590 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A Simple Carbon Cycle Representation for Economic and Policy Analyses M. Glotter et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2331074
2. We are losing the climate change mitigation challenge; Is it too late to recover? F. Princiotta https://doi.org/10.1557/mre.2017.5
3. A new scenario resource for integrated 1.5 °C research D. Huppmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0317-4
4. Investigating carbon and nitrogen conservation in reported CMIP6 Earth system model data G. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2111-2025
5. Fast climate impact emulation for global temperature scenarios with the rapid impact model emulator (RIME) E. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/adee3d
6. Strengthening forecasts of climate change impacts with multi‐model ensemble averaged projections using MAGICC/SCENGEN 5.3 D. Fordham et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07398.x
7. Assessing socioeconomic risks of climate change through integrated modelling J. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2026.100140
8. Contributions of developed and developing countries to global climate forcing and surface temperature change D. Ward & N. Mahowald https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/7/074008
9. Questions of bias in climate models S. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2345
10. Fair carbon removal obligations under climate response uncertainty G. Ganti et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2481138
11. The benefits of climate change mitigation in integrated assessment models: the role of the carbon cycle and climate component A. Hof et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0363-7
12. Implications of alternative assumptions regarding future air pollution control in scenarios similar to the Representative Concentration Pathways C. Chuwah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.008
13. Climate Extreme Versus Carbon Extreme: Responses of Terrestrial Carbon Fluxes to Temperature and Precipitation S. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005252
14. Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement N. Höhne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01142-2
15. Challenges and Prospects for Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Pathways Consistent With the Paris Agreement S. Leahy et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00069
16. Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1385
17. Atmospheric methane underestimated in future climate projections T. Kleinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1814
18. Fldgen v1.0: an emulator with internal variability and space–time correlation for Earth system models R. Link et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1477-2019
19. A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4537-2018
20. Future sea level rise constrained by observations and long-term commitment M. Mengel et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500515113
21. Multi-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime D. Johansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4
22. Marine carbon sink dominated by biological pump after temperature overshoot W. Koeve et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01541-y
23. The Zero Emissions Commitment and climate stabilization S. Palazzo Corner et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2023.1170744
24. Future potential distribution and expansion trends of highland barley under climate change in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau (QTP) Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108702
25. Consistent assessments of pathways toward sustainable development and climate stabilization K. Akimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2012.01460.x
26. Some Contributions of Integrated Assessment Models of Global Climate Change J. Weyant https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew018
27. Coupling an integrated assessment model with an input–output database N. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2024.2387023
28. China Can Achieve Carbon Neutrality in Line with the Paris Agreement’s 2 °C Target: Navigating Global Emissions Scenarios, Warming Levels, and Extreme Event Projections X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.023
29. Implications of potentially lower climate sensitivity on climate projections and policy J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/031003
30. The world's biggest gamble J. Rockström et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000392
31. Integrated assessment of climate change: state of the literature J. Weyant https://doi.org/10.1515/jbca-2014-9002
32. The impact of human health co-benefits on evaluations of global climate policy N. Scovronick et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09499-x
33. A probabilistic quantification of the anthropogenic component of twentieth century global warming T. Wigley & B. Santer https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1585-8
34. How do carbon cycle uncertainties affect IPCC temperature projections? R. Bodman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.648
35. A probabilistic study of the return of stratospheric ozone to 1960 levels A. Södergren et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069700
36. Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability R. Roman-Cuesta et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02494-9
37. An analytical framework to price long‐dated climate‐exposed assets P. Chikhani & J. Renne https://doi.org/10.3982/QE2570
38. Improving reduced complexity model assessment and usability M. Sarofim et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00973-9
39. Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: a multi-model analysis F. Joos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2793-2013
40. Solution algorithms for regional interactions in large-scale integrated assessment models of climate change M. Leimbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2340-z
41. Evaluating the near- and long-term role of carbon dioxide removal in meeting global climate objectives G. Ganti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01527-z
42. Climate and carbon budget implications of linked future changes in CO 2 and non-CO 2 forcing F. Feijoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab08a9
43. Hedging our bet on forest permanence for the economic viability of climate targets M. Windisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57607-x
44. Net zero-emission pathways reduce the physical and economic risks of climate change L. Drouet et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01218-z
45. The Energy Modeling Forum (EMF)-30 study on short-lived climate forcers: introduction and overview S. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02938-5
46. Hector V3.2.0: functionality and performance of a reduced-complexity climate model K. Dorheim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4855-2024
47. Statistical modelling of extreme daily rainfall over Aotearoa New Zealand S. Rosier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100799
48. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 B. O'Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
49. The Energy-Water-Food Nexus D. Keairns et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-080615-033539
50. A theoretical framework to understand sources of error in Earth System Model emulation C. Womack et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-107-2026
51. Source Attributions of Radiative Forcing by Regions, Sectors, and Climate Forcers X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3912948
52. A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0286-2
53. Climate sensitivity from radiative-convective equilibrium: A chalkboard approach N. Jeevanjee https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0135727
54. Improving terrestrial carbon flux simulations with machine learning and global Earth observations C. Seiler https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-651-2026
55. Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas H. McJeon et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13837
56. OPTIMAL CLIMATE POLICY IN 3D: MITIGATION, CARBON REMOVAL, AND SOLAR GEOENGINEERING M. BELAIA et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007821500081
57. Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris H. Schellnhuber et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3013
58. Integrated impact of climate change on health outcomes and economic stability in PEPFAR-supported African countries S. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag050
59. AR6 updates to RF by GHGs and aerosols lowers the probability of accomplishing the Paris Agreement compared to AR5 formulations E. Farago et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1739-2025
60. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Areas Suitable to Grow Some Key Crops in New Jersey, USA K. Ngoy & D. Shebitz https://doi.org/10.3390/environments7100076
61. Global-scale climate impact functions: the relationship between climate forcing and impact N. Arnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1034-7
62. Risk to rely on soil carbon sequestration to offset global ruminant emissions Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43452-3
63. Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era R. Kopp et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517056113
64. Modeling Uncertainty in Climate Change: A Multi-Model Comparison K. Gillingham et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2743137
65. Reducing sectoral hard-to-abate emissions to limit reliance on carbon dioxide removal O. Edelenbosch et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02025-y
66. How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming? A. Reisinger & H. Clark https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13975
67. Global sustainability scenarios lead to regionally different outcomes for terrestrial biodiversity G. Ambrósio et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad73eb
68. Identification of Linear Climate Models from the CMIP3 Multimodel Ensemble S. Weller et al. https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.01929
69. If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various climate strategies D. van Vuuren & E. Stehfest https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0769-5
70. The climate impacts and potential benefits of services export growth in developing countries R. Huang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169775
71. Addressing methane emission feedbacks from global wetlands E. Ury et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01625-6
72. DICE and the Carbon Budget for Ambitious Climate Targets C. Azar & D. Johansson https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002041
73. Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios D. Gernaat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.010
74. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2868
75. High-income groups disproportionately contribute to climate extremes worldwide S. Schöngart et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02325-x
76. Long-term forest-sector mitigation and radiative forcing under contrasting management, climate, and substitution pathways I. Boukhris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129586
77. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions R. Millar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7213-2017
78. A comprehensive view on climate change: coupling of earth system and integrated assessment models D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024012
79. An integrated approach to quantifying uncertainties in the remaining carbon budget H. Damon Matthews et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00064-9
80. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C R. Millar et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3031
81. Global Warming and Socioeconomic Activities: Impact of Labor Productivity K. Matsumoto https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3219603
82. Projection of the Airborne CO2 Concentration by Land/Ocean Absorption Dynamics and Fossil-Fuel Reserve Depletion E. Canuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-024-09985-7
83. A note on effects of fossil fuel reduction policies on atmospheric carbon dioxide buildup and global warming B. Alagoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2026.106724
84. ACE—Analytic Climate Economy C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20210297
85. Analytically tractable climate–carbon cycle feedbacks under 21st century anthropogenic forcing S. Lade et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-507-2018
86. Ocean liming can help achieve the Paris climate target J. Strefler et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adf12c
87. Integrated human-earth system modeling—state of the science and future directions K. Calvin & B. Bond-Lamberty https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac642
88. Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation B. Samset et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17001-1
89. Trade-offs between water needs for food, utilities, and the environment—a nexus quantification at different scales L. de Vos et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2b5e
90. Assessing the feasibility of sprinkler irrigation schemes and their adaptation to future climate change in groundwater over-exploitation regions X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108674
91. Understanding the causes and consequences of past marine carbon cycling variability through models D. Hülse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.004
92. Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality M. Harmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02800-8
93. Global and regional climate responses to national-committed emission reductions under the Paris agreement F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.2018.1488538
94. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways G. Luderer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0198-6
95. Description and Evaluation of the MIT Earth System Model (MESM) A. Sokolov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001277
96. From global to national scenarios: Bridging different models to explore power generation decarbonisation based on insights from socio-technical transition case studies A. Hof et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119882
97. A Scaling Approach to Probabilistic Assessment of Regional Climate Change K. Frieler et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00199.1
98. Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets A. Harper et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z
99. TEMPERATURE AND ENERGY SECURITY: WILL FOREST BIOMASS HELP IN THE FUTURE? A. FAVERO et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007823500185
100. A temperature binning approach for multi-sector climate impact analysis M. Sarofim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03048-6
101. ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF CHANGES IN METHANE CONCENTRATION ON TROPOSPHERIC OZONE CONCENTRATIONS USING LONG⁻TERM FUTURE SCENARIO H. WATANABE et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.25-27036
102. Radiative forcing in the ACCMIP historical and future climate simulations D. Shindell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2939-2013
103. The Climate Mitigation Challenge-Where Do We Stand? F. Princiotta https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1948458
104. Changes in terrestrial water stress and contributions of major factors under temperature rise constraint scenarios A. Hayashi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9780-5
105. Temperature responses from methane mitigation approaches vary widely due to non-methane impacts S. Abernethy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad60e0
106. Bringing it all together: science priorities for improved understanding of Earth system change and to support international climate policy C. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1319-2024
107. Opportunities beyond net-zero CO2 for cost-effective greenhouse gas mitigation in China Y. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2024.08.012
108. REMIND-PyPSA-Eur: integrating power system flexibility into sector-coupled energy transition pathways A. Odenweller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/ae3ffe
109. Estimating the Likelihood of GHG Concentration Scenarios From Probabilistic Integrated Assessment Model Simulations D. Huard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002715
110. Economic assessment of SRM under socio-political and geophysical tipping dynamics F. Estrada et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae33df
111. Spatial Climate-Economic Models in the Design of Optimal Climate Policies Across Locations W. Brock et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2175480
112. Deep learning for stochastic precipitation generation – deep SPG v1.0 L. Bird et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3785-2023
113. Synthesizing global carbon–nitrogen coupling effects – the MAGICC coupled carbon–nitrogen cycle model v1.0 G. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2193-2025
114. Quantification of temperature response to CO2 forcing in atmosphere–ocean general circulation models J. Tsutsui https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1832-9
115. Reservoir CO2 and CH4 emissions and their climate impact over the period 1900–2060 C. Soued et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01004-2
116. Stranded on a low-carbon planet: Implications of climate policy for the phase-out of coal-based power plants N. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028
117. Rising Air-Conditioning Use Intensifies Global Warming H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69393-1
118. A human-scale perspective on global warming: Zero emission year and personal quotas A. de la Fuente et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179705
119. Impact of short-lived non-CO 2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075001
120. Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 °C and 2 °C C. Schleussner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-327-2016
121. Timing Is Everything: How Economists Can Better Address the Urgency of Stronger Climate Policy L. Goulder https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez014
122. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview K. Riahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
123. Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress G. Grassi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
124. Attributing long-term sea-level rise to Paris Agreement emission pledges A. Nauels et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1907461116
125. CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool M. Sandstad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024
126. Economic impacts of alternative greenhouse gas emission metrics: a model-based assessment J. Strefler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1188-y
127. A method to encapsulate model structural uncertainty in ensemble projections of future climate: EPIC v1.0 J. Lewis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4563-2017
128. Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage T. Wigley https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0217-3
129. Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals Y. Robiou du Pont et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3186
130. Evaluating the accuracy of climate change pattern emulation for low warming targets C. Tebaldi & R. Knutti https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabef2
131. MEDEAS: a new modeling framework integrating global biophysical and socioeconomic constraints I. Capellán-Pérez et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE02627D
132. The role of history and strength of the oceanic forcing in sea level projections from Antarctica with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model R. Reese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3097-2020
133. Future changes in global warming potentials under representative concentration pathways A. Reisinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024020
134. The Importance of the Montreal Protocol in Mitigating the Potential Intensity of Tropical Cyclones L. Polvani et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0232.1
135. Faculty of Business Administration and Economics A. Greiner https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5187034
136. Incremental improvements of 2030 targets insufficient to achieve the Paris Agreement goals A. Geiges et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-697-2020
137. It Is Still Possible to Achieve the Paris Climate Agreement: Regional, Sectoral, and Land-Use Pathways S. Teske et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082103
138. Climate-induced mortality projections in Europe: Estimation and valuation of heat-related deaths P. Ignjačević et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104692
139. Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity using observationally constrained simple climate models R. Bodman & R. Jones https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.397
140. Interactive Visualization of Large Turbulent Flow as a Cloud Service T. Hobson et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2021.3091387
141. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3
142. Ocean Acidification Alters the Acute Stress Response of a Marine Fish A. Servili et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4116088
143. Is Workplace Temperature a Valuable Job Amenity? Implications for Climate Change A. Rode et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4882247
144. CLIMRISK-RIVER: Accounting for local river flood risk in estimating the economic cost of climate change P. Ignjacevic et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104784
145. Quantifying food security and mitigation risks consequential to climate change impacts on crop yields H. Luchtenbelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad97d3
146. Global carbon cycle: model complexity and BIBO stability E. Canuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.08.162
147. Multi-criteria analysis of nuclear power in the global energy system: Assessing trade-offs between simultaneously attainable economic, environmental and social goals M. Lehtveer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2015.09.004
148. Can air pollutant controls change global warming? J. Strefler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.009
149. Regional energy diversity and sovereignty in different 2 °C and 1.5 °C pathways A. Hof et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122197
150. Cost and attainability of meeting stringent climate targets without overshoot K. Riahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01215-2
151. Welfare in the 21st century: Increasing development, reducing inequality, the impact of climate change, and the cost of climate policies B. Lomborg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119981
