Clarke, A. D. and Kapustin, V. N.: A Pacific aerosol survey. Part I: A decade of data on particle production, transport, evolution, and mixing in the troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 363–382, 2002.
a,
b
Decker, Z. C., Alpert, P. A., Ammann, M., Anet, J. G., Bauer, M., Cui, T., Durdina, L., Edebeli, J., Gysel-Beer, M., and Prévôt, A. S.: Emission and Formation of Aircraft Engine Oil Ultrafine Particles, ACS ES&T Air, 1, 1662–1672, 2024.
a,
b
Durdina, L., Brem, B. T., Elser, M., Schönenberger, D., Siegerist, F., and Anet, J. G.: Reduction of nonvolatile particulate matter emissions of a commercial turbofan engine at the ground level from the use of a sustainable aviation fuel blend, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 14576–14585, 2021. a
Engberg, Z., Teoh, R., Abbott, T., Dean, T., Stettler, M. E. J., and Shapiro, M. L.: Forecasting contrail climate forcing for flight planning and air traffic management applications: the CocipGrid model in pycontrails 0.51.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 253–286,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-253-2025, 2025.
a
Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Speth, R. L., and Barrett, S. R. H.: The role of plume-scale processes in long-term impacts of aircraft emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5697–5727,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5697-2020, 2020.
a
Fushimi, A., Saitoh, K., Fujitani, Y., and Takegawa, N.: Identification of jet lubrication oil as a major component of aircraft exhaust nanoparticles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6389–6399,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6389-2019, 2019.
a
Gierens, K., Matthes, S., and Rohs, S.: How well can persistent contrails be predicted?, Aerospace, 7, 169,
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120169, 2020.
a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz‐Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., and Schepers, D.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, 2020. a
Kaiser, J. C., Hendricks, J., Righi, M., Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Kandler, K., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., Heimerl, K., Schwarz, J. P., Perring, A. E., and Popp, T.: Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 541–579,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019, 2019.
a
Kärcher, B.: The importance of contrail ice formation for mitigating the climate impact of aviation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3497–3505, 2016.
a,
b,
c,
d
Kärcher, B., Turco, R., Yu, F., Danilin, M., Weisenstein, D., Miake‐Lye, R., and Busen, R.: A unified model for ultrafine aircraft particle emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 29379–29386, 2000. a
Kärcher, B., Burkhardt, U., Bier, A., Bock, L., and Ford, I.: The microphysical pathway to contrail formation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7893–7927, 2015.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j
Kölker, K., Zengerling, Z., Kühlen, M., Lütjens, K., and Linke, F.: Assessing the impact of contrail avoidance through rescheduling on airline network flows: A case study of North Atlantic flights, Transport. Res. A-Pol., 187, 104155,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104155, 2024.
a
Lambe, A. T., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P., Croasdale, D. R., Wright, J. P., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Worsnop, D. R., Brune, W. H., and Davidovits, P.: Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary organic aerosol (OPOA), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8913–8928,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011, 2011.
a,
b,
c,
d
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D. W., Skowron, A., Allen, M. R., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q., Doherty, S. J., Freeman, S., Forster, P. M., and Fuglestvedt, J.: The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834, 2021.
a,
b
Lewellen, D.: Persistent contrails and contrail cirrus. Part II: Full lifetime behavior, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4420–4438, 2014. a
Lewellen, D. C.: A large-eddy simulation study of contrail ice number formation, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 2585–2604, 2020. a
Lewellen, D., Meza, O., and Huebsch, W.: Persistent contrails and contrail cirrus. Part I: Large-eddy simulations from inception to demise, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 4399–4419, 2014.
a,
b,
c,
d
Liu, H. J., Zhao, C. S., Nekat, B., Ma, N., Wiedensohler, A., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2525–2539,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014, 2014.
