Articles | Volume 25, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8907-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8907-2025
Research article
 | 
14 Aug 2025
Research article |  | 14 Aug 2025

Ozone (O3) observations in Saxony, Germany, for 1997–2020: trends, modelling and implications for O3 control

Yaru Wang, Dominik van Pinxteren, Andreas Tilgner, Erik Hans Hoffmann, Max Hell, Susanne Bastian, and Hartmut Herrmann
Abstract

Given its importance for human health, vegetation and climate, trends in ground-level ozone (O3) concentrations in eastern Germany were systematically analysed using the long-term O3 data from 16 measurement stations. The findings indicate that despite reductions in oxides of nitrogen (NOx= NO + NO2) concentrations across all sites, O3 pollution in Saxony has in fact worsened over the past decade, especially in densely populated urban areas. The strongest O3 trend is observed at a traffic-dominated station, with an annual ozone increase of 1.2 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 3.5 % yr−1), while urban and rural background stations show more moderate rises of, on average, 0.5 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 1.1 % yr−1) over the last decade.

To diagnose O3 formation and the controlling effects of NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) over the past decades in this region, for the first time, detailed photochemical box modelling was performed by means of the complex MCM (Master Chemical Mechanism). Analysis of isopleth diagrams for two seasons indicates that O3 formation was predominantly VOC-limited at traffic and urban sites from 2000 to 2019. The observed rise in O3 levels suggests that current efforts to reduce total non-methane volatile organic compound (TNMVOC, including NMVOCs and oxygenated VOCs) emissions and NOx from various sources unfortunately remain insufficient. Based on anthropogenic and biogenic emission data, we recommend that continued NOx abatement and further additional VOC controls, with a focus on solvent use, be implemented in densely populated areas to mitigate O3 pollution in the coming years.

Share
1 Introduction

Tropospheric ground-level ozone, acting simultaneously as a key oxidant and a greenhouse gas, has adverse effects on human health, vegetation such as forests and agricultural crops, and the Earth's climate as a short-lived climate forcer or SLCF (Lefohn et al., 2018; Agathokleous et al., 2020). Apart from typical climate conditions causing the intrusion of stratospheric O3 from high elevations (Lin et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020) and long-range atmospheric transport from polluted places (Derwent and Parrish, 2022; Mathur et al., 2022), primarily emitted oxides of nitrogen (NOx= NO + NO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the key precursors, which form O3 in a complex photochemical reaction system depending on the prevailing chemical regime (Crutzen, 1973; Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998, 2016).

The highly nonlinear O3 chemical formation has always been the biggest challenge in controlling ozone pollution. It is widely acknowledged that O3 formation can be limited by VOCs or NOx or coupling-limited by both VOCs and NOx (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). In the “NOx-limited” regime, reductions in NOx emissions lead to the most effective O3 reduction. Conversely, in the “VOC-limited” regime, reductions in VOC emissions show the greatest reduction of O3 pollution, while reductions in NOx actually increase O3 formation rates. In densely populated European metropolitan areas (e.g. Milan, Athens, Berlin and Paris) with high NOx emissions, O3 production tends to be VOC-limited or in a transitional regime, whereas in rural and other background areas (such as mountain and ocean sites) it is typically under NOx-limited regimes (Hammer et al., 2002; Gabusi and Volta, 2005; Bossioli et al., 2007; Deguillaume et al., 2008; Beekmann and Vautard, 2010; Melkonyan and Kuttler, 2012; Mar et al., 2016; Feldner et al., 2022).

Europe launched the Gothenburg Protocol of 1999 to limit emissions from fossil fuel combustion associated with motor vehicles and power plants, resulting in emission reductions, compared to 1990, of 63 % (NOx) and 59 % (NMVOCs) in 2021 (EEA, 2023). It should be noted that the decline in VOCs has plateaued since 2010, unlike the continued reduction in NOx.