152. Quantifying aggregated economic damages from “fat-tail” extremes high-temperature events in climate change H. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.05.007
153. Description of the REMIND Model (Version 1.6) G. Luderer et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2697070
154. Assessing carbon cycle projections from complex and simple models under SSP scenarios I. Melnikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03639-5
155. An EOF-Based Emulator of Means and Covariances of Monthly Climate Fields G. Geogdzhayev et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-235-2026
156. The Paris warming targets: emissions requirements and sea level consequences T. Wigley https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2119-5
157. A tragedy of the horizons? An intertemporal perspective on public support for carbon taxes M. Silvi & E. Padilla Rosa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106815
158. A scaling approach to project regional sea level rise and its uncertainties M. Perrette et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-11-2013
159. Allowable carbon emissions for medium-to-high mitigation scenarios K. Tachiiri et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20586
160. IMPLICATION OF PARIS AGREEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF LONG-TERM CLIMATE MITIGATION TARGET S. FUJIMORI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.72.I_223
161. Meeting global cooling demand with photovoltaics during the 21st century H. Laine et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE00002J
162. Beyond carbon budgets G. Peters https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0142-4
163. Likelihood of climate change pathways under uncertainty on fossil fuel resource availability I. Capellán-Pérez et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EE01008C
164. Freshwater resources under success and failure of the Paris climate agreement J. Heinke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-205-2019
165. The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions N. Höhne et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1218320
166. Constraints on biomass energy deployment in mitigation pathways: the case of water scarcity R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabcd7
167. Environment-related stranded assets: An agenda for research into value destruction within carbon-intensive sectors in response to environmental concerns A. Shimbar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111010
168. Simplified mathematical model for calculating global warming through anthropogenic CO2 E. Specht et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.10.039
169. Managing food and water security in Small Island States: New evidence from economic modelling of climate stressed groundwater resources A. Gohar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.008
170. The role of prior assumptions in carbon budget calculations B. Sanderson https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-563-2020
171. A step-response approach for predicting and understanding non-linear precipitation changes P. Good et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1571-1
172. Causal knowledge promotes behavioral self-regulation: An example using climate change dynamics D. Sewell et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184480
173. Global sensitivity analysis for optimal climate policies: Finding what truly matters A. Miftakhova https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105653
174. The tale of two climate risks in Latin America: the perspective of the NGFS climate scenarios G. Bressan & M. Nieto https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2563063
175. The global impacts of US climate policy: a model simulation using GCAM-TU and MAGICC H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1465390
176. Estimation and inversion across the spectrum of carbon cycle modeling I. Enting https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2018.2.126
177. Emulating Earth system model temperatures with MESMER: from global mean temperature trajectories to grid-point-level realizations on land L. Beusch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-139-2020
178. The sensitivity of stratospheric ozone changes through the 21st century to N2O and CH4 L. Revell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11309-2012
179. Climate change and economic growth: Evidence for European countries A. Greiner et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4626705
180. Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations D. Shindell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2653-2013
181. Governing atmospheric oxidation capacity is the key to synergistic air quality and climate gains Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101569
182. Meta-modelling paths of simple climate models using neural networks and dirichlet polynomials: an application to DICE E. Gobet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00438-3
183. All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisal L. Warszawski et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abfeec
184. Global implications of uncertainty in China’s climate policy delivery D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70400-8
185. Uncertainties in CMIP5 Climate Projections due to Carbon Cycle Feedbacks P. Friedlingstein et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00579.1
186. Mitigation choices impact carbon budget size compatible with low temperature goals J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/7/075003
187. Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals K. Riahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.016
188. The effect of climate–carbon cycle feedbacks on emission metrics E. Sterner & D. Johansson https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa61dc
189. Carbon concentration mechanisms in Canary Islands macroalgae and their implications for future benthic community structure under ocean acidification C. Hernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2026.107898
190. Future warming from global food consumption C. Ivanovich et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01605-8
191. The contribution of Paris to limit global warming to 2 °C G. Iyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/125002
192. flat10MIP: an emissions-driven experiment to diagnose the climate response to positive, zero and negative CO2 emissions B. Sanderson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5699-2025
193. BRICK v0.2, a simple, accessible, and transparent model framework for climate and regional sea-level projections T. Wong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2741-2017
194. The Role of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Policies for Climate Change Mitigation M. Kalkuhl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9757-5
195. The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture A. Marcucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2051-8
196. Emulating climate extreme indices C. Tebaldi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8332
197. Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States S. Hsiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369
198. How well do integrated assessment models represent non-CO2 radiative forcing? M. Harmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1485-0
199. CMIP6 simulations with the compact Earth system model OSCAR v3.1 Y. Quilcaille et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1129-2023
200. Climate and socio-economic scenarios for climate change research and assessment: reconciling the new with the old D. van Vuuren & T. Carter https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0974-2
201. A lower and more constrained estimate of climate sensitivity using updated observations and detailed radiative forcing time series R. Skeie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-139-2014
202. Potential climate forcing of land use and land cover change D. Ward et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12701-2014
203. Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/105007
204. Evaluating climate emulation: fundamental impulse testing of simple climate models A. Schwarber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-729-2019
205. The role of methane in future climate strategies: mitigation potentials and climate impacts M. Harmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02437-2
206. Modeling Uncertainty in Climate Change: A MultiiModel Comparison K. Gillingham et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2664693
207. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2572
208. Response function analysis of carbon dioxide and climate using the Padé-Laplace technique I. Enting https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2022020
209. Assessing the Techno-Economic Effects of the Delayed Deployment of CCS Power Plants S. Carrara https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3386086
210. A 4-Stated Dice: Quantitatively Addressing Uncertainty Effects in Climate Change C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2270473
211. NDCmitiQ v1.0.0: a tool to quantify and analyse greenhouse gas mitigation targets A. Günther et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5695-2021
212. Climate Change Impacts on the Within-Country Income Distributions M. Gilli et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4520461
213. Changes in IPCC Scenario Assessment Emulators Between SR1.5 and AR6 Unraveled Z. Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099788
214. Climate model emulation in an integrated assessment framework: a case study for mitigation policies in the electricity sector A. Foley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-119-2016
215. Statistical approximation of high-dimensional climate models A. Miftakhova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.05.005
216. Combined Effects of Refrigerant Substitutions of Residential Air Conditioners and Improvement in Lifecycle Refrigerant Management on Reduction of Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions T. Homma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188429
217. Using dynamic relative climate impact curves to quantify the climate impact of bioenergy production systems over time S. de Jong et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12573
218. Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system F. Moore et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04423-8
219. The U.S. Government’s Social Cost of Carbon Estimates after Their First Two Years: Pathways for Improvement R. Kopp & B. Mignone https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-15
220. Constraints on global temperature target overshoot K. Ricke et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9
221. Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal R. Brecha et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31734-1
222. Methodological aspects of a pattern-scaling approach to produce global fields of monthly means of daily maximum and minimum temperature S. Kremser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-249-2014
223. Improved pattern scaling approaches for the use in climate impact studies N. Herger et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063569
224. Methane Emissions from Wetlands in China and Their Climate Feedbacks in the 21st Century T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01575
225. Economic damages from on-going climate change imply deeper near-term emission cuts A. Schultes et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac27ce
