels and their dependence on combustion efficiency C. Jen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1013-2019
491. Source apportionment of NMVOCs in the Kathmandu Valley during the SusKat-ABC international field campaign using positive matrix factorization C. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8129-2017
492. Burning Characteristics and Smoke Emission from Mixed Fuel Cribs A. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00275
493. Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016 G. van der Werf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017
494. Optimizing 4 years of CO2 biospheric fluxes from OCO-2 and in situ data in TM5: fire emissions from GFED and inferred from MOPITT CO data H. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15817-2022
495. Sources of carbonaceous aerosols and deposited black carbon in the Arctic in winter-spring: implications for radiative forcing Q. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12453-2011
496. Particulate emissions from large North American wildfires estimated using a new top-down method T. Nikonovas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6423-2017
497. Smoke-charged vortex doubles hemispheric aerosol in the middle stratosphere and buffers ozone depletion C. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn3657
498. Gridded 1 km × 1 km emission inventory for paddy stubble burning emissions over north-west India constrained by measured emission factors of 77 VOCs and district-wise crop yield data A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148064
499. Reanalysis of NOAA H2 observations: implications for the H2 budget F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4217-2024
500. Underestimated contribution of open biomass burning to terpenoid emissions revealed by a novel hourly dynamic inventory J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172764
501. Five primary sources of organic aerosols in the urban atmosphere of Belgrade (Serbia) R. Zangrando et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.188
502. A high-resolution emission inventory of crop burning in fields in China based on MODIS Thermal Anomalies/Fire products X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.01.017
503. Emission Factor from Small Scale Tropical Peat Combustion W. Setyawati et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/180/1/012113
504. A pilot study of gaseous pollutants' measurement (NO2, SO2, NH3, HNO3 and O3) in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire: contribution to an overview of gaseous pollution in African cities J. Bahino et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5173-2018
505. Impacts of 2018 California Wildfires on Organic Aerosol Composition and Air Quality under Low Smoke Conditions J. Enders et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00202
506. Study on emission factor and reduction potential of organic solid waste gasification process D. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2024.103978
507. Evaluation of Different Types of Aerosols From Wildfires in South America Using Ground‐Based Observations, Reanalysis and CMIP6 Models F. Forgioni et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70149
508. Impact of grassland fire dynamics on particulate emission factors A. Josephson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104554
509. Evaluation of biomass burning aerosols in the HadGEM3 climate model with observations from the SAMBBA field campaign B. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14657-2016
510. Sensitivity of mesoscale modeling of smoke direct radiative effect to the emission inventory: a case study in northern sub-Saharan African region F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/075002
511. N2O5reactive uptake kinetics and chlorine activation on authentic biomass-burning aerosol L. Goldberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00330D
512. Chemical speciation of water-soluble ionic components in PM2.5 derived from peatland fires in Sumatra Island Y. Fujii et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.02.009
513. Assessing Carbon Emissions from Biomass Burning in Croplands in Burkina Faso, West Africa P. Bougma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6100402
514. Global modeling study of soluble organic nitrogen from open biomass burning A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.031
515. Bayesian inversion of emissions from large urban fire using in situ observations E. Launay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120391
516. Long-term variations of factors controlling REE-rich mud formation based on ocean–sediment Nd mass balance modeling R. Matsunami et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106338
517. The influence of fuel moisture content on the combustion of Eucalyptus foliage M. Possell & T. Bell https://doi.org/10.1071/WF12077
518. The food we eat, the air we breathe: a review of the fine particulate matter-induced air quality health impacts of the global food system S. Balasubramanian et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac065f
519. Measurement report: Spatial variability of VOCs, ozone, and carbonaceous aerosols during the 2022 European summer heatwave W. Aas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8717-2026
520. Burning conditions and transportation pathways determine biomass-burning aerosol properties in the Ascension Island marine boundary layer A. Dobracki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2333-2025
521. Mid-infrared absorption cross sections for two unsaturated hydrocarbons: Allene and isoprene K. Leroux et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2025.109737
522. Seasonal emission factors from rangeland prescribed burns in the Kansas Flint Hills grasslands J. Aurell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119769
523. Estimation of fire-induced carbon emissions from Equatorial Asia in 2015 using in situ aircraft and ship observations Y. Niwa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9455-2021
524. Emissions and Atmospheric Chemistry of Furanoids from Biomass Burning: Insights from Laboratory to Atmospheric Observations M. Romanias et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00226
525. Biomass burning contributions to Mexico City’s atmospheric CO2 estimated using a multi-isotope approach M. Villarreal-Brito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2026.03.048
526. Light absorption by polar and non-polar aerosol compounds from laboratory biomass combustion D. Sengupta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10849-2018
527. What could have caused pre-industrial biomass burning emissions to exceed current rates? G. van der Werf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-289-2013
528. Patterns of CO2and radiocarbon across high northern latitudes during International Polar Year 2008 S. Vay et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015643
529. The Pagami Creek smoke plume after long-range transport to the upper troposphere over Europe – aerosol properties and black carbon mixing state F. Dahlkötter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6111-2014
530. Tropical peat fire emissions: 2019 field measurements in Sumatra and Borneo and synthesis with previous studies R. Yokelson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10173-2022
531. Evaluation of black carbon emission inventories over Indian subcontinent: Role of open biomass burning and its representation in emission fluxes A. Arora et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121367
532. Planning, implementation, and scientific goals of the Studies of Emissions and Atmospheric Composition, Clouds and Climate Coupling by Regional Surveys (SEAC4RS) field mission O. Toon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024297
533. Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report M. Day et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1629363
534. APIFLAME v2.0 biomass burning emissions model: impact of refined input parameters on atmospheric concentration in Portugal in summer 2016 S. Turquety et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2981-2020
535. Formation of Ozone and PM2.5 in Smoke from Prescribed Burning in the Southeastern United States R. El Asmar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00231
536. Quantitative infrared absorption cross sections of isoprene for atmospheric measurements C. Brauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3839-2014
537. Measuring acetic and formic acid by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry: sensitivity, humidity dependence, and quantifying interferences M. Baasandorj et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1303-2015
538. Advancing global aerosol classification: Source-compositional typology and variability from 30 years (1993–2024) of AERONET observations A. Krishnaveni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180918
539. Constraining NOx emissions with satellite NO2 data to improve modeling of 2023 wildfire air quality J. Kumm & Z. Qu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.121985
540. Australian Fire Emissions of Carbon Monoxide Estimated by Global Biomass Burning Inventories: Variability and Observational Constraints M. Desservettaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035925
541. Multimodal Approach for Assessing Emissions and Transport of Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollutants from the January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires P. Vannucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00430
542. Atmospheric aerosols local–regional discrimination for a semi-urban area in India R. Hooda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.08.014
543. The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty D. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583
544. Chemical properties of emissions from solid residential fuels used for energy in the rural sector of the southern region of India T. Mandal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18543-1
545. The unaccounted costs of slash pile burning: Carbon emissions and PM2.5 exposure in central Oregon, USA C. Axlund et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101081
546. Tracer-based characterization of source variations of ambient isoprene mixing ratios in a hillocky megacity, India, influenced by the local meteorology R. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112465
547. Decadal changes in premature mortality associated with exposure to outdoor PM2.5 in mainland Southeast Asia and the impacts of biomass burning and anthropogenic emissions S. Yin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158775
548. Modeling Wildfire Smoke Feedback Mechanisms Using a Coupled Fire‐Atmosphere Model With a Radiatively Active Aerosol Scheme A. Kochanski et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030558
549. Chasing parts in quadrillion: applications of dynamical downscaling in atmospheric pollutant transport modelling during field campaigns A. Poulidis et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00642-x
550. The dark side of the tradition: The polluting effect of Epiphany folk fires in the eastern Po Valley (Italy) M. Masiol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.077
551. A new source of methylglyoxal in the aqueous phase M. Rodigast et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2689-2016
552. Brownness of organics in aerosols from biomass burning linked to their black carbon content R. Saleh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2220
553. Potentials of agricultural and agro-industrial crop residues for the displacement of fossil fuels: A Philippine context A. Go et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.12.010
554. Estimation of Emission Flux of Particulate Matter by Agricultural Burning in Rural Areas using Scanning LIDAR G. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2022.38.3.414
555. Molecular characteristics and formation pathways of organosulfur compounds: a comparative field study across contrasting atmospheric environments D. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11067-2026
556. Photochemical production of ozone and emissions of NOx and CH4 in the San Joaquin Valley J. Trousdell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10697-2019
557. Bottom-up re-estimations of greenhouse gas and atmospheric pollutants derived from straw burning of three cereal crops production in China based on a national questionnaire Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15658-9
558. Global atmospheric budget of simple monocyclic aromatic compounds D. Cabrera-Perez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6931-2016
559. Estimation of local and external contributions of biomass burning to PM2.5 in an industrial zone included in a large urban settlement F. Benetello et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7987-0
560. Wildfire combustion emission inventory in Southwest China (2001–2020) based on MODIS fire radiative energy data X. Ning et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102279
561. Emerging investigator series: deposited particles and human lung lining fluid are dynamic, chemically-complex reservoirs leading to thirdhand smoke emissions and exposure R. Sheu et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00107H
562. Investigation of the tracers for plastic-enriched waste burning aerosols S. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.066
563. Separating the influence of temperature, drought, and fire on interannual variability in atmospheric CO2 G. Keppel‐Aleks et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB004890
564. Seasonal ambient ammonia and ammonium concentrations in a pilot IMPROVE NHx monitoring network in the western United States X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.058
565. Determination of the Area Affected by Agricultural Burning D. Prato & J. Huertas https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10060312
566. Observations of glyoxal and methylglyoxal in a suburban area of the Yangtze River Delta, China J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117727
567. A system dynamics-based scenario analysis of residential solid waste management in Kisumu, Kenya K. Dianati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146200
568. Influence of Fuel Properties on the Light Absorption of Fresh and Laboratory-Aged Atmospheric Brown Carbon Produced from Realistic Combustion of Boreal Peat and Spruce Foliage M. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07091
569. Black Carbon Emissions from Associated Natural Gas Flaring C. Weyant et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04712
570. Chemical interactions within biomass-burning emissions significantly influence the composition and optical properties of nanoscale secondary organic aerosols S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EN00770D
571. Molecular characteristics of organic aerosols and impacts of transboundary biomass burning in Southwest China Z. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142035
572. Emissions and source allocation of carbonaceous air pollutants from wood stoves in developed countries: A review Y. Olsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.10.007
573. Managing Smoke Risk from Wildland Fires: Northern California as a Case Study K. Chung et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c01914
574. The FireWork v2.0 air quality forecast system with biomass burning emissions from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System v2.03 J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019
575. Source apportionment of black carbon and combustion-related CO2 for the determination of source-specific emission factors B. Alfoldy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-135-2023
576. Quantifying Carbon Monoxide Emissions on the Scale of Large Wildfires M. Bela et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095831
577. Smoldering of crop residues emits a large amount of intermediate volatility organic compounds to the atmosphere H. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.141877
578. Satellites may underestimate rice residue and associated burning emissions in Vietnam K. Lasko et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa751d
579. Review of agricultural biomass burning and its impact on air quality in the continental United States of America S. Pinakana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100546
580. Aromatic acids in a Eurasian Arctic ice core: a 2600-year proxy record of biomass burning M. Grieman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-395-2017
581. Photolytic Mass Loss of Secondary Organic Aerosol Derived from Photooxidation of Biomass Burning Furan Precursors N. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00230
582. Constraining the uncertainty in emissions over India with a regional air quality model evaluation A. Karambelas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.052
583. Spaceborne Measurements of Formic and Acetic Acids: A Global View of the Regional Sources B. Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086239
584. Molecular distribution and compound-specific stable carbon isotopic composition of dicarboxylic acids, oxocarboxylic acids and α-dicarbonyls in PM2.5 from Beijing, China W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2749-2018
585. Long-range transport of Siberian biomass burning emissions to North America during FIREX-AQ M. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118241
586. Incorporating observed fire severity in refined emissions estimates for boreal and temperate forest fires in the carbon budget model CBM-CFS3 v1.2 D. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3617-2026
587. Spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5-related preterm birth in China and India during 1990–2019 and implications for emission controls S. Yin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.114415
588. Using TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) measurements and Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) CO modelling to understand the contribution of meteorology and emissions to an extreme air pollution event in India A. Vellalassery et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5393-2021
589. Assessment of biomass-burning types and transport over Thailand and the associated health risks P. Punsompong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118176
590. Ammonium-based fire suppressants alter the pyrolysis and combustion behavior of pine wood: A mechanistic study on competing degradation pathways Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2026.112308
591. The black carbon record of mid- to late-holocene environmental changes and its links to climate change and anthropogenic activity on the northwest Qinghai-Tibetan plateau W. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178659
592. Seasonal and interannual variations in HCN amounts in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere observed by MIPAS N. Glatthor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-563-2015
593. Chemical characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Wuhan, China F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-019-09395-0
594. Smoke emissions from agricultural fires in Mexico and Central America B. Rios & G. Raga https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.13.036509
595. A long-term overview of nitrogen in tropical rainwater and wet deposition fluxes in southern Brazil J. Florêncio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119369
596. Secondary aerosol formation in incense burning particles by O3 and OH oxidation via single particle mixing state analysis Z. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164942
597. Forest fires in Siberia and the Far East: Emissions and atmospheric transport of black carbon to the Arctic A. Vinogradova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1024856015060184
598. Bacterial Emission Factors: A Foundation for the Terrestrial-Atmospheric Modeling of Bacteria Aerosolized by Wildland Fires L. Kobziar et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05142
599. Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database T. van Leeuwen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-7305-2014
600. Extension of Large Fire Emissions From Summer to Autumn and Its Drivers in the Western US S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003086
601. Chemical characterization of organic vapors from wood, straw, cow dung, and coal burning T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2707-2025
602. Development of accurate and stable primary standard gas mixtures for global atmospheric acetonitrile monitoring: evaluating adsorption loss and long-term stability B. Tsogt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-971-2025
603. Greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural residue burning have increased by 75 % since 2011 across India M. Deshpande et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166944
604. Emissions and Partitioning of Intermediate-Volatility and Semi-Volatile Polar Organic Compounds (I/SV-POCs) During Laboratory Combustion of Boreal and Sub-Tropical Peat R. Yatavelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-017-0001-5
605. Atmospheric dispersion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from open burning of agricultural residues in Chiang Rai, Thailand D. Sirithian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0476-x
606. Large role of anthropogenic climate change in driving smoke concentrations across the western United States from 1992 to 2020 X. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2421903122
607. Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric pollutant emissions from open biomass burning with multiple methods: a case study for the Yangtze River Delta region, China Y. Yang & Y. Zhao https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-327-2019
608. Pressure scaling of measured absorption cross-sections by modifying the molecular free induction decay signal A. Makowiecki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.107189
609. Biomass burning at Cape Grim: exploring photochemistry using multi-scale modelling S. Lawson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11707-2017
610. Modelling of air emissions from open burning of municipal waste in Ilorin Metropolis, North Central Nigeria J. Adeniran et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22156
611. Sensitivity of tropospheric loads and lifetimes of short lived pollutants to fire emissions N. Daskalakis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3543-2015
612. Constraining Biomass Burning δ15N(NH3) in the Western United States Using Field-Based Measurements W. Walters et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00348
613. Estimating annual air emissions from nargyla water pipes in cafés and restaurants using Monte Carlo analysis B. Freeman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1662-6
614. Estimation of biomass-burning emissions by fusing the fire radiative power retrievals from polar-orbiting and geostationary satellites across the conterminous United States F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.017
615. Seasonal variations in fire conditions are important drivers in the trend of aerosol optical properties over the south-eastern Atlantic H. Che et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8767-2022
616. Lower-tropospheric CO2 from near-infrared ACOS-GOSAT observations S. Kulawik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5407-2017
617. Measurement report: Observations of long-lived volatile organic compounds from the 2019–2020 Australian wildfires during the COALA campaign A. Mouat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11033-2022
618. The characteristics and origins of carbonaceous aerosol at a rural site of PRD in summer of 2006 W. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1811-2012
619. Energy Efficiency Study of Household Natural Gas Burner Using Pot-Bottom Shield and Modified Pot Arrangement A. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4162401
620. Chemically speciated air pollutant emissions from open burning of household solid waste from South Africa X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15375-2023
621. Carbon monoxide and related trace gases and aerosols over the Amazon Basin during the wet and dry seasons M. Andreae et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6041-2012
622. Size distributions of molecular markers for biogenic secondary organic aerosol in urban Beijing D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121569
623. Estimation of GHGs emission from traditional kilns charcoal production in northwestern Ethiopia: Implications on climate change B. Belay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41015
624. Carbon Monoxide in Optically Thick Wildfire Smoke: Evaluating TROPOMI Using CU Airborne SOF Column Observations J. Rowe et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00048
625. Chemical composition of pre-monsoon air in the Indo-Gangetic Plain measured using a new air quality facility and PTR-MS: high surface ozone and strong influence of biomass burning V. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5921-2014
626. Impact of biomass burning on HONO chemistry and atmospheric oxidation capacity in the Yangtze River delta, China B. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127008
627. ACE-FTS observations of pyrogenic trace species in boreal biomass burning plumes during BORTAS K. Tereszchuk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4529-2013
628. Wildfire Smoke: Health Effects, Mechanisms, and Mitigation Y. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06653
629. Exposures to Carbon Monoxide in a Cookstove Intervention in Northern Ghana R. Piedrahita et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10070402
630. Multiparameter Detection of Summer Open Fire Emissions: The Case Study of GAW Regional Observatory of Lamezia Terme (Southern Italy) L. Malacaria et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7060198
631. Air pollution mitigation assessment to inform Cambodia's first clean air plan P. Sokharavuth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115230
632. Measurements of brown carbon and its optical properties from boreal forest fires in Alaska summer K. Bali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120436
633. Spatial variability in tropospheric peroxyacetyl nitrate in the tropics from infrared satellite observations in 2005 and 2006 V. Payne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6341-2017
634. Biomass burning emission estimation in the MODIS era: State-of-the-art and future directions M. Parrington et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2024.00089
635. Charcoal-production, Air Pollutant Impacts on Ambient Environment and Associated Health Risks: A Systematic Review O. Okimiji https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2024.11.2
636. Contiguous United States wildland fire emission estimates during 2003–2015 S. Urbanski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2241-2018
637. Development of a finer-resolution multi-year emission inventory for open biomass burning in Heilongjiang Province, China B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81092-9
638. Airborne and ground-based measurements of the trace gases and particles emitted by prescribed fires in the United States I. Burling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12197-2011
639. Measurements of ambient hydrocarbons and carbonyls in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), China B. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.03.006
640. Nighttime chemistry of biomass burning emissions in urban areas: A dual mobile chamber study S. Jorga et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15337-2021
641. Uncertainty assessment of remote sensing- and ground-based methods to estimate wildfire emissions: a case study in Calabria region (Italy) J. Castagna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01300-1
642. Size-resolved characterisation of organic compounds in atmospheric aerosols collected at Welgegund, South Africa W. Booyens et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-015-9304-6
643. Analysis of particulate emissions from tropical biomass burning using a global aerosol model and long-term surface observations C. Reddington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11083-2016
644. Aerosol meteorology of Maritime Continent for the 2012 7SEAS southwest monsoon intensive study – Part 2: Philippine receptor observations of fine-scale aerosol behavior J. Reid et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14057-2016
645. Faecal Sludge Briquettes as an alternative cooking biofuel in reducing negative environmental impacts: A study based on Nakuru, Kenya T. Sierat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rset.2026.100159
646. Volatile organic compounds in a typical petrochemical industrialized valley city of northwest China based on high-resolution PTR-MS measurements: Characterization, sources and chemical effects X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.283
647. Gaseous, particulate matter, carbonaceous compound, water-soluble ion, and trace metal emissions measured from 2019 peatland fires in Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan P. Lestari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120171
648. Interannual variability of summertime formaldehyde (HCHO) vertical column density and its main drivers at northern high latitudes T. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6105-2024
649. Top-Down Estimation of Particulate Matter Emissions from Extreme Tropical Peatland Fires Using Geostationary Satellite Fire Radiative Power Observations D. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247075
650. Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa J. Hickman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010
651. Advances in the estimation of high Spatio-temporal resolution pan-African top-down biomass burning emissions made using geostationary fire radiative power (FRP) and MAIAC aerosol optical depth (AOD) data H. Nguyen & M. Wooster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111971
652. Emission factors of selected air pollutants from rice straw open burning in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam P. Hong Phuong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101353
653. High-resolution ammonia emissions inventories in Fujian, China, 2009–2015 S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.027
654. Key challenges for tropospheric chemistry in the Southern Hemisphere C. Paton-Walsh et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00050
655. The influence of biomass burning on the global distribution of selected non-methane organic compounds A. Lewis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-851-2013
656. HONO emission and production determined from airborne measurements over the Southeast U.S. J. Neuman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025197
657. Technical note: Pyrolysis principles explain time-resolved organic aerosol release from biomass burning M. Fawaz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15605-2021
658. Biomass burning and biochar: developments in Sub-Saharan Africa A. Oloruntoba et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2023-0016
659. Fuel-Type Independent Parameterization of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Western US Wildfires K. Sekimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00537
660. Quantifying the high resolution seasonal emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India S. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117165
661. Global carbonyl sulfide (OCS) measured by MIPAS/Envisat during 2002–2012 N. Glatthor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2631-2017
662. Emissions of C6–C8 aromatic compounds in the United States: Constraints from tall tower and aircraft measurements L. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022627
663. Characterizing primary dicarboxylic acid emissions from biomass burning in China: Fuel-Specific signatures and decadal emission trends P. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.128236
664. Floating Patches of HCN at the Surface of Their Aqueous Solutions – Can They Make “HCN World” Plausible? B. Fábián et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp505978p
665. Water-soluble low molecular weight organics in cloud water at Mt. Tai Mo Shan, Hong Kong W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134095
666. A Plant Species Dependent Wildfire Black Carbon Emission Inventory in Northern Eurasia R. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104184
667. An overview of regional experiments on biomass burning aerosols and related pollutants in Southeast Asia: From BASE-ASIA and the Dongsha Experiment to 7-SEAS N. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.066
668. Remote sensing estimates of time-resolved HONO and NO2 emission rates and lifetimes in wildfires C. Fredrickson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3669-2025
669. Atmospheric emissions of typical toxic heavy metals from open burning of municipal solid waste in China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.017
670. Brown carbon emissions from laboratory combustion of Eurasian arctic-boreal and South African savanna biomass A. Mukherjee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16747-2025
671. Power-to-Liquid catalytic CO2 valorization into fuels and chemicals: focus on the Fischer-Tropsch route C. Panzone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2020.02.009
672. Emission characteristics of carbonyl compounds from open burning of typical subtropical biomass in South China C. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140979
673. Comparison of chemical characteristics of 495 biomass burning plumes intercepted by the NASA DC-8 aircraft during the ARCTAS/CARB-2008 field campaign A. Hecobian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13325-2011
674. Photochemical Cloud Processing of Primary Wildfire Emissions as a Potential Source of Secondary Organic Aerosol S. Tomaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03293
675. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2017 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021
676. INFERNO: a fire and emissions scheme for the UK Met Office's Unified Model S. Mangeon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2685-2016
677. How emissions uncertainty influences the distribution and radiative impacts of smoke from fires in North America T. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2073-2020
678. Neural network predictions of pollutant emissions from open burning of crop residues: Application to air quality forecasts in southern China X. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.02.002
679. Characteristics of Particles Emitted from Waste Fires—A Construction Materials Case Study J. Bihałowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010152
680. A transdisciplinary approach to understanding the health effects of wildfire and prescribed fire smoke regimes G. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125009
681. Significant Increase of Aromatics-Derived Secondary Organic Aerosol during Fall to Winter in China X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06408
682. Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for air quality management D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309
683. Chemical characterization of prescribed burn emissions from a mixed forest in Northern Michigan J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00069E
684. Tracer-based investigation of organic aerosols in marine atmospheres from marginal seas of China to the northwest Pacific Ocean T. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5055-2020
685. Polar semivolatile organic compounds in biomass-burning emissions and their chemical transformations during aging in an oxidation flow reactor D. Sengupta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8227-2020
686. Uncertainties from biomass burning aerosols in air quality models obscure public health impacts in Southeast Asia M. Marvin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3699-2024
687. Analyzing the interconnected dynamics of domestic biofuel burning in India: unravelling VOC emissions, surface-ozone formation, diagnostic ratios, and source identification A. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SU00030G
688. A comprehensive review of domestic-open waste burning: recent trends, methodology comparison, and factors assessment B. Ramadan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01430-9
689. Evaluation of Regional Air Quality Models over Sydney, Australia: Part 2, Comparison of PM2.5 and Ozone E. Guérette et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11030233
690. Experimental and numerical investigations of the geometry influence on gas accumulation using a V-shaped forest model B. Coudour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.051
691. The sensitivity of smoke aerosol dispersion to smoke injection height and source-strength: a multi-model AeroCom study X. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-171-2026
692. The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database I. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.038
693. Prenatal exposure to wildfire-related PM2.5 and birth outcomes: A population-based California statewide study L. Song & O. von Ehrenstein https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.120202
694. Estimating emissions from open burning of municipal solid waste in municipalities of Nepal B. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.013
695. Environmental consequences of waste burning in rural mexico: A Simulation-Based case study from the Sierra Norte of Puebla P. Escamilla-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-026-02492-9
696. Airborne observations of trace gases over boreal Canada during BORTAS: campaign climatology, air mass analysis and enhancement ratios S. O'Shea et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12451-2013
697. Urban Air Quality in a Coastal City: Wollongong during the MUMBA Campaign C. Paton-Walsh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9120500
698. A tool for air pollution scenarios (TAPS v1.0) to enable global, long-term, and flexible study of climate and air quality policies W. Atkinson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7767-2022
699. The Relationship Between MAIAC Smoke Plume Heights and Surface PM M. Cheeseman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088949
700. Characterization of isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosols at a rural site in North China Plain with implications for anthropogenic pollution effects J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18983-7
701. Development of the crop residue and rangeland burning in the 2014 National Emissions Inventory using information from multiple sources G. Pouliot et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1268982
702. Satellite-derived emissions of carbon monoxide, ammonia, and nitrogen dioxide from the 2016 Horse River wildfire in the Fort McMurray area C. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2577-2019
703. Efficient biomass cooking in Africa for climate change mitigation and development G. Bensch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.05.015
704. Mortality due to Vegetation Fire–Originated PM2.5 Exposure in Europe—Assessment for the Years 2005 and 2008 V. Kollanus et al. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP194
705. Emissions of Glyoxal and Other Carbonyl Compounds from Agricultural Biomass Burning Plumes Sampled by Aircraft K. Zarzana et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03517
706. Differences between a deciduous and a conifer tree species in gaseous and particulate emissions from biomass burning E. Pallozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.080
707. Simulation of the influence of residential biomass burning on air quality in an urban area E. Siouti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119897
708. Atmospheric Aging of Organic Carbon and Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds Emitted from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion: Effects of Fuel Type and Combustion Temperature Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17060578
709. Chemical properties of emission from biomass fuels used in the rural sector of the western region of India A. Sen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.012
710. VOCs and Odor Episodes near the German–Czech Border: Social Participation, Chemical Analyses and Health Risk Assessment J. Leníček et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031296
711. Top-down CO emission estimates using TROPOMI CO data in the TM5-4DVAR (r1258) inverse modeling suit J. Nüß et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2861-2025
712. Amazonian Biomass Burning Enhances Tropical Andean Glaciers Melting N. Magalhães et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53284-1
713. Six global biomass burning emission datasets: intercomparison and application in one global aerosol model X. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-969-2020
714. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of global fires and their emissions H. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7781-2023
715. Formaldehyde evolution in US wildfire plumes during the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality experiment (FIREX-AQ) J. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18319-2021
716. Modeling the impacts of biomass burning on air quality in and around Mexico City W. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2299-2013
717. Fine Ash‐Bearing Particles as a Major Aerosol Component in Biomass Burning Smoke K. Adachi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035657
718. Comparison of approaches to identify long-range transport of biomass burning in an urban atmosphere M. Ramirez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100438
719. Impact of wildfires on particulate matter in the Euro-Mediterranean in 2007: sensitivity to some parameterizations of emissions in air quality models M. Majdi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-785-2019
720. Evaluation of WRF-Chem-simulated meteorology and aerosols over northern India during the severe pollution episode of 2016 P. Agarwal et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2239-2024
721. A scoping review of gaseous pollutant emissions from solid fuel combustion and vicennial advancement in adsorbent materials for their mitigation programs D. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.efmat.2025.11.001
722. Simulating smoke transport from wildland fires with a regional-scale air quality model: Sensitivity to spatiotemporal allocation of fire emissions F. Garcia-Menendez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.108
723. Observations of the temporal variability in aerosol properties and their relationships to meteorology in the summer monsoonal South China Sea/East Sea: the scale-dependent role of monsoonal flows, the Madden–Julian Oscillation, tropical cyclones, squall lines and cold pools J. Reid et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1745-2015
724. Satellite Monitoring of Anomalous Wildfires in Australia V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.617252
725. Isotopic evidence for dominant secondary production of HONO in near-ground wildfire plumes J. Chai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13077-2021
726. Satellite observations indicate substantial spatiotemporal variability in biomass burning NOx emission factors for South America P. Castellanos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3929-2014
727. The contribution of wildland fire emissions to deposition in the U S: implications for tree growth and survival in the Northwest S. Koplitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd26e
728. Aerosol optical properties and trace gas emissions by PAX and OP-FTIR for laboratory-simulated western US wildfires during FIREX V. Selimovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2929-2018
729. Biomass burning aerosol over the Amazon: analysis of aircraft, surface and satellite observations using a global aerosol model C. Reddington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9125-2019
