the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Nutrients Dissolution Kinetics of Aerosols at Qianliyan Island, the Yellow Sea by a High Time-resolution Nutrient Dissolution Experiment, Potential Linkages with Inorganic Compositions and P solubility controlled factors
Abstract. A series of high time-resolution nutrient dissolution experiments were designed to determine the soluble fraction of atmospheric nutrients and reveal the short-time dissolution processes, patterns and kinetics of nutrient elements in aerosols. Aerosols that represented an important part of atmospheric transport path over the East Asian to West Pacific were leached by Milli-Q water and aged seawater at gradient pHs for certain time duration. Varied nutrient dissolution curves indicated that aerosol inorganic N, P and Si species dissolution reactions were quasi-first-order. Particularly, prominent factors influenced P solubility were source and acidity. Ratios of acid-soluble to water-soluble nutrient concentrations in high time-resolution dissolution experiments and ultra-sound extractions were 1.0 (0.9–1.1) for NH4+ and NO3−, 2.4 (2.1–2.6) for PO43− and 2.5 for SiO32−, demonstrating that inorganic N species were inclined to immediate and complete dissolution due to fine particles formed by gas-particle transformation, inorganic P (Fe-P, Ca-P and De-P) and Si were tended to dissolve more in strong acidity mainly because of coarse soil-derived mineral particles. Compared with the slow dissolution of inorganic P and Si, the rapid dissolution of inorganic N can affect the composition of marine nutrients and marine primary productivity.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Withdrawal notice
This preprint has been withdrawn.
-
Preprint
(7344 KB)
-
Supplement
(2209 KB)
-
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(7344 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2209 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Zhang et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Dec 2018
- SC4: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 28 Jan 2019
-
SC1: 'The manuscript acp-2018-985 is not suitable to be published on ACP', Xinye Zhang, 30 Dec 2018
-
SC6: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 30 Jan 2019
- SC10: 'The manuscript acp-2018-985 is not suitable to be published in this journal', Xinye Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC6: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC2: 'I do not feel that this manuscript fits the scope of ACP due to its too local interest and its defect in sample collection methods', T. B. Williams, 30 Dec 2018
-
SC3: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 27 Jan 2019
-
SC7: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC8: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
- SC9: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC8: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC7: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC3: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 27 Jan 2019
-
RC2: 'Review of Zhang et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2019
- SC5: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 29 Jan 2019
- AC1: 'Author comment (AC)', Ke Zhang, 14 Mar 2019
- EC1: 'manuscript not suitable for further review', Chak K. Chan, 15 Mar 2019
Interactive discussion
-
RC1: 'Review of Zhang et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Dec 2018
- SC4: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 28 Jan 2019
-
SC1: 'The manuscript acp-2018-985 is not suitable to be published on ACP', Xinye Zhang, 30 Dec 2018
-
SC6: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 30 Jan 2019
- SC10: 'The manuscript acp-2018-985 is not suitable to be published in this journal', Xinye Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC6: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC2: 'I do not feel that this manuscript fits the scope of ACP due to its too local interest and its defect in sample collection methods', T. B. Williams, 30 Dec 2018
-
SC3: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 27 Jan 2019
-
SC7: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC8: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
- SC9: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC8: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 31 Jan 2019
-
SC7: 'I still think that this manuscript does not fit the scope of ACP due to its methodological deficiency in TSP sample collection', T. B. Williams, 30 Jan 2019
-
SC3: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 27 Jan 2019
-
RC2: 'Review of Zhang et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Jan 2019
- SC5: 'Reply', Ke Zhang, 29 Jan 2019
- AC1: 'Author comment (AC)', Ke Zhang, 14 Mar 2019
- EC1: 'manuscript not suitable for further review', Chak K. Chan, 15 Mar 2019
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,250 | 260 | 52 | 1,562 | 165 | 47 | 42 |
- HTML: 1,250
- PDF: 260
- XML: 52
- Total: 1,562
- Supplement: 165
- BibTeX: 47
- EndNote: 42
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Ke Zhang
Lijun Han
Sumei Liu
Lingyan Wang
This preprint has been withdrawn.
- Preprint
(7344 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2209 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote