Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.
Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply
Abstract. We continue the debate on anisotropic but scaling turbulence and its effect on aircraft measurements of turbulence (cf. Lindborg et al., 2010a, b); hereafter LTNCG1, LTNCG2). We revisit the repeatedly presented back-of-the-envelope calculation and discuss wind statistics on real isobars. We then discuss theoretical and empirical evidence that a k−5/3 horizontal wind spectrum could extend out to planetary scales.
How to cite. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., and Tuck, A. F.: Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 7495–7506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010, 2010.
Download & links
Download & links
- Preprint
(402 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC C1625: 'Interactive comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply"', Jun-Ichi Yano, 14 Apr 2010
- AC C4677: 'Reply to Interactive comment by I. Yano on “Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply” by S. Lovejoy et al.', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2488: 'Referee Comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply to E. Lindborg"', Shafer Smith, 07 May 2010
- AC C4679: 'Response to Shafer Smith', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2770: 'Interactive comment on ``Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply''', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 May 2010
- AC C4689: 'Reactions to referee 2', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC C1625: 'Interactive comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply"', Jun-Ichi Yano, 14 Apr 2010
- AC C4677: 'Reply to Interactive comment by I. Yano on “Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply” by S. Lovejoy et al.', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2488: 'Referee Comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply to E. Lindborg"', Shafer Smith, 07 May 2010
- AC C4679: 'Response to Shafer Smith', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2770: 'Interactive comment on ``Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply''', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 May 2010
- AC C4689: 'Reactions to referee 2', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
Viewed
Total article views: 1,727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,171 | 430 | 126 | 1,727 | 126 | 96 |
- HTML: 1,171
- PDF: 430
- XML: 126
- Total: 1,727
- BibTeX: 126
- EndNote: 96
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved
Latest update: 30 Apr 2024
S. Lovejoy
Physics, McGill University, 3600 University st., Montreal, Que. H3A 2T8, Canada
on leave to: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Physical Sciences Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO 80305-3337, USA
D. Schertzer
CEREVE, Université Paris Est, France
Météo France, 1 Quai Branly, Paris 75005, France
A. F. Tuck
currently at: Physics Department, Imperial College, London, UK