a
Minikin, A., Petzold, A., Ström, J., Krejci, R., Seifert, M., van Velthoven, P., Schlager, H., and Schumann, U.: Aircraft observations of the upper tropospheric fine particle aerosol in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres at midlatitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016458, 2003.
a,
b
Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., D’Ascoli, E., Kim, J., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Beaton, B., and Beyersdorf, A. J.: Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions, Nature, 543, 411–415, 2017. a
Padró, L. T., Tkacik, D., Lathem, T., Hennigan, C. J., Sullivan, A. P., Weber, R. J., Huey, L. G., and Nenes, A.: Investigation of cloud condensation nuclei properties and droplet growth kinetics of the water‐soluble aerosol fraction in Mexico City, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013195, 2010.
a
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Ponsonby, J., King, L., Murray, B. J., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Jet aircraft lubrication oil droplets as contrail ice-forming particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2045–2058,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2045-2024, 2024.
a,
b
Ponsonby, J., Teoh, R., Kärcher, B., and Stettler, M. E. J.: An updated microphysical model for particle activation in contrails: the role of volatile plume particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 18617–18637,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18617-2025, 2025.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f
Rädel, G. and Shine, K. P.: Validating ECMWF forecasts for the occurrence of ice supersaturation using visual observations of persistent contrails and radiosonde measurements over England, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1723–1732, 2010. a
Raes, F., Van Dingenen, R., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Putaud, J.-P., Seinfeld, J. H., and Adams, P.: Formation and cycling of aerosols in the global troposphere, Atmos. Environ., 34, 4215–4240, 2000.
a,
b
Reutter, P., Neis, P., Rohs, S., and Sauvage, B.: Ice supersaturated regions: properties and validation of ERA-Interim reanalysis with IAGOS in situ water vapour measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 787–804,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-787-2020, 2020.
a
Rosenow, J., Fricke, H., Luchkova, T., and Schultz, M.: Minimizing contrail formation by rerouting around dynamic ice-supersaturated regions, Aeron. Aero. Open Access J., 2, 105–111, 2018. a
Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts, Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, 1996.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e
Schumann, U., Mayer, B., Gierens, K., Unterstrasser, S., Jessberger, P., Petzold, A., Voigt, C., and Gayet, J.-F.: Effective radius of ice particles in cirrus and contrails, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 300–321, 2011. a
Schumann, U., Mayer, B., Graf, K., and Mannstein, H.: A parametric radiative forcing model for contrail cirrus, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1391–1406, 2012. a
Schumann, U., Baumann, R., Baumgardner, D., Bedka, S. T., Duda, D. P., Freudenthaler, V., Gayet, J.-F., Heymsfield, A. J., Minnis, P., Quante, M., Raschke, E., Schlager, H., Vázquez-Navarro, M., Voigt, C., and Wang, Z.: Properties of individual contrails: a compilation of observations and some comparisons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 403–438,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-403-2017, 2017.
a
Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Teoh, R., and Dean, T.: pycontrails: Python library for modeling aviation climate impacts, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7775435, 2023.
a
Stier, P., Feichter, J., Kinne, S., Kloster, S., Vignati, E., Wilson, J., Ganzeveld, L., Tegen, I., Werner, M., Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Minikin, A., and Petzold, A.: The aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1125–1156,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1125-2005, 2005.
a
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Gryspeerdt, E., Shapiro, M., Molloy, J., Koudis, G., Voigt, C., and Stettler, M. E. J.: Aviation contrail climate effects in the North Atlantic from 2016 to 2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10919–10935,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10919-2022, 2022a.
a
Teoh, R., Schumann, U., Voigt, C., Schripp, T., Shapiro, M., Engberg, Z., Molloy, J., Koudis, G., and Stettler, M. E.: Targeted use of sustainable aviation fuel to maximize climate benefits, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 17246–17255, 2022b. a
Timko, M. T., Albo, S. E., Onasch, T. B., Fortner, E. C., Yu, Z., Miake-Lye, R. C., Canagaratna, M. R., Ng, N. L., and Worsnop, D. R.: Composition and sources of the organic particle emissions from aircraft engines, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 61–73, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Ungeheuer, F., Caudillo, L., Ditas, F., Simon, M., van Pinxteren, D., Kılıç, D., Rose, D., Jacobi, S., Kürten, A., and Curtius, J.: Nucleation of jet engine oil vapours is a large source of aviation-related ultrafine particles, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 319,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00653-w, 2022.
a,
b
Unterstrasser, S. and Gierens, K.: Numerical simulations of contrail-to-cirrus transition – Part 1: An extensive parametric study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2017–2036,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2017-2010, 2010.
a
Voigt, C., Schumann, U., Jurkat, T., Schäuble, D., Schlager, H., Petzold, A., Gayet, J.-F., Krämer, M., Schneider, J., Borrmann, S., Schmale, J., Jessberger, P., Hamburger, T., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Gourbeyre, C., Meyer, J., Kübbeler, M., Frey, W., Kalesse, H., Butler, T., Lawrence, M. G., Holzäpfel, F., Arnold, F., Wendisch, M., Döpelheuer, A., Gottschaldt, K., Baumann, R., Zöger, M., Sölch, I., Rautenhaus, M., and Dörnbrack, A.: In-situ observations of young contrails – overview and selected results from the CONCERT campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 9039–9056,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9039-2010, 2010.
a
Voigt, C., Kleine, J., Sauer, D., Moore, R. H., Bräuer, T., Le Clercq, P., Kaufmann, S., Scheibe, M., Jurkat-Witschas, T., and Aigner, M.: Cleaner burning aviation fuels can reduce contrail cloudiness, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 114,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00174-y, 2021.
a
Voigt, C., Märkl, R., Sauer, D., Dischl, R., Renard, C., Seeliger, K., Yu, F., Kaufmann, S., Bräuer, T., and Jurkat-Witschas, T.: Substantial aircraft contrail formation at low soot emission levels, Nature, 652, 112–118, 2026. a
Wang, M., Kong, W., Marten, R., He, X.-C., Chen, D., Pfeifer, J., Heitto, A., Kontkanen, J., Dada, L., and Kürten, A.: Rapid growth of new atmospheric particles by nitric acid and ammonia condensation, Nature, 581, 184–189, 2020. a
Yang, P., Hong, G., Dessler, A. E., Ou, S. S., Liou, K.-N., Minnis, P., and Harshvardhan: Contrails and induced cirrus: Optics and radiation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 473–478, 2010. a
Yu, F. and Turco, R. P.: The role of ions in the formation and evolution of particles in aircraft plumes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1927–1930, 1997. a
Yu, F., Karcher, B., and Anderson, B. E.: Revisiting contrail ice formation: Impact of primary soot particle sizes and contribution of volatile particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2024.
a,
b,
c,
d
Yu, Z., Liscinsky, D. S., Winstead, E. L., True, B. S., Timko, M. T., Bhargava, A., Herndon, S. C., Miake-Lye, R. C., and Anderson, B. E.: Characterization of lubrication oil emissions from aircraft engines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 9530–9534, 2010.
a,
b,
c
Zhang, C., Chen, L., Ding, S., Zhou, X., Chen, R., Zhang, X., Yu, Z., and Wang, J.: Mitigation effects of alternative aviation fuels on non-volatile particulate matter emissions from aircraft gas turbine engines: A review, Sci. Total Environ., 820, 153233,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153233, 2022.
a
Zink, J., Unterstrasser, S., and Jurkat‐Witschas, T.: On the potential role of lubrication oil particles in contrail formation for kerosene and hydrogen combustion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD043487,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD043487, 2025.
a,
b,
c,
d
Zink, J., Unterstrasser, S., and Burkhardt, U.: Contrail formation for aircraft with hydrogen combustion – Part 1: A systematic microphysical investigation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 3125–3143,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3125-2026, 2026.
a
