Articles | Volume 9, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-287-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-287-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
16 Jan 2009
Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE)
E. Dupuy
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
K. A. Walker
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
J. Kar
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
C. D. Boone
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
C. T. McElroy
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Environment Canada, Downsview, ON, Canada
P. F. Bernath
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
J. R. Drummond
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
R. Skelton
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
S. D. McLeod
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
R. C. Hughes
Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
C. R. Nowlan
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
D. G. Dufour
Picomole Instruments Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada
J. Zou
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
F. Nichitiu
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
K. Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
P. Baron
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
R. M. Bevilacqua
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., USA
T. Blumenstock
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
G. E. Bodeker
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Lauder, New Zealand
T. Borsdorff
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
A. E. Bourassa
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
H. Bovensmann
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
I. S. Boyd
NIWA – Environmental Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
A. Bracher
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
C. Brogniez
Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, CNRS – Université des sciences et technologies de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
J. P. Burrows
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
V. Catoire
Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l'Environnement, CNRS – Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France
S. Ceccherini
Instituto di Fisica Applicata "N. Carrara" (IFAC) del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
S. Chabrillat
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
T. Christensen
Danish Climate Centre, Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
M. T. Coffey
Earth and Sun Systems Laboratory (ESSL), National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA
U. Cortesi
Instituto di Fisica Applicata "N. Carrara" (IFAC) del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
J. Davies
Environment Canada, Downsview, ON, Canada
C. De Clercq
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
D. A. Degenstein
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
M. De Mazière
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
P. Demoulin
Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
J. Dodion
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
B. Firanski
Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Centre For Atmospheric Research Experiments, Egbert, ON, Canada
H. Fischer
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
G. Forbes
Environment Canada Sable Island, Dartmouth, Canada
L. Froidevaux
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
D. Fussen
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
P. Gerard
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
S. Godin-Beekmann
CNRS – Service d'Aéronomie (SA), Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris VI, Paris, France
F. Goutail
CNRS – Service d'Aéronomie (SA), Verrières-le-Buisson, France
J. Granville
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
D. Griffith
School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
C. S. Haley
Centre for Research in Earth and Space Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
J. W. Hannigan
Earth and Sun Systems Laboratory (ESSL), National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA
M. Höpfner
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
J. J. Jin
Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
A. Jones
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
N. B. Jones
School of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
K. Jucks
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA
A. Kagawa
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
Fujitsu FIP Corporation, Koto, Tokyo, Japan
Y. Kasai
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
T. E. Kerzenmacher
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
A. Kleinböhl
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
A. R. Klekociuk
Ice, Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate (IOAC) Program, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia
I. Kramer
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
H. Küllmann
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
J. Kuttippurath
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
CNRS – Service d'Aéronomie (SA), Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris VI, Paris, France
E. Kyrölä
Earth Observation, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland
J.-C. Lambert
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
N. J. Livesey
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
E. J. Llewellyn
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
N. D. Lloyd
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
E. Mahieu
Institut d'Astrophysique et de Géophysique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
G. L. Manney
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USA
B. T. Marshall
GATS, Inc., Newport News, VA, USA
J. C. McConnell
Department of Earth and Space Science and Engineering, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
M. P. McCormick
NASA Langley Research Center, Atmospheric Sciences Division, Hampton, VA, USA
I. S. McDermid
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Table Mountain Facility, Wrightwood, CA, USA
M. McHugh
GATS, Inc., Newport News, VA, USA
C. A. McLinden
Environment Canada, Downsview, ON, Canada
J. Mellqvist
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
K. Mizutani
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
Y. Murayama
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Koganei, Tokyo, Japan
D. P. Murtagh
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
H. Oelhaf
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
A. Parrish
Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
S. V. Petelina
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Department of Physics, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia
C. Piccolo
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, UK
J.-P. Pommereau
CNRS – Service d'Aéronomie (SA), Verrières-le-Buisson, France
C. E. Randall
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
C. Robert
Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie de l'Environnement, CNRS – Université d'Orléans, Orléans, France
C. Roth
Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
M. Schneider
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
C. Senten
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
T. Steck
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
A. Strandberg
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
K. B. Strawbridge
Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Centre For Atmospheric Research Experiments, Egbert, ON, Canada
R. Sussmann
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
D. P. J. Swart
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
D. W. Tarasick
Environment Canada, Downsview, ON, Canada
J. R. Taylor
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
C. Tétard
Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, CNRS – Université des sciences et technologies de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
L. W. Thomason
NASA Langley Research Center, Atmospheric Sciences Division, Hampton, VA, USA
A. M. Thompson
Department of Meteorology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
M. B. Tully
Atmosphere Watch Section, Bureau of Meteorology, Melboune, Vic, Australia
J. Urban
Department of Radio and Space Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
F. Vanhellemont
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
C. Vigouroux
Institut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Belgique (BIRA-IASB), Bruxelles, Belgium
T. von Clarmann
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung (IMK), Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK) and Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
P. von der Gathen
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, Germany
C. von Savigny
Institut für Umweltphysik (IUP), Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany
J. W. Waters
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
J. C. Witte
Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD, USA
M. Wolff
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
J. M. Zawodny
NASA Langley Research Center, Atmospheric Sciences Division, Hampton, VA, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 7,635 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 08 Feb 2008)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,129 | 3,063 | 443 | 7,635 | 531 | 404 |
- HTML: 4,129
- PDF: 3,063
- XML: 443
- Total: 7,635
- BibTeX: 531
- EndNote: 404
Total article views: 6,620 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 16 Jan 2009)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,732 | 2,488 | 400 | 6,620 | 498 | 389 |
- HTML: 3,732
- PDF: 2,488
- XML: 400
- Total: 6,620
- BibTeX: 498
- EndNote: 389
Total article views: 1,015 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 08 Feb 2008)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 397 | 575 | 43 | 1,015 | 33 | 15 |
- HTML: 397
- PDF: 575
- XML: 43
- Total: 1,015
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 15
Cited
79 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Global and long-term comparison of SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles with correlative satellite data (2002–2008) S. Mieruch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-771-2012
- Sunset–sunrise difference in solar occultation ozone measurements (SAGE II, HALOE, and ACE–FTS) and its relationship to tidal vertical winds T. Sakazaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-829-2015
- Validation of the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment by noncoincident MkIV balloon profiles V. Velazco et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014928
- Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements from onboard the International Space Station M. McCormick et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1287-2020
- Four Fourier transform spectrometers and the Arctic polar vortex: instrument intercomparison and ACE-FTS validation at Eureka during the IPY springs of 2007 and 2008 R. Batchelor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-51-2010
- Cloud sensitivity studies for stratospheric and lower mesospheric ozone profile retrievals from measurements of limb-scattered solar radiation T. Sonkaew et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-653-2009
- Validation of MIPAS IMK/IAA V5R_O3_224 ozone profiles A. Laeng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3971-2014
- Simultaneous trace gas measurements using two Fourier transform spectrometers at Eureka, Canada during spring 2006, and comparisons with the ACE-FTS D. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5383-2011
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002852
- Case studies of the impact of orbital sampling on stratospheric trend detection and derivation of tropical vertical velocities: solar occultation vs. limb emission sounding L. Millán et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11521-2016
- Technical Note: A trace gas climatology derived from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) data set A. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012
- The effects of springtime mid-latitude storms on trace gas composition determined from the MACC reanalysis K. Knowland et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3605-2015
- The SPARC water vapour assessment II: profile-to-profile and climatological comparisons of stratospheric δD(H2O) observations from satellite C. Högberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2497-2019
- Ozone correlation lengths and measurement uncertainties from analysis of historical ozonesonde data in North America and Europe G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010576
- Copernicus stratospheric ozone service, 2009–2012: validation, system intercomparison and roles of input data sets K. Lefever et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2269-2015
- NO2 air afterglow and O and NO densities from Odin‐OSIRIS night and ACE‐FTS sunset observations in the Antarctic MLT region R. Gattinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013205
- SPARC Data Initiative: A comparison of ozone climatologies from international satellite limb sounders S. Tegtmeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD019877
- Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Ozone. 2. Satellite Methods Y. Timofeev et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373925080023
- Updated validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements in the Arctic using ground-based instruments at Eureka, Canada K. Bognar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.07.014
- Validation of NO2 and NO from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) T. Kerzenmacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5801-2008
- Climatology and variability of trace gases in extratropical double‐tropopause regions from MLS, HIRDLS, and ACE‐FTS measurements M. Schwartz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021964
- Ozone Measurements Using the Refurbished Eureka Stratospheric Differential Absorption Lidar A. Tikhomirov et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1651195
- GOMOS O3, NO2, and NO3 observations in 2002–2008 E. Kyrölä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7723-2010
- The decrease in mid-stratospheric tropical ozone since 1991 G. Nedoluha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015
- Trend and variability in ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere over 2.5 solar cycles observed by SAGE II and OSIRIS C. Sioris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014
- Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 1: Measurement techniques, uncertainties and availability B. Hassler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1395-2014
- Line parameter study of ozone at 5 and 10 μm using atmospheric FTIR spectra from the ground: A spectroscopic database and wavelength region comparison C. Janssen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2016.04.003
- Validation of ACE-FTS version 5.2 ozone data with ozonesonde measurements J. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6983-2024
- High‐resolution tropospheric ozone fields for INTEX and ARCTAS from IONS ozonesondes D. Tarasick et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012918
- Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Extratropics M. Hegglin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013884
- Validation of Version 1.3 Ozone Measured by the SOFIE Instrument S. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002649
- Validation of HNO3, ClONO2, and N2O5 from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) M. Wolff et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3529-2008
- Historical trend of ozone-depleting substances and hydrofluorocarbon concentrations during 2004–2020 derived from satellite observations and estimates for global emissions A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120570
- The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives M. De Mazière et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018
- Multi-parameter dynamical diagnostics for upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric studies L. Millán et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2957-2023
- High vertical resolution water vapour profiles in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere retrieved from MAESTRO solar occultation spectra C. Sioris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.04.040
- Strategic ozone sounding networks: Review of design and accomplishments A. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.002
- Validation of reactive gases and aerosols in the MACC global analysis and forecast system H. Eskes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3523-2015
- Global OZone Chemistry And Related trace gas Data records for the Stratosphere (GOZCARDS): methodology and sample results with a focus on HCl, H2O, and O3 L. Froidevaux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10471-2015
- Analysis of IASI tropospheric O3 data over the Arctic during POLARCAT campaigns in 2008 M. Pommier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7371-2012
- Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements A. Boynard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018
- Characterization of Odin-OSIRIS ozone profiles with the SAGE II dataset C. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1447-2013
- The ALTIUS atmospheric limb sounder D. Fussen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.06.021
- Satellite observations of ozone in the upper mesosphere A. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50445
- Relative drifts and biases between six ozone limb satellite measurements from the last decade N. Rahpoe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4369-2015
- Validating the reported random errors of ACE‐FTS measurements M. Toohey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014185
- Comparison of upper tropospheric carbon monoxide from MOPITT, ACE‐FTS, and HIPPO‐QCLS S. Martínez‐Alonso et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022397
- Validation of ACE-FTS N2O measurements K. Strong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4759-2008
- Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements E. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014
- Nighttime Ozone Chemical Equilibrium in the Mesopause Region M. Kulikov et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026717
- Assessment of the quality of ACE-FTS stratospheric ozone data P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1233-2022
- Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) trace gas measurements at the University of Toronto Atmospheric Observatory from 2002 to 2020 S. Yamanouchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3387-2023
- The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013
- ACE-FTS ozone, water vapour, nitrous oxide, nitric acid, and carbon monoxide profile comparisons with MIPAS and MLS P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.026
- GOMOS ozone profile validation using ground-based and balloon sonde measurements J. van Gijsel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10473-2010
- Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-577-2019
- Model simulations of stratospheric ozone loss caused by enhanced mesospheric NOx during Arctic Winter 2003/2004 B. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5279-2008
- Validation of ACE-FTS v2.2 measurements of HCl, HF, CCl3F and CCl2F2 using space-, balloon- and ground-based instrument observations E. Mahieu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6199-2008
- Comparison of the H2O, HDO and δD stratospheric climatologies between the MIPAS-ESA V8, MIPAS-IMK V5 and ACE-FTS V4.1/4.2 satellite datasets K. De Los Ríos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3401-2024
- China's First Infrared Occultation Spectrometer (GaoFen-5/AIUS) Monitoring Atmosphere Above Antarctic: Evaluation of Methane Profiles S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3381651
- The ozone climate change initiative: Comparison of four Level-2 processors for the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) A. Laeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.013
- Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021
- UTLS water vapour from SCIAMACHY limb measurementsV3.01 (2002–2012) K. Weigel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-133-2016
- Non-Voigt line-shape effects on retrievals of atmospheric ozone: Collisionally isolated lines H. Tran et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.04.002
- Validation of stratospheric and mesospheric ozone observed by SMILES from International Space Station Y. Kasai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2311-2013
- Comparison of SMILES ClO profiles with satellite, balloon-borne and ground-based measurements H. Sagawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3325-2013
- Data assimilation of satellite-retrieved ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide with ECMWF's Composition-IFS A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5275-2015
- Multi-year comparisons of ground-based and space-borne Fourier transform spectrometers in the high Arctic between 2006 and 2013 D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3273-2017
- Comparison of HDO measurements from Envisat/MIPAS with observations by Odin/SMR and SCISAT/ACE-FTS S. Lossow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1855-2011
- Evaluation of ACE-FTS and OSIRIS Satellite retrievals of ozone and nitric acid in the tropical upper troposphere: Application to ozone production efficiency M. Cooper et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015056
- Monitoring Trace Gases over the Antarctic Using Atmospheric Infrared Ultraspectral Sounder Onboard GaoFen-5: Algorithm Description and First Retrieval Results of O3, H2O, and HCl X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171991
- Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records D. Hubert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016
- Validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements using ground-based instruments at 80° N C. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-927-2012
- Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements P. Jeffery et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025
- Validation of SAGE III/ISS Solar Occultation Ozone Products With Correlative Satellite and Ground‐Based Measurements H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032430
- Validation of SSUSI-derived auroral electron densities: comparisons to EISCAT data S. Bender et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-899-2021
- Comparison of the CMAM30 data set with ACE-FTS and OSIRIS: polar regions D. Pendlebury et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12465-2015
- The SPARC water vapour assessment II: profile-to-profile comparisons of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour data sets obtained from satellites S. Lossow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2693-2019
- Harmonized dataset of ozone profiles from satellite limb and occultation measurements V. Sofieva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-349-2013
79 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Global and long-term comparison of SCIAMACHY limb ozone profiles with correlative satellite data (2002–2008) S. Mieruch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-771-2012
- Sunset–sunrise difference in solar occultation ozone measurements (SAGE II, HALOE, and ACE–FTS) and its relationship to tidal vertical winds T. Sakazaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-829-2015
- Validation of the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment by noncoincident MkIV balloon profiles V. Velazco et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014928
- Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements from onboard the International Space Station M. McCormick et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1287-2020
- Four Fourier transform spectrometers and the Arctic polar vortex: instrument intercomparison and ACE-FTS validation at Eureka during the IPY springs of 2007 and 2008 R. Batchelor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-51-2010
- Cloud sensitivity studies for stratospheric and lower mesospheric ozone profile retrievals from measurements of limb-scattered solar radiation T. Sonkaew et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-653-2009
- Validation of MIPAS IMK/IAA V5R_O3_224 ozone profiles A. Laeng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3971-2014
