Dear Authors,

The referees had a positive opinion of your original manuscript, and I find that you have satisfactorily addressed their comments. It is therefore my pleasure to accept the paper for publication; congratulations!
I have just noticed a few typos. Some details of your methodology could also be further explained (see below). Hence, I have selected 'technical corrections' in order to give you the possibility to correct those other very minor points, as well as proofread the whole manuscript before it is transferred to copy-editing.

Sincerely,
Aurelien Podglajen

Minor comments:

All lines refer to the tracked-changes version of the manuscript.

l 160: (O’Shea 160 et al., 2016) -> change citep for citet in latex
l 191: consider adding 'synthetic' before ’FORUM-aircraft’
l 240: Could you perhaps explain how gamma_i is evolved across the iterations ?