109 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Investigation of dynamical processes in the polar stratospheric vortex during the unusually cold winter 2004/2005 L. El Amraoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031251
2. Long‐term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50316
3. Transport parameterization of the Polar SWIFT model (version 2) I. Wohltmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7243-2022
4. Summertime free-tropospheric ozone pool over the eastern Mediterranean/Middle East P. Zanis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-115-2014
5. SEAS5: the new ECMWF seasonal forecast system S. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1087-2019
6. Skill assessment of three earth system models with common marine biogeochemistry R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1362-8
7. Comprehensive evaluation of the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalysis against independent observations A. Wagner et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00171
8. Historical and Projected Changes in the Southern Hemisphere Surface Westerlies R. Goyal et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090849
9. Simultaneous assimilation of ozone profiles from multiple UV-VIS satellite instruments J. van Peet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1685-2018
10. Parameterization of plume chemistry into large‐scale atmospheric models: Application to aircraft NOx emissions D. Cariolle et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011873
11. Estimation of the local diffusion tensor and normalization for heterogeneous correlation modelling using a diffusion equation O. Pannekoucke & S. Massart https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.288
12. How Useful Is a Linear Ozone Parameterization for Global Climate Modeling? K. Meraner et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002003
13. A linear CO chemistry parameterization in a chemistry-transport model: evaluation and application to data assimilation M. Claeyman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6097-2010
14. The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3515-2019
15. A stratospheric prognostic ozone for seamless Earth system models: performance, impacts and future B. Monge-Sanz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4277-2022
16. Technical Note: SWIFT – a fast semi-empirical model for polar stratospheric ozone loss M. Rex et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6545-2014
17. The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation A. Voldoire et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y
18. Quantifying uncertainties due to chemistry modelling – evaluation of tropospheric composition simulations in the CAMS model (cycle 43R1) V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1725-2019
19. Evaluating the Performance of Ozone Products Derived from CrIS/NOAA20, AIRS/Aqua and ERA5 Reanalysis in the Polar Regions in 2020 Using Ground-Based Observations H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214375
20. Multi-year assimilation of IASI and MLS ozone retrievals: variability of tropospheric ozone over the tropics in response to ENSO H. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6939-2018
21. Evaluating high-resolution forecasts of atmospheric CO and CO2 from a global prediction system during KORUS-AQ field campaign W. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11007-2018
22. Evaluation of tropospheric ozone columns derived from assimilated GOME ozone profile observations A. de Laat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8105-2009
23. Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation T. Sukhodolov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021
24. Multi-scale impacts of Indochina biomass burnings on tropospheric ozone in coastal South China: Insights from long-term (2000–2024) observations Z. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108465
25. OpenIFS/AC: atmospheric chemistry and aerosol in OpenIFS 43r3 V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6221-2022
26. Assessment of regional and interannual variations in tropospheric ozone in chemical reanalyses D. Jones et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6655-2026
27. Data assimilation of stratospheric constituents: a review W. Lahoz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5745-2007
28. Simulation of Stratospheric Processes with the SLAV072L96 Atmospheric General Circulation Model V. Shashkin et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373923060018
29. Simulation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols with the climate model EC-Earth T. van Noije et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2435-2014
30. Update of the Polar SWIFT model for polar stratospheric ozone loss (Polar SWIFT version 2) I. Wohltmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2671-2017
31. Modeling the climate impact of road transport, maritime shipping and aviation over the period 1860–2100 with an AOGCM D. Olivié et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1449-2012
32. Ozone loss in the 2002–2003 Arctic vortex deduced from the assimilation of Odin/SMR O3 and N2O measurements: N2O as a dynamical tracer L. El Amraoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.191
33. Modelling stratospheric composition for the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service: multi-species evaluation of IFS-COMPO Cy49 S. Chabrillat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8973-2025
34. Tropospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF J. Flemming et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-975-2015
35. Combined assimilation of IASI and MLS observations to constrain tropospheric and stratospheric ozone in a global chemical transport model E. Emili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-177-2014
36. Using machine learning to build temperature-based ozone parameterizations for climate sensitivity simulations P. Nowack et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae2be
37. The Extrapolar SWIFT model (version 1.0): fast stratospheric ozone chemistry for global climate models D. Kreyling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-753-2018
38. The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013
39. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service – Regional Air Quality Production System v1.0 A. Colette et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6835-2025
40. Impact of the new HNO3-forming channel of the HO2+NO reaction on tropospheric HNO3, NOx, HOx and ozone D. Cariolle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4061-2008
41. Data assimilation of satellite-retrieved ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide with ECMWF's Composition-IFS A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5275-2015
42. Importance of using ensemble estimated background error covariances for the quality of atmospheric ozone analyses S. Massart et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.971
43. Advanced Ultraviolet Radiation and Ozone Retrieval for Applications (AURORA): A Project Overview U. Cortesi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9110454
44. The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system D. Dee et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
45. Detection of stratospheric intrusion events and their role in ozone enhancement at a mountain background site in sub-tropical East Asia C. Ou-Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118779
46. Pangolin v1.0, a conservative 2-D advection model towards large-scale parallel calculation A. Praga et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-205-2015
47. Impact of stratospheric ozone on the subseasonal prediction in the southern hemisphere spring J. Oh et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00485-4
48. Springtime impacts of stratospheric intrusion on near-surface ozone over the Yangtze River Delta J. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.109067
49. Results from a new linear O3 scheme with embedded heterogeneous chemistry compared with the parent full-chemistry 3-D CTM B. Monge-Sanz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1227-2011
50. Climate and ocean circulation in the aftermath of a Marinoan snowball Earth L. Ramme & J. Marotzke https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-759-2022
51. Multi sensor reanalysis of total ozone R. van der A et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11277-2010
52. A process-oriented evaluation of CAMS reanalysis ozone during tropopause folds over Europe for the period 2003–2018 D. Akritidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6275-2022
53. Quantification of relative contribution of Antarctic ozone depletion to increased austral extratropical precipitation during 1979–2013 K. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024247
54. Assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapor and ozone in reanalyses as part of S-RIP S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12743-2017
55. C-IFS-CB05-BASCOE: stratospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3071-2016
56. Extended and refined multi sensor reanalysis of total ozone for the period 1970–2012 R. van der A et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3021-2015
57. Assessment of bias correction technique to improve ozone reanalysis dataset over India T. Gangwar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42865-025-00109-x
58. Operational assimilation of ozone‐sensitive infrared radiances at ECMWF R. Dragani & A. McNally https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2106
59. A new tropospheric and stratospheric Chemistry and Transport Model MOCAGE-Climat for multi-year studies: evaluation of the present-day climatology and sensitivity to surface processes H. Teyssèdre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5815-2007
60. First steps towards the assimilation of IASI ozone data into the MOCAGE-PALM system S. Massart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5073-2009
61. Multiple subtropical stratospheric intrusions over Reunion Island: Observational, Lagrangian, and Eulerian numerical modeling approaches H. Vérèmes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025330
62. The Diurnal Variation in Stratospheric Ozone from MACC Reanalysis, ERA-Interim, WACCM, and Earth Observation Data: Characteristics and Intercomparison A. Schanz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050625
63. Beyond self-healing: stabilizing and destabilizing photochemical adjustment of the ozone layer A. Match et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10305-2024
64. An assessment of ozone mini-hole representation in reanalyses over the Northern Hemisphere L. Millán & G. Manney https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9277-2017
65. A comprehensive assessment of yield loss in rice due to surface ozone pollution in India during 2005–2020: A great concern for food security K. Anagha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103849
66. An observed and analysed stratospheric ozone intrusion over the high Canadian Arctic UTLS region during the summer of 2003 N. Semane et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.141
67. Deciphering multi-temporal scale dynamics in the concentration, sources and processes of near surface ozone over different climatic regions of India C. Kumar & A. Tandon https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33470-z
68. Higher‐Resolution Tropopause Folding Accounts for More Stratospheric Ozone Intrusions S. Bartusek et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101690
69. Semi-empirical models for chlorine activation and ozone depletion in the Antarctic stratosphere: proof of concept P. Huck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3237-2013
70. Evaluating the representation of Arctic cirrus solar radiative effects in the Integrated Forecasting System with airborne measurements J. Röttenbacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8085-2024
71. A comparative analysis of UV nadir-backscatter and infrared limb-emission ozone data assimilation R. Dragani https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8539-2016
72. Investigation of Arctic middle-atmospheric dynamics using 3 years of H2O and O3 measurements from microwave radiometers at Ny-Ålesund F. Schranz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9927-2019
73. On the Merits of Using a 3D-FGAT Assimilation Scheme with an Outer Loop for Atmospheric Situations Governed by Transport S. Massart et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3237.1
74. Forecasts and assimilation experiments of the Antarctic ozone hole 2008 J. Flemming et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1961-2011
75. Exceptionally Low Arctic Stratospheric Ozone in Spring 2020 as Seen in the CAMS Reanalysis A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033563
76. Evaluation of tropospheric ozone reanalyses with independent ozonesonde observations in East Asia S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00161-9
77. Using a two-stage Rosenbrock solver to increase computational efficiency in the DOE's Exascale Earth System Model version 1 (E3SMv1) R. Chien & J. Fu https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10309-2026
78. Global reanalysis products cannot reproduce seasonal and diurnal cycles of tropospheric ozone in the Congo Basin I. Vieira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119773
79. Assessing the relative impacts of satellite ozone and its precursor observations to improve global tropospheric ozone analysis using multiple chemical reanalysis systems T. Sekiya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2243-2025
80. Flow‐dependent wind extraction in strong‐constraint 4D‐Var Ž. Zaplotnik et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4497
81. Implementation of solar UV and energetic particle precipitation within the LINOZ scheme in ICON-ART M. Ramezani Ziarani et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7891-2025
82. The CAMS interim Reanalysis of Carbon Monoxide, Ozone and Aerosol for 2003–2015 J. Flemming et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1945-2017
83. Impact of Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) thermal infrared measurements on global ozone reanalyses E. Emili & M. El Aabaribaoune https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6291-2021
84. On the quality of the ERA‐Interim ozone reanalyses: comparisons with satellite data R. Dragani https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.821
85. The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE‐Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation R. Roehrig et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002075
86. Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems M. Fujiwara et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1417-2017
87. An intercomparison of tropospheric ozone reanalysis products from CAMS, CAMS interim, TCR-1, and TCR-2 V. Huijnen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1513-2020
88. Changes in tropospheric ozone concentration over Indo-Gangetic Plains: the role of meteorological parameters S. Payra et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-022-00932-3
89. Effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone trends and age of air from a chemical transport model Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10635-2022
90. Simulation of stratospheric ozone in global forecast model using linear photochemistry parameterization G. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-016-0032-x
91. Modeling the present and future impact of aviation on climate: an AOGCM approach with online coupled chemistry P. Huszar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10027-2013
92. Evaluating reanalysis representations of climatological trace gas distributions in the Asian monsoon tropopause layer J. Wright et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9617-2025
93. Adiabatic versus diabatic transport contributions to the ozone budget in the northern hemispheric upper troposphere and lower stratosphere F. Harzer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14909-2025
94. Monitoring and assimilation tests with TROPOMI data in the CAMS system: near-real-time total column ozone A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3939-2019
95. Deriving tropospheric ozone from assimilated profiles J. van Peet & R. van der A https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8297-2019
96. Impact of horizontal resolution and model time step on European precipitation extremes in the OpenIFS 43r3 atmospheric model Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-5435-2025
97. Copernicus stratospheric ozone service, 2009–2012: validation, system intercomparison and roles of input data sets K. Lefever et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2269-2015
98. Enhancing surface ozone representation over India through the machine-learning bias correction of reanalysis data T. Gangwar et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D6VA00160B
99. On the uses of a new linear scheme for stratospheric methane in global models: water source, transport tracer and radiative forcing B. Monge-Sanz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9641-2013
100. A deep stratosphere-to-troposphere ozone transport event over Europe simulated in CAMS global and regional forecast systems: analysis and evaluation D. Akritidis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15515-2018
101. The Simplified Chemistry-Dynamical Model (SCDM V1.0) H. Hong & T. Reichler https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6647-2021
102. Four‐dimensional variational assimilation of ozone profiles from the Microwave Limb Sounder on the Aura satellite L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009121
103. A new method (M3Fusion v1) for combining observations and multiple model output for an improved estimate of the global surface ozone distribution K. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-955-2019
104. The ENSO signal in atmospheric composition fields: emission-driven versus dynamically induced changes A. Inness et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9083-2015
105. Characteristics of local recirculation affecting summer ozone in coastal areas of the Korean Peninsula J. Yoo & S. Lee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.107934
106. Development and evaluation of CNRM Earth system model – CNRM-ESM1 R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1423-2016
107. Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1 A. Voldoire et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001683
108. Facets of the tropical high-cloud feedback in a global storm-resolving model J. Deutloff et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01463-z
109. Climatological Study of Ozone over Saudi Arabia S. Al-Kallas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12101275