53 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. LINET—An international lightning detection network in Europe H. Betz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2008.06.012
2. Sources contributing to background surface ozone in the US Intermountain West L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5295-2014
3. Global sensitivity analysis of GEOS-Chem modeled ozone and hydrogen oxides during the INTEX campaigns K. Christian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2443-2018
4. Tropospheric ozone precursors: global and regional distributions, trends, and variability Y. Elshorbany et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12225-2024
5. Air mass origins influencing TTL chemical composition over West Africa during 2006 summer monsoon K. Law et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10753-2010
6. Tropospheric ozone production related to West African city emissions during the 2006 wet season AMMA campaign G. Ancellet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6349-2011
7. The NASA Lightning Nitrogen Oxides Model (LNOM): Application to air quality modeling W. Koshak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.12.015
8. Estimate of NOX production in the lightning channel based on three-dimensional lightning locating system R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4812-1
9. Assessing and improving cloud-height-based parameterisations of global lightning flash rate, and their impact on lightning-produced NOx and tropospheric composition in a chemistry–climate model A. Luhar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7053-2021
10. Geological evidence of extensive N-fixation by volcanic lightning during very large explosive eruptions A. Aroskay et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2309131121
11. Observing U.S. Regional Variability in Lightning NO2 Production Rates J. Lapierre et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031362
12. Significant contribution of lightning NOx to summertime surface O3 on the Tibetan Plateau M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154639
13. Mesoscale convective systems observed during AMMA and their impact on the NOx and O3 budget over West Africa H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2503-2011
14. Tracking potential sources of peak ozone concentrations in the upper troposphere over the Arabian Gulf region T. Spohn & B. Rappenglück https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.026
15. Production of lightning NOx and its vertical distribution calculated from three‐dimensional cloud‐scale chemical transport model simulations L. Ott et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011880
16. Impacts of midlatitude precursor emissions and local photochemistry on ozone abundances in the Arctic T. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016370
17. North American influence on tropospheric ozone and the effects of recent emission reductions: Constraints from ICARTT observations R. Hudman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010126
18. Sensitivity of satellite observations for freshly produced lightning NOx S. Beirle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1077-2009
19. Direct satellite observation of lightning-produced NOx S. Beirle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10965-2010
20. Estimates of lightning NOx production based on OMI NO2 observations over the Gulf of Mexico K. Pickering et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024179
21. Impact of lightning NO emissions on North American photochemistry as determined using the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) model D. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014062
22. High-speed camera observations of intracloud flashes T. da Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108344
23. Cloud-resolving chemistry simulation of a Hector thunderstorm K. Cummings et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2757-2013
24. Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States? K. Travis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016
25. Role of Lightning NOx in Ozone Formation: A Review S. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02710-5
26. Sensitivity of climate–chemistry model simulated atmospheric composition to the application of an inverse relationship between NOx emission and lightning flash frequency F. Pérez-Invernón et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5557-2025
27. On the origin of pronounced O3 gradients in the thunderstorm outflow region during DC3 H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024279
28. Injection of lightning‐produced NOx, water vapor, wildfire emissions, and stratospheric air to the UT/LS as observed from DC3 measurements H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024273
29. Airborne quantification of upper tropospheric NOx production from lightning in deep convective storms over the United States Great Plains I. Pollack et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023941
30. NOx production by lightning in Hector: first airborne measurements during SCOUT-O3/ACTIVE H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8377-2009
31. Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer long-term trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO2 background R. Silvern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019
32. Lightning NO_x influence on large-scale NO_y and O₃ plumes observed over the northern mid-latitudes A. Gressent et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.25544
33. The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign M. Barth et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1
34. Impact of lightning-NO on eastern United States photochemistry during the summer of 2006 as determined using the CMAQ model D. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1737-2012
35. Trans-Pacific transport of reactive nitrogen and ozone to Canada during spring T. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8353-2010
36. Lightning characteristics observed by a VLF/LF lightning detection network (LINET) in Brazil, Australia, Africa and Germany H. Höller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7795-2009
37. Lightning NO x and Impacts on Air Quality L. Murray https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0031-7
38. Ground-based observation of lightning-induced nitrogen oxides at a mountaintop in free troposphere R. Wada et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-019-09391-4
39. Spaceborne Observations of Lightning NO2 in the Arctic X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07988
40. Lightning NOx emissions over the USA constrained by TES ozone observations and the GEOS-Chem model L. Jourdain et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-107-2010
41. Global lightning NOx production estimated by an assimilation of multiple satellite data sets K. Miyazaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3277-2014
42. Observations of Lightning NOx Production From GOES‐R Post Launch Test Field Campaign Flights D. Allen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033769
43. Observations of ozone production in a dissipating tropical convective cell during TC4 G. Morris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11189-2010
44. Convective transport of trace species observed during the Stratosphere‐Troposphere Analyses of Regional Transport 2008 experiment L. Siu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023645
45. Modeling the Flash Rate of Thunderstorms. Part I: Framework J. Dahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-10-05031.1
46. INFERNO: a fire and emissions scheme for the UK Met Office's Unified Model S. Mangeon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2685-2016
47. Construction of merged satellite total O3 and NO2 time series in the tropics for trend studies and evaluation by comparison to NDACC SAOZ measurements M. Pastel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3337-2014
48. Lightning‐Produced Nitrogen Oxides Per Flash Length Obtained by Using TROPOMI Observations and the Ebro Lightning Mapping Array F. Pérez‐Invernón et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL104699
49. Global patterns of lightning properties derived by OTD and LIS S. Beirle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2715-2014
50. Sensitivity of tropical tropospheric composition to lightning NOx production as determined by replay simulations with GEOS‐5 C. Liaskos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022987
51. Effects of regional-scale and convective transports on tropospheric ozone chemistry revealed by aircraft observations during the wet season of the AMMA campaign G. Ancellet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-383-2009
52. Comparison of Six Lightning Parameterizations in CAM5 and the Impact on Global Atmospheric Chemistry F. Gordillo‐Vázquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000873
53. Introduction to the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) 2012 Studies M. Barth et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030944