- Simultaneous trace gas measurements using two Fourier transform spectrometers at Eureka, Canada during spring 2006, and comparisons with the ACE-FTS D. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5383-2011
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002852
- Case studies of the impact of orbital sampling on stratospheric trend detection and derivation of tropical vertical velocities: solar occultation vs. limb emission sounding L. Millán et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11521-2016
- Technical Note: A trace gas climatology derived from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) data set A. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012
- The effects of springtime mid-latitude storms on trace gas composition determined from the MACC reanalysis K. Knowland et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3605-2015
- The SPARC water vapour assessment II: profile-to-profile and climatological comparisons of stratospheric δD(H2O) observations from satellite C. Högberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2497-2019
- Ozone correlation lengths and measurement uncertainties from analysis of historical ozonesonde data in North America and Europe G. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010576
- Copernicus stratospheric ozone service, 2009–2012: validation, system intercomparison and roles of input data sets K. Lefever et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2269-2015
- NO2 air afterglow and O and NO densities from Odin‐OSIRIS night and ACE‐FTS sunset observations in the Antarctic MLT region R. Gattinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013205
- SPARC Data Initiative: A comparison of ozone climatologies from international satellite limb sounders S. Tegtmeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD019877
- Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Ozone. 2. Satellite Methods Y. Timofeev et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373925080023
- Updated validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements in the Arctic using ground-based instruments at Eureka, Canada K. Bognar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.07.014
- Validation of NO2 and NO from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) T. Kerzenmacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5801-2008
- Climatology and variability of trace gases in extratropical double‐tropopause regions from MLS, HIRDLS, and ACE‐FTS measurements M. Schwartz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021964
- Ozone Measurements Using the Refurbished Eureka Stratospheric Differential Absorption Lidar A. Tikhomirov et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2019.1651195
- GOMOS O3, NO2, and NO3 observations in 2002–2008 E. Kyrölä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7723-2010
- The decrease in mid-stratospheric tropical ozone since 1991 G. Nedoluha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015
- Trend and variability in ozone in the tropical lower stratosphere over 2.5 solar cycles observed by SAGE II and OSIRIS C. Sioris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3479-2014
- Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 1: Measurement techniques, uncertainties and availability B. Hassler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1395-2014
- Line parameter study of ozone at 5 and 10 μm using atmospheric FTIR spectra from the ground: A spectroscopic database and wavelength region comparison C. Janssen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jms.2016.04.003
- Validation of ACE-FTS version 5.2 ozone data with ozonesonde measurements J. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6983-2024
- High‐resolution tropospheric ozone fields for INTEX and ARCTAS from IONS ozonesondes D. Tarasick et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012918
- Multimodel assessment of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: Extratropics M. Hegglin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013884
- Validation of Version 1.3 Ozone Measured by the SOFIE Instrument S. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002649
- Validation of HNO3, ClONO2, and N2O5 from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) M. Wolff et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3529-2008
- Historical trend of ozone-depleting substances and hydrofluorocarbon concentrations during 2004–2020 derived from satellite observations and estimates for global emissions A. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120570
- The Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC): history, status and perspectives M. De Mazière et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4935-2018
- Multi-parameter dynamical diagnostics for upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric studies L. Millán et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-2957-2023
- High vertical resolution water vapour profiles in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere retrieved from MAESTRO solar occultation spectra C. Sioris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.04.040
- Strategic ozone sounding networks: Review of design and accomplishments A. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.002
- Validation of reactive gases and aerosols in the MACC global analysis and forecast system H. Eskes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3523-2015
- Global OZone Chemistry And Related trace gas Data records for the Stratosphere (GOZCARDS): methodology and sample results with a focus on HCl, H2O, and O3 L. Froidevaux et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10471-2015
- Analysis of IASI tropospheric O3 data over the Arctic during POLARCAT campaigns in 2008 M. Pommier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7371-2012
- Validation of the IASI FORLI/EUMETSAT ozone products using satellite (GOME-2), ground-based (Brewer–Dobson, SAOZ, FTIR) and ozonesonde measurements A. Boynard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5125-2018
- Characterization of Odin-OSIRIS ozone profiles with the SAGE II dataset C. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1447-2013
- The ALTIUS atmospheric limb sounder D. Fussen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.06.021
- Satellite observations of ozone in the upper mesosphere A. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50445
- Relative drifts and biases between six ozone limb satellite measurements from the last decade N. Rahpoe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4369-2015
- Validating the reported random errors of ACE‐FTS measurements M. Toohey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014185
- Comparison of upper tropospheric carbon monoxide from MOPITT, ACE‐FTS, and HIPPO‐QCLS S. Martínez‐Alonso et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022397
- Validation of ACE-FTS N2O measurements K. Strong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4759-2008
- Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements E. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014
- Nighttime Ozone Chemical Equilibrium in the Mesopause Region M. Kulikov et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026717
- Assessment of the quality of ACE-FTS stratospheric ozone data P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1233-2022
- Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) trace gas measurements at the University of Toronto Atmospheric Observatory from 2002 to 2020 S. Yamanouchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3387-2023
- The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013
- ACE-FTS ozone, water vapour, nitrous oxide, nitric acid, and carbon monoxide profile comparisons with MIPAS and MLS P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.026
- GOMOS ozone profile validation using ground-based and balloon sonde measurements J. van Gijsel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10473-2010
- Stratospheric ozone loss in the Arctic winters between 2005 and 2013 derived with ACE-FTS measurements D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-577-2019
- Model simulations of stratospheric ozone loss caused by enhanced mesospheric NOx during Arctic Winter 2003/2004 B. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5279-2008
- Validation of ACE-FTS v2.2 measurements of HCl, HF, CCl3F and CCl2F2 using space-, balloon- and ground-based instrument observations E. Mahieu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6199-2008
- Comparison of the H2O, HDO and δD stratospheric climatologies between the MIPAS-ESA V8, MIPAS-IMK V5 and ACE-FTS V4.1/4.2 satellite datasets K. De Los Ríos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3401-2024
- China's First Infrared Occultation Spectrometer (GaoFen-5/AIUS) Monitoring Atmosphere Above Antarctic: Evaluation of Methane Profiles S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3381651
- The ozone climate change initiative: Comparison of four Level-2 processors for the Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) A. Laeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.013
- Model estimations of geophysical variability between satellite measurements of ozone profiles P. Sheese et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1425-2021
- UTLS water vapour from SCIAMACHY limb measurementsV3.01 (2002–2012) K. Weigel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-133-2016
- Non-Voigt line-shape effects on retrievals of atmospheric ozone: Collisionally isolated lines H. Tran et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2010.04.002
- Validation of stratospheric and mesospheric ozone observed by SMILES from International Space Station Y. Kasai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2311-2013
- Comparison of SMILES ClO profiles with satellite, balloon-borne and ground-based measurements H. Sagawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3325-2013
- Data assimilation of satellite-retrieved ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide with ECMWF's Composition-IFS A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5275-2015
- Multi-year comparisons of ground-based and space-borne Fourier transform spectrometers in the high Arctic between 2006 and 2013 D. Griffin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3273-2017
- Comparison of HDO measurements from Envisat/MIPAS with observations by Odin/SMR and SCISAT/ACE-FTS S. Lossow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1855-2011
- Evaluation of ACE-FTS and OSIRIS Satellite retrievals of ozone and nitric acid in the tropical upper troposphere: Application to ozone production efficiency M. Cooper et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015056
- Monitoring Trace Gases over the Antarctic Using Atmospheric Infrared Ultraspectral Sounder Onboard GaoFen-5: Algorithm Description and First Retrieval Results of O3, H2O, and HCl X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171991
- Ground-based assessment of the bias and long-term stability of 14 limb and occultation ozone profile data records D. Hubert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2497-2016
- Validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements using ground-based instruments at 80° N C. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-927-2012
- Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements P. Jeffery et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-569-2025
- Validation of SAGE III/ISS Solar Occultation Ozone Products With Correlative Satellite and Ground‐Based Measurements H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032430
- Validation of SSUSI-derived auroral electron densities: comparisons to EISCAT data S. Bender et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-899-2021
- Comparison of the CMAM30 data set with ACE-FTS and OSIRIS: polar regions D. Pendlebury et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12465-2015
- The SPARC water vapour assessment II: profile-to-profile comparisons of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour data sets obtained from satellites S. Lossow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2693-2019
- Harmonized dataset of ozone profiles from satellite limb and occultation measurements V. Sofieva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-349-2013
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 21 Oct 2026
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint