80 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Production of lightning NOx and its vertical distribution calculated from three‐dimensional cloud‐scale chemical transport model simulations L. Ott et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011880
2. Lightning activity in Brazilian thunderstorms during TROCCINOX: implications for NOx production H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-921-2008
3. Relative sensitivities of simulated rainfall to fixed shape parameters and collection efficiencies S. Freeman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3550
4. Retention of α-pinene oxidation products and nitro-aromatic compounds during riming C. Borchers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13961-2024
5. The historical climate trend resulted in changed vertical transport patterns in climate model simulations A. Jeske & H. Tost https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14435-2025
6. Observational and modelling evidence of tropical deep convective clouds as a source of mid‐tropospheric accumulation mode aerosols A. Engström et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035817
7. Evaluation of Supercell Storm Triggering Factors Based on a Cloud Resolving Model Simulation V. Spiridonov & M. Ćurić https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-018-0070-7
8. The impact of overshooting deep convection on local transport and mixing in the tropical upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) W. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6467-2015
9. Differences in deep convective transport characteristics between quasi‐isolated strong convection and mesoscale convective systems using seasonal WRF simulations B. Bigelbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021875
10. Why Flash Type Matters: A Statistical Analysis R. Mecikalski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075003
11. Improvement of inorganic aerosol component in PM2.5 by constraining aqueous-phase formation of sulfate in cloud with satellite retrievals: WRF-Chem simulations T. Sha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150229
12. Modeling regional aerosol and aerosol precursor variability over California and its sensitivity to emissions and long-range transport during the 2010 CalNex and CARES campaigns J. Fast et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10013-2014
13. Ozone production and transport over the Amazon Basin during the dry-to-wet and wet-to-dry transition seasons M. Bela et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-757-2015
14. The impact of inhomogeneous emissions and topography on ozone photochemistry in the vicinity of Hong Kong Island Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3531-2021
15. A cloud chemistry module for the 3-D cloud-resolving mesoscale model Meso-NH with application to idealized cases M. Leriche et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1275-2013
16. Chemical analysis of the Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL) with emphasis on secondary aerosol particles using aircraft-based in situ aerosol mass spectrometry O. Appel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13607-2022
17. Derivation of aerosol profiles for MC3E convection studies and use in simulations of the 20 May squall line case A. Fridlind et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5947-2017
18. Cloud-resolving simulations of mercury scavenging and deposition in thunderstorms U. Nair et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10143-2013
19. Study of interaction between cloud microphysics and chemistry using coupled bin microphysics and bin aqueous chemistry scheme G. Schmeller & I. Geresdi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.064
20. Mesoscale convective systems observed during AMMA and their impact on the NOx and O3 budget over West Africa H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2503-2011
21. Implementation of Improved Parameterization of Terrestrial Flux in WRF‐VPRM Improves the Simulation of Nighttime CO2 Peaks and a Daytime CO2 Band Ahead of a Cold Front X. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034362
22. Comparing turbulent mixing of atmospheric oxidants across model scales Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.004
23. Transport and chemistry of isoprene and its oxidation products in deep convective clouds R. Bardakov et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2021.1979856
24. Do organics contribute to small particle formation in the Amazonian upper troposphere? A. Ekman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034970
25. Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and Fogs B. Ervens https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887
26. From urban meteorology, climate and environment research to integrated city services A. Baklanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2017.05.004
27. Injection of lightning‐produced NOx, water vapor, wildfire emissions, and stratospheric air to the UT/LS as observed from DC3 measurements H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024273
28. A 1-D model to retrieve the vertical profiles of minor atmospheric constituents for cloud microphysical modelling: III. Disturbed weather situations K. Patnaik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167959
29. Analysis of Convective Transport and Parameter Sensitivity in a Single Column Version of the Goddard Earth Observation System, Version 5, General Circulation Model L. Ott et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2694.1
30. Quantifying the relationship between extreme air pollution events and extreme weather events H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.11.010
31. Numerical simulation of a violent supercell tornado over Vienna airport initialized and initiated with a cloud model V. Spiridonov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105758
32. Formation of ozone and growth of aerosols in young smoke plumes from biomass burning: 2. Three‐dimensional Eulerian studies M. Alvarado et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011186
33. Representation of tropical deep convection in atmospheric models – Part 2: Tracer transport C. Hoyle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8103-2011
34. Megacities, air quality and climate A. Baklanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.059
35. Estimation of total lightning from various storm parameters: A cloud‐resolving model study C. Barthe et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014405
36. The Role of Convective Up‐ and Downdrafts in the Transport of Trace Gases in the Amazon R. Bardakov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037265
37. The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign M. Barth et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00290.1
38. Effect of Marine and Land Convection on Wet Scavenging of Ozone Precursors Observed During a SEAC4RS Case Study G. Cuchiara et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037107
39. The Chemistry CATT-BRAMS model (CCATT-BRAMS 4.5): a regional atmospheric model system for integrated air quality and weather forecasting and research K. Longo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1389-2013
40. Numerical study of tracers transport by a mesoscale convective system over West Africa C. Barthe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-731-2011
