50 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The magnitude and causes of uncertainty in global model simulations of cloud condensation nuclei L. Lee et al. 10.5194/acp-13-8879-2013
2. What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO2? U. Niemeier & C. Timmreck 10.5194/acp-15-9129-2015
3. Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol microphysics representations within the same 3-D global chemical transport model G. Mann et al. 10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012
4. Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
5. Reformulating the bromine alpha factor and equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC): evolution of ozone destruction rates of bromine and chlorine in future climate scenarios J. Klobas et al. 10.5194/acp-20-9459-2020
6. Tropical tropopause ice clouds: a dynamic approach to the mystery of low crystal numbers P. Spichtinger & M. Krämer 10.5194/acp-13-9801-2013
7. An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
8. Injecting solid particles into the stratosphere could mitigate global warming but currently entails great uncertainties S. Vattioni et al. 10.1038/s43247-025-02038-1
9. The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations D. MacMartin et al. 10.1002/2017JD026868
10. Volcanic forcing for climate modeling: a new microphysics-based data set covering years 1600–present F. Arfeuille et al. 10.5194/cp-10-359-2014
11. Quantifying the impact of sulfate geoengineering on mortality from air quality and UV-B exposure S. Eastham et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.047
12. Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
13. A review of coarse mineral dust in the Earth system A. Adebiyi et al. 10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100849
14. Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
15. The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone P. Heckendorn et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045108
16. Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering Z. Dai et al. 10.1002/2017GL076472
17. A perturbed parameter model ensemble to investigate Mt. Pinatubo's 1991 initial sulfur mass emission J. Sheng et al. 10.5194/acp-15-11501-2015
18. The Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP): motivation and experimental design C. Timmreck et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018
19. Stratospheric solar geoengineering without ozone loss D. Keith et al. 10.1073/pnas.1615572113
20. Anthropogenic Aerosol Indirect Effects in Cirrus Clouds J. Penner et al. 10.1029/2018JD029204
21. The impacts of volcanic aerosol on stratospheric ozone and the Northern Hemisphere polar vortex: separating radiative-dynamical changes from direct effects due to enhanced aerosol heterogeneous chemistry S. Muthers et al. 10.5194/acp-15-11461-2015
22. Validating a microphysical prognostic stratospheric aerosol implementation in E3SMv2 using observations after the Mount Pinatubo eruption H. Brown et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-5087-2024
23. Predictive modeling of atmospheric nuclear fallout microphysics D. McGuffin et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175536
24. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
25. The Sectional Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol module (S3A-v1) within the LMDZ general circulation model: description and evaluation against stratospheric aerosol observations C. Kleinschmitt et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-3359-2017
26. Stratospheric aerosol evolution after Pinatubo simulated with a coupled size-resolved aerosol–chemistry–climate model, SOCOL-AERv1.0 T. Sukhodolov et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-2633-2018
27. SALSA – a Sectional Aerosol module for Large Scale Applications H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/acp-8-2469-2008
28. Global atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol‐chemistry‐climate model predictions and validation J. Sheng et al. 10.1002/2014JD021985
29. Sensitivity of stratospheric ozone to the latitude, season, and halogen content of a contemporary explosive volcanic eruption F. Østerstrøm et al. 10.1038/s41598-023-32574-9
30. A fully coupled solid-particle microphysics scheme for stratospheric aerosol injections within the aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7767-2024
31. Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency A. Jones et al. 10.1038/s41467-017-01606-0
32. SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
33. The global middle-atmosphere aerosol model MAECHAM5-SAM2: comparison with satellite and in-situ observations R. Hommel et al. 10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011
34. Stratospheric injection of solid particles reduces side effects on circulation and climate compared to SO2 injections F. Stefanetti et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/ad9f93
35. Stratospheric aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate S. Kremser et al. 10.1002/2015RG000511
36. Coupled IMPACT aerosol and NCAR CAM3 model: Evaluation of predicted aerosol number and size distribution M. Wang et al. 10.1029/2008JD010459
37. Parameterizing cloud condensation nuclei concentrations during HOPE L. Hande et al. 10.5194/acp-16-12059-2016
38. Anthropogenic contribution to cloud condensation nuclei and the first aerosol indirect climate effect F. Yu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024029
39. Size-Resolved Aerosol Microphysics in a Global Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model: Model Description and Validation C. CHENG & K. SUZUKI 10.2151/jmsj.2021-031
40. Limitations of assuming internal mixing between different aerosol species: a case study with sulfate geoengineering simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-22-1739-2022
41. Sensitivity of volcanic aerosol dispersion to meteorological conditions: A Pinatubo case study A. Jones et al. 10.1002/2016JD025001
42. Solar geoengineering using solid aerosol in the stratosphere D. Weisenstein et al. 10.5194/acp-15-11835-2015
43. Evaluations of tropospheric aerosol properties simulated by the community earth system model with a sectional aerosol microphysics scheme P. Yu et al. 10.1002/2014MS000421
44. Microphysical and radiative changes in cirrus clouds by geoengineering the stratosphere A. Cirisan et al. 10.1002/jgrd.50388
45. Correction of approximation errors with Random Forests applied to modelling of cloud droplet formation A. Lipponen et al. 10.5194/gmd-6-2087-2013
46. Sensitivity of Iodine-Mediated Stratospheric Ozone Loss Chemistry to Future Chemistry-Climate Scenarios J. Klobas et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.617586
47. Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
48. Cloud Condensation Nuclei Closure Study Using Airborne Measurements Over the Southern Great Plains G. Kulkarni et al. 10.1029/2022JD037964
49. Modeling the stratospheric warming following the Mt. Pinatubo eruption: uncertainties in aerosol extinctions F. Arfeuille et al. 10.5194/acp-13-11221-2013
50. Aerosol Dynamics in the Near Field of the SCoPEx Stratospheric Balloon Experiment C. Golja et al. 10.1029/2020JD033438