Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.
Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply
Abstract. We continue the debate on anisotropic but scaling turbulence and its effect on aircraft measurements of turbulence (cf. Lindborg et al., 2010a, b); hereafter LTNCG1, LTNCG2). We revisit the repeatedly presented back-of-the-envelope calculation and discuss wind statistics on real isobars. We then discuss theoretical and empirical evidence that a k−5/3 horizontal wind spectrum could extend out to planetary scales.
How to cite. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., and Tuck, A. F.: Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 7495–7506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010, 2010.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Download & links
Download & links
- Preprint
(402 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC C1625: 'Interactive comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply"', Jun-Ichi Yano, 14 Apr 2010
- AC C4677: 'Reply to Interactive comment by I. Yano on “Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply” by S. Lovejoy et al.', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2488: 'Referee Comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply to E. Lindborg"', Shafer Smith, 07 May 2010
- AC C4679: 'Response to Shafer Smith', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2770: 'Interactive comment on ``Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply''', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 May 2010
- AC C4689: 'Reactions to referee 2', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
SC C1625: 'Interactive comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply"', Jun-Ichi Yano, 14 Apr 2010
- AC C4677: 'Reply to Interactive comment by I. Yano on “Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply” by S. Lovejoy et al.', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2488: 'Referee Comment on "Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply to E. Lindborg"', Shafer Smith, 07 May 2010
- AC C4679: 'Response to Shafer Smith', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
-
RC C2770: 'Interactive comment on ``Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply''', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 May 2010
- AC C4689: 'Reactions to referee 2', Shaun Lovejoy, 01 Jul 2010
Viewed
Total article views: 1,988 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,413 | 442 | 133 | 1,988 | 140 | 106 |
- HTML: 1,413
- PDF: 442
- XML: 133
- Total: 1,988
- BibTeX: 140
- EndNote: 106
Cited
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
S. Lovejoy
Physics, McGill University, 3600 University st., Montreal, Que. H3A 2T8, Canada
on leave to: NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Physical Sciences Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO 80305-3337, USA
D. Schertzer
CEREVE, Université Paris Est, France
Météo France, 1 Quai Branly, Paris 75005, France
A. F. Tuck
currently at: Physics Department, Imperial College, London, UK