226. Uncertainties around net‐zero climate targets have major impact on greenhouse gas emissions projections M. den Elzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15285
227. The implications of fossil fuel supply constraints on climate change projections: A supply-side analysis J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.04.007
228. Socioeconomic factors and future challenges of the goal of limiting the increase in global average temperature to 1.5 °C J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1477374
229. A methodology and implementation of automated emissions harmonization for use in Integrated Assessment Models M. Gidden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.04.002
230. Improved representation of ocean heat content in energy balance models B. Nadiga & N. Urban https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2333-9
231. Climate change mitigation costs reduction caused by socioeconomic-technological transitions S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00041-w
232. Physical inconsistencies in the representation of the ocean heat-carbon nexus in simple climate models R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01464-x
233. A permafrost implementation in the simple carbon–climate model Hector v.2.3pf D. Woodard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4751-2021
234. Equity is more important for the social cost of methane than climate uncertainty F. Errickson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03386-6
235. Paleo Constraints on Future Sea-Level Rise A. Kemp et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0014-6
236. Reply to Comment on ‘National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane and climate policy: reinforcing inequality in the global food system’ C. Duffy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae53fc
237. Theory and the future of land-climate science M. Byrne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01553-8
238. The Economics of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Developing Asia L. Reis et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894782
239. How great will the demand for critical minerals be to meet the 2 °C and 1.5 °C goals? Insights from various technology deployment scenarios A. Hayashi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03939-y
240. Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024
241. Climate change under a scenario near 1.5 °C of global warming: monsoon intensification, ocean warming and steric sea level rise J. Schewe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2-25-2011
242. The contribution of carbon dioxide emissions from the aviation sector to future climate change E. Terrenoire et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab3086
243. Modeling the climate impact of road transport, maritime shipping and aviation over the period 1860–2100 with an AOGCM D. Olivié et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1449-2012
244. When a tree falls: Controls on wood decay predict standing dead tree fall and new risks in changing forests B. Oberle et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196712
245. Quantifying the potential future contribution to global mean sea level from the Filchner–Ronne basin, Antarctica E. Hill et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4675-2021
246. A computationally efficient method for probabilistic local warming projections constrained by history matching and pattern scaling, demonstrated by WASP–LGRTC-1.0 P. Goodwin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5389-2020
247. FaIRv2.0.0: a generalized impulse response model for climate uncertainty and future scenario exploration N. Leach et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3007-2021
248. Carbon-climate feedback responses to spatial aerosol model implementation variations E. Monteiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01343-6
249. The impact of future emission policies on tropospheric ozone using a parameterised approach S. Turnock et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8953-2018
250. Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39794-7
251. A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and warming implications of current mitigation efforts I. Sognnaes et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01206-3
252. Asynchronous exposure to global warming: freshwater resources and terrestrial ecosystems D. Gerten et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034032
253. The emergence of projected scaled patterns of extreme temperatures over Europe T. Ozturk et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1178461
254. The value of early methane mitigation in preserving Arctic summer sea ice T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4f10
255. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.008
256. Analysis of the evolution of parametric drivers of high-end sea-level hazards A. Hough & T. Wong https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-8-117-2022
257. Emission metrics and sea level rise E. Sterner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1258-1
258. Marginal climate and air quality costs of aviation emissions C. Grobler et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4942
259. The effect of climate policy on the impacts of climate change on river flows in the UK N. Arnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.046
260. Estimating the near-surface permafrost-carbon feedback on global warming T. Schneider von Deimling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-649-2012
261. Downscaling of climate change scenarios for a high-resolution, site-specific assessment of drought stress risk for two viticultural regions with heterogeneous landscapes M. Hofmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-911-2022
262. Regionally aggregated, stitched and de‐drifted CMIP‐climate data, processed with netCDF‐SCM v2.0.0 Z. Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.113
263. Plausible global emissions scenario for 2 °C aligned with China’s net-zero pathway J. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-62983-5
264. Lightweight climate models could be useful for assessing aviation mitigation strategies and moving beyond the CO2-equivalence metrics debate S. Arriolabengoa et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01888-5
265. MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM nexus module: integrating water sector and climate impacts M. Awais et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2447-2024
266. Pymagicc: A Python wrapper for the simple climate model MAGICC R. Gieseke et al. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00516
267. Acting rapidly to deploy readily available methane mitigation measures by sector can immediately slow global warming I. Ocko et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf9c8
268. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? A. Fawcett et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5761
269. The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century O. Fricko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
270. Persistent inequality in economically optimal climate policies P. Gazzotti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23613-y
271. Policy solutions to better assess progress toward Paris goals given warming-induced ecosystem emissions, which shorten timelines by 2–5 years B. Buma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101571
272. Midway toward the 2 degree target: Adequacy and fairness of the Cancún pledges Y. Ha & F. Teng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.021
273. Climate benefits of proposed carbon dioxide mitigation strategies for international shipping and aviation C. Ivanovich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14949-2019
274. Matilda v1.0: An R package for probabilistic climate projections using a reduced complexity climate model J. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000295
275. Uncertainty Analysis in Multi‐Sector Systems: Considerations for Risk Analysis, Projection, and Planning for Complex Systems V. Srikrishnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002644
276. Spatial climate-economic models in the design of optimal climate policies across locations W. Brock et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.02.008
277. Revisiting BCC-SESM parameters sensitivity with BCC-CSM1.1 co2-concentration-driven simulations C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2022.03.002
278. Temperature neutrality and Irish methane policy J. Wheatley https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2191921
279. ANALYSIS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ON GLOBAL POVERTY Y. MARUTA et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.23-27040
280. The interplay of future emissions and geophysical uncertainties for projections of sea-level rise C. Darnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02457-0
281. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 M. Meinshausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z
282. Rapid and reliable assessment of methane impacts on climate I. Ocko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15555-2018
283. Impacts of Observational Constraints Related to Sea Level on Estimates of Climate Sensitivity B. Vega‐Westhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001082
284. Making the Paris agreement climate targets consistent with food security objectives J. Doelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.04.003
285. Assessing climate strategies of major energy corporations and examining projections in relation to Paris Agreement objectives within the framework of sustainable energy K. Mudhee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uncres.2024.100127
286. The uncertainty of climate sensitivity and its implication for the Paris negotiation Y. Kaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0339-z
287. Achieving net‐zero emissions targets: An analysis of long‐term scenarios using an integrated assessment model I. Dafnomilis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14970
288. The Paris Agreement’s ratcheting mechanism needs strengthening 4-fold to keep 1.5°C alive N. Grant https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.017
289. Shutdown of Atlantic overturning circulation could cause persistent increase of primary production in the Pacific R. Liebermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad178b
290. A simple earth system model for C3IAM: based on BCC_CSM1.1 and CMIP5 simulations C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03640-1
291. Current level and rate of warming determine emissions budgets under ambitious mitigation N. Leach et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0156-y
292. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500 M. Meinshausen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
293. From optimal to robust climate strategies: expanding integrated assessment model ensembles to manage economic, social, and environmental objectives L. Ferrari et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac843b
294. Taking some heat off the NDCs? The limited potential of additional short-lived climate forcers’ mitigation M. Harmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02436-3
295. Scenario and modelling uncertainty in global mean temperature change derived from emission-driven global climate models B. Booth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-95-2013
296. Critical impacts of global warming on land ecosystems S. Ostberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-347-2013
297. Dynamic modelling shows substantial contribution of ecosystem restoration to climate change mitigation E. Littleton et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3c6c
298. The climate opportunities and risks of contrail avoidance J. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68784-8
299. A traceable physical calibration of the vertical advection‐diffusion equation for modeling ocean heat uptake M. Huber et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063383
300. The many possible climates from the Paris Agreement’s aim of 1.5 °C warming S. Seneviratne et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0181-4
301. Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart D. Watson-Parris https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0098
302. An equitable redistribution of unburnable carbon S. Pye et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17679-3
303. Extending MESMER-X: a spatially resolved Earth system model emulator for fire weather and soil moisture Y. Quilcaille et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1333-2023
304. Do national-level policies to promote low-carbon technology deployment pay off for the investor countries? G. Iyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.017
305. Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon P. Balcombe et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EM00414E
306. Estimates of the social cost of carbon: A review based on meta-analysis P. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.058
307. Multi-model climate projections for biodiversity risk assessments D. Fordham et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0314.1
308. Climate impacts from North American boreal forest fires M. van Gerrevink et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-01940-3
309. Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South Asia C. Cameron et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.10
310. The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks Y. Cai & T. Lontzek https://doi.org/10.1086/701890
311. Global heat balance and heat uptake in potential temperature coordinates A. Hochet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05832-7
312. MESMER-M: an Earth system model emulator for spatially resolved monthly temperature S. Nath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-851-2022
313. Copenhagen Accord Pledges imply higher costs for staying below 2°C warming J. van Vliet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0458-9
314. Exploration of diverse solutions for the calibration of imperfect climate models S. Peatier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-987-2024
315. Evaluating temporal trade-offs in climate effects from carbon dioxide removal strategies across different metrics: a case study on wetland restoration S. Sartzetakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adeb9d
316. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization J. Rockström et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443
317. Economic Impacts of Alternative Greenhouse Gas Emission Metrics: A Model-Based Assessment J. Strefler et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2333464
318. A global assessment of the effects of climate policy on the impacts of climate change N. Arnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1793
319. The legacy of our CO2 emissions: a clash of scientific facts, politics and ethics R. Knutti & J. Rogelj https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1340-3
320. Climate policies under climate model uncertainty: Max-min and min-max regret A. Rezai & F. van der Ploeg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.018
321. A European Climate Bond I. Monasterolo et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4701414
322. FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018
323. Quantifying the effects of solar geoengineering on vegetation K. Dagon & D. Schrag https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02387-9
324. A food system transformation pathway reconciles 1.5 °C global warming with improved health, environment and social inclusion B. Bodirsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01268-y
325. Disentangling the effects of CO2and short-lived climate forcer mitigation J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1415631111
326. Issues in the theoretical foundations of climate science J. Katzav & W. Parker https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.02.001
327. On the feasibility of cropland and forest area expansions required to achieve long-term temperature targets A. Hayashi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00791-0
328. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda B. Soergel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01098-3
329. Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections R. Knutti & J. Sedláček https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1716
330. Das Neue Deutsche Gebäudeenergiegesetz: Mehr Schaden Als Nutzen (The New German Building Energy Act: More Costs than Benefits) A. Greiner https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4634582
331. Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges T. Vandyck et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9
332. On linking an Earth system model to the equilibrium carbon representation of an economically optimizing land use model B. Bond-Lamberty et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2545-2014
333. Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal C. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044002
334. Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century M. Gidden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1443-2019
335. Estimating the sea level rise responsibility of industrial carbon producers S. Sadai et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adb59f
336. The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series J. Gütschow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-571-2016
337. Refining global warming projections C. Huntingford https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1964
338. Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure? F. Cherubini et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014049
339. Emission pathways to achieve 2.0°C and 1.5°C climate targets X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000492
340. ON THE REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF CLIMATE MITIGATION COSTS: THE IMPACT OF DELAYED COOPERATIVE ACTION T. ABOUMAHBOUB et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007814400028
341. Stochastic Integrated Assessment of Ecosystem Tipping Risk T. Lontzek et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0054-y
342. Plausible mitigation targets N. Edwards https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1267
343. Uncertainty of Climate Models and Policy implications: A European Perspective A. Greiner https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4802792
344. The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6 D. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1133-2018
345. Fixed climate feedback assumptions systematically underestimate policy-relevant economic risks: Implications for climate resilience W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2026.04.004
346. Gridded emissions and land-use data for 2005–2100 under diverse socioeconomic and climate mitigation scenarios S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.210
347. The climate commons dilemma: how can humanity solve the commons dilemma for the global climate commons? Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02989-2
348. Impact of methane and black carbon mitigation on forcing and temperature: a multi-model scenario analysis S. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02794-3
349. Effect on the Earth system of realizing a 1.5 °C warming climate target after overshooting to the 2 °C level K. Tachiiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5199
350. Consumptive Water Use from Electricity Generation in the Southwest under Alternative Climate, Technology, and Policy Futures S. Talati et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01389
351. Long-Range Persistence in Global Surface Temperatures Explained by Linear Multibox Energy Balance Models H. Fredriksen & M. Rypdal https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0877.1
352. The social costs of tropical cyclones H. Krichene et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43114-4
353. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11787
354. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade‐offs J. Doelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14887
355. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C C. McGlade & P. Ekins https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14016
356. The Sectoral and Regional Economic Consequences of Climate Change to 2060 R. Dellink et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0197-5
357. Fossil energy deployment through midcentury consistent with 2°C climate stabilization H. McJeon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100034
358. Decision support for international climate policy – The PRIMAP emission module J. Nabel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.004
359. Dependence of Precipitation Scaling Patterns on Emission Scenarios for Representative Concentration Pathways Y. Ishizaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00540.1
360. Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1368-z
361. Impact of the choice of emission metric on greenhouse gas abatement and costs M. van den Berg et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024001
362. Costs and benefits of differences in the timing of greenhouse gas emission reductions A. Admiraal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9641-4
363. Potential contribution of fusion power generation to low-carbon development under the Paris Agreement and associated uncertainties K. Gi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100432
364. Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/075002
365. Minimal CMIP Emulator (MCE v1.2): a new simplified method for probabilistic climate projections J. Tsutsui https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-951-2022
366. Projecting Antarctic ice discharge using response functions from SeaRISE ice-sheet models A. Levermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-271-2014
367. A simple carbon cycle representation for economic and policy analyses M. Glotter et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1224-y
368. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century E. Kriegler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.015
369. Bottom-up assessment of climate change vulnerability of a large and complex river basin using emulator models A. John et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.103095
370. Impact factors for quantifying country-level terrestrial biodiversity intactness footprints (IBIF) A. Schipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05946-1
371. Impact of climate change on the behaviour of solar radiation using AFR-CORDEX model over West Africa O. Ojo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-024-01033-z
372. CMIP7 data request: Earth system priorities and opportunities M. McPartland et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2849-2026
373. EMULATION OF A COUPLE ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL WITH A SIMPLE CLIMATE MODEL Y. ISHIZAKI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.70.I_307
374. Extended crop yield meta-analysis data do not support upward SCC revision R. McKitrick https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90254-2
375. A more complete IMAGE: enhancing the climate change impact representation in integrated assessment models D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae55b9
