Articles | Volume 25, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9031-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9031-2025
Research article
 | 
21 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 21 Aug 2025

Climate forcing due to future ozone changes: an intercomparison of metrics and methods

William J. Collins, Fiona M. O'Connor, Rachael E. Byrom, Øivind Hodnebrog, Patrick Jöckel, Mariano Mertens, Gunnar Myhre, Matthias Nützel, Dirk Olivié, Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie, Laura Stecher, Larry W. Horowitz, Vaishali Naik, Gregory Faluvegi, Ulas Im, Lee T. Murray, Drew Shindell, Kostas Tsigaridis, Nathan Luke Abraham, and James Keeble

Data sets

Data repository in support of “Climate Forcing due to Future Ozone Changes: An intercomparison of metrics and methods”, F. O'Connor https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15828602

CMIP6 Data Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) https://esgf-metagrid.cloud.dkrz.de/search

NIWA-BS Total Column Ozone Database V3.4.1 (3.4.1) G. E. Bodeker et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1346424

ciceroOslo/Radiative-kernels: v1.0.0 Ø. Hodnebrog et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16759214

Download
Short summary
We used 7 climate models that include atmospheric chemistry and find that in a scenario with weak controls on air quality, the warming effects (over 2015 to 2050) of decreases in ozone-depleting substances and increases in air quality pollutants are approximately equal and would make ozone the second highest contributor to warming over this period. We find that for stratospheric ozone recovery, the standard measure of climate effects underestimates a more comprehensive measure. 
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint