79 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. On the performance of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry for breath-relevant gas matrices J. Beauchamp et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/12/125003
2. Comparison of formaldehyde measurements by Hantzsch, CRDS and DOAS in the SAPHIR chamber M. Glowania et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-4239-2021
3. Field Experience for Determination of Formaldehyde in Stack Emissions A. Cefalì et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910150
4. Leaf-Level Bidirectional Exchange of Formaldehyde on Deciduous and Evergreen Tree Saplings J. Shutter et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00325
5. Isotope effect in the formation of H2 from H2CO studied at the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR T. Röckmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5343-2010
6. Observations and modeling of formaldehyde at the PROPHET mixed hardwood forest site in 2008 M. Galloway et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.053
7. Characterizing formaldehyde emissions from forklifts in China based on real-world online measurements Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120685
8. Emission and chemistry of organic carbon in the gas and aerosol phase at a sub-urban site near Mexico City in March 2006 during the MILAGRO study J. de Gouw et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3425-2009
9. Intercomparison of oxygenated volatile organic compound measurements at the SAPHIR atmosphere simulation chamber E. Apel et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009865
10. Formaldehyde passive sampler using an optical chemical sensor: how to limit the humidity interference J. Vignau-Laulhere et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-017-0568-3
11. Intercomparison of Hantzsch and fiber-laser-induced-fluorescence formaldehyde measurements J. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1571-2014
12. Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Applications in Atmospheric Sciences B. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325
13. Near Real-Time Monitoring of Formaldehyde in a Low-Energy School Building C. Trocquet et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120763
14. Interband cascade laser absorption sensor for real-time monitoring of formaldehyde filtration by a nanofiber membrane C. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.008005
15. HCN detection with a proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer W. Knighton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2009.02.013
16. Formation of Formaldehyde and Other Byproducts by TiO2 Photocatalyst Materials W. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094821
17. Abundance of volatile organic compounds and their role in ozone pollution management: evidence from multi-platform observations and model representation during the 2021–2022 field campaign in Hong Kong X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17629-2025
18. Formaldehyde and its relation to CO, PAN, and SO2 in the Houston-Galveston airshed B. Rappenglück et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2413-2010
19. Analytical chemistry of carbonyl compounds in indoor air T. Salthammer https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN00822C
20. On the distribution of formaldehyde in the western Po-Valley, Italy, during FORMAT 2002/2003 W. Junkermann https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9187-2009
21. A new device for formaldehyde and total aldehydes real-time monitoring M. Sassine et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2010-5
22. Accurate determination of formaldehyde amount fraction in cylinders using mixtures of primary standards of formaldehyde in nitrogen prepared by a gravimetric permeation method N. Aoki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-018-1321-0
23. Useful hourly measurements of formaldehyde at PAMS sites in New York O. Rattigan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2025.102568
24. Measurement of gaseous and particulate formaldehyde in the Yangtze River Delta, China R. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117114
25. Reference Gas Mixtures of Formaldehyde in Nitrogen: Preparation by a Dynamic Gravimetric Method L. Konopel’ko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01713-3
26. On-line gaseous formaldehyde detection by a microfluidic analytical method based on simultaneous uptake and derivatization in a temperature controlled annular flow M. Guglielmino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.038
27. Reference gas mixtures of formaldehyde in nitrogen: preparation by a dynamic-gravimetric method L. Konopelko et al. https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2019-10-61-67
28. Formaldehyde in the Indoor Environment T. Salthammer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800399g
29. A review of microbial and chemical assessment of indoor surfaces V. Mihucz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2021.1995870
30. Experimental setup and analytical methods for the non-invasive determination of volatile organic compounds, formaldehyde and NO in exhaled human breath U. Riess et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2010.04.049
31. Formaldehyd in der Umgebungsluft: von der Innenluftverunreinigung zur Außenluftverunreinigung? T. Salthammer https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201205984
32. A portable self-calibrating logic detector for gradient detection of formaldehyde based on luminescent metal organic frameworks Y. Zhang & B. Yan https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC01288E
33. Denuder sampling techniques for the determination of gas-phase carbonyl compounds: A comparison and characterisation of in situ and ex situ derivatisation methods A. Kahnt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.02.028
34. Improved spherical mirror multipass-cell-based interband cascade laser spectrometer for detecting ambient formaldehyde at parts per trillion by volume levels B. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.008743
35. Hyperspectral Vertical Remote Sensing Bridges the Satellite-to-Surface Gap: Unraveling Height-Resolved Evolution Mechanisms of Atmospheric Formaldehyde in China B. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c02601
36. A product study of the isoprene+NO3 reaction A. Perring et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4945-2009
37. A new laser-based and ultra-portable gas sensor for indoor and outdoor formaldehyde (HCHO) monitoring J. Shutter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6079-2019
38. Evaluation of the permeability of formaldehyde and water through a permeation tube for the preparation of an accurate formaldehyde reference gas mixture N. Aoki et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an00112a
39. Detection of nitrous acid in the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR using open-path incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy and extractive long-path absorption photometry S. Dixneuf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-945-2022
40. Airborne formaldehyde measurements using PTR-MS: calibration, humidity dependence, inter-comparison and initial results C. Warneke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2345-2011
41. PTR-QMS versus PTR-TOF comparison in a region with oil and natural gas extraction industry in the Uintah Basin in 2013 C. Warneke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-411-2015
42. Measuring OVOCs and VOCs by PTR-MS in an urban roadside microenvironment of Hong Kong: relative humidity and temperature dependence, and field intercomparisons L. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5763-2016
43. Portable photocatalytic air cleaners: efficiencies and by-product generation J. Gunschera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5992-3
44. Calibration and intercomparison of acetic acid measurements using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) K. Haase et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2739-2012
45. An Upgrade of Apparatus and Measurement Systems for Generation of Gaseous Formaldehyde: A Review S. Dugheri et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2021.1913090
46. An Imidazole-Based Triangular Macrocycle for Visual Detection of Formaldehyde M. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03118
47. Sensitive Detection of Ambient Formaldehyde by Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04821
48. Evaluation of Aeris mid-infrared absorption (MIRA), Picarro CRDS (cavity ring-down spectroscopy) G2307, and dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)-based sampling for long-term formaldehyde monitoring efforts A. Mouat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1979-2024
49. Formaldehyde in the Ambient Atmosphere: From an Indoor Pollutant to an Outdoor Pollutant? T. Salthammer https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201205984
50. Platinum dioxide activated porous SnO2 microspheres for the detection of trace formaldehyde at low operating temperature Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.014
51. Formaldehyde and glyoxal measurement deploying a selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS) A. Zogka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2001-2022
52. Production and stability of low amount fraction of formaldehyde in hydrogen gas standards T. Bacquart et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.026
53. Multi-tool formaldehyde measurement in simulated and real atmospheres for indoor air survey and concentration change monitoring L. Chiappini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-010-0102-7
54. Assessing the Ratios of Formaldehyde and Glyoxal to NO2 as Indicators of O3–NOx–VOC Sensitivity J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07506
55. First direct measurements of formaldehyde flux via eddy covariance: implications for missing in-canopy formaldehyde sources J. DiGangi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10565-2011
56. Gaseous reference standards of formaldehyde from trioxane P. Brewer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.02.075
57. Key results from the salt lake regional smoke, ozone, and aerosol study (SAMOZA) D. Jaffe et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2301956
58. Recent developments of proton‐transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR‐MS) and its applications in medical research X. Zhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21357
59. A coupled sensor-spectrophotometric device for continuous measurement of formaldehyde in indoor environments E. Carter et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2013.61
60. Measuring atmospheric composition change P. Laj et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.020
61. The atmospheric HCHO budget at Dumont d'Urville (East Antarctica): Contribution of photochemical gas‐phase production versus snow emissions S. Preunkert et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD019864
62. Technical Note: Quantitative long-term measurements of VOC concentrations by PTR-MS – measurement, calibration, and volume mixing ratio calculation methods R. Taipale et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6681-2008
63. Validation of primary formaldehyde gas standards prepared by dynamic thermogravimetry through a tri-national comparison of gaseous formaldehyde amount fraction N. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-016-1219-7
64. Colorimetric sensor strips for formaldehyde assay utilizing fluoral-p decorated polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an00812f
65. Mitigation of Indoor Air Pollution from Air Cleaners Using a Catalyst R. Mesburis et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00117
66. A tunable diode laser absorption spectrometer for formaldehyde atmospheric measurements validated by simulation chamber instrumentation V. Catoire et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60726-2
67. Ozone-initiated Terpene Reaction Products in Five European Offices: Replacement of a Floor Cleaning Agent A. Nørgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504106j
68. Particulate-bound alkyl nitrate pollution and formation mechanisms in Beijing, China J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-123-2024
69. Broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy in the ultraviolet spectral region for measurements of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde R. Washenfelder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-41-2016
70. Monitoring techniques of airborne carbonyl compounds: Principles, performance and challenges Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117395
71. Ozone-initiated VOC and particle emissions from a cleaning agent and an air freshener: Risk assessment of acute airway effects A. Nørgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.029
72. Human reference values for acute airway effects of five common ozone-initiated terpene reaction products in indoor air P. Wolkoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.11.008
73. Experimental evaluation on energy performance of innovative clean air heat pump for indoor environment control in summer and winter seasons J. Nie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.008
74. Ultrasensitive and highly selective detection of formaldehyde via an adenine-based biological metal–organic framework Y. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0QM01097A
75. Formaldehyde measurements by Proton transfer reaction – Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS): correction for humidity effects A. Vlasenko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1055-2010
76. Seasonal and Diurnal Variations in Greenhouse Gas Methane (CH4) in a Rural Area of Rome (Italy) A. Ianniello et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020159
77. A new airborne laser-induced fluorescence instrument for in situ detection of formaldehyde throughout the troposphere and lower stratosphere M. Cazorla et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-541-2015
78. Characterisation of organic contaminants in the CLOUD chamber at CERN R. Schnitzhofer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2159-2014
79. Detection of formaldehyde emissions from an industrial zone in the Yangtze River Delta region of China using a proton transfer reaction ion-drift chemical ionization mass spectrometer Y. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6101-2016