376. Quantifying uncertainties influencing the long-term impacts of oil prices on energy markets and carbon emissions D. McCollum et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.77
377. Advocating Feedback Control for Human-Earth System Applications G. Cavraro https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2024.3413392
378. CO2 Emissions Determined by HadGEM2-ES to be Compatible with the Representative Concentration Pathway Scenarios and Their Extensions S. Liddicoat et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00569.1
379. Integrated scenarios to support analysis of the food–energy–water nexus D. Van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0418-8
380. AIRCC-Clim: A user-friendly tool for generating regional probabilistic climate change scenarios and risk measures F. Estrada et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105528
381. The fractional energy balance equation for climate projections through 2100 R. Procyk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-81-2022
382. Climate change-induced variations in blue and green water usage in U.S. urban agriculture C. Cooper et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131326
383. Indicators of Global Climate Change 2022: annual update of large-scale indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence P. Forster et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023
384. Implications of non-linearities between cumulative CO2 emissions and CO2-induced warming for assessing the remaining carbon budget Z. Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab83af
385. Assessing the merits of bioenergy by estimating marginal climate-change impacts M. Kirschbaum https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1196-4
386. Adjusting Mitigation Pathways to Stabilize Climate at 1.5°C and 2.0°C Rise in Global Temperatures to Year 2300 P. Goodwin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000732
387. Hierarchy of the Models of the Earth Climate System A. Eliseev https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-025-10391-6
388. Analytic Integrated Assessment and Uncertainty C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2667972
389. Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets G. Luderer et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034033
390. A new precipitation emulator (PREMU v1.0) for lower-complexity models G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1277-2023
391. Inconsistencies when applying novel metrics for emissions accounting to the Paris agreement C. Schleussner et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab56e7
392. Projections of Future Droughts in Morocco: Key Insights from Bias-Corrected Med-CORDEX Simulations in the Haouz Region I. El Bouazzaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-024-00544-4
393. Emission pathways consistent with a 2 °C global temperature limit J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258
394. Quantifying the economic impact of changes in energy demand for space heating and cooling systems under varying climatic scenarios T. Hasegawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.13
395. Understanding the origin of Paris Agreement emission uncertainties J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15748
396. Strong time dependence of ocean acidification mitigation by atmospheric carbon dioxide removal M. Hofmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13586-4
397. Exploring pathways for world development within planetary boundaries D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08928-w
398. Glasgow to Paris—The impact of the Glasgow commitments for the Paris climate agreement L. Aleluia Reis & M. Tavoni https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.105933
399. Calibrating Simple Climate Models to Individual Earth System Models: Lessons Learned From Calibrating Hector K. Dorheim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000980
400. Ocean acidification alters the acute stress response of a marine fish A. Servili et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159804
401. Bridging the gap between impact assessment methods and climate science F. Cherubini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.019
402. Modern air-sea flux distributions reduce uncertainty in the future ocean carbon sink G. McKinley et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc195
403. A simple object-oriented and open-source model for scientific and policy analyses of the global climate system – Hector v1.0 C. Hartin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-939-2015
404. The use of the land-sea warming contrast under climate change to improve impact metrics M. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0715-6
405. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
406. Local and remote climate impacts of future African aerosol emissions C. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3575-2023
407. The impact of aerosol emissions on the 1.5 °C pathways A. Hienola et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b2
408. Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects S. Fuss et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f
409. The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertainty D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0732-1
410. Path to net zero is critical to climate outcome T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01639-y
411. Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets R. Lamboll et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01848-5
412. On the effects of aviation on carbon-methane cycles and climate change during the period 2015-2100 C. Varotsos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.08.033
413. Mid- and long-term climate projections for fragmented and delayed-action scenarios M. Schaeffer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.013
414. Towards Bayesian hierarchical inference of equilibrium climate sensitivity from a combination of CMIP5 climate models and observational data A. Jonko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2232-0
415. Adapting wheat ideotypes for climate change: accounting for uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections M. Semenov & P. Stratonovitch https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01297
416. Climate change impacts on socioeconomic activities through labor productivity changes considering interactions between socioeconomic and climate systems K. Matsumoto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.127
417. Emulators of Climate Model Output C. Tebaldi et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012125-085838
418. Extending Near‐Term Emissions Scenarios to Assess Warming Implications of Paris Agreement NDCs J. Gütschow et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000781
419. Evolving patterns of sterodynamic sea-level rise under mitigation scenarios and insights from linear system theory Q. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05727-7
420. The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures J. Kikstra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
421. Emulating Atlantic overturning strength for low emission scenarios: consequences for sea-level rise along the North American east coast C. Schleussner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2-191-2011
422. A global analysis of residential heating and cooling service demand and cost-effective energy consumption under different climate change scenarios up to 2050 K. Gi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9728-6
423. A governing framework for international ocean acidification policy E. Harrould-Kolieb & O. Hoegh-Guldberg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.02.004
424. Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability K. Tokarska et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abaf1b
425. HIRM v1.0: a hybrid impulse response model for climate modeling and uncertainty analyses K. Dorheim et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-365-2021
426. Distortion of sectoral roles in climate change threatens climate goals N. Cohen-Shields et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2023.1163557
427. Modeling the climate and carbon systems to estimate the social cost of carbon T. Thompson https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.532
428. Producing Policy-relevant Science by Enhancing Robustness and Model Integration for the Assessment of Global Environmental Change R. Warren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.010
429. Improving statistical projections of ocean dynamic sea-level change using pattern recognition techniques V. Malagón-Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-499-2023
430. GHG emission pathways until 2300 for the 1.5 °C temperature rise target and the mitigation costs achieving the pathways K. Akimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9762-z
431. Large Ensemble Analytic Framework for Consequence‐Driven Discovery of Climate Change Scenarios J. Lamontagne et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000701
432. Future methane, hydroxyl, and their uncertainties: key climate and emission parameters for future predictions C. Holmes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-285-2013
433. The impact of technology availability on the timing and costs of emission reductions for achieving long-term climate targets J. van Vliet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0961-7
434. Climate Linkers: Rationale and Pricing P. Chikhani & J. Renne https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881262
435. Reply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits B. Samset et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31426-w
436. Spatial Climate-Economic Models in the Design of Optimal Climate Policies Across Locations W. Brock et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2175480
437. The climate and health effects of a USA switch from coal to gas electricity generation R. Lueken et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.078
438. Economic impacts and risks of climate change under failure and success of the Paris Agreement F. Estrada & W. Botzen https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14652
439. Intercomparison of the capabilities of simplified climate models to project the effects of aviation CO2 on climate A. Khodayari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.055
440. The macroeconomic effects of adapting to high-end sea-level rise via protection and migration G. Bachner et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33043-z
441. Local sources of global climate forcing from different categories of land use activities D. Ward & N. Mahowald https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-175-2015
442. Earth Insolation and Tendencies of the Variation of Alpine Ice Resources V. Fedorov et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372821040065
443. Air quality impacts of electricity purchase and air travel by organizations Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae21f9
444. SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009
445. On the Physics of Three Integrated Assessment Models R. Calel & D. Stainforth https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0034.1
446. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation P. Forster et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0
447. Greenhouse Gas Policy Influences Climate via Direct Effects of Land-Use Change A. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00377.1
448. Investigation of the dynamic equilibrium of atmospheric CO2 concentrations R. Sánta & L. Garbai https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01783-8
