Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-28237-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-12-28237-2012
26 Oct 2012
 | 26 Oct 2012
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

A compressed super-parameterization: test of NAM-SCA under single-column GCM configurations

J.-I. Yano, S. K. Cheedela, and G. L. Roff

Abstract. The NAM-SCA (nonhydrostatic anelastic model with segmentally-constant approximation) is a type of cloud-resolving model (CRM) with a highly-inhomogeneous distribution of finite volumes of varying sizes in a horizontal direction under a two-dimensional geometrical configuration. These finite-volume positions and sizes are dynamically adapted to achieve best performance with a limited number of finite volumes. The concept can be compared with "compression" techniques used for digital images. The physics are also limited only to a minimum microphysics.

The present paper reports on a successful implementation of NAM-SCA into single column versions of two global atmospheric models as a compressed super-parameterization. ECHAM1 and ACCESS2 are chosen as the host models. A stand-alone single-column model (SCM) is also developed, in which the other physics are prescribed by observations. A simple radiation scheme is added as required.

Overall, it is found that, under this configuration, the lowest-resolution (Δ x = 16 km) NAM-SCA with the smallest domain size (L = 32 km) often works the best in terms of the errors for the precipitation rate, apparent heat source and moisture sink. Neither increase of resolution nor domain size leads to better performance in these respects until both cross the thresholds (Δ x ≤ 1km and L ≥ 256 km). These results suggest that even a simple parameterization (with a small degree of freedom) can perform in a reliable way as long as it is constructed in a physically consistent manner.

On the other hand, the prediction errors tend to be smaller for higher resolutions and larger domains. This tendency is clearer for the GATE3 case than the TWP-ICE4case.



1ECMWF (European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts) Hamburg version Atmospheric Model.
2Australian Community Climate and Earth-System Simulator.
3The Global Atmospheric Research Program’s (GARP) Atlantic Tropical Experiment.
4Tropical Warm Pool-International Cloud Experiment.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
J.-I. Yano, S. K. Cheedela, and G. L. Roff
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J.-I. Yano, S. K. Cheedela, and G. L. Roff
J.-I. Yano, S. K. Cheedela, and G. L. Roff

Viewed

Total article views: 2,209 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,549 518 142 2,209 102 116
  • HTML: 1,549
  • PDF: 518
  • XML: 142
  • Total: 2,209
  • BibTeX: 102
  • EndNote: 116
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics