Preprints
    
    
                
                    
            
            https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-817
                    © Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-817
                    © Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
                the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
            Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.
        
    
    Sensitivity of particle loss to the Kelvin effect in LES of young contrails
Abstract. Different treatments of the Kelvin effect in LES modeling of early contrails are shown to cause variations in the survival rate of ice particles by up to a factor of 4 and in optical depth and mean particle size by up to 50 %. The Kelvin effect which varies exponentially with particle size, can reduce or even suppress the impact of other important ambient parameters, such as ice supersaturation, on particle survival rate. Lowering or neglecting the Kelvin effect is shown to substantially alter the evolution of the ice particle size distribution and delay the onset of particle loss. A strongly Kelvin effect dependent exponential relation between particle survival rate and particle size is shown for high EIsoot (O(1015)).
                        How to cite.  Inamdar, A. R., Naiman, A. D., Lele, S. K., and Jacobson, M. Z.: Sensitivity of particle loss to the Kelvin effect in LES of young
contrails, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint],  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-817, 2016.
        
            
                Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
            
        
            
                Download & links
                    
                Download & links
            
                        - Preprint
                                        (2147 KB) 
- Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
             Status: closed
        
        
             Status: closed
        
    
            AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
        
     - Printer-friendly version
 - Printer-friendly version
            
            
             - Supplement
 - Supplement
 
        - 
                RC1:  'Review of ACP 2016 817', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Nov 2016
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC1:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Nov 2016
                                
                                        
 
- 
                                
                                AC1:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Nov 2016
                                
                                    
- 
                RC2:  'Review of Inamdar et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Nov 2016
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC2:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Dec 2016
                                
                                        
 
- 
                                
                                AC2:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Dec 2016
                                
                                    
             Status: closed
        
        
             Status: closed
        
    
            AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
        
     - Printer-friendly version
 - Printer-friendly version
            
            
             - Supplement
 - Supplement
 
        - 
                RC1:  'Review of ACP 2016 817', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Nov 2016
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC1:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Nov 2016
                                
                                        
 
- 
                                
                                AC1:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #1', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Nov 2016
                                
                                    
- 
                RC2:  'Review of Inamdar et al', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Nov 2016
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC2:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Dec 2016
                                
                                        
 
- 
                                
                                AC2:  'Response to Anonymous Referee #2', Aniket Inamdar, 23 Dec 2016
                                
                                    
Viewed
                            
                                Total article views: 2,435 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                            
                                
                                    
                                    
                                
                                    
                                    
                                
                            
                            
                                Cumulative views and downloads 
                                             (calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
                            
                            
                                
                                    
                                
                        
            
            
                    
                | HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,000 | 327 | 108 | 2,435 | 97 | 126 | 
- HTML: 2,000
- PDF: 327
- XML: 108
- Total: 2,435
- BibTeX: 97
- EndNote: 126
Viewed (geographical distribution)
                                    Total article views: 2,392 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
                                    
                                    Thereof 2,387 with geography defined
                                        and 5 with unknown origin. 
                                
            
            
                        | Country | # | Views | % | 
|---|
| Total: | 0 | 
| HTML: | 0 | 
| PDF: | 0 | 
| XML: | 0 | 
- 1
1
                                Latest update: 30 Oct 2025
    Aniket R. Inamdar
                                        Dept. of Mech. Engg., Stanford University, California, USA
                                    
                                Alexander D. Naiman
                                        Dept. of Aero. & Astro., Stanford University, California, USA
                                    
                                Sanjiva K. Lele
                                        Dept. of Mech. Engg., Stanford University, California, USA
                                    
                                
                                        Dept. of Aero. & Astro., Stanford University, California, USA
                                    
                                Mark Z. Jacobson
                                        Dept. of Civil & Env. Engg., Stanford University, California, USA
                                    
                                Short summary
                    Various LES models are used to study the physics of contrail evolution in a bid to help reduce the uncertainty in their predicted climate impact. However, the sensitivity of contrail properties to simulation parameters as predicted by different LES models is discrepant. This paper carefully isolates the cause of these discrepancies – different modeling of the Kelvin effect in these LES models. Different modeling of the Kelvin effect is shown to substantially alter important contrail properties.
                    Various LES models are used to study the physics of contrail evolution in a bid to help reduce...
                    
                Altmetrics
                 
 
                         
                         
                        