111 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Chemistry‐climate model simulations of spring Antarctic ozone J. Austin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013577
2. Antarctic ozone variability inside the polar vortex estimated from balloon measurements M. Parrondo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-217-2014
3. UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model A. Sellar et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739
4. Multimodel projections of stratospheric ozone in the 21st century V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD008332
5. Long‐term ozone changes and associated climate impacts in CMIP5 simulations V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50316
6. Chemical ozone losses in Arctic and Antarctic polar winter/spring season derived from SCIAMACHY limb measurements 2002–2009 T. Sonkaew et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1809-2013
7. Numerical Modeling of Climate-Chemistry Connections: Recent Developments and Future Challenges M. Dameris & P. Jöckel https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos4020132
8. On the Role of Heterogeneous Chemistry in Ozone Depletion and Recovery C. Wilka et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078596
9. The 2010 Antarctic ozone hole: Observed reduction in ozone destruction by minor sudden stratospheric warmings A. de Laat & M. van Weele https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00038
10. Effect of recent sea surface temperature trends on the Arctic stratospheric vortex C. Garfinkel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023284
11. Multi-sensor data merging with stacked neural networks for the creation of satellite long-term climate data records D. Loyola & M. Coldewey-Egbers https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2012-91
12. Comparative Spectral Analysis and Correlation Properties of Observed and Simulated Total Column Ozone Records V. Homonnai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos4020198
13. Circulation anomalies in the Southern Hemisphere and ozone changes P. Braesicke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10677-2013
14. Diagnosing the radiative and chemical contributions to future changes in tropical column ozone with the UM-UKCA chemistry–climate model J. Keeble et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13801-2017
15. The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm A. Stenke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1407-2013
16. Improving Antarctic Total Ozone Projections by a Process-Oriented Multiple Diagnostic Ensemble Regression A. Karpechko et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-071.1
17. Direct and ozone‐mediated forcing of the Southern Annular Mode by greenhouse gases O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062140
18. Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – technical overview M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020
19. Validation of Version 1.3 Ozone Measured by the SOFIE Instrument S. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002649
20. Chemical ozone loss in a chemistry‐climate model from 1960 to 1999 C. Lemmen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026939
21. Early signatures of ozone trend reversal over the Antarctic A. Várai et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000270
22. ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016
23. Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51 P. Jöckel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016
24. Implementation of the Fast-JX Photolysis scheme (v6.4) into the UKCA component of the MetUM chemistry-climate model (v7.3) P. Telford et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-161-2013
25. On ozone trend detection: using coupled chemistry–climate simulations to investigate early signs of total column ozone recovery J. Keeble et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7625-2018
26. The Antarctic ozone hole during 2018 and 2019 A. Klekociuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES20010
27. Trend and recovery of the total ozone column in South America and Antarctica R. Toro A. et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3540-1
28. Simple measures of ozone depletion in the polar stratosphere R. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-251-2008
29. Ozone database in support of CMIP5 simulations: results and corresponding radiative forcing I. Cionni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11267-2011
30. On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 2: The effects of the El Niño/Southern Oscillation, volcanic eruptions and contributions of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry to long-term total ozone changes H. Rieder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-165-2013
31. Is Missing Orographic Gravity Wave Drag near 60°S the Cause of the Stratospheric Zonal Wind Biases in Chemistry–Climate Models? C. McLandress et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0159.1
32. Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry‐climate model simulations of the recent past V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007327
33. Sulfate Aerosols from Non-Explosive Volcanoes: Chemical-Radiative Effects in the Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere G. Pitari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7070085
34. The impacts of volcanic aerosol on stratospheric ozone and the Northern Hemisphere polar vortex: separating radiative-dynamical changes from direct effects due to enhanced aerosol heterogeneous chemistry S. Muthers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11461-2015
35. Effects of Ozone and Clouds on Temporal Variability of Surface UV Radiation and UV Resources over Northern Eurasia Derived from Measurements and Modeling N. Chubarova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010059
36. Evaluation of the ACCESS – chemistry–climate model for the Southern Hemisphere K. Stone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2401-2016
