the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dynamical and chemical processes contributing to ozone loss in exceptional Arctic stratosphere winter-spring of 2020
Abstract. The features of dynamical processes and changes in the ozone layer in the Arctic stratosphere during the winter-spring season 2019–2020 are analyzed using ozonesondes, reanalysis data and numerical experiments with a chemistry-transport model (CTM). Using the trajectory model of the Central Aerological Observatory (TRACAO) and the ERA5 reanalysis ozone mixing ratio data, a comparative analysis of the evolution of stratospheric ozone averaged along the trajectories in the winter-spring seasons of 2010–2011, 2015–2016, and 2019–2020 was carried out, which demonstrated that the largest ozone loss at altitudes of 18–20 km within stratospheric polar vortex in the Arctic in winter-spring 2019–2020 exceeded the corresponding values of the other two winter-spring seasons 2010–2011 and 2015–2016 with the largest decrease in ozone content in recent year. The total decrease in the column ozone inside the stratospheric polar vortex, calculated using the vertical ozone profiles obtained based on the ozonesondes data, in the 2019–2020 winter-spring season was more than 150 Dobson Units, which repeated the record depletion for the 2010–2011 winter-spring season. At the same time, the maximum ozone loss in winter 2019–2020 was observed at lower levels than in 2010–2011, which is consistent with the results of trajectory analysis and the results of other authors. The results of numerical calculations with the CTM with dynamical parameters specified from the MERRA-2 reanalysis data, carried out according to several scenarios of accounting for the chemical destruction of ozone, indicated that both dynamical and chemical processes make contributions to ozone loss inside the polar vortex. In this case, dynamical processes predominate in the western hemisphere, while in the eastern hemisphere chemical processes make an almost equal contribution with dynamical factors, and the chemical depletion of ozone is determined not only by heterogeneous processes on the surface of the polar stratospheric clouds, but by the gas-phase destruction in nitrogen catalytic cycles as well.
- Preprint
(5786 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Reviewer comment on acp-2021-11', Ingo Wohltmann, 03 Feb 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Ingo,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mention how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev,Pavel N. Vargin,
Alexander N. Lukyanov,
Natalia D. Tsvetkova,
Maxim A.Motsakov
- AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
RC2: 'review of acp-2021-11', Gloria Manney, 23 Feb 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Gloria,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mention how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev,Pavel N. Vargin,
Alexander N. Lukyanov,
Natalia D. Tsvetkova,
Maxim A. Motsakov
- AC5: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
RC3: 'Comment on acp-2021-11', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Feb 2021
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Referee,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mentioned how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev, Pavel N. Vargin, Alexander N. Lukyanov, Natalia D. Tsvetkova, Maxim A.Motsakov
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Reviewer comment on acp-2021-11', Ingo Wohltmann, 03 Feb 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Ingo,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mention how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev,Pavel N. Vargin,
Alexander N. Lukyanov,
Natalia D. Tsvetkova,
Maxim A.Motsakov
- AC4: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
RC2: 'review of acp-2021-11', Gloria Manney, 23 Feb 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Gloria,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mention how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev,Pavel N. Vargin,
Alexander N. Lukyanov,
Natalia D. Tsvetkova,
Maxim A. Motsakov
- AC5: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
-
RC3: 'Comment on acp-2021-11', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Feb 2021
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Dear Referee,
Thank you for your comments on the paper and constructive recommendations. We have tried to follow your suggestions and have taken into account most of them. In the attached file we mentioned how the manuscript has been changed according to your comments.
Thank you again for taking the time to review our manuscript.
With respect,
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev, Pavel N. Vargin, Alexander N. Lukyanov, Natalia D. Tsvetkova, Maxim A.Motsakov
-
AC3: 'Reply on RC3', Sergei Smyshlyaev, 26 Mar 2021
Model code and software
INM-RSHU Chemistry-Climate Model 0-120 km Smyshlyaev, Sergei, Galin, Vener, and Volodin, Evgenii https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3555479
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,329 | 628 | 52 | 2,009 | 34 | 34 |
- HTML: 1,329
- PDF: 628
- XML: 52
- Total: 2,009
- BibTeX: 34
- EndNote: 34
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
10 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The 2020 Arctic ozone depletion and signs of its effect on the ozone column at lower latitudes B. Petkov et al. 10.1007/s42865-021-00040-x
- Arctic Stratosphere Dynamical Processes in the Winter 2021–2022 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13101550
- Lagrange Studies of Anomalously Stable Arctic Stratospheric Vortex Observed in Winter 2019–2020 A. Lukyanov et al. 10.1134/S0001433821030075
- Measurements and Modelling of Total Ozone Columns near St. Petersburg, Russia G. Nerobelov et al. 10.3390/rs14163944
- Stratospheric Warming Events in the Period January–March 2023 and Their Impact on Stratospheric Ozone in the Northern Hemisphere P. Mukhtarov et al. 10.3390/atmos14121762
- Variations of Planetary Wave Activity in the Lower Stratosphere in February as a Predictor of Ozone Depletion in the Arctic in March P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos15101237
- Satellite Monitoring of the Ozonosphere Y. Timofeev et al. 10.3103/S1068373921120062
- Dynamic Processes of the Arctic Stratosphere in the 2020–2021 Winter P. Vargin et al. 10.1134/S0001433821060098
- Arctic Stratosphere Circulation Changes in the 21st Century in Simulations of INM CM5 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13010025
- The unexpected smoke layer in the High Arctic winter stratosphere during MOSAiC 2019–2020 K. Ohneiser et al. 10.5194/acp-21-15783-2021