Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7495-2010
23 Mar 2010
 | 23 Mar 2010
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Why anisotropic turbulence matters: another reply

S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, and A. F. Tuck

Abstract. We continue the debate on anisotropic but scaling turbulence and its effect on aircraft measurements of turbulence (cf. Lindborg et al., 2010a, b); hereafter LTNCG1, LTNCG2). We revisit the repeatedly presented back-of-the-envelope calculation and discuss wind statistics on real isobars. We then discuss theoretical and empirical evidence that a k−5/3 horizontal wind spectrum could extend out to planetary scales.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, and A. F. Tuck
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, and A. F. Tuck
S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, and A. F. Tuck

Viewed

Total article views: 2,015 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,440 442 133 2,015 140 106
  • HTML: 1,440
  • PDF: 442
  • XML: 133
  • Total: 2,015
  • BibTeX: 140
  • EndNote: 106
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics