683 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Black carbon concentration and deposition estimations in Finland by the regional aerosol–climate model REMO-HAM A. Hienola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4033-2013
2. Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033364
3. Investigating the zero transmission problem in satellite solar occultation measurements in the context of possible stratospheric aerosol injections A. Lange et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1973-2026
4. Development of a parameterization of black carbon aging for use in general circulation models N. Oshima & M. Koike https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-263-2013
5. Enhancement of marine cloud albedo via controlled sea spray injections: a global model study of the influence of emission rates, microphysics and transport H. Korhonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4133-2010
6. Quasi-biennial oscillation of the tropical stratospheric aerosol layer R. Hommel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5557-2015
7. Major secondary aerosol formation in southern African open biomass burning plumes V. Vakkari et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0170-0
8. Multicompartmental fate of persistent substances G. Lammel et al. https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2006.11.363
9. Influence of grid resolution and meteorological forcing on simulated European air quality: A sensitivity study with the modeling system COSMO–MUSCAT R. Wolke et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.085
10. Aerosol distribution over Brazil with ECHAM-HAM and CAM5-MAM3 simulations and its comparison with ground-based and satellite data D. Alvim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.01.008
11. Updated African biomass burning emission inventories in the framework of the AMMA-IDAF program, with an evaluation of combustion aerosols C. Liousse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9631-2010
12. Temperature and radiative responses to anthropogenic aerosols over the Mediterranean Basin based on CMIP6 Earth system models A. Kalisoras et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9413-2026
13. Quantifying the importance of the atmospheric sink for polychlorinated dioxins and furans relative to other global loss processes R. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006923
14. H2SO4–H2O binary and H2SO4–H2O–NH3 ternary homogeneous and ion-mediated nucleation: lookup tables version 1.0 for 3-D modeling application F. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2663-2020
15. Global organic and inorganic aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on radiative forcing M. Pöhlker et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41695-8
16. The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation G. McFiggans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2593-2006
17. 100 Years of Progress in Cloud Physics, Aerosols, and Aerosol Chemistry Research S. Kreidenweis et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0024.1
18. Mapping the uncertainty in global CCN using emulation L. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9739-2012
19. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations G. Myhre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1853-2013
20. Global evaluation of CCN formation by direct emission of sea salt and growth of ultrafine sea salt J. Pierce & P. Adams https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006186
21. Effect of horizontal resolution on meteorology and air-quality prediction with a regional scale model S. Varghese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.007
22. Climate response to the Toba super-eruption: Regional changes C. Timmreck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.10.008
23. Aerosol size confines climate response to volcanic super‐eruptions C. Timmreck et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045464
24. Simultaneous Retrieval of Trace Gases, Aerosols, and Cirrus Using RemoTAP—The Global Orbit Ensemble Study for the CO2M Mission S. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.914378
25. Spatial distributions and seasonal cycles of aerosols in India and China seen in global climate-aerosol model S. Henriksson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7975-2011
26. The influence of absorbed solar radiation by Saharan dust on hurricane genesis S. Bretl et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022441
27. Influence of future air-pollution mitigation strategies on climate by 2030 S. Kloster et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/6/2/022003
28. Below-cloud rain scavenging of atmospheric aerosols for aerosol deposition models D. Chate et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.010
29. MAC‐v1: A new global aerosol climatology for climate studies S. Kinne et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20035
30. Is increasing ice crystal sedimentation velocity in geoengineering simulations a good proxy for cirrus cloud seeding? B. Gasparini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4871-2017
31. Surface layer structure for ten categories of land surfaces of the Indian region with instrumented Mini Boundary Layer Mast Network (MBLM-Net) establishment during PRWONAM K. Rao & N. Narendra Reddy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.03.014
32. Impact of carbonaceous aerosol emissions on regional climate change E. Roeckner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-006-0147-3
33. Updated estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite observations and comparison against the Hadley Centre climate model N. Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009385
34. Analysis of nucleation events in the European boundary layer using the regional aerosol–climate model REMO-HAM with a solar radiation-driven OH-proxy J. Pietikäinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11711-2014
35. Modelling emission and transport of key components of primary marine organic aerosol using the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 A. Leon-Marcos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4183-2025
36. Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012
37. Retrievals of atmospheric CO_2 from simulated space-borne measurements of backscattered near-infrared sunlight: accounting for aerosol effects A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.003322
38. Climate impact of contrail cirrus from hydrogen combustion aircraft S. Pettersson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13485-2026
39. A novel approach for the characterisation of transport and optical properties of aerosol particles near sources – Part II: Microphysics–chemistry-transport model development and application Á. Valdebenito B et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.004
40. Black carbon radiative effects highly sensitive to emitted particle size when resolving mixing-state diversity H. Matsui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05635-1
41. Insights from Antarctica on volcanic forcing during the Common Era M. Sigl et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2293
42. Elevated aerosol layer over South Asia worsens the Indian droughts S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46704-9
43. Large difference in aerosol radiative effects from BVOC-SOA treatment in three Earth system models M. Sporre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8953-2020
44. An improved representation of aerosol mixing state for air quality–weather interactions R. Stevens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13527-2022
45. Global anthropogenic aerosol effects on convective clouds in ECHAM5-HAM U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2115-2008
46. The role of deep convection and nocturnal low‐level jets for dust emission in summertime West Africa: Estimates from convection‐permitting simulations B. Heinold et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50402
47. The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2 U. Lohmann & D. Neubauer https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018
48. A climatology of aerosol optical and microphysical properties over the Indian subcontinent from 9 years (2000–2008) of Multiangle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR) data S. Dey & L. Di Girolamo https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013395
49. Introduction of prognostic rain in ECHAM5: design and single column model simulations R. Posselt & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2949-2008
50. Consistent simulation of bromine chemistry from the marine boundary layer to the stratosphere – Part 1: Model description, sea salt aerosols and pH A. Kerkweg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5899-2008
51. Evaluation of the global aerosol microphysical ModelE2-TOMAS model against satellite and ground-based observations Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-631-2015
52. Evaluation of the sectional aerosol microphysics module SALSA implementation in ECHAM5-HAM aerosol-climate model T. Bergman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-845-2012
53. Aerosol optical depth over the Arctic: a comparison of ECHAM-HAM and TM5 with ground-based, satellite and reanalysis data J. von Hardenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6953-2012
54. Direct and semi-direct effects of aerosol climatologies on long-term climate simulations over Europe M. Schultze & B. Rockel https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3808-5
55. Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity J. Ching et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017
56. Assessing Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE aerosol climatology using satellite and ground‐based measurements: A comparison study L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007334
57. SALSA – a Sectional Aerosol module for Large Scale Applications H. Kokkola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2469-2008
58. Rapid increase in simulated North Atlantic dust deposition due to fast change of northwest African landscape during the Holocene S. Egerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-14-1051-2018
59. Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation K. Pringle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010
60. Quantifying the impacts of an updated global dimethyl sulfide climatology on cloud microphysics and aerosol radiative forcing A. Mahajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022687
61. The radiative impact of Nordic anthropogenic black carbon A. Hienola et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.27428
62. Systematic lidar observations of Saharan dust over Europe in the frame of EARLINET (2000–2002) A. Papayannis et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009028
63. Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review M. Lawrence & J. Lelieveld https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11017-2010
64. Three‐dimensional modeling of the mixing state of particles over Greater Paris S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024241
65. Influence of oceanic dimethyl sulfide emissions on cloud condensation nuclei concentrations and seasonality over the remote Southern Hemisphere oceans: A global model study H. Korhonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009718
66. Impacts of emission reductions on aerosol radiative effects J. Pietikäinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5501-2015
67. Re-analysis of tropospheric sulfate aerosol and ozone for the period 1980–2005 using the aerosol-chemistry-climate model ECHAM5-HAMMOZ L. Pozzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9563-2011
68. Modeling aerosol growth by aqueous chemistry in a nonprecipitating stratiform cloud M. Ovchinnikov & R. Easter https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012816
69. Coatings and their enhancement of black carbon light absorption in the tropical atmosphere J. Schwarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009042
70. Bestimmung des Ferntransports von persistenten organischen Spurenstoffen und der Umweltexposition mittels Modelluntersuchungen G. Lammel et al. https://doi.org/10.1065/uwsf2006.09.136
71. Dimming over the oceans: Transient anthropogenic aerosol plumes in the twentieth century T. Dallafior et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022658
72. Impact of the modal aerosol scheme GLOMAP-mode on aerosol forcing in the Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model N. Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3027-2013
73. Diurnal variations of humidity and ice water content in the tropical upper troposphere P. Eriksson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11519-2010
74. North Atlantic Oscillation and tropospheric ozone variability in Europe: model analysis and measurements intercomparison F. Pausata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6357-2012
75. Detailed source term estimation of the atmospheric release for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident by coupling simulations of an atmospheric dispersion model with an improved deposition scheme and oceanic dispersion model G. Katata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1029-2015
76. Spatial and temporal variations of new particle formation in East Asia using an NPF‐explicit WRF‐chem model: North‐south contrast in new particle formation frequency H. Matsui et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50821
77. Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – Part 2: Minimising the effects of aerosol swelling and wet scavenging in ECHAM6-HAM2 for comparison to satellite data D. Neubauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13165-2017
78. The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere P. Jöckel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5067-2006
79. A global model study of processes controlling aerosol size distributions in the Arctic spring and summer H. Korhonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009114
80. Toward a Minimal Representation of Aerosols in Climate Models: Comparative Decomposition of Aerosol Direct, Semidirect, and Indirect Radiative Forcing S. Ghan et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00650.1
81. Particle number concentrations and size distributions in the stratosphere: implications of nucleation mechanisms and particle microphysics F. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1863-2023
82. Modelling the impact of fungal spore ice nuclei on clouds and precipitation A. Sesartic et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014029
83. Assessment of black carbon radiative effects in climate models J. Feichter & P. Stier https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.180
84. The effect of aerosols and sea surface temperature on China's climate in the late twentieth century from ensembles of global climate simulations D. Folini & M. Wild https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022851
85. Simulating glacial dust changes in the Southern Hemisphere using ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 S. Krätschmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-67-2022
86. An investigation into the aerosol dispersion effect through the activation process in marine stratus clouds Y. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007401
87. Initial fate of fine ash and sulfur from large volcanic eruptions U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9043-2009
88. Aerosols at the poles: an AeroCom Phase II multi-model evaluation M. Sand et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12197-2017
89. Modelling soil dust aerosol in the Bodélé depression during the BoDEx campaign I. Tegen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4345-2006
90. Fractionation and current time trends of PCB congeners: evolvement of distributions 1950–2010 studied using a global atmosphere-ocean general circulation model G. Lammel & I. Stemmler https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7199-2012
91. Simulation of particle diversity and mixing state over Greater Paris: a model–measurement inter-comparison S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00175G
92. Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
93. Does optically effective complex refractive index of internal-mixed aerosols have a physically-based meaning? X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.0A1216
94. Long-range transport of organic chemicals in the environment M. Scheringer https://doi.org/10.1897/08-324R.1
95. Amplified drying in South Asian summer monsoon precipitation due to anthropogenic sulfate aerosols S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123175
96. An offline constrained data assimilation technique for aerosols: Improving GCM simulations over South Asia using observations from two satellite sensors A. Baraskar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.026
97. Testing different CO2 response algorithms against a FACE crop rotation experiment C. Nendel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2009.07.005
98. Enhanced Rates of Regional Warming and Ocean Acidification After Termination of Large‐Scale Ocean Alkalinization M. González et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077847
99. Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020
100. Size-resolved aerosol emission factors and new particle formation/growth activity occurring in Mexico City during the MILAGRO 2006 Campaign A. Kalafut-Pettibone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8861-2011
101. Understanding the contributions of aerosol properties and parameterization discrepancies to droplet number variability in a global climate model R. Morales Betancourt & A. Nenes https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4809-2014
102. Future warming exacerbated by aged-soot effect on cloud formation U. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0631-0
103. The surface tension and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activation of sea spray aerosol particles J. Kleinheins et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-881-2025
104. Distribution and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in an interactive size‐resolving aerosol–climate model D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009756
105. The influence of African air pollution on regional and global tropospheric ozone A. Aghedo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1193-2007
106. An interactive stratospheric aerosol model intercomparison of solar geoengineering by stratospheric injection of SO2 or accumulation-mode sulfuric acid aerosols D. Weisenstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2955-2022
107. MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective L. Remer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1829-2013
108. Aerosol microphysics simulations of the Mt.~Pinatubo eruption with the UM-UKCA composition-climate model S. Dhomse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11221-2014
109. Understanding the role of contrails and contrail cirrus in climate change: a global perspective D. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024
110. Aerosol activation and cloud processing in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM G. Roelofs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2389-2006
111. Prognostic precipitation with three liquid water classes in the ECHAM5–HAM GCM V. Sant et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8717-2015
112. Variations of aerosol optical thickness of the atmosphere in Russia in 1976–2003 I. Plakhina et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373907020021
113. Bacteria in the ECHAM5-HAM global climate model A. Sesartic et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8645-2012
114. Impacts of increasing the aerosol complexity in the Met Office global numerical weather prediction model J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4749-2014
115. Radon activity in the lower troposphere and its impact on ionization rate: a global estimate using different radon emissions K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7817-2011
116. How much of the global aerosol optical depth is found in the boundary layer and free troposphere? Q. Bourgeois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018
117. Optical Properties and Refractive Index of Wintertime Aerosol at a Highly Polluted North‐Indian Site T. Kapoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD038272
118. Technical Note: An implementation of the dry removal processes DRY DEPosition and SEDImentation in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) A. Kerkweg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4617-2006
119. A size-composition resolved aerosol model for simulating the dynamics of externally mixed particles: SCRAM (v 1.0) S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1595-2015
120. Radiative Forcing of Climate: The Historical Evolution of the Radiative Forcing Concept, the Forcing Agents and their Quantification, and Applications V. Ramaswamy et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-19-0001.1
121. Deep learning representation of the aerosol size distribution D. Barahona et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2437-2026
122. Simulation of size-segregated aerosol chemical composition over northern Italy in clear sky and wind calm conditions T. Landi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.01.009
123. NHM-Chem, the Japan Meteorological Agency's Regional Meteorology – Chemistry Model: Model Evaluations toward the Consistent Predictions of the Chemical, Physical, and Optical Properties of Aerosols M. KAJINO et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-020
124. BVOC-aerosol-climate interactions in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5.5-HAM2 R. Makkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10077-2012
125. Influences of in-cloud aerosol scavenging parameterizations on aerosol concentrations and wet deposition in ECHAM5-HAM B. Croft et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1511-2010
126. Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols U. Niemeier & H. Schmidt https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14871-2017
127. Aerosol processing in mixed‐phase clouds in ECHAM5‐HAM: Model description and comparison to observations C. Hoose et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009251
128. Aerosol characteristics including fumigation effect under weak precipitation over the southeastern coast of China X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.05.005
129. Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
130. Climate impacts of ice nucleation A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017950
131. Capability of multi-viewing-angle photo-polarimetric measurements for the simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and cloud properties O. Hasekamp https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-839-2010
132. Quantifying and Comparing Effects of Climate Engineering Methods on the Earth System S. Sonntag et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000620
133. Sensitivity of aerosol to assumed optical properties over Asia using a global aerosol model and AERONET D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048675
134. Multivariate quadrature for representing cloud condensation nuclei activity of aerosol populations L. Fierce & R. McGraw https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026335
135. Impact of cloud-borne aerosol representation on aerosol direct and indirect effects S. Ghan & R. Easter https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4163-2006
136. Impact of dust particle non‐sphericity on climate simulations P. Räisänen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2084
137. Investigating relationships between aerosol optical depth and cloud fraction using satellite, aerosol reanalysis and general circulation model data B. Grandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3177-2013
138. Binning for Efficient Stochastic Multiscale Particle Simulations M. Michelotti et al. https://doi.org/10.1137/130908038
139. Reconstructing volcanic radiative forcing since 1990, using a comprehensive emission inventory and spatially resolved sulfur injections from satellite data in a chemistry-climate model J. Schallock et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1169-2023
140. Direct radiative effect of dust–pollution interactions K. Klingmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7397-2019
141. Real-case simulations of aerosol–cloud interactions in ship tracks over the Bay of Biscay A. Possner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2185-2015
142. Development of a global aerosol model using a two‐dimensional sectional method: 1. Model design H. Matsui https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000936
143. Could gradual changes in Holocene Saharan landscape have caused the observed abrupt shift in North Atlantic dust deposition? S. Egerer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.010
144. The Role of In‐Cloud Wet Removal in Simulating Aerosol Vertical Profiles and Cloud Radiative Forcing Y. Shan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038564
145. Evaluation of a global aerosol microphysics model against size-resolved particle statistics in the marine atmosphere D. Spracklen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2073-2007
146. The Dark Target Algorithm for Observing the Global Aerosol System: Past, Present, and Future L. Remer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12182900
147. Influence of model resolution on the atmospheric transport of 10Be U. Heikkilä & A. Smith https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10601-2012
148. Production rate and climate influences on the variability of 10Be deposition simulated by ECHAM5‐HAM: Globally, in Greenland, and in Antarctica U. Heikkilä & A. Smith https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50217
149. Sensitivity of atmospheric aerosol scavenging to precipitation intensity and frequency in the context of global climate change P. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8173-2018
150. Emission-Induced Nonlinearities in the Global Aerosol System: Results from the ECHAM5-HAM Aerosol-Climate Model P. Stier et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3772.1
151. How present aerosol pollution from North America impacts North Atlantic climate I. FISCHER-BRUNS et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00446.x
152. Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM) M. Mills et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024290
153. Climate Impacts of COVID‐19 Induced Emission Changes A. Gettelman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091805
154. Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures N. Riemer & M. West https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013
155. Statistical Analysis of Aerosol Effects on Simulated Mixed-Phase Clouds and Precipitation in the Alps E. Zubler et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3632.1
156. Variations of carbonaceous aerosols from open crop residue burning with transport and its implication to estimate their lifetimes X. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.048
157. Evaluation of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment soil moisture simulations for the second half of the twentieth century H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007455
158. How well do IPCC‐AR4/CMIP3 climate models simulate global dimming/brightening and twentieth‐century daytime and nighttime warming? M. Wild https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011372
159. Impacts of large-scale atmospheric circulation changes in winter on black carbon transport and deposition to the Arctic L. Pozzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11803-2017
160. Atmospheric transport and deposition of Indonesian volcanic emissions M. Pfeffer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2525-2006
161. Intercomparison of aerosol climatologies for use in a regional climate model over Europe E. Zubler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048081
162. Energy budgets and transports: global evolution and spatial patterns during the twentieth century as estimated in two AMIP-like experiments V. Lembo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3173-9
163. Modelling and forecasting of CERES-retrieved ultraviolet radiation and AOD using a seasonal-ARIMA model in urban regions of Indo-Gangetic Plain A. Mall & S. Singh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121570
164. Dynamic subgrid heterogeneity of convective cloud in a global model: description and evaluation of the Convective Cloud Field Model (CCFM) in ECHAM6–HAM2 Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-327-2017
165. Global modelling of direct and indirect effects of sea spray aerosol using a source function encapsulating wave state A. Partanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11731-2014
166. Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements E. Dunne et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649
167. The multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF: model description and evaluation M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-137-2011
168. Investigating the sign of stratocumulus adjustments to aerosols in the ICON global storm-resolving model E. Fons et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8653-2024
169. Interpreting the cloud cover – aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model J. Quaas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010
170. On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2765-2016
171. The physics of Martian weather and climate: a review P. Read et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/12/125901
172. Aerosols in the Pre-industrial Atmosphere K. Carslaw et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0061-2
173. In situ constraints on the vertical distribution of global aerosol D. Watson-Parris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11765-2019
174. Tropospheric aerosol microphysics simulation with assimilated meteorology: model description and intermodel comparison W. Trivitayanurak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3149-2008
175. The direct and indirect radiative effects of biogenic secondary organic aerosol C. Scott et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-447-2014
176. MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): an aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models S. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008
177. Emulation of a complex global aerosol model to quantify sensitivity to uncertain parameters L. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12253-2011
178. A comparison of two chemistry and aerosol schemes on the regional scale and the resulting impact on radiative properties and liquid- and ice-phase aerosol–cloud interactions F. Glassmeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8651-2017
179. An aerosol climatology for global models based on the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF A. Bozzo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1007-2020
180. In-cloud scavenging scheme for sectional aerosol modules – implementation in the framework of the Sectional Aerosol module for Large Scale Applications version 2.0 (SALSA2.0) global aerosol module E. Holopainen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6215-2020
181. Incorporation of pollen data in source maps is vital for pollen dispersion models A. Kurganskiy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2099-2020
182. Particle Size as a Key Driver of Black Carbon Wet Removal: Advances and Insights Y. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111309
183. Global 2-D intercomparison of sectional and modal aerosol modules D. Weisenstein et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2339-2007
184. Untangling causality in midlatitude aerosol–cloud adjustments D. McCoy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4085-2020
185. Implementing microscopic charcoal particles into a global aerosol–climate model A. Gilgen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11813-2018
186. Modulation of quasi-biennial oscillation by volcanic sulfate aerosols P. Chavan et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1831183
187. Isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol in the global aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0–HAM2.3–MOZ1.0 S. Stadtler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3235-2018
188. Redistribution of Indian summer monsoon by dust aerosol forcing P. Maharana et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.1786
189. A pathway analysis of global aerosol processes N. Schutgens & P. Stier https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11657-2014
190. A model study investigating the sensitivity of aerosol forcing to the volatilities of semi-volatile organic compounds M. Irfan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8489-2024
191. An optimized particle size bin scheme for modeling mineral dust aerosol G. Foret et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006797
192. Fire emission heights in the climate system – Part 1: Global plume height patterns simulated by ECHAM6-HAM2 A. Veira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7155-2015
193. Geographical and diurnal features of amine‐enhanced boundary layer nucleation T. Bergman et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023181
194. The global influence of dust mineralogical composition on heterogeneous ice nucleation in mixed-phase clouds C. Hoose et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003
195. The impact of organochlorines cycling in the cryosphere on their global distribution and fate – 1. Sea ice F. Guglielmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.09.039
196. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3379-2015
197. Advancing global aerosol simulations with size-segregated anthropogenic particle number emissions F. Xausa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10039-2018
198. Absorbing aerosols and high‐temperature extremes in India: A general circulation modelling study A. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6783
199. Investigating the ability of satellite occultation instruments to monitor possible geoengineering experiments A. Lange et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-11673-2025
200. Significant contribution of fractal morphology to aerosol light absorption in polluted environments dominated by black carbon (BC) B. Romshoo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00634-0
201. Do sulfate and nitrate coatings on mineral dust have important effects on radiative properties and climate modeling? S. Bauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006977
202. Long-term trends of continental-scale PCB patterns studied using a global atmosphere–ocean general circulation model I. Stemmler & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0943-8
203. U.K. HiGEM: Simulations of Desert Dust and Biomass Burning Aerosols with a High-Resolution Atmospheric GCM M. Woodage et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2994.1
204. Simulating effects of aerosols on rainfall in southern Africa S. Henriksson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0619-8
205. Explaining global surface aerosol number concentrations in terms of primary emissions and particle formation D. Spracklen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4775-2010
206. Gas/particle partitioning and global distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons – A modelling approach G. Lammel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.017
207. The variation in the particle number size distribution during the rainfall: wet scavenging and air mass changing G. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7521-2023
208. The chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 M. Schultz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1695-2018
209. ICON-HAM-lite 1.0: simulating the Earth system with interactive aerosols at kilometer scales P. Weiss et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3877-2025
210. Impact of nucleation on global CCN J. Merikanto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009
211. Global simulations of aerosol processing in clouds C. Hoose et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6939-2008
212. New Parameterizations for Neutral and Ion‐Induced Sulfuric Acid‐Water Particle Formation in Nucleation and Kinetic Regimes A. Määttänen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027429
213. Future vegetation–climate interactions in Eastern Siberia: an assessment of the competing effects of CO2 and secondary organic aerosols A. Arneth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5243-2016
214. Contrail cirrus radiative forcing for future air traffic L. Bock & U. Burkhardt https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8163-2019
215. Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity G. Mann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4679-2014
216. Global dimming and brightening: A review M. Wild https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011470
217. The global middle-atmosphere aerosol model MAECHAM5-SAM2: comparison with satellite and in-situ observations R. Hommel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-809-2011
218. Satellite-based rainfall data reveal a recent drying trend in central equatorial Africa J. Diem et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1217-x
219. Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with Piecewise Log-normal Approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM Y. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6891-2012
220. Reflection models for soil and vegetation surfaces from multiple-viewing angle photopolarimetric measurements P. Litvinov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.11.001
221. Importance of deposition processes in simulating the seasonality of the Arctic black carbon aerosol L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013478
222. Contribution of Isoprene Oxidation Products to Marine Aerosol over the North‐East Atlantic T. Anttila et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/482603
223. A study of synthetic 13CH4 retrievals from TROPOMI and Sentinel-5/UVNS E. Malina et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6273-2019
224. Technical Note: On the use of nudging for aerosol–climate model intercomparison studies K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8631-2014
225. Variability of aerosol-cloud interactions induced by different cloud droplet nucleation schemes D. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105367
226. Driving Factors of Aerosol Properties Over the Foothills of Central Himalayas Based on 8.5 Years Continuous Measurements R. Hooda et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029744
227. The atmospheric lifetime of black carbon J. Cape et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.030
228. Modeling Atmospheric Transport of Cosmogenic Radionuclide 10Be Using GEOS‐Chem 14.1.1 and ECHAM6.3‐HAM2.3: Implications for Solar and Geomagnetic Reconstructions M. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL106642
229. Global cloud and precipitation chemistry and wet deposition: tropospheric model simulations with ECHAM5/MESSy1 H. Tost et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2733-2007
230. Contribution of primary carbonaceous aerosol to cloud condensation nuclei: processes and uncertainties evaluated with a global aerosol microphysics model J. Pierce et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5447-2007
231. Long range transport of South and East Asian anthropogenic aerosols counteracting Arctic warming S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00633-1
232. Analysis of the global atmospheric background sulfur budget in a multi-model framework C. Brodowsky et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5513-2024
233. New Particle Formation and Growth in Urban Atmospheres: From Observations to Molecular-Level Understanding R. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00684
234. 36Cl bomb peak: comparison of modeled and measured data U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4145-2009
235. A New Ice Nucleation Active Site Parameterization for Desert Dust and Soot R. Ullrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0074.1
236. Parameterization of dust emissions in the global atmospheric chemistry-climate model EMAC: impact of nudging and soil properties M. Astitha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11057-2012
237. The Role of Error Covariances in Estimation of Aerosol Number Concentrations T. Viskari et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003730962
238. Evaluation of aerosol microphysical, optical and radiative properties measured with a multiwavelength photometer Y. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2139-2022
239. Fire emission heights in the climate system – Part 2: Impact on transport, black carbon concentrations and radiation A. Veira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7173-2015
240. A GCM study of future climate response to aerosol pollution reductions S. Kloster et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0573-0
241. Anthropogenic aerosol forcing – insights from multiple estimates from aerosol-climate models with reduced complexity S. Fiedler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6821-2019
242. The link between marine sediment records and changes in Holocene Saharan landscape: simulating the dust cycle S. Egerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1009-2016
243. Assessing the stratospheric temperature response to volcanic sulfate injections by Mt. Pinatubo: insights from the Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project K. Perny et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-10997-2026
244. Primary versus secondary contributions to particle number concentrations in the European boundary layer C. Reddington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12007-2011
245. Sensitivity of dust radiative forcing to representation of aerosol size distribution in radiative transfer model Y. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2018.04.037
246. Direct observational evidence linking atmospheric aerosol formation and cloud droplet activation V. Kerminen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023130
247. Uncertainty associated with convective wet removal of entrained aerosols in a global climate model B. Croft et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10725-2012
248. Assessment of changing meteorology and emissions on air quality using a regional climate model: Impact on ozone L. Coleman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.048
249. Deliquescence and Efflorescence Behavior of Ternary Inorganic/Organic/Water Aerosol Particles A. Peckhaus et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211522t
250. Tropospheric distribution of sulphate aerosols mass and number concentration during INDOEX-IFP and its transport over the Indian Ocean: a GCM study S. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6185-2012
251. A GCM study of organic matter in marine aerosol and its potential contribution to cloud drop activation G. Roelofs https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-709-2008
252. Secondary organic aerosol formation during June 2010 in Central Europe: measurements and modelling studies with a mixed thermodynamic-kinetic approach B. Langmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3831-2014
253. Exploiting the weekly cycle as observed over Europe to analyse aerosol indirect effects in two climate models J. Quaas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8493-2009
254. Radiative absorption enhancements by black carbon controlled by particle-to-particle heterogeneity in composition L. Fierce et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919723117
255. Evaluation of simulated aerosol properties with the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM using observations from the IMPACT field campaign G. Roelofs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7709-2010
256. Direct effects and feedback of desert dust on the climate of the Arabian Peninsula during the wet season: a regional climate model study M. Islam & M. Almazroui https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1293-4
257. Characteristics of atmospheric black carbon and other aerosol particles over the Arctic Ocean in early autumn 2016: Influence from biomass burning as assessed with observed microphysical properties and model simulations F. Taketani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157671
258. Enhanced Central European summer precipitation in the late 19th century: a link to the Tropics A. Bichet et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2111
259. Inter-hemispheric asymmetry in the sea-ice response to volcanic forcing simulated by MPI-ESM (COSMOS-Mill) D. Zanchettin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-223-2014
260. Aerosol emissions and dimming/brightening in Europe: Sensitivity studies with ECHAM5-HAM D. Folini & M. Wild https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016227
261. Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions R. Saleh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697-T
262. The importance of temporal collocation for the evaluation of aerosol models with observations N. Schutgens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1065-2016
263. Climatology of the Aerosol Extinction-to-Backscatter Ratio from Sun-Photometric Measurements R. Pedros et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2027699
264. The Sectional Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol module (S3A-v1) within the LMDZ general circulation model: description and evaluation against stratospheric aerosol observations C. Kleinschmitt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3359-2017
265. The magnitude and causes of uncertainty in global model simulations of cloud condensation nuclei L. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8879-2013
266. Optical properties of coated black carbon aggregates: numerical simulations, radiative forcing estimates, and size-resolved parameterization scheme B. Romshoo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12989-2021
267. Cirrus cloud formation and ice supersaturated regions in a global climate model U. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045022
268. Evaluation of biomass burning aerosols in the HadGEM3 climate model with observations from the SAMBBA field campaign B. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14657-2016
269. Surfactant effects in global simulations of cloud droplet activation N. Prisle et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050467
270. Inadvertent climate modification due to anthropogenic lead D. Cziczo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo499
271. Observation-based constraints on modeled aerosol surface area: implications for heterogeneous chemistry R. Bergin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15449-2022
272. Chemical apportionment of southern African aerosol mass and optical depth B. Magi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7643-2009
273. A new implementation of FLEXPART with Enviro-HIRLAM meteorological input, and a case study during a heavy air pollution event B. Foreback et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2024.2316320
274. A steady-state analysis of the temperature responses of water vapor and aerosol lifetimes G. Roelofs https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8245-2013
275. The importance of the representation of air pollution emissions for the modeled distribution and radiative effects of black carbon in the Arctic J. Schacht et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11159-2019
276. Regional and global modeling of aerosol optical properties with a size, composition, and mixing state resolved particle microphysics model F. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5719-2012
277. Comparison of measurement and modeling results of the global 10Be flux in topsoil P. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5171-8
278. Orographic Effects and Evaporative Cooling along a Subtropical Cold Front: The Case of the Spectacular Saharan Dust Outbreak of March 2004 G. Gläser et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00315.1
279. What controls the vertical distribution of aerosol? Relationships between process sensitivity in HadGEM3–UKCA and inter-model variation from AeroCom Phase II Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2221-2016
280. Uncertainty in aerosol effective radiative forcing from anthropogenic and natural aerosol parameters in ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 Y. Bhatti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-269-2026
281. Pollution transport efficiency toward the Arctic: Sensitivity to aerosol scavenging and source regions Q. Bourgeois & I. Bey https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015096
282. Cirrus cloud thinning using a more physically based ice microphysics scheme in the ECHAM-HAM general circulation model C. Tully et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022
283. Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei P. Stier https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
284. The role of tropical volcanic eruptions in exacerbating Indian droughts S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81566-0
285. Derivation and verification of an aerosol dynamics expression for the below-cloud scavenging process using the moment method S. Bae et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.11.006
286. Developing a Cloud Scheme With Prognostic Cloud Fraction and Two Moment Microphysics for ECHAM‐HAM S. Muench & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001824
287. Impact of nonabsorbing anthropogenic aerosols on clear‐sky atmospheric absorption P. Stier et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007147
288. 10Be measured in a GRIP snow pit and modeled using the ECHAM5‐HAM general circulation model U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL033067
289. A parameterization of size resolved below cloud scavenging of aerosols by rain J. Henzing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3363-2006
290. Influence of aerosol radiative effects on surface temperature and snow melt in the Himalayan region A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151299
291. Sea salt concentrations across the European continent A. Manders et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.028
292. Modeling global secondary organic aerosol formation and processing with the volatility basis set: Implications for anthropogenic secondary organic aerosol S. Farina et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013046
293. MODIS satellite data evaluation for sand and dust storm monitoring in Saudi Arabia M. Butt & A. Mashat https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1488293
294. Retrieving aerosol in a cloudy environment: aerosol product availability as a function of spatial resolution L. Remer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1823-2012
295. Multi-method determination of the below-cloud wet scavenging coefficients of aerosols in Beijing, China D. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15569-2019
296. The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign J. Haywood et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021
297. An aerosol classification scheme for global simulations using the K-means machine learning method J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-509-2022
298. Improving the predictions of black carbon (BC) optical properties at various aging stages using a machine-learning-based approach B. Romshoo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8821-2024
299. Sub-micron atmospheric aerosols in the surroundings of Marseille and Athens: physical characterization and new particle formation T. Petäjä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2705-2007
300. Effects of land use and anthropogenic aerosol emissions in the Roman Empire A. Gilgen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1885-2019
301. Black carbon indirect radiative effects in a climate model R. Cherian et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2017.1369342
302. The influence of eruption season on the global aerosol evolution and radiative impact of tropical volcanic eruptions M. Toohey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12351-2011
303. Global atmospheric sulfur budget under volcanically quiescent conditions: Aerosol‐chemistry‐climate model predictions and validation J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021985
304. Data-driven emulation of modal aerosol microphysics via neural operator-based modeling Z. Bai & D. Rouson https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33209-x
305. The Mineral Dust Cycle in EMAC 2.40: sensitivity to the spectral resolution and the dust emission scheme G. Gläser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1611-2012
306. Reducing Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty by Combining Models With Satellite and Within‐The‐Atmosphere Observations: A Three‐Way Street R. Kahn et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022RG000796
307. An underestimated negative cloud feedback from cloud lifetime changes J. Mülmenstädt et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01038-1
308. Evaluation of dust production efficiencies in sandy sediments A. Bhattachan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5312
309. Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations C. Lacagnina et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025706
310. Coupled IMPACT aerosol and NCAR CAM3 model: Evaluation of predicted aerosol number and size distribution M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010459
311. Duration of tangent-linear regime in sectional multi-component aerosol dynamics T. Viskari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.04.002
312. Numerical issues associated with compensating and competing processes in climate models: an example from ECHAM-HAM H. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-861-2013
313. Initial atmospheric conditions control transport of volcanic volatiles, forcing and impacts Z. Zhuo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6233-2024
314. Recent Progress in Impacts of Mixing State on Optical Properties of Black Carbon Aerosol X. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-020-00158-0
315. Latitudinal variations of cloud and aerosol optical thickness trends based on MODIS satellite data P. Kishcha et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028796
316. Time series prediction of aerosol optical depth across the northern Indian region: integrating PSO-optimized SARIMA-SVR based on MODIS data N. Panicker & J. Valarmathi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01472-7
317. A review of natural aerosol interactions and feedbacks within the Earth system K. Carslaw et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1701-2010
318. The stratospheric ozone rich cold intrusion during El‐Niño over the Indian region: Implication during the Indian summer monsoon C. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6680
319. The impact of orbital sampling, monthly averaging and vertical resolution on climate chemistry model evaluation with satellite observations A. Aghedo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6493-2011
320. Biomass burning aerosol emissions from vegetation fires: particle number and mass emission factors and size distributions S. Janhäll et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1427-2010
321. Uncertainty in Aerosol Rainout Processes through the Case of the Radioactive Materials Emitted by the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant in March 2011 D. GOTO & J. UCHIDA https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2022-010
322. Regional and seasonal radiative forcing by perturbations to aerosol and ozone precursor emissions N. Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13885-2016
323. Comparison of the Accuracy of Aerosol Refractive Index Measurements from Single Particle and Ensemble Techniques B. Mason et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3049668
324. The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models K. Tsigaridis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014
325. How Well Can We Represent the Spectrum of Convective Clouds in a Climate Model? Comparisons between Internal Parameterization Variables and Radar Observations L. Labbouz et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0191.1
326. The outflow of Asian biomass burning carbonaceous aerosol into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in spring: radiative effects seen in a global model P. Chavan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14371-2021
327. Sources of uncertainties in modelling black carbon at the global scale E. Vignati et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2595-2010
328. 100 Years of Earth System Model Development D. Randall et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-18-0018.1
329. Impacts of black carbon mixing state on black carbon nucleation scavenging: Insights from a particle‐resolved model J. Ching et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018269
330. Atmospheric Transport of Persistent Organic Pollutants to and from the Arctic under Present-Day and Future Climate M. Octaviani et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505636g
331. Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles for aircraft with hydrogen combustion: a box model trajectory study A. Bier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2319-2024
332. A simple model for the time evolution of the condensation sink in the atmosphere for intermediate Knudsen numbers E. Ezhova et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2431-2018
333. Changes to the Chemical Composition of Soot from Heterogeneous Oxidation Reactions E. Browne et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp511507d
334. Fire and human record at Lake Victoria, East Africa, during the Early Iron Age: Did humans or climate cause massive ecosystem changes? D. Battistel et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616678466
335. Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020445
336. Towards an improved understanding of the impact of clouds and precipitation on the representation of aerosols over the Boreal Forest in GCMs S. Talvinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14449-2025
337. Towards an online-coupled chemistry-climate model: evaluation of trace gases and aerosols in COSMO-ART C. Knote et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1077-2011
338. Measurements and modeling of surface–atmosphere exchange of microorganisms in Mediterranean grassland F. Carotenuto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14919-2017
339. The impact of precipitation evaporation on the atmospheric aerosol distribution in EC-Earth v3.2.0 M. de Bruine et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1443-2018
340. Implementation of a comprehensive ice crystal formation parameterization for cirrus and mixed-phase clouds in the EMAC model (based on MESSy 2.53) S. Bacer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4021-2018
341. Modelling hydrologic impacts of light absorbing aerosol deposition on snow at the catchment scale F. Matt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-179-2018
342. Aerosol size-dependent below-cloud scavenging by rain and snow in the ECHAM5-HAM B. Croft et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4653-2009
343. Response of dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the ocean and atmosphere to global warming S. Kloster et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000224
344. Changes in stratospheric aerosol extinction coefficient after the 2018 Ambae eruption as seen by OMPS-LP and MAECHAM5-HAM E. Malinina et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14871-2021
345. On the contribution of fast and slow responses to precipitation changes caused by aerosol perturbations S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10179-2021
346. An Ensemble Cumulus Convection Parameterization with Explicit Cloud Treatment T. Wagner & H. Graf https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3485.1
347. Modal Bin Hybrid Model: A surface area consistent, triple‐moment sectional method for use in process‐oriented modeling of atmospheric aerosols M. Kajino et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50685
348. Mapping spectroscopic uncertainties into prospective methane retrieval errors from Sentinel-5 and its precursor R. Checa-Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3617-2015
349. Wet scavenging limits the detection of aerosol effects on precipitation E. Gryspeerdt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7557-2015
350. Sensitivity studies of different aerosol indirect effects in mixed-phase clouds U. Lohmann & C. Hoose https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8917-2009
351. Aerosol indirect effects – general circulation model intercomparison and evaluation with satellite data J. Quaas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8697-2009
352. Soot microphysical effects on liquid clouds, a multi-model investigation D. Koch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1051-2011
353. SSH-Aerosol v1.1: A Modular Box Model to Simulate the Evolution of Primary and Secondary Aerosols K. Sartelet et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050525
354. CH4 retrievals from space‐based solar backscatter measurements: Performance evaluation against simulated aerosol and cirrus loaded scenes A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014514
355. Beryllium-10 transport to Antarctica: Results from seasonally resolved observations and modeling J. Pedro et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016530
356. On the contribution of Aitken mode particles to cloud droplet populations at continental background areas – a parametric sensitivity study T. Anttila & V. Kerminen https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4625-2007
357. Influence of enhanced Asian NOx emissions on ozone in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in chemistry–climate model simulations C. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1297-2017
358. Air quality in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River channel: a cruise campaign Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14445-2018
359. A Fast and Efficient Version of the TwO-Moment Aerosol Sectional (TOMAS) Global Aerosol Microphysics Model Y. Lee & P. Adams https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.643259
360. The impact of organochlorines cycling in the cryosphere on global distributions and fate – 2. Land ice and temporary snow cover L. Hofmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.10.004
361. The contribution of boundary layer nucleation events to total particle concentrations on regional and global scales D. Spracklen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5631-2006
362. Evaluation of autoconversion schemes in a single model framework with satellite observations T. Michibata & T. Takemura https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023818-T
363. Recent Advances in Quantifying Wet Scavenging Efficiency of Black Carbon Aerosol Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040175
364. Predicting cloud droplet number concentration in Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)‐Oslo T. Storelvmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006300
365. The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 1: Aerosol evaluation I. Tegen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1643-2019
366. ICON coupled to HAM-lite 1.0 in limited-area mode: an efficient framework for targeted kilometer-scale simulations with interactive aerosols B. Heinold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-6167-2026
367. Opposite Effects of Mineral Dust Nonsphericity and Size on Dust‐Induced Snow Albedo Reduction T. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099031
368. A Modeling Perspective on the Lingering Glacial Sea Surface Temperature Conundrum S. Krätschmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100378
369. Air pollution reductions caused by the COVID-19 lockdown open up a way to preserve the Himalayan glaciers S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10439-2023
370. The Emissions Model Intercomparison Project (Emissions-MIP): quantifying model sensitivity to emission characteristics H. Ahsan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14779-2023
371. Atmospheric transport and deposition of cosmogenic 36Cl using ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3 model M. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119494
372. Physically based parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric models B. Kärcher et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006219
373. Treatment of Key Aerosol and Cloud Processes in Earth System Models – Recommendations from the FORCeS Project I. Riipinen et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1883
374. Differing responses of the quasi-biennial oscillation to artificial SO2 injections in two global models U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8975-2020
375. Introducing aerosol-cloud interactions in the ECMWF model reveals new constraints on aerosol representation P. Andreozzi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11309-2026
376. From nuclear power to coal power: Aerosol‐induced health and radiative effects T. Mielonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024183
377. Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol microphysics representations within the same 3-D global chemical transport model G. Mann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4449-2012
378. The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.304
379. Enviro-HIRLAM online integrated meteorology–chemistry modelling system: strategy, methodology, developments and applications (v7.2) A. Baklanov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2971-2017
380. Evaluation of ECMWF-IFS (version 41R1) operational model forecasts of aerosol transport by using ceilometer network measurements K. Chan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3807-2018
381. Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme H. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024
382. Evaluation of UKESM aerosol size and composition using ATom measurements indicates missing marine aerosol formation mechanisms X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3805-2026
383. Reallocation in modal aerosol models: impacts on predicting aerosol radiative effects T. Korhola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-161-2014
384. Climate responses to anthropogenic emissions of short-lived climate pollutants L. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8201-2015
385. Technical note: Implementation of prescribed (OFFLEM), calculated (ONLEM), and pseudo-emissions (TNUDGE) of chemical species in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) A. Kerkweg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006
386. Processes limiting the emergence of detectable aerosol indirect effects on tropical warm clouds in global aerosol-climate model and satellite data K. Peters et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.24054
387. Evaluation of ECMWF IFS-AER (CAMS) operational forecasts during cycle 41r1–46r1 with calibrated ceilometer profiles over Germany H. Flentje et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1721-2021
388. Unexpected Changes of Aerosol Burdens With Decreased Convection in the Context of Scale‐Aware Convection Schemes W. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099008
389. Improvement and Implementation of a Parameterization for Shallow Cumulus in the Global Climate Model ECHAM5-HAM F. Isotta et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3447.1
390. Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
391. Aerosol-climate interactions in the CAM-Oslo atmospheric GCM and investigation of associated basic shortcomings Ø. Seland et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00318.x
392. Towards spaceborne monitoring of localized CO2 emissions: an instrument concept and first performance assessment J. Strandgren et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2887-2020
393. Dust and the low‐level circulation over the Bodélé Depression, Chad: Observations from BoDEx 2005 R. Washington et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006502
394. Toward Direct Measurement of Atmospheric Nucleation M. Kulmala et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144124
395. Spatial distributions and seasonal cycles of aerosol climate effects in India seen in a global climate–aerosol model S. Henriksson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10177-2014
396. Impact of Parametrizing Microphysical Processes in the Jet and Vortex Phase on Contrail Cirrus Properties and Radiative Forcing A. Bier & U. Burkhardt https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036677
397. Simulations of the transport and deposition of 137Cs over Europe after the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident: influence of varying emission-altitude and model horizontal and vertical resolution N. Evangeliou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7183-2013
398. Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM J. Kazil et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10733-2010
399. Causes and importance of new particle formation in the present‐day and preindustrial atmospheres H. Gordon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026844
400. On the Atmospheric Transport and Deposition of the Cosmogenic Radionuclides (10Be): A Review U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9838-0
401. The operational methane retrieval algorithm for TROPOMI H. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5423-2016
402. Potential modulations of pre-monsoon aerosols during El Niño: impact on Indian summer monsoon S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3451-6
403. The comprehensive model system COSMO-ART – Radiative impact of aerosol on the state of the atmosphere on the regional scale B. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8661-2009
404. Atmospheric component of the MPI‐M Earth System Model: ECHAM6 B. Stevens et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20015
405. Effects of mass ratio heterogeneity and coating-related optical characteristics on the light absorption enhancement of black carbon-containing particles J. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-2881-2026
406. Validation of components of the water cycle in the ECHAM4 general circulation model based on the Newtonian relaxation technique: a case study of an intense winter cyclone H. Bauer & V. Wulfmeyer https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-009-0018-7
407. Development of a global aerosol model using a two‐dimensional sectional method: 2. Evaluation and sensitivity simulations H. Matsui & N. Mahowald https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000937
408. How important is biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale? C. Hoose et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009
409. Sensitivity of the total anthropogenic aerosol effect to the treatment of rain in a global climate model R. Posselt & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035796
410. Atmospheric removal times of the aerosol-bound radionuclides 137Cs and 131I measured after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident – a constraint for air quality and climate models N. Kristiansen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10759-2012
411. Subgrid-scale variability in clear-sky relative humidity and forcing by aerosol–radiation interactions in an atmosphere model P. Petersik et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8589-2018
412. Abrupt emission reduction during COVID-19 intensified the spring 2020 rainfall over India A. Asutosh et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.911363
413. Contribution of brown carbon and lensing to the direct radiative effect of carbonaceous aerosols from biomass and biofuel burning emissions R. Saleh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023697
414. On the Limits of CALIOP for Constraining Modeled Free Tropospheric Aerosol D. Watson‐Parris et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078195
415. A stochastic model for predicting aerosol optical depth over the north Indian region B. Abish & K. Mohanakumar https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.723149
416. Uncertainties and importance of sea spray composition on aerosol direct and indirect effects K. Tsigaridis et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018165
417. Global precipitation response to changing forcings since 1870 A. Bichet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9961-2011
418. Comparison of ozonesonde measurements in the upper troposphere and lower Stratosphere in Northern India with reanalysis and chemistry-climate-model data S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34330-5
419. Hemispheric Contrast in Aerosol-Cloud Interactions: An Attempt for Detection and Attribution A. Henkes et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1886
420. Global estimate of aerosol direct radiative forcing from satellite measurements N. Bellouin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04348
421. The temporal evolution of a long‐lived contrail cirrus cluster: Simulations with a global climate model L. Bock & U. Burkhardt https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024475
422. Uncertainty in global CCN concentrations from uncertain aerosol nucleation and primary emission rates J. Pierce & P. Adams https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1339-2009
423. Synoptic Control of Contrail Cirrus Life Cycles and Their Modification Due to Reduced Soot Number Emissions A. Bier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027011
424. Aerosol microphysics modules in the framework of the ECHAM5 climate model – intercomparison under stratospheric conditions H. Kokkola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2-97-2009
425. Do new sea spray aerosol source functions improve the results of a regional aerosol model? S. Barthel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.016
426. 500 000-year-old basal ice at Skytrain Ice Rise, West Antarctica, estimated with the 36Cl ∕ 10Be ratio N. Kappelt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-21-1585-2025
427. Wildfires in a warmer climate: Emission fluxes, emission heights, and black carbon concentrations in 2090–2099 A. Veira et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024142
428. EMAC model evaluation and analysis of atmospheric aerosol properties and distribution with a focus on the Mediterranean region A. de Meij et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.05.014
429. Cycling of DDT in the global environment 1950–2002: World ocean returns the pollutant I. Stemmler & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041340
430. Description and evaluation of aerosol in UKESM1 and HadGEM3-GC3.1 CMIP6 historical simulations J. Mulcahy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-6383-2020
431. A Computationally Efficient Aerosol Nucleation/ Condensation Method: Pseudo-Steady-State Sulfuric Acid J. Pierce & P. Adams https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802587896
432. Online-coupled meteorology and chemistry models: history, current status, and outlook Y. Zhang https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2895-2008
433. Prescribing the aerosol effective radiative forcing in the Simple Cloud-Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model v1 N. Mahfouz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15105-2025
434. The impact of recent changes in Asian anthropogenic emissions of SO2 on sulfate loading in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere and the associated radiative changes S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9989-2019
435. Tropopause level Rossby wave breaking in the Northern Hemisphere: a feature‐based validation of the ECHAM5‐HAM climate model A. Béguin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3631
436. Large-Scale Modeling of Absorbing Aerosols and Their Semi-Direct Effects I. Tegen & B. Heinold https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9100380
437. The Global Atmosphere‐aerosol Model ICON‐A‐HAM2.3–Initial Model Evaluation and Effects of Radiation Balance Tuning on Aerosol Optical Thickness M. Salzmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002699
438. Key drivers to heterogeneity evolution of black carbon-containing particles in real atmosphere Y. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166394
439. Improvement and further development in CESM/CAM5: gas-phase chemistry and inorganic aerosol treatments J. He & Y. Zhang https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9171-2014
440. Long-range transported North American wildfire aerosols observed in marine boundary layer of eastern North Atlantic G. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105680
441. Regional aerosol hygroscopicity influences radiative forcing globally S. Deshmukh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03505-z
442. Inter-annual variations in satellite observations of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde over India A. Mahajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.06.004
443. Physics-informed learning of aerosol microphysics P. Harder et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.22
444. A multi-model assessment of the impact of sea spray geoengineering on cloud droplet number K. Pringle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11647-2012
445. The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM, version 2: sensitivity to improvements in process representations K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8911-2012
446. How thermodynamic environments control stratocumulus microphysics and interactions with aerosols H. Andersen & J. Cermak https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004
447. Numerical model simulation of the Saharan dust event of 6–11 March 2006 using the Regional Climate Model version 3 (RegCM3) C. Cavazos et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011078
448. Evaluation of a Method for Measurement of the Concentration and Size Distribution of Black Carbon Particles Suspended in Rainwater S. Ohata et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.593590
449. Factors controlling black carbon distribution in the Arctic L. Qi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017
450. Sensitivity of aerosol concentrations and cloud properties to nucleation and secondary organic distribution in ECHAM5-HAM global circulation model R. Makkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1747-2009
451. An Aerosol Optical Module With Observation‐Constrained Black Carbon Properties for Global Climate Models G. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022MS003501
452. Production of extremely low volatile organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric implications T. Jokinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112
453. Intercomparison of the cloud water phase among global climate models M. Komurcu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021119
454. Assessing the impact of a future volcanic eruption on decadal predictions S. Illing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-701-2018
455. Estimating aerosol emission from SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission using an ensemble Kalman smoother: observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs) A. Tsikerdekis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022
456. Global fate and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons emitted from Europe and Russia A. Sehili & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.050
457. Aerosol distribution over Europe: a model evaluation study with detailed aerosol microphysics B. Langmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1591-2008
458. MADE-in: a new aerosol microphysics submodel for global simulation of insoluble particles and their mixing state V. Aquila et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-325-2011
459. Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds M. Kuebbeler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3027-2014
460. Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire carbonaceous particles S. China et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122
461. Transport of trace gases via eddy shedding from the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone and associated impacts on ozone heating rates S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11493-2018
462. Estimating the direct and indirect effects of secondary organic aerosols using ECHAM5-HAM D. O'Donnell et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8635-2011
463. Global perspectives on nitrate aerosol dynamics: a comprehensive sensitivity analysis A. Milousis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-571-2026
464. Air pollution control and decreasing new particle formation lead to strong climate warming R. Makkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1515-2012
465. The near future availability of photovoltaic energy in Europe and Africa in climate-aerosol modeling experiments M. Gaetani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.041
466. Characterization of optically effective complex refractive index of black carbon composite aerosols X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105180
467. Challenges in global climate models to represent cloud response to aerosols: insights from volcanic eruptions Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67359-3
468. Meridional transport and deposition of atmospheric 10Be U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-515-2009
469. In situ chemical composition measurement of individual cloud residue particles at a mountain site, southern China Q. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8473-2017
470. Volcanic climate forcing preceding the inception of the Younger Dryas: Implications for tracing the Laacher See eruption P. Abbott et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107260
471. Distributions and regional budgets of aerosols and their precursors simulated with the EMAC chemistry-climate model A. Pozzer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-961-2012
472. The Collection 6 MODIS aerosol products over land and ocean R. Levy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2989-2013
473. The impact of dust on sulfate aerosol, CN and CCN during an East Asian dust storm P. Manktelow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-365-2010
474. Impact of Anthropogenic Emission Injection Height Uncertainty on Global Sulfur Dioxide and Aerosol Distribution Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030001
475. Low sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei to changes in the sea-air flux of dimethyl-sulphide M. Woodhouse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010
476. The depositional flux of meteoric cosmogenic 10Be from modeling and observation K. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116530
477. Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis K. Block et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-443-2024
478. Impact of numerical choices on water conservation in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1971-2018
479. Impact of future Arctic shipping on high‐latitude black carbon deposition J. Browse et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50876
480. Developing a climatological simplification of aerosols to enter the cloud microphysics of a global climate model U. Proske et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5907-2024
481. A study of uncertainties in the sulfate distribution and its radiative forcing associated with sulfur chemistry in a global aerosol model D. Goto et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10889-2011
482. A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models S. Tilmes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-43-2015
483. Sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei to regional changes in dimethyl-sulphide emissions M. Woodhouse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2723-2013
484. Classifying and quantifying decadal changes in wet deposition over Southeast and East Asia using EANET, OMI, and GPCP S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107400
485. Cloud microphysics and aerosol indirect effects in the global climate model ECHAM5-HAM U. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3425-2007
486. Impact of parametric uncertainties on the present-day climate and on the anthropogenic aerosol effect U. Lohmann & S. Ferrachat https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11373-2010
487. Global environmental cycling of γ-HCH and DDT in the 1980s – A study using a coupled atmosphere and ocean general circulation model F. Guglielmo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.024
488. Summertime Aerosol Radiative Effects and Their Dependence on Temperature over the Southeastern USA T. Mielonen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050180
489. Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models D. Koch et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009
490. Modelling of mineral dust for interglacial and glacial climate conditions with a focus on Antarctica N. Sudarchikova et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-11-765-2015
491. Machine learning-based downscaling of aerosol size distributions from a global climate model A. Vartiainen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-5763-2025
492. Parameterizing the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols in the Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling and Analysis Atmospheric General Circulation Model with impacts on global radiation and energy fluxes D. Bäumer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007319
493. A Review of the Representation of Aerosol Mixing State in Atmospheric Models R. Stevens & A. Dastoor https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040168
494. Quantification of DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions using the ECHAM5-HAMMOZ model in a current climate scenario M. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7425-2010
495. The role of aerosol in altering North Atlantic atmospheric circulation in winter and its impact on air quality F. Pausata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1725-2015
496. Assessing predicted cirrus ice properties between two deterministic ice formation parameterizations C. Tully et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2957-2023
497. Evaluation of MSG-SEVIRI mineral dust retrieval products over North Africa and the Middle East J. Banks & H. Brindley https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.07.017
498. Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI‐ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 M. Giorgetta et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20038
499. Comparison of measured multi-decadal rainfall variability with farmers’ perceptions of and responses to seasonal changes in western Uganda J. Diem et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0943-1
500. High‐resolution simulation of a major West African dust‐storm: comparison with observations and investigation of dust impact C. Kocha et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.927
501. GCM simulations of anthropogenic aerosol‐induced changes in aerosol extinction, atmospheric heating and precipitation over India R. Cherian et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50298
502. An improvement on the dust emission scheme in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM T. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1105-2008
503. Improved representation of particle size and solubility in model simulations of atmospheric dispersion and wet-deposition from Fukushima H. Dacre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2020.106193
504. Global–regional nested simulation of particle number concentration by combing microphysical processes with an evolving organic aerosol module X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9343-2021
505. Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation M. Wang & J. Penner https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-239-2009
506. A Critical Examination of the Observed First Aerosol Indirect Effect H. Shao & G. Liu https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2812.1
507. Impacts of internally and externally mixed anthropogenic sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols on East Asian climate L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0508-7
508. Simulating aerosol microphysics with the ECHAM4/MADE GCM – Part II: Results from a first multiannual simulation of the submicrometer aerosol A. Lauer & J. Hendricks https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5495-2006
509. On the Contribution of Biomass Burning to POPs (PAHs and PCDDs) in Air in Africa G. Lammel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401499q
510. Regional differences in gas–particle partitioning and deposition of semivolatile organic compounds on a global scale C. Götz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.033
511. Investigating the role of aerosol wet scavenging on global horizontal irradiance simulation in the WRF-Chem-solar model S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126062
512. Change in global aerosol composition since preindustrial times K. Tsigaridis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5143-2006
513. Cirrus Cloud Properties as Seen by the CALIPSO Satellite and ECHAM-HAM Global Climate Model B. Gasparini et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0608.1
514. Evaluation of meteorological parameters over a coniferous forest in a single-column chemistry-climate model L. Ganzeveld et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.061
515. Sensitivity Studies of the Role of Aerosols in Warm-Phase Orographic Precipitation in Different Dynamical Flow Regimes A. Muhlbauer & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2492.1
516. Some implications of sampling choices on comparisons between satellite and model aerosol optical depth fields A. Sayer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10705-2010
517. Transport of aerosols into the UTLS and their impact on the Asian monsoon region as seen in a global model simulation S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8771-2013
518. Bacteria in the global atmosphere – Part 2: Modeling of emissions and transport between different ecosystems S. Burrows et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9281-2009
519. Reducing the aerosol forcing uncertainty using observational constraints on warm rain processes J. Mülmenstädt et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz6433
520. Modelling the stratospheric budget of beryllium isotopes G. Delaygue et al. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28582
521. The Eyjafjallajökull ash plume – Part 2: Simulating ash cloud dispersion with REMOTE C. O'Dowd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.037
522. Influence of future air pollution mitigation strategies on total aerosol radiative forcing S. Kloster et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6405-2008
523. Tropospheric aerosol size distributions simulated by three online global aerosol models using the M7 microphysics module K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6409-2010
524. Phase of solar activity affects response of solar proxy 10Be U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.08.036
525. Simulation of ash clouds after a Laacher See-type eruption U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-633-2021
526. First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives B. Kravitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026874
527. Importance of microphysical settings for climate forcing by stratospheric SO2 injections as modeled by SOCOL-AERv2 S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4181-2024
528. Aerosol effect on climate extremes in Europe under different future scenarios J. Sillmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50459
529. Evaluation of Land Surface Models in Reproducing Satellite Derived Leaf Area Index over the High-Latitude Northern Hemisphere. Part II: Earth System Models A. Anav et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5083637
530. Estimation of Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) using a neural network retrieval algorithm—A synthetic study for SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission N. Hannadige et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2026.109853
531. Radiative forcing and climate impact resulting from SO2 injections based on a 200,000-year record of Plinian eruptions along the Central American Volcanic Arc D. Metzner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-012-0814-z
532. Atmospheric chemistry: from the gas phase to the multiphase system D. Scheres Firak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40828-026-00226-w
533. Microphysical processing of aerosol particles in orographic clouds S. Pousse-Nottelmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9217-2015
534. Implementing a sectional scheme for early aerosol growth from new particle formation in the Norwegian Earth System Model v2: comparison to observations and climate impacts S. Blichner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3335-2021
535. Climate and air quality trade-offs in altering ship fuel sulfur content A. Partanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12059-2013
536. Implementation of the MEGAN (v2.1) biogenic emission model in the ECHAM6-HAMMOZ chemistry climate model A. Henrot et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-903-2017
537. Influence of Giant CCN on warm rain processes in the ECHAM5 GCM R. Posselt & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3769-2008
538. Global cycling and climate effects of aeolian dust controlled by biological soil crusts E. Rodriguez-Caballero et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00942-1
539. A simple model of global aerosol indirect effects S. Ghan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50567
540. The mass and number size distributions of black carbon aerosol over Europe C. Reddington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4917-2013
541. Description and evaluation of GLOMAP-mode: a modal global aerosol microphysics model for the UKCA composition-climate model G. Mann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-519-2010
542. The impact of residential combustion emissions on atmospheric aerosol, human health, and climate E. Butt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-873-2016
543. Air–sea exchange of semivolatile organic compounds — Wind and/or sea surface temperature control of volatilisation studied using a coupled general circulation model I. Stemmler & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.11.002
544. Trends in peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere over southern Asia during the summer monsoon season: regional impacts S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12725-2014
545. New developments in the representation of Saharan dust sources in the aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2 B. Heinold et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-765-2016
546. Investigating the quality of modeled aerosol profiles based on combined lidar and sunphotometer data N. Siomos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7003-2017
547. Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle‐resolved aerosol model N. Riemer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011073
548. Comparison of aerosol optical properties above clouds between POLDER and AeroCom models over the South East Atlantic Ocean during the fire season F. Peers et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068222
549. Aerosol optical depths and their contributing sources in Taiwan K. Chan & K. Chan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.11.011
550. Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models N. Kristiansen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016
551. How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in a warming Arctic summer and autumn? A. Gilgen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10521-2018
552. Evaluation of aerosol number concentrations in NorESM with improved nucleation parameterization R. Makkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5127-2014
553. Potential impact of carbonaceous aerosol on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) and precipitation during Asian summer monsoon in a global model simulation S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11637-2017
554. The vertical distribution of ozone instantaneous radiative forcing from satellite and chemistry climate models A. Aghedo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014243
555. Importance of tropospheric volcanic aerosol for indirect radiative forcing of climate A. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7321-2012
556. Do climate models project changes in solar resources? I. Huber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.016
557. SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
558. Mid-latitude convective boundary-layer electricity: A study by large-eddy simulation S. Anisimov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105035
559. An AeroCom assessment of black carbon in Arctic snow and sea ice C. Jiao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2399-2014
560. Effects of the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process on global black carbon distribution L. Qi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7459-2017
561. Precipitation over East Asia simulated by ECHAM6.3 with different schemes of cumulus convective parameterization S. Gui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05226-1
562. Radiative Fluxes in the ECHAM5 General Circulation Model M. Wild & E. Roeckner https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3823.1
563. General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) – integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales M. Kulmala et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13061-2011
564. Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016
565. On the Role of Climate Forcing by Volcanic Sulphate and Volcanic Ash B. Langmann https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/340123
566. Modeling the Processing of Aerosol and Trace Gases in Clouds and Fogs B. Ervens https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5005887
567. Modeling cosmogenic radionuclides 10Be and 7Be during the Maunder Minimum using the ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model U. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008
568. Linking variations in sea spray aerosol particle hygroscopicity to composition during two microcosm experiments S. Forestieri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9003-2016
569. Weighted Flow Algorithms (WFA) for stochastic particle coagulation R. DeVille et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.027
570. Description and evaluation of the community aerosol dynamics model MAFOR v2.0 M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3969-2022
571. Enhanced simulation of East Asian summer precipitation with a revised simplified Arakawa–Schubert convection scheme S. Gui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2026.109154
572. Aerosol mixing state revealed by transmission electron microscopy pertaining to cloud formation and human airway deposition J. Ching et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0081-9
573. Aerosol characteristics over the Tibetan Plateau simulated with a coupled aerosol–climate model (FGOALS-f3-L) 耦合气溶胶气候模式FGOALS-f3-L模拟青藏高原地区气溶胶特性 M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aosl.2021.100031
574. Aerosol indirect effects from shipping emissions: sensitivity studies with the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM-HAM K. Peters et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5985-2012
575. Monthly-averaged anthropogenic aerosol direct radiative forcing over the Mediterranean based on AERONET aerosol properties A. Bergamo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6995-2008
576. Aerosol optical depth disaggregation: toward global aerosol vertical profiles S. Bouabid et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2024.15
577. Aerosol–climate interactions in the Norwegian Earth System Model – NorESM1-M A. Kirkevåg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-207-2013
578. Aerosol-cloud-climate interactions in the climate model CAM-Oslo A. Kirkevåg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2007.00313.x
579. Carbon monoxide total column retrievals from TROPOMI shortwave infrared measurements J. Landgraf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4955-2016
580. Blue skies over China: The effect of pollution-control on solar power generation and revenues M. Labordena et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207028
581. Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations M. Schulz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006
582. TROPOMI aboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: Prospective performance of CH4 retrievals for aerosol and cirrus loaded atmospheres A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.030
583. Modeling below-cloud scavenging of size-resolved particles in GEM-MACHv3.1 R. Ghahreman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-685-2024
584. Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols M. Andreae & D. Rosenfeld https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001
585. Community Intercomparison Suite (CIS) v1.4.0: a tool for intercomparing models and observations D. Watson-Parris et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3093-2016
586. Evaluations of tropospheric aerosol properties simulated by the community earth system model with a sectional aerosol microphysics scheme P. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000421
587. Development of high-resolution regional aerosol climate model: SCALE-SPRINTARS R. Yasui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44394-026-00019-2
588. Global cloud condensation nuclei influenced by carbonaceous combustion aerosol D. Spracklen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9067-2011
589. Impact of the representation of marine stratocumulus clouds on the anthropogenic aerosol effect D. Neubauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11997-2014
590. Disproportionately strong climate forcing from extratropical explosive volcanic eruptions M. Toohey et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0286-2
591. Thirty years of arctic primary marine organic aerosols: patterns, seasonal dynamics, and trends (1990–2019) A. Leon-Marcos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1109-2026
592. Regional radiative impact of volcanic aerosol from the 2009 eruption of Mt. Redoubt C. Young et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3699-2012
593. The effect of aerosol representation on cloud microphysical properties in Northeast Asia I. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-013-0288-y
594. Assimilating aerosol optical properties related to size and absorption from POLDER/PARASOL with an ensemble data assimilation system A. Tsikerdekis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2637-2021
595. Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0) P. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025
596. Pathways of PFOA to the Arctic: variabilities and contributions of oceanic currents and atmospheric transport and chemistry sources I. Stemmler & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9965-2010
597. Process evaluation suggests models misrepresent the precipitation-driven replenishment of cloud condensation nuclei S. Blichner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11281-2026
598. Projected 21st century decrease in marine productivity: a multi-model analysis M. Steinacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-979-2010
599. Black carbon absorption at the global scale is affected by particle-scale diversity in composition L. Fierce et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12361
600. Optically effective complex refractive index of coated black carbon aerosols: from numerical aspects X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7507-2019
601. Examination of aerosol distributions and radiative effects over the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian Sea region during ICARB using satellite data and a general circulation model R. Cherian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1287-2012
602. Fluxes of soot black carbon to South Atlantic sediments R. Lohmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003253
603. Extending legacy climate models by adaptive mesh refinement for single-component tracer transport: a case study with ECHAM6-HAMMOZ (ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0) Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2289-2021
604. Global dust model intercomparison in AeroCom phase I N. Huneeus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7781-2011
605. Radiative and climate impacts of a large volcanic eruption during stratospheric sulfur geoengineering A. Laakso et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-305-2016
606. Development and evaluation of the ECHAM6-iMAPLE v1.0 coupled atmosphere–ecosystem model W. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9395-2026
607. The European aerosol budget in 2006 J. Aan de Brugh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1117-2011
608. An overview of optical and thermal methods for the characterization of carbonaceous aerosol D. Massabò & P. Prati https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-021-00017-8
609. Tracing devastating fires in Portugal to a snow archive in the Swiss Alps: a case study D. Osmont et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3731-2020
610. Implementation and evaluation of aerosol and cloud microphysics in a regional climate model E. Zubler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014572
611. EC-Earth3-AerChem: a global climate model with interactive aerosols and atmospheric chemistry participating in CMIP6 T. van Noije et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5637-2021
612. Global warming amplified by reduced sulphur fluxes as a result of ocean acidification K. Six et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1981
613. Time series analysis of aerosol optical depth over New Delhi using Box–Jenkins ARIMA modeling approach K. Taneja et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.02.004
614. Indian monsoon and the elevated‐heat‐pump mechanism in a coupled aerosol‐climate model M. D'Errico et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023346
615. Tropospheric warming over the northern Indian Ocean caused by South Asian anthropogenic aerosols: possible impact on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7179-2022
616. Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions A. Tsikerdekis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023
617. Simulation of dimming and brightening in Europe from 1958 to 2001 using a regional climate model E. Zubler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015396
618. Sources, sinks, and transatlantic transport of North African dust aerosol: A multimodel analysis and comparison with remote sensing data D. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021099
619. Size distribution and coating thickness of black carbon from the Canadian oil sands operations Y. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2653-2018
620. Inversion of Near-Surface Aerosol Equivalent Complex Refractive Index Based on Aethalometer, Micro-Pulse Lidar and Portable Optical Particle Profiler X. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16020279
621. Optical Properties of Boundary Layer Aerosols From High Spectral Resolution Lidar Measurements in a Polluted Urban Environment (Seoul, Korea) S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038523
622. Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54 C. Beer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020
623. Separating radiative forcing by aerosol–cloud interactions and rapid cloud adjustments in the ECHAM–HAMMOZ aerosol–climate model using the method of partial radiative perturbations J. Mülmenstädt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15415-2019
624. Revisiting the Agung 1963 volcanic forcing – impact of one or two eruptions U. Niemeier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10379-2019
625. Constraints on aerosol processes in climate models from vertically-resolved aircraft observations of black carbon Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5969-2013
626. Multi-model comparison of the volcanic sulfate deposition from the 1815 eruption of Mt. Tambora L. Marshall et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2307-2018
627. The impact of aerosol emissions on the 1.5 °C pathways A. Hienola et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b2
628. Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations Y. Lee & P. Adams https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010
629. What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO2? U. Niemeier & C. Timmreck https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9129-2015
630. Aerosol absorption and radiative forcing P. Stier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5237-2007
631. High Contribution of Sea Salt Aerosols on Atmospheric Particles Measured at an Urban Tropical Location in Reunion Island C. Bhugwant et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.48097
632. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on the Indian summer monsoon S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac109c
633. The scavenging processes controlling the seasonal cycle in Arctic sulphate and black carbon aerosol J. Browse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6775-2012
634. Global variability in atmospheric new particle formation mechanisms B. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07547-1
635. Trace gas and aerosol interactions in the fully coupled model of aerosol‐chemistry‐climate ECHAM5‐HAMMOZ: 1. Model description and insights from the spring 2001 TRACE‐P experiment L. Pozzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009007
636. Decadal Disruption of the QBO by Tropical Volcanic Supereruptions H. Brenna et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089687
637. Model evaluation of short-lived climate forcers for the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme: a multi-species, multi-model study C. Whaley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5775-2022
638. The Identification and Analysis of Long-Range Aerosol Transport Pathways with Layered Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization Datasets from 2006 to 2016 L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15184537
639. Quantifying the sensitivity of aerosol optical properties to the parameterizations of physico-chemical processes during the 2010 Russian wildfires and heatwave L. Palacios-Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9679-2020
640. Rate of non-linearity in DMS aerosol-cloud-climate interactions M. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11175-2011
641. Estimation of global black carbon direct radiative forcing and its uncertainty constrained by observations R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024326
642. Water uptake of clay and desert dust aerosol particles at sub- and supersaturated water vapor conditions H. Herich et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/b901585j
643. Weaker cooling by aerosols due to dust–pollution interactions K. Klingmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15285-2020
644. Mixed‐layer ocean responses to anthropogenic aerosol dimming from 1870 to 2000 T. Dallafior et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024070
645. Dust mobilization due to density currents in the Atlas region: Observations from the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment 2006 field campaign P. Knippertz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008774
646. Transport pathways of peroxyacetyl nitrate in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere from different monsoon systems during the summer monsoon season S. Fadnavis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11477-2015
647. Weak influence of anthropogenic emissions on aerosol, cloud, and rain in the wet season of the Amazon rainforest X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9685-2025
648. Revising the hygroscopicity of inorganic sea salt particles P. Zieger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883
649. Parameterizations of size distribution and refractive index of biomass burning organic aerosol with black carbon content B. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12401-2022
650. Variable CCN formation potential of regional sulfur emissions P. Manktelow et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3253-2009
651. The characteristics and sources of the aerosols within the nocturnal residual layer over Wuhan, China B. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104959
652. Regional diversity in black carbon emissions, size, and mixing state across Asia: Implications for climate and public health S. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105578
653. Sensitivity Studies of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in Mixed-Phase Orographic Precipitation A. Muhlbauer & U. Lohmann https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3001.1
654. Evaluating the Impacts of Cloud Processing on Resuspended Aerosol Particles After Cloud Evaporation Using a Particle‐Resolved Model Y. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034992
655. The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6.3–HAM2.3 – Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity D. Neubauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3609-2019
656. Aerosol modelling for regional climate studies: application to anthropogenic particles and evaluation over a European/African domain F. Solmon et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2005.00155.x
657. Aerosol Mixing State: Measurements, Modeling, and Impacts N. Riemer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000615
658. Global response of parameterised convective cloud fields to anthropogenic aerosol forcing Z. Kipling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4445-2020
659. MADMS: Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for multiple Modes and fractal Shapes in the free-molecular and near-continuum regimes M. Kajino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.01.005
660. Improving Below‐Cloud Scavenging Coefficients of Sulfate, Nitrate, and Ammonium in PM2.5 and Implications for Numerical Simulation and Air Pollution Control L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039487
661. Technical Note: Simulation of detailed aerosol chemistry on the global scale using MECCA-AERO A. Kerkweg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2973-2007
662. A bibliometric and scientometric: analysis towards global pattern and trends related to aerosol and precipitation studies from 2002 to 2022 R. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-022-01290-0
663. Impacts of a newly-developed aerosol climatology on numerical weather prediction using a global atmospheric forecasting model I. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.019
664. Global modeling of multicomponent aerosol species: Aerosol optical parameters T. Ayash et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008968
665. Does prognostic seeding along flight tracks produce the desired effects of cirrus cloud thinning? C. Tully et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7673-2023
666. Exploring accumulation-mode H2SO4 versus SO2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
667. Modelling of sea salt concentrations over Europe: key uncertainties and comparison with observations S. Tsyro et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10367-2011
668. Reduced efficacy of marine cloud brightening geoengineering due to in-plume aerosol coagulation: parameterization and global implications G. Stuart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10385-2013
669. The evolution of the global aerosol system in a transient climate simulation from 1860 to 2100 P. Stier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3059-2006
670. Description and evaluation of GMXe: a new aerosol submodel for global simulations (v1) K. Pringle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010
671. Geostationary Emission Explorer for Europe (G3E): mission concept and initial performance assessment A. Butz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4719-2015
672. Rapid metal pollutant deposition from the volcanic plume of Kīlauea, Hawai’i E. Ilyinskaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00146-2
673. Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 47R1) of ECMWF S. Rémy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4881-2022
674. Toward Reduced Representation of Mixing State for Simulating Aerosol Effects on Climate N. Riemer & T. Bond https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1
675. Trace gas and aerosol interactions in the fully coupled model of aerosol‐chemistry‐climate ECHAM5‐HAMMOZ: 2. Impact of heterogeneous chemistry on the global aerosol distributions L. Pozzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009008
676. Large methane releases lead to strong aerosol forcing and reduced cloudiness T. Kurtén et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6961-2011
677. Powering aircraft with 100 % sustainable aviation fuel reduces ice crystals in contrails R. Märkl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3813-2024
678. Study of distinctive regional features of surface solar radiation in North and East China F. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-011-0408-x
679. Contribution of fungi to primary biogenic aerosols in the atmosphere: wet and dry discharged spores, carbohydrates, and inorganic ions W. Elbert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4569-2007
680. Evidence of the return of past pollution in the ocean: A model study I. Stemmler & G. Lammel https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50248
681. Development of a global model of mineral dust aerosol microphysics Y. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2441-2009
682. Stratospheric aerosol size reduction after volcanic eruptions F. Wrana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9725-2023
683. The regional aerosol-climate model REMO-HAM J. Pietikäinen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1323-2012