37. The ozone hole measurements at the Indian station Maitri in Antarctica J. Kuttippurath et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2021.100701
38. Dynamics, stratospheric ozone, and climate change T. Shepherd https://doi.org/10.3137/ao.460106
39. Total Ozone Columns from the Environmental Trace Gases Monitoring Instrument (EMI) Using the DOAS Method Y. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112098
40. Stratospheric ozone change and related climate impacts over 1850–2100 as modelled by the ACCMIP ensemble F. Iglesias-Suarez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-343-2016
41. Connections between the Spring Breakup of the Southern Hemisphere Polar Vortex, Stationary Waves, and Air–Sea Roughness C. Garfinkel et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0242.1
42. Variability of the total ozone trend over Europe for the period 1950–2004 derived from reconstructed data J. Krzyścin & J. Borkowski https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2847-2008
43. Reassessment of causes of ozone column variability following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo using a nudged CCM P. Telford et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4251-2009
44. Quantitative evaluation of ozone and selected climate parameters in a set of EMAC simulations M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-733-2015
45. A new version of the CNRM Chemistry-Climate Model, CNRM-CCM: description and improvements from the CCMVal-2 simulations M. Michou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-873-2011
46. Sensitivity of the Amundsen Sea Low to Stratospheric Ozone Depletion R. Fogt & E. Zbacnik https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00657.1
47. Decline and recovery of total column ozone using a multimodel time series analysis J. Austin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013857
48. Northern winter stratospheric temperature and ozone responses to ENSO inferred from an ensemble of Chemistry Climate Models C. Cagnazzo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8935-2009
49. The Flexible Ocean and Climate Infrastructure version 1 (FOCI1): mean state and variability K. Matthes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2533-2020
50. South Pole Station ozonesondes: variability and trends in the springtime Antarctic ozone hole 1986–2021 B. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3133-2023
51. A closer look at Arctic ozone loss and polar stratospheric clouds N. Harris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8499-2010
52. Influences of ozone depletion, the solar cycle and the QBO on the Southern Annular Mode H. Roscoe & J. Haigh https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.153
53. Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020
54. Antarctic ozone depletion between 1960 and 1980 in observations and chemistry–climate model simulations U. Langematz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15619-2016
55. Comment on “Correlation between Cosmic Rays and Ozone Depletion” M. Alvarez-Madrigal https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.169801
56. Indicators of Antarctic ozone depletion: 1979 to 2019 G. Bodeker & S. Kremser https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5289-2021
57. The Influence of ENSO on Northern Midlatitude Ozone during the Winter to Spring Transition J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00615.1
58. The 1985 Southern Hemisphere mid-latitude total column ozone anomaly G. Bodeker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5625-2007
59. Multi sensor reanalysis of total ozone R. van der A et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11277-2010
60. The simulation of the Antarctic ozone hole by chemistry-climate models H. Struthers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6363-2009
61. Statistical reconstruction of daily total ozone over Europe 1950 to 2004 J. Krzyścin https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008881
62. An improved measure of ozone depletion in the Antarctic stratosphere P. Huck et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007860
63. Missing Stratospheric Ozone Decrease at Southern Hemisphere Middle Latitudes after Mt. Pinatubo: A Dynamical Perspective C. Poberaj et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-10-05004.1
64. Does Cosmic-Ray-Induced Heterogeneous Chemistry Influence Stratospheric Polar Ozone Loss? R. Müller & J. Grooß https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.228501
65. Modelling the potential impacts of the recent, unexpected increase in CFC-11 emissions on total column ozone recovery J. Keeble et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7153-2020
66. Climate warming and decreasing total column ozone over the Tibetan Plateau during winter and spring J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23415
67. Exceptional loss in ozone in the Arctic winter/spring of 2019/2020 J. Kuttippurath et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14019-2021
68. Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate R. Séférian et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001791
69. A global total column ozone climate data record G. Bodeker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3885-2021
70. Semi-empirical models for chlorine activation and ozone depletion in the Antarctic stratosphere: proof of concept P. Huck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3237-2013
71. Evaluating the Relationship between Interannual Variations in the Antarctic Ozone Hole and Southern Hemisphere Surface Climate in Chemistry–Climate Models Z. Gillett et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0273.1
72. Stratospheric ozone loss over the Eurasian continent induced by the polar vortex shift J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02565-2
73. The GFDL Earth System Model Version 4.1 (GFDL‐ESM 4.1): Overall Coupled Model Description and Simulation Characteristics J. Dunne et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002015
74. Changes of the Antarctic ozone hole: Controlling mechanisms, seasonal predictability, and evolution M. Salby et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016285
75. Analysis of stratospheric NO2 trends above Jungfraujoch using ground-based UV-visible, FTIR, and satellite nadir observations F. Hendrick et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8851-2012
76. A record of ozone variability in South Pole Antarctic snow: Role of nitrate oxygen isotopes J. McCabe et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007822
77. Interactive ozone and methane chemistry in GISS-E2 historical and future climate simulations D. Shindell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2653-2013
78. The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone P. Heckendorn et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045108
79. Ensemble simulations of the decline and recovery of stratospheric ozone J. Austin & R. Wilson https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006907
80. Intercomparison of vertically resolved merged satellite ozone data sets: interannual variability and long-term trends F. Tummon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3021-2015
81. A Review of Anthropogenic Ground-Level Carbon Emissions Based on Satellite Data K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3355549
82. Technical Note: Chemistry-climate model SOCOL: version 2.0 with improved transport and chemistry/microphysics schemes M. Schraner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5957-2008
83. Sensitivity of polar ozone to sea surface temperatures and halogen amounts J. Austin & R. Wilson https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013292
84. Zonally asymmetric trends of winter total column ozone in the northern middle latitudes J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4393-y
85. The GFDL Global Atmospheric Chemistry‐Climate Model AM4.1: Model Description and Simulation Characteristics L. Horowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002032
86. Impact of biogenic very short-lived bromine on the Antarctic ozone hole during the 21st century R. Fernandez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1673-2017
87. The Final Warming Date of the Antarctic Polar Vortex and Influences on its Interannual Variability J. Haigh & H. Roscoe https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2865.1
88. The Antarctic ozone hole during 2020 A. Klekociuk et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES21015
89. Benchmarking CMIP5 models with a subset of ESA CCI Phase 2 data using the ESMValTool A. Lauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.007
90. Planetary wave peculiarities in Antarctic ozone distribution during 1979–2008 A. Grytsai https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541518
91. Tropospheric jet response to Antarctic ozone depletion: An update with Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) models S. Son et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aabf21
92. Skillful Seasonal Prediction of the Southern Annular Mode and Antarctic Ozone W. Seviour et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00264.1
93. Estimates of past and future ozone trends from multimodel simulations using a flexible smoothing spline methodology J. Scinocca et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013622
94. Revisiting ozone measurements as an indicator of tropical width S. Davis et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0214-5
95. Inorganic chlorine variability in the Antarctic vortex and implications for ozone recovery S. Strahan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022295
96. Extreme ozone loss over the Northern Hemisphere high latitudes in the early 2011 J. Krzyścin https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.17347
97. Spatio-Temporal Variability of the Phase of Total Ozone Quasi-Decennial Oscillations K. Visheratin https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433817090341
98. How Useful Is a Linear Ozone Parameterization for Global Climate Modeling? K. Meraner et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002003
99. Reappraisal of the Climate Impacts of Ozone‐Depleting Substances O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088295
100. Interannual-to-decadal variability of the stratosphere during the 20th century: ensemble simulations with a chemistry-climate model A. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-7755-2008
101. Estimating probability distributions of solar irradiance A. Voskrebenzev et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1189-9
102. The impacts of two types of El Niño on global ozone variations in the last three decades F. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-3166-0
103. Influence of the El Niño southern oscillation on the total ozone column and clear-sky ultraviolet radiation over China J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.080
104. On the relationship between total ozone and atmospheric dynamics and chemistry at mid-latitudes – Part 1: Statistical models and spatial fingerprints of atmospheric dynamics and chemistry L. Frossard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-147-2013
105. Measurements of stratospheric ozone and nitrogen dioxide at Èvora, Portugal D. Bortoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160902822849
106. Variability and trends in total and vertically resolved stratospheric ozone based on the CATO ozone data set D. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4985-2006
107. Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) G. Pitari et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020566
108. Volcanic Drivers of Stratospheric Sulfur in GFDL ESM4 C. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003532
109. Ozone distribution in the Antarctic region from the data of 30-year satellite measurements A. Grytsai et al. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2010.01.020
110. Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM‐CM6‐1 A. Voldoire et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001683
111. Future Arctic ozone recovery: the importance of chemistry and dynamics E. Bednarz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12159-2016