41. Development and Implementation of a Physics‐Based Convective Mixing Scheme in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling Framework A. Pouyaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002475
42. Cloud-resolving chemistry simulation of a Hector thunderstorm K. Cummings et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2757-2013
43. The relationship between lightning activity and ice fluxes in thunderstorms W. Deierling et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009700
44. Kinetic processes of interfacial transport of reactive species across plasma–water interfaces: the effect of temperature F. Green & M. Hasan https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CP04272G
45. Evaluation of deep convective transport in storms from different convective regimes during the DC3 field campaign using WRF‐Chem with lightning data assimilation Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026461
46. Prediction of extreme convective rainfall intensities using a free-running 3-D sub-km-scale cloud model initialized from WRF km-scale NWP forecasts V. Spiridonov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105401
47. Partitioning of HNO3, H2O2 and SO2 to cloud ice: Simulations with CMAQ B. Marmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.12.041
48. Simulation of carbonaceous aerosols over the Third Pole and adjacent regions: distribution, transportation, deposition, and climatic effects Z. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2509-1
49. Convective transport and scavenging of peroxides by thunderstorms observed over the central U.S. during DC3 M. Barth et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024570
50. CELLS v1.0: updated and parallelized version of an electrical scheme to simulate multiple electrified clouds and flashes over large domains C. Barthe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-167-2012
51. A Novel Framework to Study Trace Gas Transport in Deep Convective Clouds R. Bardakov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001931
52. Treatment of Key Aerosol and Cloud Processes in Earth System Models – Recommendations from the FORCeS Project I. Riipinen et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1883
53. Ice properties of single‐layer stratocumulus during the Mixed‐Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment: 2. Model results A. Fridlind et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008646
54. Aerosol sources in the western Mediterranean during summertime: a model-based approach M. Chrit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9631-2018
55. Vertical Transport, Entrainment, and Scavenging Processes Affecting Trace Gases in a Modeled and Observed SEAC4RS Case Study G. Cuchiara et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031957
56. Evaluation of the Physical and Chemical Properties of Eyjafjallajökull Volcanic Plume Using a Cloud-Resolving Model V. Spiridonov & M. Curic https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-012-0607-0
57. Model representations of aerosol layers transported from North America over the Atlantic Ocean during the Two‐Column Aerosol Project J. Fast et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025248
58. Radar reflectivity as a proxy for convective mass transport G. Mullendore et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011431
59. Wet scavenging of soluble gases in DC3 deep convective storms using WRF‐Chem simulations and aircraft observations M. Bela et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024623
60. Numerical simulation of airborne cloud seeding over Greece, using a convective cloud model V. Spiridonov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0056-z
61. Overview of the Meso-NH model version 5.4 and its applications C. Lac et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1929-2018
62. NOx production by lightning in Hector: first airborne measurements during SCOUT-O3/ACTIVE H. Huntrieser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8377-2009
63. In situ measurements of tropical cloud properties in the West African Monsoon: upper tropospheric ice clouds, Mesoscale Convective System outflow, and subvisual cirrus W. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5569-2011
64. Examination of in-cloud sulfate chemistry using a different model initialization V. Spiridonov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0632-y
65. Evaluation of a new lightning-produced NOx parameterization for cloud resolving models and its associated uncertainties C. Barthe & M. Barth https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4691-2008
66. New off-line aircraft instrumentation for non-methane hydrocarbon measurements J. Bechara et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2330-3
67. Convective transport of trace species observed during the Stratosphere‐Troposphere Analyses of Regional Transport 2008 experiment L. Siu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023645
68. Impact of In‐Cloud Aqueous Processes on the Chemistry and Transport of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026688
69. Impact of Two-Way Aerosol–Cloud Interaction and Changes in Aerosol Size Distribution on Simulated Aerosol-Induced Deep Convective Cloud Sensitivity A. Ekman et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3651.1
70. A comparison of TWP‐ICE observational data with cloud‐resolving model results A. Fridlind et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016595
71. Wet Scavenging in WRF‐Chem Simulations of Parameterized Convection for a Severe Storm During the DC3 Field Campaign Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030484
72. Chemistry of riming: the retention of organic and inorganic atmospheric trace constituents A. Jost et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9717-2017
73. Aerosol transport and wet scavenging in deep convective clouds: A case study and model evaluation using a multiple passive tracer analysis approach Q. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023647
74. Examining relationships between cloud‐resolving model parameters and total flash rates to generate lightning density maps C. Bovalo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3494
75. Three-dimensional cloud-resolving modeling of the flash-flood heavy rainfall event over Kosovo L. Osmanaj et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01426-z
76. Analysis and numerical simulation of a real cell merger using a three-dimensional cloud resolving model T. Karacostas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.09.011
77. Examination of sulfate chemistry sensitivity in a mid-latitude and tropical storm using a cloud resolving model V. Spiridonov & M. Ćurić https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-012-0036-0
78. Freezing-enhanced oxidation of iodide by hydrogen peroxide in the presence of antifreeze proteins from the Arctic yeast Leucosporidium sp.AY30 B. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113233
79. Retention during freezing of raindrops – Part 1: Investigation of single and binary mixtures of nitric, formic, and acetic acids and 2-nitrophenol M. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11813-2025
80. Isentropic transport and the seasonal cycle amplitude of CO2 E. Barnes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025109