449. Implications of the international reduction pledges on long-term energy system changes and costs in China and India P. Lucas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.026
450. Measuring the sustainable development implications of climate change mitigation S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab9966
451. Stocktake of G20 countries’ climate pledges reveals limited macroeconomic costs and employment shifts R. Garaffa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.012
452. Are climate models credible worlds? Prospects and limitations of possibilistic climate prediction G. Betz https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-015-0108-y
453. Multiple strategies for road transport considering regional diversity and critical mineral supply constraints K. Akimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2026.100246
454. The UN's 'Sustainable Energy for All' initiative is compatible with a warming limit of 2 °C J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1806
455. Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming C. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07999-w
456. A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering D. Keith & D. MacMartin https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2493
457. Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots E. Byers et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf45
458. The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net-negative emissions and climate uncertainty S. Baur et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-367-2023
459. Model uncertainty and energy technology policy: The example of induced technical change Y. Cai & A. Sanstad https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.07.014
460. A development of reduction scenarios of the short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs) for mitigating global warming and environmental problems T. Nakajima et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00351-1
461. Historical and future extremes of cauvery basin analysed using cmip6 models and ETCCDI indices S. Sridhara et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42818-z
462. Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2 °C M. Meinshausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04553-z
463. Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering L. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240
464. The importance of health co-benefits under different climate policy cooperation frameworks N. Scovronick et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abf2e7
465. The compact Earth system model OSCAR v2.2: description and first results T. Gasser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-271-2017
466. Alternative carbon price trajectories can avoid excessive carbon removal J. Strefler et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22211-2
467. Global and Regional Energy and Employment Transition Implied by Climate Policy Pledges R. Garaffa et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4141955
468. Internalising health-economic impacts of air pollution into climate policy: a global modelling study L. Reis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00259-X
469. Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers S. Delbecq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100920
470. A 4-Stated DICE: Quantitatively Addressing Uncertainty Effects in Climate Change C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9776-x
471. nonlinMIP contribution to CMIP6: model intercomparison project for non-linear mechanisms: physical basis, experimental design and analysis principles (v1.0) P. Good et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4019-2016
472. STITCHES: a Python package to amalgamate existing Earth system model output into new scenario realizations A. Snyder et al. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05525
473. Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change research R. Lamboll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5259-2020
474. Attributed radiative forcing of air pollutants from biomass and fossil burning emissions K. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119378
475. Complementing thermosteric sea level rise estimates K. Lorbacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2723-2015
476. Greater committed warming after accounting for the pattern effect C. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00955-x
477. Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges Y. Robiou du Pont & M. Meinshausen https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07223-9
478. Earth climate identification vs. anthropic global warming attribution P. de Larminat https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.09.018
479. The changing radiative forcing of fires: global model estimates for past, present and future D. Ward et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10857-2012
480. The cumulative carbon budget and its implications R. Millar et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw009
481. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies A. Grubler et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6
482. Model Uncertainty and Energy Technology Policy: The Example of Induced Technical Change Y. Cai & A. Sanstad https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2426332
483. The representative concentration pathways: an overview D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
484. The Impact of the Glasgow Commitments for the Paris Agreement Long-Term Goals L. Aleluia Reis & M. Tavoni https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4075227
485. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 2: Synthesizing Earth System Knowledge for Probabilistic Climate Projections Z. Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001900
486. Carbon budget concept and its deviation through the pulse response lens V. Avakumović https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-387-2024
487. Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050 H. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn3441
488. The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE D. Klein et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z
489. Uncertainty in temperature projections reduced using carbon cycle and climate observations R. Bodman et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1903
490. Simulating diverse forest management options in a changing climate on a Pinus nigra subsp. laricio plantation in Southern Italy R. Testolin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159361
491. A regression-based approach to the CO2 airborne fraction M. Bennedsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52728-1
492. Climate change and economic growth: Evidence for European countries A. Greiner et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12605
493. Climate intervention on a high-emissions pathway could delay but not prevent West Antarctic Ice Sheet demise J. Sutter et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01738-w
494. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies D. van Vuuren et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8
495. The Social Cost of Carbon Should not be used for Making Energy Policy Decisions J. Lesser https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5371055
496. Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level J. Rogelj & C. Schleussner https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4928
497. Diagnosing Transient Response to CO2 Forcing in Coupled Atmosphere‐Ocean Model Experiments Using a Climate Model Emulator J. Tsutsui https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085844
498. Mitigating trade-offs between global food access and net-zero emissions: the potential contribution of direct air carbon capture and storage A. Hayashi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03528-x
499. UNDERSTANDING THE SOCIAL COST OF CARBON: A MODEL DIAGNOSTIC AND INTER-COMPARISON STUDY S. ROSE et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007817500099
500. Opportunities and challenges in using remaining carbon budgets to guide climate policy H. Matthews et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00663-3
501. Carbon Consumption, the Carbon-Based Ecosystem, and Output C. Figueroa et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3442532
502. Scoping review of the potentials of fuzzy cognitive maps as a modeling approach for integrated environmental assessment and management A. Mourhir https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104891
503. Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels D. Shindell & C. Smith https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z
504. Emulating global climate change impacts on crop yields O. Oyebamiji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X14568248
505. Community climate simulations to assess avoided impacts in 1.5 and 2  °C futures B. Sanderson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-827-2017
506. ClimateBench v1.0: A Benchmark for Data‐Driven Climate Projections D. Watson‐Parris et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002954
507. Effects of scenario-based carbon pricing policies on China's dual climate change mitigation goals: Does policy design matter? J. Chai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2022.10.002
508. 1.5°C Hotspots: Climate Hazards, Vulnerabilities, and Impacts C. Schleussner et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025835
509. The effect of surface sink saturation and emission altitude on hydrogen's atmospheric impact E. Gibney et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5EA00139K
510. Synthesizing long-term sea level rise projections – the MAGICC sea level model v2.0 A. Nauels et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2495-2017
511. Quantifying airborne fraction trends and the destination of anthropogenic CO2 by tracking carbon flows in a simple climate model L. Pressburger et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acca35
512. Probabilistic projections of temperature and rainfall for climate risk assessment in Vietnam Q. Tran-Anh & T. Ngo-Duc https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.461
513. A Second-order Dynamic Model of the Mean Global Carbon Cycle E. Canuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.07.096
514. ACE – Analytic Climate Economy C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832722
515. Enhancing global climate policy ambition towards a 1.5 °C stabilization: a short-term multi-model assessment Z. Vrontisi et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab53e
516. Global crop yield response to extreme heat stress under multiple climate change futures D. Deryng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034011
517. Projections of hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions and the resulting global warming based on recent trends in observed abundances and current policies G. Velders et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6087-2022
518. A review on mathematical modeling of microbial and plant induced permafrost carbon feedback N. Fasaeiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173144
519. MESMER-RCM: a probabilistic climate emulator for regional warming projections H. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-33-73-2026
520. Global blue carbon accumulation in tidal wetlands increases with climate change F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa296
521. Global warming projections using the human–earth system model BNU-HESM1.0 S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-016-1176-x
522. Robust Enough? Exploring Temperature-Constrained Energy Transition Pathways under Climate Uncertainty C. Nicolas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248595
523. Assessing alternative methane emission metrics conducive to quantifying global warming and setting near-term climate goals J. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adca46
524. An AgMIP framework for improved agricultural representation in integrated assessment models A. Ruane et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8da6
525. Review of climate simulation by Simple Climate Models A. Romero-Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-115-2026
526. Optimal CO2 mitigation under damage risk valuation B. Crost & C. Traeger https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2249
527. Long run emulator calibration increases warming and sea-level rise projections C. Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae3847
528. Evaluating the potential of iron-based interventions in methane reduction and climate mitigation D. Meidan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad3d72
529. Accounting for radiative forcing from albedo change in future global land-use scenarios A. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1411-5
530. Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy E. Kriegler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021
531. Pathfinder v1.0.1: a Bayesian-inferred simple carbon–climate model to explore climate change scenarios T. Bossy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8831-2022
532. China's potential SO2 emissions from coal by 2050 Y. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111856
533. Guidance on emissions metrics for nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement S. Denison et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab4df4
534. Long-term sea-level rise implied by 1.5 °C and 2 °C warming levels M. Schaeffer et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1584
535. Emerging role of wetland methane emissions in driving 21st century climate change Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618765114
536. How do climate-related uncertainties influence 2 and 1.5 °C pathways? X. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0525-2
537. A European climate bond I. Monasterolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiae065
538. The Variation of Meteorological Drought with the Probabilities of Rainfall and Temperature Under the Impact of Climate Change on the South Central Coast Region of Vietnam T. Lap https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-025-00781-z
539. The growing metaverse sector can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 10 Gt CO2e in the united states by 2050 N. Zhao & F. You https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EE00081H
540. Measuring Success: Improving Assessments of Aggregate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Goals M. Jeffery et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000865
541. TimberTracer: a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of carbon sequestration by forest management and substitution of harvested wood products I. Boukhris et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00296-2
542. Valuing the Global Mortality Consequences of Climate Change Accounting for Adaptation Costs and Benefits T. Carleton et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224365
543. Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals S. Fujimori et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3235-9
544. Fundamentals of data assimilation applied to biogeochemistry P. Rayner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019
545. The impact of climate change mitigation on water demand for energy and food: An integrated analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways I. Mouratiadou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.007
546. The MESSAGE Integrated Assessment Model and the ix modeling platform (ixmp): An open framework for integrated and cross-cutting analysis of energy, climate, the environment, and sustainable development D. Huppmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.012
547. From emission scenarios to spatially resolved projections with a chain of computationally efficient emulators: coupling of MAGICC (v7.5.1) and MESMER (v0.8.3) L. Beusch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2085-2022
548. Urban and non-urban contributions to the social cost of carbon F. Estrada et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59466-y
549. Projecting terrestrial biodiversity intactness with GLOBIO 4 A. Schipper et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14848
550. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1758
551. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal J. Rogelj et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1541-4
552. Climate Change Impact on Economic Growth: Regional Climate Policy under Cooperation and Noncooperation Y. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1086/722274
553. Does the metric matter? Climate change impacts of light-duty vehicle electrification in the US A. Milovanoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac8071
554. Implications of greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios for the main Asian regions B. van Ruijven et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.03.013
555. Committed sea-level rise under the Paris Agreement and the legacy of delayed mitigation action M. Mengel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02985-8
556. Global mean sea-level rise in a world agreed upon in Paris K. Bittermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9def
557. A new climate dataset for systematic assessments of climate change impacts as a function of global warming J. Heinke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1689-2013
558. Mediterranean irrigation under climate change: more efficient irrigation needed to compensate for increases in irrigation water requirements M. Fader et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-953-2016
559. Reduced Complexity Model Intercomparison Project Phase 1: introduction and evaluation of global-mean temperature response Z. Nicholls et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5175-2020
560. Econometric models of climate change: Introduction by the guest editors E. Hillebrand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.05.001
561. Impact of methane and other precursor emission reductions on surface ozone in Europe: scenario analysis using the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) Meteorological Synthesizing Centre – West (MSC-W) model W. van Caspel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11545-2024
562. Linking sea level rise and socioeconomic indicators under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways A. Nauels et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa92b6
563. Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century M. Eisen et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000010
564. Causes of Climate Models Uncertainty and Implications for Economic Policy A. Greiner https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0019
565. Land-Use and Carbon Cycle Responses to Moderate Climate Change: Implications for Land-Based Mitigation? F. Humpenöder et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es506201r
566. STITCHES: creating new scenarios of climate model output by stitching together pieces of existing simulations C. Tebaldi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1557-2022
567. The analyses on the economic costs for achieving the nationally determined contributions and the expected global emission pathways K. Akimoto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40844-016-0049-y
568. Quantifying synergies and trade-offs in the global water-land-food-climate nexus using a multi-model scenario approach J. Doelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5766
569. Climate change impacts on the within-country income distributions M. Gilli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2024.103012
570. Responsibility of major emitters for country-level warming and extreme hot years L. Beusch et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00320-6
571. Transferring climate change physical knowledge F. Immorlano et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2413503122
572. OpenSCM Two Layer Model: A Python implementation of the two-layer climate model Z. Nicholls & J. Lewis https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02766
573. Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models M. Webb et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1336-x
574. On the relationship between metrics to compare greenhouse gases – the case of IGTP, GWP and SGTP C. Azar & D. Johansson https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-139-2012
575. A machine learning approach to rapidly project climate responses under a multitude of net-zero emission pathways V. Kitsios et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01011-0
576. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation J. Doelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014
577. Climate change impacts on fish reproduction are mediated at multiple levels of the brain-pituitary-gonad axis A. Servili et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2020.113439
578. Carbon Cycle–Climate Feedbacks in the Post-Paris World D. Schimel & D. Carroll https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-081700
579. Climate Warming in Response to Emission Reductions Consistent with the Paris Agreement F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2487962
580. Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA: insights and lessons from two continental-scale projects* J. Ciscar et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab281e
581. NEW SOCIOECONOMIC SCENARIO SSP QUANTIFICATION OF THE AIM'S EXAMPLE AND ITS CHARACTERISTIC S. FUJIMORI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.71.II_217
582. Progress and Trends in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Y. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080826
583. The Bern Simple Climate Model (BernSCM) v1.0: an extensible and fully documented open-source re-implementation of the Bern reduced-form model for global carbon cycle–climate simulations K. Strassmann & F. Joos https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1887-2018
584. Uncertainty in non-CO2 greenhouse gas mitigation contributes to ambiguity in global climate policy feasibility M. Harmsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38577-4
585. National temperature neutrality, agricultural methane and climate policy: reinforcing inequality in the global food system C. Duffy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adf12d
586. Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries D. Rasmussen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac87
587. Patterns and Regulation of Hypolimnetic CO2 and CH4 in a Tropical Reservoir Using a Process‐Based Modeling Approach C. Soued & Y. Prairie https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG006897
588. A solution to the misrepresentations of CO2-equivalent emissions of short-lived climate pollutants under ambitious mitigation M. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0026-8
589. On the future role of the most parsimonious climate module in integrated assessment M. Khabbazan & H. Held https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-135-2019
590. Abrupt CO2 experiments as tools for predicting and understanding CMIP5 representative concentration pathway projections P. Good et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1410-4