730. The fate of NOx emissions due to nocturnal oxidation at high latitudes: 1-D simulations and sensitivity experiments P. Joyce et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7601-2014
731. Aerosols from Fires: An Examination of the Effects on Ozone Photochemistry in the Western United States X. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es301541k
732. Comparison of global inventories of CO2 emissions from biomass burning during 2002–2011 derived from multiple satellite products Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.009
733. Smoke radiocarbon measurements from Indonesian fires provide evidence for burning of millennia-aged peat E. Wiggins et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806003115
734. Physicochemical properties and cytotoxicity of brown carbon produced under different combustion conditions K. Atwi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117881
735. Dilution and photooxidation driven processes explain the evolution of organic aerosol in wildfire plumes A. Akherati et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00082A
736. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China H. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.007
737. Real-time measurements of aromatic hydrocarbons at a regional background station in North China: Seasonal variations, meteorological effects, and source implications T. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105371
738. Non-methane volatile organic compounds emitted from domestic fuels in Delhi: Emission factors and total city-wide emissions A. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100127
739. Plume-exit modeling to determine cloud condensation nuclei activity of aerosols from residential biofuel combustion F. Mena et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9399-2017
740. Health Risk Implications of Volatile Organic Compounds in Wildfire Smoke During the 2019 FIREX‐AQ Campaign and Beyond G. Dickinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000546
741. Pollutant emissions from biomass burning: A review on emission characteristics, environmental impacts, and research perspectives K. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.07.012
742. Influence of Southeast Asian biomass burning on ozone and carbon monoxide over subtropical Taiwan Y. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.050
743. Improved simulations of biomass burning aerosol optical properties and lifetimes in the NASA GEOS Model during the ORACLES-I campaign S. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4421-2024
744. Methyl, Ethyl, and Propyl Nitrates: Global Distribution and Impacts on Reactive Nitrogen in Remote Marine Environments J. Fisher et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029046
745. Divergent radiative forcing of fine-mode aerosols across tree genera during wildfires in North America and Europe J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138881
746. Attribution of a typical ozone pollution episode in Handan: WRF-CMAQ modeling and process analysis based on a local emission inventory C. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102862
747. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers J. Poore & T. Nemecek https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216
748. Fine and ultrafine particle emission factors and new diagnostic ratios of PAHs for peat swamp forest fires N. Nim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122237
749. Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region B. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015
750. Historical (1700–2012) global multi-model estimates of the fire emissions from the Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project (FireMIP) F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12545-2019
751. Incorporating Sentinel-1 SAR imagery with the MODIS MCD64A1 burned area product to improve burn date estimates and reduce burn date uncertainty in wildland fire mapping K. Lasko https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1608592
752. Relationships between Particulate Matter, Ozone, and Nitrogen Oxides during Urban Smoke Events in the Western US C. Buysse et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05241
753. Household air pollution and its impact on human health: the case of Vihiga County, Kenya C. Ang’u et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01249-1
754. Firewood residential heating – local versus remote influence on the aerosol burden C. Betancourt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5953-2021
755. Composition and sources of carbonaceous aerosol in the European Arctic at Zeppelin Observatory, Svalbard (2017 to 2020) K. Yttri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2731-2024
756. Climate Disaster and Cognitive Ability: Evidence From Wildfire R. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607128
757. Source apportionment of particulate matter and trace gases near a major refinery near the Houston Ship Channel H. Wallace et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.049
758. Characterization and dark oxidation of the emissions of a pellet stove K. Florou et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00070B
759. Indian Ocean temperature anomalies modulate the interannual variability of springtime smoke aerosols over the Indochina Peninsula Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad932b
760. Domestic Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Natural Gas Stoves as an Important Source of Indoor and Outdoor HONO and NOx W. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6c00059
761. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report A. Archibald et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034
762. Boreal forest fire CO and CH4 emission factors derived from tower observations in Alaska during the extreme fire season of 2015 E. Wiggins et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8557-2021
763. New emission factors for Australian vegetation fires measured using open-path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – Part 1: Methods and Australian temperate forest fires C. Paton-Walsh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11313-2014
764. The vertical distribution of biomass burning pollution over tropical South America from aircraft in situ measurements during SAMBBA E. Darbyshire et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5771-2019
765. Black carbon aerosol dynamics and isotopic composition in Alaska linked with boreal fire emissions and depth of burn in organic soils G. Mouteva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005247
766. Non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning: identification, quantification, and emission factors from PTR-ToF during the FIREX 2016 laboratory experiment A. Koss et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3299-2018
767. Emissions of trace gases from Australian temperate forest fires: emission factors and dependence on modified combustion efficiency E. Guérette et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3717-2018
768. Spatiotemporal variation and distribution characteristics of crop residue burning in China from 2001 to 2018 S. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115849
769. Measurement report: Diurnal and temporal variations of sugar compounds in suburban aerosols from the northern vicinity of Beijing, China – an influence of biogenic and anthropogenic sources S. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4959-2021
770. The pyrohealth transition: how combustion emissions have shaped health through human history F. Johnston et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0173
771. Sensitivity of tropospheric oxidants to biomass burning emissions: implications for radiative forcing J. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50210
772. Emission time and amount of crop residue burning play critical role on PM2.5 variability during October–November in northwestern India during 2022–2024 A. Biswal et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00052A
773. Understanding the Greenhouse Gas Impact of Deforestation Fires in Indonesia and Brazil in 2019 and 2020 A. Datta & R. Krishnamoorti https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.799632
774. Atmospheric biogenic volatile organic compounds in the Alaskan Arctic tundra: constraints from measurements at Toolik Field Station V. Selimovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14037-2022
775. Assessment of Fine Aerosol in Two Different Climate Regions of India Using MERRA-2 Products, Ground-based Measurements, and Machine Learning D. Anand M et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-024-00279-9
776. From BASE-ASIA toward 7-SEAS: A satellite-surface perspective of boreal spring biomass-burning aerosols and clouds in Southeast Asia S. Tsay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.013
777. Long-term variations in PM2.5 emission from open biomass burning in Northeast Asia derived from satellite-derived data for 2000–2013 Z. Shon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.038
778. Impact of 2050 climate change on North American wildfire: consequences for ozone air quality X. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10033-2015
779. A framework for natural resource management with geospatial machine learning: a case study of the 2021 Almora forest fires A. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00293-9
780. Evolution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and oxygenated PAHs (OPAHs) in fresh and aged biomass burning emissions I. Tsiodra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2026.127654
781. ESD Reviews: Climate feedbacks in the Earth system and prospects for their evaluation C. Heinze et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-379-2019
782. Wildland fire emission sampling at Fishlake National Forest, Utah using an unmanned aircraft system J. Aurell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118193
783. Fire and deforestation dynamics in Amazonia (1973–2014) M. van Marle et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005445
784. Spatiotemporal Analysis of Multi-Year Wildfires and Emissions of Trace Gases and Aerosols in Russia Based on Satellite Data V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433820120348
785. Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997 V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26886
786. The atmospheric oxidation of hydroxyacetone: Chemistry of activated and stabilized CH3C(O)CH(OH)OO• radicals between 252 and 298 K J. Orlando & G. Tyndall https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.21346
787. Direct and indirect air pollutant reductions as co-benefits of the energy transition toward carbon-neutrality in India's residential sector S. Yawale et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101143
788. Primary and secondary organic aerosol origin by combined gas-particle phase source apportionment M. Crippa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8411-2013
789. Explosive growth in African combustion emissions from 2005 to 2030 C. Liousse et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/035003
790. Improving regional air quality predictions in the Indo-Gangetic Plain – case study of an intensive pollution episode in November 2017 B. Roozitalab et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2837-2021
791. Black carbon emissions from traffic contribute substantially to air pollution in Nairobi, Kenya L. Kirago et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00400-1
792. Simulating wildfire emissions and plume rise using geostationary satellite fire radiative power measurements: a case study of the 2019 Williams Flats fire A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10195-2022
793. Future climate-driven fires may boost ocean productivity in the iron-limited North Atlantic E. Bergas-Masso et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02356-4
794. Research on aerosol sources and chemical composition: Past, current and emerging issues A. Calvo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.09.021
795. Life Cycle Analysis of Charcoal Production in Masonry Kilns with and without Carbonization Process Generated Gas Combustion S. Miranda Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091558
796. Gaseous and speciated particulate emissions from the open burning of wastes from tree pruning C. Alves et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.04.014
797. Baseline measurements of ethene in 2002: Implications for increased ethanol use and biomass burning on air quality and ecosystems J. Gaffney et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.002
798. Quantifying greenhouse gases from the production, transportation and utilization of charcoal in developing countries: a case study of Kampala, Uganda O. Ekeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0765-7
799. Simulation of fresh and chemically-aged biomass burning organic aerosol L. Posner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.055
800. Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Reaction of 3-Methylfuran with Nitrate Radicals T. Joo et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00068
801. Carbonaceous gas and aerosol emissions from biomass burning in China from 2012 to 2021 Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132199
802. Characterisation of Indoor Volatile Organic Compounds and Its Association with Respiratory Symptoms Among Children Living in Solid Fuel Using Households in Tamil Nadu, India S. Natarajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-022-00588-9
803. Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: comparison of simple and complex representations of the volatility basis set approach M. Shrivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6639-2011
804. An evaluation of advanced baseline imager fire radiative power based wildfire emissions using carbon monoxide observed by the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument across the conterminous United States F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9d3a
805. Development of volatility distributions for organic matter in biomass burning emissions A. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00080F
806. Status and future of numerical atmospheric aerosol prediction with a focus on data requirements A. Benedetti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10615-2018
807. Satellite-Constrained Estimation of Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Guangxi, Southern China (2017–2023) X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9030132
808. Changes from traditional solid fuels to clean household energies – Opportunities in emission reduction of primary PM2.5 from residential cookstoves in China G. Shen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.004
809. Decadal trends of MERRA-estimated PM2.5 concentrations in East Asia and potential exposure from 1990 to 2019 S. Yin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118690
810. Comparative Analysis of Estimates of Carbon Emissions from Wildfires in Russia Based on Global Remote Sensing Products A. Matveev & S. Bartalev https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952525602014
811. Air Quality Impact of Diffuse and Inefficient Combustion Emissions in Africa (DICE-Africa) E. Marais & C. Wiedinmyer https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02602
812. Characteristics of VOC Composition at Urban and Suburban Sites of New Delhi, India in Winter N. Tripathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035342
813. Emission inventory of crop residue open burning and its high-resolution spatial distribution in 2014 for Shandong province, China R. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.009
814. Quantifying the Potential for Low-Level Transport of Black Carbon Emissions from Cropland Burning in Russia to the Snow-Covered Arctic J. Hall & T. Loboda https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2017.00109
815. Transboundary atmospheric pollution in Southeast Asia: current methods, limitations and future developments Q. Chen & D. Taylor https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1493337
816. Absorption of chemically aged biomass burning carbonaceous aerosol A. Tasoglou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.07.011
817. On the Role of Continuing Currents in Lightning‐Induced Fire Ignition F. Pérez‐Invernón et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038891
818. The Fire Inventory from NCAR version 2.5: an updated global fire emissions model for climate and chemistry applications C. Wiedinmyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023
819. The role of semi-volatile organic compounds in the mesoscale evolution of biomass burning aerosol: a modeling case study of the 2010 mega-fire event in Russia I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13269-2015
820. Measurement report: Source apportionment and environmental impacts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in Lhasa, a highland city in China C. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10383-2023
821. Postfire nitrogen balance of Mediterranean shrublands: Direct combustion losses versus gaseous and leaching losses from the postfire soil mineral nitrogen flush M. Dannenmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14388
822. Carbon emissions and radiative forcings from tundra wildfires in the Yukon–Kuskokwim River Delta, Alaska M. Moubarak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1537-2023
823. Potentially underestimated gas flaring activities—a new approach to detect combustion using machine learning and NASA’s Black Marble product suite S. Chakraborty et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb6a7
824. Introducing the VIIRS-based Fire Emission Inventory version 0 (VFEIv0) G. Ferrada et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8085-2022
825. Characterizing the Aging of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol by Use of Mixing Ratios: A Meta-analysis of Four Regions M. Jolleys et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302386v
826. How Do Emission Factors Contribute to the Uncertainty in Biomass Burning Emissions in the Amazon and Cerrado? G. Mataveli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16040423
827. Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon Z. Klimont et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017
828. Emission of volatile organic compounds from residential biomass burning and their rapid chemical transformations M. Desservettaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166592
829. Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx‐impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign E. Apel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022121
830. Parameterization of single-scattering albedo (SSA) and absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) with EC / OC for aerosol emissions from biomass burning R. Pokhrel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9549-2016
831. Biomass Burning is an Important Source of Organic Aerosols in Interior Alaska M. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034586
832. Novel Analysis to Quantify Plume Crosswind Heterogeneity Applied to Biomass Burning Smoke Z. Decker et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03803
833. Can the remote sensing of combustion phase improve estimates of landscape fire smoke emission rate and composition? F. Owsley-Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6247-2024
834. Estimation of black carbon emissions from Siberian fires using satellite observations of absorption and extinction optical depths I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14889-2018
835. Policy solutions to better assess progress toward Paris goals given warming-induced ecosystem emissions, which shorten timelines by 2–5 years B. Buma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101571
836. Anthropogenic VOCs in Abidjan, southern West Africa: from source quantification to atmospheric impacts P. Dominutti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11721-2019
837. Valorization of paddy straw through fermented organic manure: a circular economy approach for low carbon agriculture S. Rathore et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1702102
838. Hindcast experiments of tropospheric composition during the summer 2010 fires over western Russia V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4341-2012
839. Impacts of photochemical ageing on the half-lives and diagnostic ratio of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons intrinsic to PM2.5 collected from ‘real-world’ like combustion events of wood and rice straw burning D. Ray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.079
840. On the sources and sinks of atmospheric VOCs: an integrated analysis of recent aircraft campaigns over North America X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9097-2019
841. Insight into the Primary and Secondary Particle-Bound Methoxyphenols and Nitroaromatic Compound Emissions from Solid Fuel Combustion and the Updated Source Tracers B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04370
842. Investigation of CO, C2H6 and aerosols in a boreal fire plume over eastern Canada during BORTAS 2011 using ground- and satellite-based observations and model simulations D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10227-2013
843. Human transport of thirdhand tobacco smoke: A prominent source of hazardous air pollutants into indoor nonsmoking environments R. Sheu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4109
844. Simulation of airborne trace metals in fine particulate matter over North America J. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116883
845. An Overview on Bioeconomy in Agricultural Sector, Biomass Production, Recycling Methods, and Circular Economy Considerations I. Toplicean & A. Datcu https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14071143
846. Large Enhancements in Southern Hemisphere Satellite‐Observed Trace Gases Due to the 2019/2020 Australian Wildfires R. Pope et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034892
847. Biomass burning spatiotemporal variations over South and Southeast Asia S. Yin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106153
848. PM2.5-bound biogenic secondary organic aerosol tracers over a regionally representative site in central India: Characteristics and sources J. Nirmalkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119516
849. Using A Low-Cost Sensor Array and Machine Learning Techniques to Detect Complex Pollutant Mixtures and Identify Likely Sources J. Thorson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173723
850. Foetal Exposure to Air Pollution and Students' Cognitive Performance: Evidence from Agricultural Fires in Brazil* J. Carneiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12579
851. Emissions of Benzо(a)pyrene and Carbon Monoxide from Forest Fires as a Source of Atmospheric Pollution in Cities of the Irkutsk Region L. Belykh et al. https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2024-5-54-59
852. The use of conservation biomass feedstocks as potential bioenergy resources in the United Kingdom D. Phillips et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.057
853. What’s cooking? Unverified assumptions, overlooking of local needs and pro-solution biases in the solar cooking literature L. Iessa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.007
854. Airborne hydrogen cyanide measurements using a chemical ionisation mass spectrometer for the plume identification of biomass burning forest fires M. Le Breton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9217-2013
855. High- and low-temperature pyrolysis profiles describe volatile organic compound emissions from western US wildfire fuels K. Sekimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9263-2018
856. Landscape fire emissions from the 5th version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED5) G. van der Werf et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06127-w
857. Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE): emissions of particulate matter from wood- and dung-fueled cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other sources T. Jayarathne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2259-2018
858. Source Apportionment of Regional Ozone Pollution Observed at Mount Tai, North China: Application of Lagrangian Photochemical Trajectory Model and Implications for Control Policy Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033519
859. Trace gas and particle emissions from open biomass burning in Mexico R. Yokelson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6787-2011
860. Gaseous and aerosol emissions from open burning of tree pruning and hedge trimming residues: Detailed composition and toxicity A. López-Caravaca et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120849
861. Aerosol vertical mass flux measurements during heavy aerosol pollution episodes at a rural site and an urban site in the Beijing area of the North China Plain R. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12857-2019
862. Detection of Smoke from Straw Burning Using Sentinel-2 Satellite Data and an Improved YOLOv5s Algorithm J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102641
863. Revisiting the global budget of atmospheric glyoxal: updates on terrestrial and marine precursor emissions, chemistry, and impacts on atmospheric oxidation capacity A. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5123-2026
864. Bottom-up emission inventories of multiple air pollutants from open straw burning: A case study of Jiangsu province, Eastern China L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.09.011
865. Pixel-Based Long-Term (2001–2020) Estimations of Forest Fire Emissions over the Himalaya S. Bar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215302
866. Health and climate impacts of policy-driven changes in open crop straw burning during China's summer harvest J. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00164A
867. Modeling Study of the Air Quality Impact of Record‐Breaking Southern California Wildfires in December 2017 H. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030472
868. Ozone and particulate matter enhancements from regional wildfires observed at Mount Bachelor during 2004–2011 N. Wigder et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.026
869. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer P. Monks et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015
870. Evaluation of modeled smoke plumes of wildfires in the Argentinian Patagonia, against satellite observations M. García Ferreyra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126540
871. Acetone Atmospheric Distribution Retrieved From Space B. Franco et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082052
872. Production of Acetylene from Viable Feedstock: Promising Recent Approaches Y. Gyrdymova et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202400247
873. Bootstrap inversion technique for atmospheric trace gas source detection and quantification using long open-path laser measurements C. Alden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1565-2018
874. Origin, variability and age of biomass burning plumes intercepted during BORTAS-B D. Finch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13789-2014
875. Ice‐nucleating particle emissions from biomass combustion and the potential importance of soot aerosol E. Levin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024879
876. Constraining CO2 emissions from open biomass burning by satellite observations of co-emitted species: a method and its application to wildfires in Siberia I. Konovalov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10383-2014
877. An emergency response model for the formation and dispersion of plumes originating from major fires (BUOYANT v4.20) J. Kukkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4027-2022
878. Seasonal cycles of secondary organic aerosol tracers in rural Guangzhou, Southern China: The importance of atmospheric oxidants Q. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.009
879. Major secondary aerosol formation in southern African open biomass burning plumes V. Vakkari et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0170-0
880. Investigating Smoke Aerosol Emission Coefficients Using MODIS Active Fire and Aerosol Products: A Case Study in the CONUS and Indonesia X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JG004974
881. Recent Advancements in the Emission Characteristics of Forest Ground Smoldering Combustion S. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122099
882. Estimating NH3 and PM2.5 emissions from the Australia mega wildfires and the impact of plume transport on air quality in Australia and New Zealand E. Akdemir et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00100K
883. A geospatial approach to understanding clean cooking challenges in sub-Saharan Africa B. Khavari et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01039-8
884. Ground solar absorption observations of total column CO, CO2, CH4, and aerosol optical depth from California's Sequoia Lightning Complex Fire: emission factors and modified combustion efficiency at regional scales I. Frausto-Vicencio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4521-2023
885. Replacing the greater evil: Can legalizing decentralized waste burning in improved devices reduce waste burning emissions for improved air quality? P. Chaudhary et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119897
886. Spatial and temporal variation of air pollutant emissions from forest fires in China R. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119156
887. Inter-comparison of black carbon measurement methods for simulated open biomass burning emissions H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.010
888. Emission factors and composition of PM2.5 from laboratory combustion of five Western Australian vegetation types T. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134796
889. Molecular markers of biomass burning and primary biological aerosols in urban Beijing: size distribution and seasonal variation S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3623-2020
890. Abundance and 14C-based source assessment of carbonaceous materials in PM2.5 aerosols in Guangzhou, South China J. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.09.003
891. African anthropogenic emissions inventory for gases and particles from 1990 to 2015 S. Keita et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3691-2021
892. Long-Term Satellite Monitoring of Various Types of Wildfires and Wildfire-Induced Emissions of Climate-Active Gases and Aerosols in Russia and in Its Large Regions V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433825700161
893. Impact of crop field burning and mountains on heavy haze in the North China Plain: a case study X. Long et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9675-2016
894. Coupling interactive fire with atmospheric composition and climate in the UK Earth System Model J. Teixeira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6515-2021
895. An attribution of the low single-scattering albedo of biomass burning aerosol over the southeastern Atlantic A. Dobracki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4775-2023
896. Organic Vapors from Residential Biomass Combustion: Emission Characteristics and Conversion to Secondary Organic Aerosols R. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15060692
897. An integrated systems model for energy services in rural developing communities N. MacCarty & K. Bryden https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.06.145
898. Scenarios for withdrawal of oil palm plantations from peatlands in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia D. Afriyanti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1452-1
899. Modeling and prediction of fire occurrences along an elevational gradient in Western Himalayas S. Bar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102867
900. Observations of a seasonal cycle in NOx emissions from fires in African woody savannas A. Mebust & R. Cohen https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50343
901. Quantifying immediate carbon emissions from El Niño-mediated wildfires in humid tropical forests K. Withey et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0312
902. Reviews and syntheses: Arctic fire regimes and emissions in the 21st century J. McCarty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5053-2021
903. Imprint of Anthropogenic Sources and Soil Removal on the Surface Concentration of H2 in the Contiguous US F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c04607
904. Agricultural fires in the southeastern U.S. during SEAC4RS: Emissions of trace gases and particles and evolution of ozone, reactive nitrogen, and organic aerosol X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025040
905. PM emissions from open field crop management: Emission factors, assessment methods and mitigation measures – A review J. Maffia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117381
906. Cropland trees need to be included for accurate model simulations of land-atmosphere heat fluxes, temperature, boundary layer height, and ozone A. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141728
907. Escalating carbon emissions from North American boreal forest wildfires and the climate mitigation potential of fire management C. Phillips et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl7161
908. Impact on air quality and health due to the Saddleworth Moor fire in northern England A. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8496
909. Detection of HCOOH, CH3OH, CO, HCN, and C2H6in Wildfire Plumes Transported Over Toronto Using Ground‐Based FTIR Measurements From 2002–2018 S. Yamanouchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031924
910. Detection and attribution of wildfire pollution in the Arctic and northern midlatitudes using a network of Fourier-transform infrared spectrometers and GEOS-Chem E. Lutsch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12813-2020
911. Aerosol Optical Characteristics During the Biomass Burning Season in Southeastern Mexico G. Carabalí et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4284-9
912. NIR Spectroscopy for Non-Destructive Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Warming Potential by Biomass Combustion P. Sirisomboon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18091142
913. Analyzing the Impact of Evolving Combustion Conditions on the Composition of Wildfire Emissions Using Satellite Data L. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105811
914. Contrasting Reactive Organic Carbon Observations in the Southeast United States (SOAS) and Southern California (CalNex) C. Heald et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05027
915. Changes in vegetation ecosystem carbon sinks and their response to drought in the karst concentration distribution area of Asia S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102907
916. Improved methodologies for Earth system modelling of atmospheric soluble iron and observation comparisons using the Mechanism of Intermediate complexity for Modelling Iron (MIMI v1.0) D. Hamilton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3835-2019
917. Performance evaluation of commercially available non-regulatory instruments and sensors in smoke for PM, CO, CO 2 , NO 2, and SO 2 M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2026.2629562
918. Real-Time Identification of Smoldering and Flaming Combustion Phases in Forest Using a Wireless Sensor Network-Based Multi-Sensor System and Artificial Neural Network X. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081228
919. Effects of atmospheric aging processes on carbonaceous species and water-soluble inorganic ions in biomass burning aerosols X. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119322
920. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Biomass Open Burning Emissions in the Greater Mekong Subregion A. Junpen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8080090
921. A sensitivity analysis of key natural factors in the modeled global acetone budget J. Brewer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025935
922. Comprehensive chemical profile and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Buenos Aires: Insights from the southernmost megalopolis P. Lichtig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121236
923. The impact of the 2016 Fort McMurray Horse River Wildfire on ambient air pollution levels in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.008
924. High-resolution and multi-year estimation of emissions from open biomass burning in Northeast China during 2001–2017 Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127496
925. Integrated analysis of elemental speciation, source apportionment, and pollution risk assessment attributable to PM2.5 exposure in Faridabad, India N. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-026-01995-6
926. Long-term variability and source signature of gases emitted from oil & natural gas and cattle feedlot operations in the Colorado front range I. Ortega et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118663
927. Exploratory study of atmospheric methane enhancements derived from natural gas use in the Houston urban area N. Sanchez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.001
928. The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): a high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning C. Wiedinmyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011
929. Modeling study of biomass burning plumes and their impact on urban air quality; a case study of Santiago de Chile G. Cuchiara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.002
930. Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing M. Shrivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000540
931. Inflammatory health effects of indoor and outdoor particulate matter W. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981
932. Semipermeable Elastic Microcapsules for Gas Capture and Sensing S. Nabavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02420
933. Operational chemical weather forecasting with the ECCC online Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System version 023 (RAQDPS023) – Part 1: system description M. Moran et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4137-2026
934. Smoke emissions from biomass burning in Central Mexico and their impact on air quality in Mexico City: May 2019 case study B. Rios et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166912
935. Rate coefficients for the gas‐phase OH + furan (C4H4O) reaction between 273 and 353 K M. Angelaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.21697
936. Biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from vegetation fires P. CICCIOLI et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12336
937. Insights into atmospheric trace gases, aerosols, and transport processes at a high-altitude station (2623 m a.s.l.) in Northeast Asia Y. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120482
938. A Holistic Approach Based on Biomonitoring Techniques and Satellite Observations for Air Pollution Assessment and Health Risk Impact of Atmospheric Trace Elements in a Semi-Rural Area of Southern Italy (High Sauro Valley) R. Caggiano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13091501
939. First High-Resolution Emission Inventory of Levoglucosan for Biomass Burning and Non-Biomass Burning Sources in China J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06675
940. Oxy-Fuel Combustion Characteristics of Pulverized Coal under O2/Recirculated Flue Gas Atmospheres S. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041362
941. Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
942. Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Black Carbon in Peru from the Analysis of Biomass Burning Sources and the Use of Numerical Models A. Moya-Álvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-023-00342-4
943. Global Ensemble Fire Emission Product Version 1.0 (EnsemFire V1.0) Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06429-z
944. Deriving High-Resolution Emission Inventory of Open Biomass Burning in China based on Satellite Observations X. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02705
945. Thermal Behaviour and Emission Characteristics of Arundo donax L. as Potential Biofuel C. Verónica et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10556-5
946. Aerosol composition trends during 2000–2020: in-depth insights from model predictions and multiple worldwide near-surface observation datasets A. Tsimpidi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10183-2025
947. Global emissions of NH3, NOx, and N2O from biomass burning and the impact of climate change C. Bray et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1842822
948. Evaluating the contribution of the unexplored photochemistry of aldehydes on the tropospheric levels of molecular hydrogen (H2) M. Pérez-Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12367-2022
949. Methods, Progress and Challenges in Global Monitoring of Carbon Emissions from Biomass Combustion G. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101247
950. Measuring light absorption by freshly emitted organic aerosols: optical artifacts in traditional solvent-extraction-based methods N. Shetty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019
951. Measurements of CO, HCN, and C2H6Total Columns in Smoke Plumes Transported from the 2010 Russian Boreal Forest Fires to the Canadian High Arctic C. Viatte et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2013.823373
952. Assessment of the effects of straw burning bans in China: Emissions, air quality, and health impacts L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147935
953. Effect of biomass burning over the western North Pacific Rim: wintertime maxima of anhydrosugars in ambient aerosols from Okinawa C. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1959-2015
954. Source apportionment of black carbon using light absorption measurement and impact of biomass burning smoke on air quality over rural central Taiwan: A yearlong study Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101264
955. Emissions of hydrogen cyanide from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles S. Moussa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.050
956. Variabilities in Primary N-Containing Aromatic Compound Emissions from Residential Solid Fuel Combustion and Implications for Source Tracers L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03000
957. Ozone chemistry in western U.S. wildfire plumes L. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl3648
958. Smoke emissions from the extreme wildfire events in central Portugal in October 2017 A. Fernandes et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21097
959. Development of an emission estimation method with satellite observations for significant forest fires and comparison with global fire emission inventories: Application to catastrophic fires of summer 2021 over the Eastern Mediterranean E. Bilgiç et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119871
960. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends P. Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.265
961. Influence of Wildfire on Urban Ozone: An Observationally Constrained Box Modeling Study at a Site in the Colorado Front Range P. Rickly et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06157
962. CO source contribution analysis for California during ARCTAS-CARB G. Pfister et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7515-2011
963. Tracking Smoke from a Prescribed Fire and Its Impacts on Local Air Quality Using Temporally Resolved GOES-16 ABI Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) A. Huff et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0162.1
964. GAMBUT field measurement of emissions from a tropical peatland fire experiment: from ignition to spread to suppression Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF23079
965. Observationally constrained representation of brown carbon emissions from wildfires in a chemical transport model S. Neyestani & R. Saleh https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00059D
966. Global Emissions of Hydrogen Chloride and Particulate Chloride from Continental Sources B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05634
967. Effects of Spring Biomass Burning in the Indochina Peninsula on May Precipitation in South China Q. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2023.155011
