Thank you for your careful revisions and responses to the reviewer comments. Based on input from one reviewer and before I can accept for final publication, I ask that you incorporate into the manuscript the key clarifications that are currently only described in your response during revision. In particular, please summarize and include the additional larger-domain simulation and its convergence with the default-domain results, clarify the explanation of the re-emission process (in response to comments on lines 124–135), and include the discussion of the potential enhancement of surface INP emissions when the mixed layer reaches the surface. These may be briefly mentioned if needed.

Please use the terms "INP" (ice nucleating particle) and "INPs" (ice nucleating particles) throughout the manuscript, as these are now the most widely accepted and commonly used terms within the ice nucleation community (see Vali et al., 2015).

Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 10263–10270, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015, 2015.

I also suggest to use the past tense when describing your simulations and results, as they represent work that has already been completed.

I apologize for not catching these issues during the minor revision stage, as my attention was primarily focused on relaying the reviewers' comments. Once these final revisions have been made, I will be happy to accept the manuscript. I simply want to ensure that your paper is in the best possible shape prior to publication.