Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.
Chemical characterization of particle emissions from controlled burns of biomass fuels using a high resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer
L. Qi,S. Hosseini,H. Jung,B. Yokelson,D. Weise,D. Cocker III,and Y. Huang
Abstract. A total of forty-nine burns were conducted at the Missoula Fire Sciences Lab consisting of nine fuel types; i.e., chamise scrub oak, ceanothus, maritime chaparral, coastal sage scrub, California sage brush, Manzanita, oak savanna, oak woodland and masticated mesquite. This paper focuses on the chemical characterization of fine particle emissions collected for flaming, mixed and smoldering phases using a HR ToF-AMS. The evolution of OM/OC, H/C, O/C and N/C from fire ignition to extinction was measured to capture the transient and integrated chemical composition of the non-refractory portion of bulk particles. Real time elemental ratios and empirical formulas derived with respect to modified combustion efficiency (MCE) are reported. For each fuel, the hydrogen fragment ions dominate the unit mass resolution (UMR) mass spectra with no specific fragment ions attributable to an individual ecological combination. An interference ion in the UMR m/z 73, a fragment normally attributed to levoglucosan, is noted. Therefore, the results imply that C2H4O2+ (m/z 60.021) plus C3H5O2+ (m/z 73.029) are more sufficient to estimate the contribution of levoglucosan. The results did not show significant variations of levoglucosan content in the organic particle with the overall average contribution fraction ranging from 0.74% for coastal sage to 1.93% for chamise.
This preprint has been withdrawn.
Received: 28 Feb 2012 – Discussion started: 29 Mar 2012
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
L. Qi,S. Hosseini,H. Jung,B. Yokelson,D. Weise,D. Cocker III,and Y. Huang
L. Qi,S. Hosseini,H. Jung,B. Yokelson,D. Weise,D. Cocker III,and Y. Huang
Viewed
Total article views: 2,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,171
454
144
2,769
146
132
HTML: 2,171
PDF: 454
XML: 144
Total: 2,769
BibTeX: 146
EndNote: 132
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Latest update: 20 Nov 2025
L. Qi
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
State Key Laboratory of Dioxin Pollution Control, National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurements, Beijing 100029, China
S. Hosseini
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
H. Jung
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
B. Yokelson
Department of Chemistry, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
D. Weise
Foreset Fire Laboratory, 4955 Canyon Crest Drive, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
D. Cocker III
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Bourns College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
Y. Huang
State Key Laboratory of Dioxin Pollution Control, National Research Center for Environmental Analysis and Measurements, Beijing 100029, China