968. Greenhouse gas emission from prescribed fires is influenced by vegetation types in West African Savannas V. Yaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73753-6
969. Hydrogenation of Hydrogen Cyanide to Methane and Ammonia by a Metal Catalyst: Insight from First-Principles Calculations M. Hsiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06490
970. Response of the Amazon carbon balance to the 2010 drought derived with CarbonTracker South America I. van der Laan‐Luijkx et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005082
971. A model-ready emission inventory for crop residue open burning in the context of Nepal B. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115069
972. The impact of biomass burning emissions on protected natural areas in central and southern Mexico F. Trujano-Jiménez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12095-y
973. Elevated Environmental Lead Concentrations Following a Major Urban Fire S. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.6c00015
974. Trends and variations in CO, C2H6, and HCN in the Southern Hemisphere point to the declining anthropogenic emissions of CO and C2H6 G. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7543-2012
975. Duff burning from wildfires in a moist region: different impacts on PM2.5 and ozone A. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-597-2022
976. The Global Budget of Atmospheric Methanol: New Constraints on Secondary, Oceanic, and Terrestrial Sources K. Bates et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033439
977. Primary nature of brown carbon absorption in a frigid atmosphere with strong haze chemistry Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112324
978. Brown Carbon Light Absorption over India: Research Status and Need for Discerning Climate Impacts C. Navinya et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00010
979. Proton Transfer Reaction Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometric (PTR-TOF-MS) determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from a biomass fire developed under stable nocturnal conditions F. Brilli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.007
980. Emission factors and chemical profile of I/SVOCs emitted from household biomass stove in China G. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156940
981. Soil smoldering in temperate forests: a neglected contributor to fire carbon emissions revealed by atmospheric mixing ratios L. Vallet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-213-2025
982. Smoke in the Great Plains, USA: an increasing phenomenon with potential policy and health implications H. Starns et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-020-00073-1
983. Global modeling of hydrogen using GFDL-AM4.1: Sensitivity of soil removal and radiative forcing F. Paulot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.088
984. Land Use Change Impacts on Air Quality and Climate C. Heald & D. Spracklen https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500446g
985. Fuel layer specific pollutant emission factors for fire prone forest ecosystems of the western U.S. and Canada S. Urbanski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100188
986. Crop residue burning emissions and cleaner alternatives for air quality in India A. Kumar & K. Pathak https://doi.org/10.1680/jenes.26.00005
987. Formation and loss of light absorbance by phenolic aqueous SOA by ●OH and an organic triplet excited state S. Arciva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4473-2024
988. Primary and secondary organic aerosol in an urban/industrial site: Sources, health implications and the role of plastic enriched waste burning P. Kanellopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.06.012
989. Evolution of Acyl Peroxynitrates (PANs) in Wildfire Smoke Plumes Detected by the Cross‐Track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) Over the Western U.S. During Summer 2018 J. Juncosa Calahorrano et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093405
990. Evaluating Recent Updated Black Carbon Emissions and Revisiting the Direct Radiative Forcing in Arctic X. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081242
991. Comprehensive analysis of emissions from wood and cow dung burning using chemometrics and two-dimensional gas chromatography M. Loebel Roson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143445
992. Ozone Production in the Soberanes Smoke Haze: Implications for Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley During the California Baseline Ozone Transport Study A. Langford et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031777
993. Revisiting global fossil fuel and biofuel emissions of ethane Z. Tzompa‐Sosa et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025767
994. Missing emissions from post-monsoon agricultural fires in northwestern India: regional limitations of MODIS burned area and active fire products T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab056c
995. Intraseasonal variability of greenhouse gas emission factors from biomass burning in the Brazilian Cerrado R. Vernooij et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1375-2021
996. Wildfire-driven changes in the abundance of gas-phase pollutants in the city of Boise, ID during summer 2018 E. Lill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101269
997. Household solid fuel burning emission characterization and activity levels in India S. Pervez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.019
998. Activity and emission inventory of open waste burning at the household level in developing countries: a case study of Semarang City B. Ramadan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01371-3
999. Organic tracers of fine aerosol particles in central Alaska: summertime composition and sources D. Deshmukh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14009-2019
1000. Non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) fingerprints of major urban and agricultural emission sources for use in source apportionment studies A. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12133-2020
1001. Energy efficiency study of household natural gas burner using pot-bottom shield and modified pot arrangement A. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.09.136
1002. Global Emissions of Trace Gases, Particulate Matter, and Hazardous Air Pollutants from Open Burning of Domestic Waste C. Wiedinmyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502250z
1003. Emission Characteristics of PM2.5 and Trace Gases from Household Wood Burning in Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-018-0030-8
1004. Dioxins from Biomass Combustion: An Overview M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9744-5
1005. Global top-down smoke-aerosol emissions estimation using satellite fire radiative power measurements C. Ichoku & L. Ellison https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6643-2014
1006. Prolonged smoldering Douglas fir smoke inhalation augments respiratory resistances, stiffens the aorta, and curbs ejection fraction in hypercholesterolemic mice M. Eden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160609
1007. Evidence for impacts on surface-level air quality in the northeastern US from long-distance transport of smoke from North American fires during the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS) 2018 H. Rogers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-671-2020
1008. Changes in PM2.5 peat combustion source profiles with atmospheric aging in an oxidation flow reactor J. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5475-2019
1009. An improved representation of fire non-methane organic gases (NMOGs) in models: emissions to reactivity T. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12093-2022
1010. Quantitative IR Spectrum and Vibrational Assignments for Glycolaldehyde Vapor: Glycolaldehyde Measurements in Biomass Burning Plumes T. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp311945p
1011. Comparing ECMWF AOD with AERONET observations at visible and UV wavelengths V. Cesnulyte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-593-2014
1012. The Emission Characteristics and Health Risks of Firefighter-Accessed Fire: A Review X. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12100739
1013. Atmospheric OH reactivity in the western United States determined from comprehensive gas-phase measurements during WE-CAN W. Permar et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00063F
1014. Emission estimation of aromatic and halogenated VOCs from household solid fuel burning practices M. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1920-7
1015. Impact of the 2019/2020 Australian Megafires on Air Quality and Health A. Graham et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GH000454
1016. Emission factors for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from laboratory biomass-burning and their chemical transformations during aging in an oxidation flow reactor D. Sengupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161857
1017. Remote‐sensing constraints on South America fire traits by Bayesian fusion of atmospheric and surface data A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062584
1018. Experimental Characterization of Particulate and Gaseous Emissions from Biomass Burning of Six Mediterranean Species and Litter E. Nestola et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020322
1019. High-Resolution Daily Emission Inventory of Biomass Burning in the Amur-Heilong River Basin Based on MODIS Fire Radiative Energy Data Z. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14164087
1020. Measurements of I/SVOCs in biomass-burning smoke using solid-phase extraction disks and two-dimensional gas chromatography L. Hatch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17801-2018
1021. The Carbon Cycle of Southeast Australia During 2019–2020: Drought, Fires, and Subsequent Recovery B. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000469
1022. Measurement of formic acid, acetic acid and hydroxyacetaldehyde, hydrogen peroxide, and methyl peroxide in air by chemical ionization mass spectrometry: airborne method development V. Treadaway et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1901-2018
1023. Observing and understanding the Southeast Asian aerosol system by remote sensing: An initial review and analysis for the Seven Southeast Asian Studies (7SEAS) program J. Reid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.005
1024. The empirical relationship between satellite-derived tropospheric NO2 and fire radiative power and possible implications for fire emission rates of NOx S. Schreier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2447-2014
1025. Global decadal measurements of methanol, ethene, ethyne, and HCN from the Cross-track Infrared Sounder K. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-695-2025
1026. Foreseeing snowmelt responses of the Tibetan Plateau to biomass-burning black carbon from South Asia J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.109031
1027. Long-range PM2.5 pollution and health impacts from the 2023 Canadian wildfires Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09482-1
1028. Field measurements of trace gases and aerosols emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El Niño C. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11711-2016
1029. Global burden of mortalities due to chronic exposure to ambient PM 2.5 from open combustion of domestic waste J. Kodros et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124022
1030. Characteristics, sources of volatile organic compounds, and their contributions to secondary air pollution during different periods in Beijing, China S. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159831
1031. The role of satellite observations in understanding the impact of El Niño on the carbon cycle: current capabilities and future opportunities P. Palmer https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0407
1032. Emisiones de gases contaminantes provenientes de un incendio forestal: caso “La Colonia” Jiguaní, Granma. Y. Rosales Sánchez et al. https://doi.org/10.56124/cct.v2i1.009
1033. Sources of secondary organic aerosols in the Pearl River Delta region in fall: Contributions from the aqueous reactive uptake of dicarbonyls N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.005
1034. Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Emissions: Laboratory Measurement of Aerosol and Trace Gas from Combustion of Manufactured Building Materials K. Benedict et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00217
1035. On the Contribution of Biomass Burning to POPs (PAHs and PCDDs) in Air in Africa G. Lammel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401499q
1036. A national burden assessment of estimated pediatric asthma emergency department visits that may be attributed to elevated ozone levels associated with the presence of smoke J. Pratt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7420-5
1037. Significant contribution of spring northwest transport to volatile organic compounds in Beijing D. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.11.023
1038. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) R. Hoesly et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018
1039. Water Solubility Distribution of Organic Matter Accounts for the Discrepancy in Hygroscopicity among Sub- and Supersaturated Humidity Regimes W. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04647
1040. Assessment of fire emission inventories during the South American Biomass Burning Analysis (SAMBBA) experiment G. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6961-2016
1041. Air Pollution and Climate Forcing of the Charcoal Industry in Africa A. Bockarie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03754
1042. Two decades of fire activity over the PEEX domain: a look from space, with contribution from models and ground-based measurements L. Sogacheva et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2024.2316730
1043. The impact of wildfire smoke on ozone production in an urban area: Insights from field observations and photochemical box modeling M. Ninneman & D. Jaffe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118764
1044. Composition and Biogeochemical Effects of Carbohydrates in Aerosols in Coastal Environment H. Chen & T. Liu https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101834
1045. Biomass burning emissions of trace gases and particles in marine air at Cape Grim, Tasmania S. Lawson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13393-2015
1046. Chemical and optical properties of biomass burning and diesel emissions and their atmospheric aging: A comprehensive chamber study M. Ródenas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121592
1047. Global impact of landscape fire emissions on surface level PM2.5 concentrations, air quality exposure and population mortality G. Roberts & M. Wooster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118210
1048. Litter moisture adsorption is tied to tissue structure, chemistry, and energy concentration A. Talhelm & A. Smith https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2198
1049. New field-based agricultural biomass burning trace gas, PM 2.5 , and black carbon emission ratios and factors measured in situ at crop residue fires in Eastern China T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.010
1050. Costs and impacts of potential energy strategies for rural households in developing communities N. MacCarty & K. Bryden https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.051
1051. Emission factors of selected air pollutants from rice straw burning in Hanoi, Vietnam C. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01050-6
1052. Perennial-GHG: A new generic allometric model to estimate biomass accumulation and greenhouse gas emissions in perennial food and bioenergy crops A. Ledo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.005
1053. Responses of wildfire-induced global black carbon pollution and radiative forcing to climate change X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acff7a
1054. Estimation of Organic and Elemental Carbon Emitted from Wood Burning in Traditional and Improved Cookstoves Using Controlled Cooking Test P. Arora & S. Jain https://doi.org/10.1021/es504012v
1055. Insights into HOx and ROx chemistry in the boreal forest via measurement of peroxyacetic acid, peroxyacetic nitric anhydride (PAN) and hydrogen peroxide J. Crowley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13457-2018
1056. Wintertime Heavy Haze Episodes in Northeast China Driven by Agricultural Fire Emissions X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00940
1057. Emission Factors from Aerial and Ground Measurements of Field and Laboratory Forest Burns in the Southeastern U.S.: PM2.5, Black and Brown Carbon, VOC, and PCDD/PCDF J. Aurell & B. Gullett https://doi.org/10.1021/es402101k
1058. Elucidating real-world vehicle emission factors from mobile measurements over a large metropolitan region: a focus on isocyanic acid, hydrogen cyanide, and black carbon S. Wren et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16979-2018
1059. Enhanced aerosols over the southeastern Tibetan Plateau induced by open biomass burning in spring 2020 Y. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161509
1060. Trace gas emissions from combustion of peat, crop residue, domestic biofuels, grasses, and other fuels: configuration and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) component of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment (FLAME-4) C. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9727-2014
1061. Adverse effects of increasing drought on air quality via natural processes Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12827-2017
1062. Decadal doubling of Siberian methane emissions due to warming-induced fires and methanogenesis S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea5828
1063. Spatial and seasonal variations of secondary organic aerosol from terpenoids over China X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025467
1064. Surface ozone climatology of South Eastern Brazil and the impact of biomass burning events A. Targino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109645
1065. Changes in ozone and precursors during two aged wildfire smoke events in the Colorado Front Range in summer 2015 J. Lindaas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10691-2017
1066. The relationship between fire severity and burning efficiency for estimating wildfire emissions in Mediterranean forests B. Balde et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01599-1
1067. Nepal Ambient Monitoring and Source Testing Experiment (NAMaSTE): emissions of trace gases and light-absorbing carbon from wood and dung cooking fires, garbage and crop residue burning, brick kilns, and other sources C. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11043-2016
1068. HONO Emissions from Western U.S. Wildfires Provide Dominant Radical Source in Fresh Wildfire Smoke Q. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00126
1069. MIXv2: a long-term mosaic emission inventory for Asia (2010–2017) M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3925-2024
1070. Acetone–CO enhancement ratios in the upper troposphere based on 7 years of CARIBIC data: new insights and estimates of regional acetone fluxes G. Fischbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1985-2017
1071. IASI-derived NH3 enhancement ratios relative to CO for the tropical biomass burning regions S. Whitburn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12239-2017
1072. Emission characteristics of refractory black carbon aerosols from fresh biomass burning: a perspective from laboratory experiments X. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13001-2017
1073. The Australian bushfires of February 2009: MIPAS observations and GEM-AQ model results N. Glatthor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1637-2013
1074. Global atmospheric hydrogen chemistry and source-sink budget equilibrium simulation with the EMAC v2.55 model N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-911-2026
1075. Mobile Near-Field Measurements of Biomass Burning Volatile Organic Compounds: Emission Ratios and Factor Analysis F. Majluf et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00194
1076. Global biomass fires and infant mortality H. Pullabhotla et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218210120
1077. Emission Factors for Crop Residue and Prescribed Fires in the Eastern US During FIREX‐AQ K. Travis et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039309
1078. Aromatic acids in an Arctic ice core from Svalbard: a proxy record of biomass burning M. Grieman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-637-2018
1079. Detecting nighttime fire combustion phase by hybrid application of visible and infrared radiation from Suomi NPP VIIRS J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111466
1080. HCOOH in the Remote Atmosphere: Constraints from Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) Airborne Observations X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00049
1081. Iodine chemistry in the chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2-I A. Karagodin-Doyennel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6623-2021
1082. Effects of moisture, bulk density, orientation, and fuel type on the burning characteristics of three vegetative fuel types K. Sung et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104674
1083. Modelling biomass burning emissions and the effect of spatial resolution: a case study for Africa based on the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) D. van Wees & G. van der Werf https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4681-2019
1084. Carbon cycle and climate effects of forcing from fire-emitted aerosols J. Landry et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa51de
1085. Molecular Characterization of Organosulfates in Highly Polluted Atmosphere Using Ultra‐High‐Resolution Mass Spectrometry D. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032253
1086. The costs and benefits of fire management for carbon mitigation in Alaska through 2100 M. Elder et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac8e85
1087. Development of gas signatures of smouldering peat wildfire from emission factors Y. Hu & G. Rein https://doi.org/10.1071/WF21093
1088. Influence of relative humidity and aging on the optical properties of organic aerosols from burning African biomass fuels M. McRee et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2024.2412652
1089. Land management: data availability and process understanding for global change studies K. Erb et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13443
1090. Evolution of trace gases and particles emitted by a chaparral fire in California S. Akagi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1397-2012
1091. Diagnosing spatial biases and uncertainties in global fire emissions inventories: Indonesia as regional case study T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111557
1092. Diagnosing uncertainties in global biomass burning emission inventories and their impact on modeled air pollutants W. Hua et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6787-2024
1093. Global Emissions Inventory from Open Biomass Burning (GEIOBB): utilizing Fengyun-3D global fire spot monitoring data Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3495-2024
1094. Characterization of pollutants emitted during burning of eight main tree species in subtropical China X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116899
1095. Ambient air benzene at background sites in China's most developed coastal regions: Exposure levels, source implications and health risks Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.003
1096. Derivation of greenhouse gas emission factors for peatlands managed for extraction in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom D. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-5291-2015
1097. Direct Observation of HONO Emissions from Real-World Residential Natural Gas Heating in China X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c09386
1098. Evaluating Wildfire Smoke Transport Within a Coupled Fire‐Atmosphere Model Using a High‐Density Observation Network for an Episodic Smoke Event Along Utah's Wasatch Front D. Mallia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032712
1099. A study on wildfire impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and regional air quality in South of Orléans, France C. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.08.032
1100. Diagnostic Ratios and Directional Analysis of Air Pollutants for Source Identification: A Global Perspective with Insights from Kuwait A. Al-Dabbous https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16091101
1101. Size, spatial distribution, and diurnal variations of particulate nitrophenols in the central Yangtze River Delta, China: Implications for their emissions and atmospheric processes C. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127581
1102. Inorganic chemical composition of PM2.5 emissions from the combustion of six main tree species in subtropical China F. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.044
1103. In situ measurements of trace gases, PM, and aerosol optical properties during the 2017 NW US wildfire smoke event V. Selimovic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3905-2019
1104. Effects of biomass briquetting and carbonization on PM2.5 emission from residential burning in Guanzhong Plain, China J. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.031
1105. Technical note: Use of PM2.5 to CO ratio as an indicator of wildfire smoke in urban areas D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12695-2022
1106. Satellite Research of the Effects of Wildfires on Various Vegetation-Cover Types in Russia V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433822120076
1107. Observations and Modeling of NOx Photochemistry and Fate in Fresh Wildfire Plumes Q. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00086
1108. Spatial variations in immediate greenhouse gases and aerosol emissions and resulting radiative forcing from wildfires in interior Alaska S. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1379-0
1109. Identification and quantification of gaseous organic compounds emitted from biomass burning using two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry L. Hatch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1865-2015
1110. Fire decline in dry tropical ecosystems enhances decadal land carbon sink Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15852-2
1111. Daily black carbon emissions from fires in northern Eurasia for 2002–2015 W. Hao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4461-2016
1112. Identification of gas-phase pyrolysis products in a prescribed fire: first detections using infrared spectroscopy for naphthalene, methyl nitrite, allene, acrolein and acetaldehyde N. Scharko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-763-2019
1113. Particulate matter and black carbon optical properties and emission factors from prescribed fires in the southeastern United States A. Holder et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024321
1114. Photochemical ageing of aerosols contributes significantly to the production of atmospheric formic acid Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14813-2023
1115. Experimental wildfire induced mobility of radiocesium in a boreal forest environment J. Martinsson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148310
1116. Ubiquity of Anthropogenic Terpenoids in Cities Worldwide: Emission Ratios, Emission Quantification and Implications for Urban Atmospheric Chemistry A. Borbon et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037566
1117. Characterizing potential wildland fire fuel in live vegetation in the Mediterranean region S. Fares et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-016-0599-5
1118. Diurnal Variations of Isoprene, Monoterpenes, and Toluene Oxidation Products in Aerosols at a Rural Site of Guanzhong Plain, Northwest China X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040634
1119. Comparing Modeled Emissions from Wildfire and Prescribed Burning of Post-Thinning Fuel: A Case Study of the 2016 Pioneer Fire J. Hyde & E. Strand https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2020022
1120. Canadian and Alaskan wildfire smoke particle properties, their evolution, and controlling factors, from satellite observations K. Junghenn Noyes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10267-2022
1121. Estimation of mercury emissions from forest fires, lakes, regional and local sources using measurements in Milwaukee and an inverse method B. de Foy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8993-2012
1122. Qualitative Study on the Observations of Emissions, Transport, and the Influence of Climatic Factors from Sugarcane Burning: A South African Perspective L. Shikwambana et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147672
1123. The impact of organic pollutants from Indonesian peatland fires on the tropospheric and lower stratospheric composition S. Rosanka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11257-2021
1124. Spatiotemporal variation and trend in carbon monoxide concentration over Africa: insights from MOPITT Data C. Okpalaonwuka et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01457-3
1125. Hygroscopicity and Volatility of Biomass Burning Aromatic and Nitroaromatic Compounds M. Amugoda et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.3c00071
1126. Crop Residue Burning Emissions and the Impact on Ambient Particulate Matters over South Korea K. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040559
1127. Changes in Atmospheric Butanes and Pentanes and Their Isomeric Ratios in the Continental United States S. Rossabi & D. Helmig https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027709
1128. Evolution of Reactive Organic Compounds and Their Potential Health Risk in Wildfire Smoke H. Pye et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c06187
1129. Aerosol single scattering albedo dependence on biomass combustion efficiency: Laboratory and field studies S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058392
1130. Contribution of Fire Emissions to PM2.5 and Its Transport Mechanism Over the Yungui Plateau, China During 2015–2019 J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036734
1131. A National Emission Inventory of Major Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases in Thailand A. Junpen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments13050244
1132. Aerosol Mass and Optical Properties, Smoke Influence on O3, and High NO3 Production Rates in a Western U.S. City Impacted by Wildfires V. Selimovic et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032791
1133. Coupling field and laboratory measurements to estimate the emission factors of identified and unidentified trace gases for prescribed fires R. Yokelson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-89-2013
1134. Precursors and formation of secondary organic aerosols from wildfires in the Euro-Mediterranean region M. Majdi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5543-2019
1135. High-resolution historical emission inventories of crop residue burning in fields in China for the period 1990–2013 J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.002
1136. Space-based observations of fire NOx emission coefficients: a global biome-scale comparison A. Mebust & R. Cohen https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2509-2014
1137. Fire Responses to the 2010 and 2015/2016 Amazonian Droughts C. Silva Junior et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00097
1138. Impact of Biomass Burning and Vertical Mixing of Residual‐Layer Aged Plumes on Ozone in the Yangtze River Delta, China: A Tethered‐Balloon Measurement and Modeling Study of a Multiday Ozone Episode Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028994
1139. Morphology of Organic Carbon Coatings on Biomass-Burning Particles and Their Role in Reactive Gas Uptake L. Jahn et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00237
1140. Growing impacts of fire smoke on ozone pollution and associated mortality burden in the United States Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aec2903
1141. How Much Does Large-Scale Crop Residue Burning Affect the Air Quality in Delhi? S. Kulkarni et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00329
1142. Annual emissions of air toxics emitted from crop residue open burning in Southeast Asia over the period of 2010–2015 N. Kim Oanh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.061
1143. Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause a volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke D. Peterson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3
1144. Volatility and Yield of Glycolaldehyde SOA Formed through Aqueous Photochemistry and Droplet Evaporation D. Ortiz-Montalvo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.686676
1145. Connecting smoke plumes to sources using Hazard Mapping System (HMS) smoke and fire location data over North America S. Brey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1745-2018
1146. Particulate and gaseous emissions from charcoal combustion in barbecue grills E. Vicente et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.03.004
1147. Hourly biomass burning emissions product from blended geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites for air quality forecasting applications F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113237
1148. Emissions of nonmethane volatile organic compounds from open crop residue burning in the Yangtze River Delta region, China S. Kudo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021044
1149. Storage stability studies and field application of low cost glass flasks for analyses of thirteen ambient VOCs using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry B. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.05.008
1150. Evaluating Chemical Transport and Machine Learning Models for Wildfire Smoke PM2.5: Implications for Assessment of Health Impacts M. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05922
1151. Utilizing an ecosystem model and satellite data to estimate daily PM2.5 emissions from recent wildland–urban interface fires in California C. Potter et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF25194
1152. Physical and chemical characterization of aerosol in fresh and aged emissions from open combustion of biomass fuels C. Bhattarai et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1498585
1153. Biogenic volatile organic compound ambient mixing ratios and emission rates in the Alaskan Arctic tundra H. Angot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-6219-2020
1154. Air pollution from agricultural fires increases hypertension risk H. Pullabhotla & M. Souza https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2022.102723
1155. Significant chlorine emissions from biomass burning affect the long-term atmospheric chemistry in Asia D. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae285
1156. CO2, CO, hydrocarbon gases and PM2.5 emissions on dry season by deforestation fires in the Brazilian Amazonia S. Amaral et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.023
1157. Impacts of different biomass burning emission inventories: Simulations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations based on GEOS-Chem M. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162825
1158. Air pollutant emissions and sources in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: a provincial scale analysis for years 2013-2019 C. O’Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad359b
1159. Airborne measurements and emission estimates of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents from the 2013 California Yosemite Rim wildfire E. Yates et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.038
1160. Nitrogen isotope signatures of oxidized nitrogen species from biomass burning W. Song & X. Liu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105569
1161. Arctic and Boreal Wildfires Impact Climate by Releasing Ancient Carbon and Light-Absorbing Particles M. Ruppel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c17130
1162. Anthropogenic and biogenic sources of Ethylene and the potential for human exposure: A literature review D. Morgott https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2015.08.012
1163. Seasonal and interannual assessment of cloud cover and atmospheric constituents across the Amazon (2000–2015): Insights for remote sensing and climate analysis V. Martins et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.05.013
1164. High temperature and pressure regime soot: Physical, optical and chemical signatures from high explosive detonations A. Aiken et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2022.2105686
1165. Ozone episodes during and after the 2018 Chinese National Day holidays in Guangzhou: Implications for the control of precursor VOCs J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.09.009
1166. Measurement report: Emission factors of NH3 and NHx for wildfires and agricultural fires in the United States L. Tomsche et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2331-2023
1167. Investigating the links between ozone and organic aerosol chemistry in a biomass burning plume from a prescribed fire in California chaparral M. Alvarado et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6667-2015
1168. Measurements of reactive trace gases and variable O3 formation rates in some South Carolina biomass burning plumes S. Akagi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1141-2013
1169. Of culture, consumption and cost: A comparative analysis of household energy consumption in Kenya, Germany and Spain M. Stoppok et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.12.004
1170. Aerosol size distribution changes in FIREX-AQ biomass burning plumes: the impact of plume concentration on coagulation and OA condensation/evaporation N. June et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12803-2022
1171. Reconstructing Fire Records from Ground-Based Routine Aerosol Monitoring H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7030043
1172. Crop residue open field burning in Pakistan; multi-year high spatial resolution emission inventory for 2000–2014 R. Azhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.03.031
1173. Convergent evidence for the pervasive but limited contribution of biomass burning to atmospheric ammonia in peninsular Southeast Asia Y. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7187-2021
1174. Quantifying O3 Impacts in Urban Areas Due to Wildfires Using a Generalized Additive Model X. Gong et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03130
1175. Simulation of organics in the atmosphere: evaluation of EMACv2.54 with the Mainz Organic Mechanism (MOM) coupled to the ORACLE (v1.0) submodel A. Pozzer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022
1176. Impact of fuel moisture on chaparral emissions under flaming and smoldering conditions S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104687
1177. Wildfires in a warmer climate: Emission fluxes, emission heights, and black carbon concentrations in 2090–2099 A. Veira et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024142
1178. The model study of the wildfire impact on the spatial distribution of deposition of sulfur and nitrogen compounds in Siberia E. Berezin et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373913110046
1179. Aerosol transport from Chiang Mai, Thailand to Mt. Lulin, Taiwan – Implication of aerosol aging during long-range transport M. Chuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.042
1180. Aging of Volatile Organic Compounds in October 2017 Northern California Wildfire Plumes Y. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05684
1181. Climatic variation drives loss and restructuring of carbon and nitrogen in boreal forest wildfire J. Eckdahl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2487-2022
1182. Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions R. Saleh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697
1183. Real-time emission and stage-dependent emission factors/ratios of specific volatile organic compounds from residential biomass combustion in China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105189
1184. Mitigation of air pollution and corresponding impacts during a global energy transition towards 100% renewable energy system by 2050 T. Galimova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.343
1185. Wildland–urban interface co-combustion of biomass, synthetic polymeric materials, and lithium-ion batteries generates a new class of ultrafine soot–metal–PAH hybrid particles M. Rumi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1768652
1186. Sources contributing to background surface ozone in the US Intermountain West L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5295-2014
1187. Temporal and spatial analysis of vegetation fire activity in the circum-Arctic during 2001–2020 X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcar.2023.03.002
1188. Chemical Fate of Particulate Sulfur from Nighttime Oxidation of Thiophene M. Lum et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00164
1189. Emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds from combustion of domestic fuels in Delhi, India G. Stewart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2383-2021
1190. Synthesis of Zeolites from Coal Fly Ash for Removal of Harmful Gaseous Pollutants: A Review X. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.12.0651
1191. Emissions from prescribed fires in temperate forest in south-east Australia: implications for carbon accounting M. Possell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-257-2015
1192. Atmospheric emissions, processes, and impacts of tropical peatland fire haze in Equatorial Asia: A review M. Kuwata https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120575
1193. Spatio-temporal distribution and source partitioning of formaldehyde over Ethiopia and Kenya Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117706
1194. Will Landscape Fire Increase in the Future? A Systems Approach to Climate, Fire, Fuel, and Human Drivers K. Riley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-019-0103-6
1195. Marked isotopic variability within and between the Amazon River and marine dissolved black carbon pools A. Coppola et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11543-9
1196. Atmospheric salt deposition in a tropical mountain rainforest at the eastern Andean slopes of south Ecuador – Pacific or Atlantic origin? S. Makowski Giannoni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10241-2016
1197. Biomass Burning Over the United States East Coast and Western North Atlantic Ocean: Implications for Clouds and Air Quality A. Mardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034916
1198. Chemical characterization of fine particulate matter emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El Niño T. Jayarathne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2585-2018
1199. Smoke emissions due to burning of green waste in the Mediterranean area: Influence of fuel moisture content and fuel mass V. Tihay-Felicelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.04.002
1200. Impact of COVID‐19 Pandemic Lockdown in Ambient Concentrations of Aromatic Volatile Organic Compounds in a Metropolitan City of Western India L. Sahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036628
1201. Predicting Emission Source Terms in a Reduced-Order Fire Spread Model—Part 1: Particulate Emissions A. Josephson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3010004
1202. Aerosols and carbonaceous and nitrogenous compounds emitted during the combustion of dead shrubs according to twigs’ diameter and combustion phases T. Barboni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102988
1203. Emissions of gaseous pollutants released by forest fire in relation to litter fuel moisture content Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119215
1204. Field measurements of trace gases emitted by prescribed fires in southeastern US pine forests using an open-path FTIR system S. Akagi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-199-2014
1205. Transient gas and particle emissions from smouldering combustion of peat Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.008
1206. Impact of the 2016 Southeastern US Wildfires on the Vertical Distribution of Ozone and Aerosol at Huntsville, Alabama B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034796
1207. Emission Ratios for Ammonia and Formic Acid and Observations of Peroxy Acetyl Nitrate (PAN) and Ethylene in Biomass Burning Smoke as Seen by the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) M. Alvarado et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos2040633
1208. Climate mitigation policies for cities must consider air quality impacts R. Commane & L. Schiferl https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2022.02.006
1209. Multi-instrument comparison and compilation of non-methane organic gas emissions from biomass burning and implications for smoke-derived secondary organic aerosol precursors L. Hatch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1471-2017
1210. Chemical characteristics of size-resolved atmospheric aerosols in Iasi, north-eastern Romania: nitrogen-containing inorganic compounds control aerosol chemistry in the area A. Galon-Negru et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5879-2018
1211. A high-resolution inventory of air pollutant emissions from crop residue burning in China X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.009
1212. Overview of the platform for experimentation and awareness-raising on fire risks at wildland urban interfaces (EXPLORII platform) V. Tihay-Felicelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103980
1213. Radiative Effects of Residential Sector Emissions in China: Sensitivity to Uncertainty in Black Carbon Emissions S. Archer‐Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030120
1214. Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions R. Saleh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697-T
1215. The nitrogen budget of laboratory-simulated western US wildfires during the FIREX 2016 Fire Lab study J. Roberts et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8807-2020
1216. Global nitrous acid emissions and levels of regional oxidants enhanced by wildfires N. Theys et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0637-7
1217. A systematic review of the impacts of open burning and open dumping of waste in Ghana: A way forward for sustainable waste management K. Anokye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100152
1218. Quantifying the multi-year impacts of Indo-China Peninsula biomass burning on vegetation gross primary productivity in southern China W. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.119570
1219. Enhancing burned area monitoring with VIIRS dataset: A case study in Sub-Saharan Africa B. Ouattara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100165
1220. Nighttime and daytime dark oxidation chemistry in wildfire plumes: an observation and model analysis of FIREX-AQ aircraft data Z. Decker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16293-2021
1221. Identifying Conifer Tree vs. Deciduous Shrub and Tree Regeneration Trajectories in a Space-for-Time Boreal Peatland Fire Chronosequence Using Multispectral Lidar H. Enayetullah et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010112
1222. A Multipollutant Smoke Emissions Sensing and Sampling Instrument Package for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Development and Testing K. Nelson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2020032
1223. Boreal forest fire emissions in fresh Canadian smoke plumes: C1-C10 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO2, CO, NO2, NO, HCN and CH3CN I. Simpson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6445-2011
1224. New Tropical Peatland Gas and Particulate Emissions Factors Indicate 2015 Indonesian Fires Released Far More Particulate Matter (but Less Methane) than Current Inventories Imply M. Wooster et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040495
1225. Heterogeneous N2O5 uptake coefficient and production yield of ClNO2 in polluted northern China: roles of aerosol water content and chemical composition Y. Tham et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13155-2018
1226. Chemical composition of PM2.5 in October 2017 Northern California wildfire plumes Y. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5719-2021
1227. Premature Deaths in Brazil Associated With Long‐Term Exposure to PM2.5 From Amazon Fires Between 2016 and 2019 M. Nawaz & D. Henze https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000268
1228. Influence of variable oxygen concentration on the combustion derived release of radiocesium from boreal soil and peat J. Martinsson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152725
1229. Dynamic savanna burning emission factors based on satellite data using a machine learning approach R. Vernooij et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023
1230. Impacts of wildfire smoke aerosols on near-surface ozone photochemistry J. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8701-2025
1231. An uncertainty quantification of PM2.5 emissions from residential wood combustion in Italy M. Rao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.12.002
1232. Identifying fire plumes in the Arctic with tropospheric FTIR measurements and transport models C. Viatte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2227-2015
1233. Emissions of organic compounds from western US wildfires and their near-fire transformations Y. Liang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9877-2022
1234. TES observations of the interannual variability of PAN over Northern Eurasia and the relationship to springtime fires L. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065328
1235. An Analysis of Prescribed Fire Activities and Emissions in the Southeastern United States from 2013 to 2020 Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112725
1236. Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2020.1749731
1237. Long term (2005–2016) study of formaldehyde (HCHO) columns from satellite data in two regions in the south of Mexico. Evidence of the impact of agricultural activity C. Mendoza-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100894
1238. Observations of nonmethane organic compounds during ARCTAS − Part 1: Biomass burning emissions and plume enhancements R. Hornbrook et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11103-2011
1239. Biomass burning contributions estimated by synergistic coupling of daily and hourly aerosol composition records S. Nava et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.034
1240. Laboratory characterization of furan, 2(3H)-furanone, 2-furaldehyde, 2,5-dimethylfuran, and maleic anhydride measured by PTR-ToF-MS W. Permar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6645-2025
1241. Measurement report: Formation and brownness of aqueous secondary organic aerosol from the aged biomass-burning emissions in the Sichuan Basin, China C. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4131-2026
1242. Differences in satellite-derived NO x emission factors between Eurasian and North American boreal forest fires S. Schreier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.071
1243. Cloud droplets aid the production of formic acid in the atmosphere J. de Gouw & D. Farmer https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01206-5
1244. Developing a fusion algorithm based on UAV and mobile monitoring to quantify black carbon emissions from various types of planned straw residue burning J. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.122062
1245. Emission inventory of carbonaceous pollutants from biomass burning in the Pearl River Delta Region, China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.055
1246. The covariation of Northern Hemisphere summertime CO2 with surface temperature in boreal regions D. Wunch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9447-2013
1247. New constraints on biogenic emissions using satellite-based estimates of carbon monoxide fluxes H. Worden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13569-2019
1248. Attributed radiative forcing of air pollutants from biomass and fossil burning emissions K. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119378
1249. New emission factors for Australian vegetation fires measured using open-path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy – Part 2: Australian tropical savanna fires T. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11335-2014
1250. Pitfalls with the use of enhancement ratios or normalized excess mixing ratios measured in plumes to characterize pollution sources and aging R. Yokelson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2155-2013
1251. Observations of atmospheric 14CO2 at Anmyeondo GAW station, South Korea: implications for fossil fuel CO2 and emission ratios H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12033-2020
1252. Valorisation of agricultural biomass-ash with CO2 C. Hills et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70504-1
1253. Fires, Smoke Exposure, and Public Health: An Integrative Framework to Maximize Health Benefits From Peatland Restoration M. Marlier et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000191
1254. Measurement report: Molecular composition, sources, and evolution of atmospheric organic aerosols in a basin city in China J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8983-2025
1255. Ozone production from wildfires: A critical review D. Jaffe & N. Wigder https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.063
1256. Food shortage driven crop residue burning and health risk T. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141645
1257. Westerly‑transported Central Asian biomass burning seasonally pollutes cities in Northwest China M. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142866
1258. Application of SCIAMACHY and MOPITT CO total column measurements to evaluate model results over biomass burning regions and Eastern China C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6083-2011
1259. Reconciling Assumptions in Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Approaches for Estimating Aerosol Emission Rates From Wildland Fires Using Observations From FIREX‐AQ E. Wiggins et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035692
1260. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen-Based Cooking Solutions in Remote African Communities—The Case of Kenya N. Schöne et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073242
1261. Molecular composition and the impact of fuel moisture content on fresh primary organic aerosol emissions during laboratory combustion of ponderosa pine needles M. Jaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/EN23013
1262. Tropospheric ozone radiative forcing uncertainty due to pre-industrial fire and biogenic emissions M. Rowlinson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10937-2020
1263. Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular waste management systems A. Gómez-Sanabria et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27624-7
1264. Laboratory study on the characteristics of fresh and aged PM1 emitted from typical forest vegetation combustion in Southwest China Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124505
1265. 中国民用生物质和煤炭燃烧细颗粒物中二噁英的排放特征及排放清单 J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2025.090
1266. Unveiling the elemental composition, sources and health impacts of PM10 over the central Indo-Gangetic plain (IGP) of India P. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2024.103752
1267. Modeling the global radiative effect of brown carbon: a potentially larger heating source in the tropical free troposphere than black carbon A. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1901-2020
1268. Fire Diurnal Cycle Derived from a Combination of the Himawari-8 and VIIRS Satellites to Improve Fire Emission Assessments in Southeast Australia Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152852
1269. Point Cloud Based Mapping of Understory Shrub Fuel Distribution, Estimation of Fuel Consumption and Relationship to Pyrolysis Gas Emissions on Experimental Prescribed Burns M. Herzog et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5040118
1270. Impact of Trash Burning on Air Quality in Mexico City A. Hodzic et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203954r
1271. The contributions of biomass burning to primary and secondary organics: A case study in Pearl River Delta (PRD), China B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.153
1272. Application of Remote Sensing Technology in Wildfire Research: Bibliometric Perspective X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01531-3
1273. High-latitude Southern Hemisphere fire history during the mid- to late Holocene (6000–750 BP) D. Battistel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-871-2018
1274. Assessment of Air Quality Impacts from a Large-Scale Wildfire in Gyeongbuk, South Korea, in March 2025 C. Ma & G. Kang https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2025.41.3.448
1275. FTIR time-series of biomass burning products (HCN, C2H6, C2H2, CH3OH, and HCOOH) at Reunion Island (21° S, 55° E) and comparisons with model data C. Vigouroux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10367-2012
1276. A study of horizontal distribution pattern of particulate and gaseous pollutants based on ambient monitoring near a busy highway A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.08.003
1277. A new method to quantify particulate sodium and potassium salts (nitrate, chloride, and sulfate) by thermal desorption aerosol mass spectrometry Y. Kobayashi & N. Takegawa https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-833-2022
1278. Experimental study of moisture content effects on the transient gas and particle emissions from peat fires Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.07.046
1279. The Pyrogeography of Methane Emissions from Seasonal Mosaic Burning Regimes in a West African Landscape P. Laris et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6020052
1280. Unexpected electrophiles in the atmosphere – anhydride nucleophile reactions and uptake to biomass burning emissions M. Loebel Roson et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP01751F
1281. Models meet data: Challenges and opportunities in implementing land management in Earth system models J. Pongratz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13988
1282. Incorrect interpretation of carbon mass balance biases global vegetation fire emission estimates N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11536
1283. Investigating African trace gas sources, vertical transport, and oxidation using IAGOS-CARIBIC measurements between Germany and South Africa between 2009 and 2011 U. Thorenz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.021
1284. An Approach to Estimate Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Total Columns Mole Fraction from Partial Column Sampling J. Tadić & S. Biraud https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9070247
1285. Modelling smoke distribution in the vicinity of a large and prolonged fire from an open-cut coal mine A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117471
1286. Quantifying charcoal conversion factors throughout the value chain in Malawi and Ghana J. Urban et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108914
1287. Dilution impacts on smoke aging: evidence in Biomass Burning Observation Project (BBOP) data A. Hodshire et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6839-2021
1288. The Human Exposure Potential from Propylene Releases to the Environment D. Morgott https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010066
1289. Province-scale screening identifies differentiated agricultural residue pathways for climate and air pollution mitigation in Indonesia D. Iskandar et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1914597
1290. Gaseous, PM2.5 mass, and speciated emission factors from laboratory chamber peat combustion J. Watson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14173-2019
1291. Human Keratinocyte Responses to Woodsmoke Chemicals N. Karim et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00353
1292. First multi-sensor characterization of fire-emitted potassium spectral signatures from space in low-light and daytime conditions W. Julstrom et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2026.115542
1293. Modeling Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol Atmospheric Evolution and Chemical Aging D. Patoulias et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121638
1294. Australia's Black Saturday fires – Comparison of techniques for estimating emissions from vegetation fires C. Paton-Walsh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.066
1295. Evaluating the Response of Summertime Surface Sulfate to Hydroclimate Variations in the Continental United States: Role of Meteorological Inputs in the GEOS‐Chem Model Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029693
1296. Wildfire burn severity and emissions inventory: an example implementation over California Q. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac80d0
1297. Extracting a History of Global Fire Emissions for the Past Millennium From Ice Core Records of Acetylene, Ethane, and Methane M. Nicewonger et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032932
1298. Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols emitted from peatland fire in Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia (2): Identification of organic compounds Y. Fujii et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.042
1299. Spatial and seasonal variations of isoprene secondary organic aerosol in China: Significant impact of biomass burning during winter X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20411
1300. Contribution of oil and natural gas production to renewed increase in atmospheric methane (2007–2014): top–down estimate from ethane and methane column observations P. Hausmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3227-2016
1301. Cumulative Firefighter Exposure to Multiple Toxins Emitted During Prescribed Burns in Australia K. MacSween et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00332-w
1302. Updated Land Use and Land Cover Information Improves Biomass Burning Emission Estimates G. Mataveli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6110426
1303. Characterization and quantification of atmospheric emissions of dioxins, dl-PCBs and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from municipal solid waste open burning in Southeast Asia N. Kim Oanh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114779
1304. Pollution transport from North America to Greenland during summer 2008 J. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3825-2013
1305. Fine Particle Emissions From Tropical Peat Fires Decrease Rapidly With Time Since Ignition C. Roulston et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027827
1306. Identification of Short and Long‐Lived Atmospheric Trace Gases From IASI Space Observations H. De Longueville et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091742
1307. Municipal waste management systems for domestic use H. Jouhara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.162
1308. Exceptional Wildfire Enhancements of PAN, C2H4, CH3OH, and HCOOH Over the Canadian High Arctic During August 2017 T. Wizenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038052
1309. Emissions from agricultural fires in India: field measurements of climate relevant aerosol chemical and optical properties T. Kapoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EA00104D
1310. Three years of MAX-DOAS observations of glyoxal and formaldehyde in Thessaloniki, Greece D. Nikolis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2026.122138
1311. Near Real-Time Biomass Burning PM2.5 Emission Estimation to Support Environmental Health Risk Management in Northern Thailand Using FINNv2.5 C. Chotamonsak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics14010084
1312. Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from land and forest fire in Indonesia during 2015 based on satellite data A. Pribadi & G. Kurata https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012060
1313. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Plume rise, atmospheric transport, and chemistry processes W. Heilman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.001
1314. Measurement report: Ambient volatile organic compound (VOC) pollution in urban Beijing: characteristics, sources, and implications for pollution control L. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11931-2022
1315. Criegee Intermediate-Mediated Oxidation of Dimethyl Disulfide: Effect of Formic Acid and Its Atmospheric Relevance G. Babu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04730
1316. Seasonal variations of biogenic secondary organic aerosol tracers in ambient aerosols from Alaska M. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.075
1317. Evolution of biomass burning smoke particles in the dark C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.003
1318. County-level of particle and gases emission inventory for animal dung burning in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, China B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133051
1319. Assignment of the Fundamental Modes of Hydroxyacetone Using Gas-Phase Infrared, Far-Infrared, Raman, and ab Initio Methods: Band Strengths for Atmospheric Measurements R. Lindenmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b05045
1320. A method for estimating the ratio of aerosol mass concentration to the imaginary part of the atmospheric complex refractive index and its application R. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105848
1321. Drivers controlling black carbon temporal variability in the lower troposphere of the European Arctic S. Gilardoni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15589-2023
1322. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Emission factors S. Urbanski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.045
1323. The toxicity emissions and spatialized health risks of heavy metals in PM2.5 from biomass fuels burning J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119178
1324. APIFLAME v1.0: high-resolution fire emission model and application to the Euro-Mediterranean region S. Turquety et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-587-2014
1325. Review of emissions from smouldering peat fires and their contribution to regional haze episodes Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF17084
1326. Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Science overview and knowledge needs W. Sommers et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.014
1327. Chemistry and the Linkages between Air Quality and Climate Change E. von Schneidemesser et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00089
1328. Measurement report: Assessment of Asian emissions of ethane and propane with a chemistry transport model based on observations from the island of Hateruma A. Adedeji et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9229-2023
1329. A modeling study of the impact of the 2007 Greek forest fires on the gaseous pollutant levels in the Eastern Mediterranean A. Poupkou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.05.015
1330. Gridded Emissions of CO, NOx, SO2, CO2, NH3, HCl, CH4, PM2.5, PM10, BC, and NMVOC from Open Municipal Waste Burning in India G. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b07076
1331. Emission ratios of trace gases and particles for Siberian forest fires on the basis of mobile ground observations A. Vasileva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12303-2017
1332. Estimating Emissions from Crop Residue Open Burning in Central China from 2012 to 2020 Using Statistical Models Combined with Satellite Observations R. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153682
1333. Net carbon emissions from African biosphere dominate pan-tropical atmospheric CO2 signal P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11097-w
1334. Fine particle pollution during megafires contains potentially toxic elements R. Gill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123306
1335. Black carbon emissions from wildfires on forest lands of the Russian Federation in 2007–2012 N. Smirnov et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373915070018
1336. Multi-pollutant emissions from the burning of major agricultural residues in China and the related health-economic effects C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4957-2017
1337. The U.S. EPA wildland fire sensor challenge: Performance and evaluation of solver submitted multi-pollutant sensor systems M. Landis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118165
1338. Impacts of a large boreal wildfire on ground level atmospheric concentrations of PAHs, VOCs and ozone G. Wentworth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.01.013
1339. Polycyclic Aromatic Carbon: A Key Fraction Determining the Light Absorption Properties of Methanol-Soluble Brown Carbon of Open Biomass Burning Aerosols Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06460
1340. Mass concentration and size distribution of particles released from harvesting and biomass burning of sugarcane S. Dattamudi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20028
1341. The state of wildfire and bushfire science: Temporal trends, research divisions and knowledge gaps M. Haghani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105797
1342. Evaluation of Smoke Exposure Risk from January 2025 Los Angeles Wildfires Using Crowdsourced Data Y. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00277
1343. Natural and anthropogenic variations in methane sources during the past two millennia C. Sapart et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11461
1344. A Collection of Airborne Measurements and Analyses of Trace Gases Emitted From Multiple Fires in California L. Iraci et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EA002116
1345. The Cultivation of Water Hyacinth in India as a Feedstock for Anaerobic Digestion: Development of a Predictive Model for Scaling Integrated Systems D. Bray et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249599
1346. Assessment of gaseous emissions and radiative forcing in Indian forest fires N. Manojkumar & B. Srimuruganandam https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1596387
1347. Direct Radiative Effects of Biomass Burning Aerosols from Key Biomass Burning Regions S. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14060125
1348. Influence of Southeast Asian biomass burning on tropospheric ozone enhancement over southern China K. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.110023
1349. Assessment of Fire Dynamics in the Amazon Basin Through Satellite Data H. Barbosa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020228
1350. Using GECKO-A to derive mechanistic understanding of secondary organic aerosol formation from the ubiquitous but understudied camphene I. Afreh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11467-2021
1351. Evidence for multi-decadal fuel buildup in a large California wildfire from smoke radiocarbon measurements A. Odwuor et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aced17
1352. Wildfire plume ageing in the Photochemical Large Aerosol Chamber (PHOTO-LAC) H. Czech et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EM00280B
1353. Simulation of Optical Properties and Direct and Indirect Radiative Effects of Smoke Aerosols Over Marine Stratocumulus Clouds During Summer 2008 in California With the Regional Climate Model RegCM M. Mallet et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026905
1354. Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis of CO and NO2 Related to Forest Fire Dynamics H. Atalay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020065
1355. Air quality impacts of European wildfire emissions in a changing climate W. Knorr et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5685-2016
1356. Open burning as a source of dioxins M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1320154
1357. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of some firewood trees and shrubs of Eastern India B. Bhatt et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13156
1358. How does burning of rice straw affect CH4 and N2O emissions? A comparative experiment of different on-field straw management practices R. Romasanta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.042
1359. Contributions of Open Biomass Burning and Crop Straw Burning to Air Quality: Current Research Paradigm and Future Outlooks K. Mehmood et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.852492
1360. Characterisation of atmospheric particulate matter over a site in southern Kerala, India - using ATR-FTIR and confocal micro-raman spectroscopy M. Sreejith et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.783
1361. Modeling Regional Pollution Transport Events During KORUS‐AQ: Progress and Challenges in Improving Representation of Land‐Atmosphere Feedbacks M. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028554
1362. Decoding clues on dominant combustion phase and aerosol chemical regimes via key tracers of fire plumes E. Dovrou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44407-025-00032-7
1363. Open fires in Greenland in summer 2017: transport, deposition and radiative effects of BC, OC and BrC emissions N. Evangeliou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1393-2019
1364. Investigating Carbonaceous Aerosol and Its Absorption Properties From Fires in the Western United States (WE‐CAN) and Southern Africa (ORACLES and CLARIFY) T. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034984
1365. Cookstove Smoke Impact on Ambient Air Quality and Probable Consequences for Human Health in Rural Locations of Southern Nepal S. Adhikari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020550
1366. Biomass burning contribution to ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the Chengdu–Chongqing Region (CCR), China L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.067
1367. Satellite‐Observed Impacts of Wildfires on Regional Atmosphere Composition and the Shortwave Radiative Forcing: A Multiple Case Study Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD027927
1368. An Experimental and Master Equation Investigation of Kinetics of the CH2OO + RCN Reactions (R = H, CH3, C2H5) and Their Atmospheric Relevance L. Franzon et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c07073
1369. Characterization of gas and particle emissions from open burning of household solid waste from South Africa X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8921-2023
1370. Assessing formic and acetic acid emissions and chemistry in western U.S. wildfire smoke: implications for atmospheric modeling W. Permar et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00098B
1371. Sugarcane burning emissions: Characterization and emission factors V. Mugica-Álvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.09.013
1372. Assessing the Impact of Wildfire Smoke Transport Through Chemical Transport Modeling, Satellite Retrievals, and Ground-Based Observations of Ozone in Rural Nevada Y. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00037
1373. Opposite impact of emission reduction during the COVID-19 lockdown period on the surface concentrations of PM2.5 and O3 in Wuhan, China H. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117899
1374. Satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia and carbon monoxide: Global distributions, regional correlations and comparisons to model simulations M. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.007
1375. Technical note: Identifying biomass burning emissions during ASIA-AQ using greenhouse gas enhancement ratios J. Miech et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15701-2025
1376. Emission factors and optical properties of black and brown carbon emitted at a mixed-conifer forest prescribed burn J. Butler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-839-2026
1377. Addressing firefighter concerns: unraveling the complexities of bushfire smoke composition and toxicity M. Desservettaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF25138
1378. From Measurements to Models: Toward Accurate Representation of Brown Carbon in Climate Calculations R. Saleh https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00139-3
1379. Estimation of CO2 Emissions from Wildfires Using OCO-2 Data M. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10100581
1380. Evaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe in 2005 M. Prank et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6041-2016
1381. Radiative effect and climate impacts of brown carbon with the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM5) H. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17745-2018
1382. Assessing the representation of the Australian carbon cycle in global vegetation models L. Teckentrup et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021
1383. New Inventories of Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions through Biomass Burning in 2001–2020 T. Shiraishi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13101914
1384. Forecasting the regional fire radiative power for regularly ignited vegetation fires T. Partanen & M. Sofiev https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1335-2022
1385. Permafrost and wildfire carbon emissions indicate need for additional action to keep Paris Agreement temperature goals within reach C. Schädel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03189-5
1386. Progress and Challenges in Quantifying Wildfire Smoke Emissions, Their Properties, Transport, and Atmospheric Impacts I. Sokolik et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029878
1387. New Emission Factors and Efficiencies from in-Field Measurements of Traditional and Improved Cookstoves and Their Potential Implications E. Coffey et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02436
1388. Receptor modelling and risk assessment of volatile organic compounds measured at a regional background site in South Africa K. Jaars et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.047
1389. The Characteristics of Gas and Particulate Emissions from Smouldering Combustion in the Pinus pumila Forest of Huzhong National Nature Reserve of the Daxing’an Mountains S. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020364
1390. Satellite Monitoring of Multiyear Wildfires and Related Emissions of Harmful Trace Gases into the Air Environment of Australia V. Bondur et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433821090449
1391. Source and variability of formaldehyde (HCHO) at northern high latitudes: an integrated satellite, aircraft, and model study T. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7163-2022
1392. Weekly derived top-down volatile-organic-compound fluxes over Europe from TROPOMI HCHO data from 2018 to 2021 G. Oomen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-449-2024
1393. Using geostationary-satellite-derived sub-daily fire radiative power variability versus prescribed diurnal cycles to assess the impact of African fires on tropospheric ozone H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17501-2025
1394. Emissions of carbon monoxide and dioxide from decomposing grass clippings – case study of football turfs Ł. Sobol et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1632196
1395. Enhanced aerosol particle growth sustained by high continental chlorine emission in India S. Gunthe et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00677-x
1396. Estimating emissions from agricultural fires in the North China Plain based on MODIS fire radiative power M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.058
1397. Global wildfire emissions and health impacts Y. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2026.100158
1398. Large unexplained suite of chemically reactive compounds present in ambient air due to biomass fires V. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-19139-3
1399. Emission characteristics of indoor HONO from residential natural gas cooking stoves in a household in Kunming, China H. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138661
1400. Particulate and trace gas emissions from prescribed burns in southeastern U.S. fuel types: Summary of a 5-year project D. Weise et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.02.016
1401. Bottom-up evaluation of the regional methane budget of northern lands from 1980 to 2015 A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100558
1402. Effects of Wildfire Smoke on Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) and PM2.5 Composition in a United States Intermountain Western Valley and Estimation of Human Health Risk D. Ketcherside et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101172
1403. Estimating emissions from crop residue open burning in China based on statistics and MODIS fire products J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2015.08.024
1404. Black Carbon Emissions from the Siberian Fires 2019: Modelling of the Atmospheric Transport and Possible Impact on the Radiation Balance in the Arctic Region S. Kostrykin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12070814
1405. Peat Fire Detection to Estimate Greenhouse Gas Emissions A. Sirin et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S106837392210003X
1406. Characterization and seasonal variations of levoglucosan in fine particulate matter in Xi’an, China T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.944959
1407. Insights into Pyrocumulus aerosol composition: black carbon content and organic vapor condensation K. Gorkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00130J
1408. Seasonal and Diurnal Air Pollution from Residential Cooking and Space Heating in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau E. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00082
1409. Emission drivers and variability of ambient isoprene, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in north-west India during monsoon season A. Mishra & V. Sinha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115538
1410. Monitoring impacts of clean cookstoves and fuels with the Fuel Use Electronic Logger (FUEL): Results of pilot testing J. Ventrella & N. MacCarty https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.06.004
1411. Accelerated rise in wildfire carbon emissions from Arctic continuous permafrost X. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.05.022
1412. Insight Study of Trace Elements in PM2.5 During Nine Years in Delhi, India: Seasonal Variation, Source Apportionment, and Health Risks Assessment S. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-024-01070-0
1413. Efficient Biomass Cooking in Africa for Climate Change Mitigation and Development G. Bensch et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919098
1414. Assessing the potential of a Trichoderma-based compost activator to hasten the decomposition of incorporated rice straw N. Organo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03828-1
1415. Laboratory benchmark of low-cost portable gas and particle analysers at the source of smouldering wildfires W. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22150
1416. Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Prescribed Burning in Tallgrass Prairie Ecosystems A. Whitehill et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10080464
1417. Annual vegetation burns across the northern savanna region of Ghana: period of occurrence, area burns, nutrient losses and emissions J. Kugbe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-012-9514-0
1418. Effect of forest floor fuel moisture content on chemical components of PM2.5 emitted during combustion Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130547
1419. Emission of Air Pollutants from Rice Residue Open Burning in Thailand, 2018 A. Junpen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110449
1420. Atmospheric methane isotopic record favors fossil sources flat in 1980s and 1990s with recent increase A. Rice et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522923113
1421. Emissions of Fine Particle Fluoride from Biomass Burning T. Jayarathne et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502933j
1422. Atmospheric ammonia retrieval from the TANSO-FTS/GOSAT thermal infrared sounder Y. Someya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020
1423. Estimated Black Carbon Emissions from Priority Source Categories in Russia V. Ginzburg et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373922100065
1424. Ambient air quality in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, during the pre-monsoon: concentrations and sources of particulate matter and trace gases M. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2927-2020
1425. Determination of Emission Factors of Pollutants From Biomass Burning of African Fuels in Laboratory Measurements R. Pokhrel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034731
1426. Estimates of greenhouse gas and black carbon emissions from a major Australian wildfire with high spatiotemporal resolution N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025087
1427. Observations of Isocyanate, Amide, Nitrate, and Nitro Compounds From an Anthropogenic Biomass Burning Event Using a ToF‐CIMS M. Priestley et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027316
1428. Sources and formation of carbonaceous aerosols in Xi'an, China: primary emissions and secondary formation constrained by radiocarbon H. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15609-2019
1429. Does Black Carbon Contribute to Eutrophication in Large Lakes? M. Odhiambo & J. Routh https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0042-4
1430. Contribution of landfill fires to air pollution – An assessment methodology J. Bihałowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.046
1431. Long-term high frequency measurements of ethane, benzene and methyl chloride at Ragged Point, Barbados: Identification of long-range transport events A. Archibald et al. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000068
1432. Biomass burning drives atmospheric nutrient redistribution within forested peatlands in Borneo A. Ponette-González et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/8/085003
1433. Small fires, big gap: High-resolution VIIRS data reveal widespread underestimation of emissions in sub-Saharan Africa B. Ouattara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomat.2025.100069
1434. Upper-tropospheric pollutants observed by MIPAS: geographic and seasonal variations N. Glatthor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1175-2025
1435. Near-field emission profiling of tropical forest and Cerrado fires in Brazil during SAMBBA 2012 A. Hodgson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5619-2018
1436. Global crop waste burning – micro-biochar; how a small community development organization learned experientially to address a huge problem one tiny field at a time M. Shafer https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00037-y
1437. Ground‐Based Field Measurements of PM2.5 Emission Factors From Flaming and Smoldering Combustion in Eucalypt Forests F. Reisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028488
1438. Assessing BC and CO emissions from China using EMeRGe aircraft observations and WRF/CMAQ modelling P. Ha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13429-2025
1439. Modelling and mitigating dose to firefighters from inhalation of radionuclides in wildland fire smoke B. Viner et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14181
1440. Impact of wildfires on SO2 detoxification mechanisms in leaves of oak and beech trees J. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116389
1441. Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Peat Combustion in Wildfires on Indonesian Peatlands, and Their Uncertainty M. Rodríguez Vásquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006218
1442. Assessment of isoprene and near-surface ozone sensitivities to water stress over the Euro-Mediterranean region S. Strada et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13301-2023
1443. Air quality simulations of wildfires in the Pacific Northwest evaluated with surface and satellite observations during the summers of 2007 and 2008 F. Herron-Thorpe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12533-2014
1444. Emission factors of trace gases and particles from tropical savanna fires in Australia M. Desservettaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025925
1445. A study of emissions and marker gases from smouldering combustion in Larix gmelinii plantations of the Daxing’an Mountains S. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-021-01323-x