Continuously reduced emissions led to successful mitigation of peak O3 pollution, as reflected in decreasing or stagnant peak O3 levels across most ground-based observations (Paoletti et al., 2014; Derwent et al., 2018; Fleming et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2018; Boleti et al., 2019; Ronan et al., 2020), except at remote, high-altitude sites due to the dominant influence of hemispheric background ozone (Gilge et al., 2010; Boleti et al., 2019).

Despite decreasing peak levels, O3 mean concentrations show opposite and often increasing trends over the last nearly 30 years across most traffic, suburban and urban sites, as well as some rural sites (Salthammer et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2018; Diaz et al., 2020). In the recent 10–15 years, stronger O3 increases for certain urban areas compared to rural sites have been identified (Salthammer et al., 2018; Sicard et al., 2020; Sicard, 2021). At remote or alpine background sites, mean O3 levels have remained stagnant or have shown only slight increases since 2000 (Cristofanelli and Bonasoni, 2009; Parrish et al., 2012; Cooper et al., 2014, 2020).

Following the clear main trend, many studies have been directed at exploring the causes of rising O3 levels in different geographic areas, which were attributed to different possible reasons, including reduction of anthropogenic emissions of NOx and therefore a weakening of the NO titration effect (Sicard et al., 2020; Sicard, 2021), higher biogenic VOC emissions (Curci et al., 2009; Bonn et al., 2018; von Schneidemesser et al., 2018), emissions from the land transport sector (involving road traffic, inland navigation and trains) (Mertens et al., 2020), specific synoptic meteorological condition in favour of horizontal downwind transport and vertical transport (Huszar et al., 2016; Kalabokas et al., 2017), effects from increasing temperature (Melkonyan and Wagner, 2013) or even extreme weather such as heat waves (Yan et al., 2018), higher CH4 emissions from increased frequency of biomass burning (Derwent et al., 2007; Cape, 2008), the net impacts of climate change leading to a so-called climate penalty (Colette et al., 2015a; Lin et al., 2020; Otero et al., 2021), or increasing background O3 levels through long-range transport from polluted areas and increased emissions in Asia (Jenkin, 2008; Derwent et al., 2015; Gaudel et al., 2018; Mertens et al., 2020). Although extensive efforts have been made to reveal possible reasons for increasing O3 trends, the complex relations between O3 formation and its drivers in different geographic areas are still not fully understood.

For Germany, a number of studies on long-term (>10 years) changes in ground-level O3 across different geographic areas have been done over past decades (Melkonyan and Kuttler, 2012; Eghdami et al., 2020; Gebhardt et al., 2021). Most studies focus on discussing O3 trends in Germany over a specific period, with few comparing mean trends over the past 10, 20 or even 30 years and explaining how ozone has changed in response to variations in anthropogenic emissions. Generally, and to a certain extent surprisingly, available annual mean ground-level O3 observations have largely remained stable since 2000 (Cooper et al., 2014; Salthammer et al., 2018; Eghdami et al., 2020) despite the continuous reduction of O3 precursors. For the trends of daily O3 in urban Germany, Sicard et al. (2020) observed a decrease in the period spanning 2005–2010 and an increase in 2010–2018 and pointed out that the insufficient or inappropriate reduction of anthropogenic emissions had shifted German cities from NOx-limited to VOC-limited chemistry depending on the ratio of VOCs to NOx. Thus, a rising trend for O3 over the last decade might have resulted from the lack of significant further reductions in VOC emissions. However, this finding and attribution are in contrast to other studies which determined the O3 precursor sensitivity with different methods (Ehlers et al., 2016; Otero et al., 2021). For example, in contrast to the conclusion from Sicard et al. (2020), Otero et al. (2021) defined a slope of ozone–temperature relationship based on generalised additive models (GAMs) to analyse the O3 precursor sensitivity using summertime observations of O3 and NOx from two periods (1999–2008 and 2009–2018) and concluded that a great number of the German stations including urban and rural areas showed at all summer temperatures a tendency to move to a NOx-limited chemistry with time. Ehlers et al. (2016) modelled local ozone production rates as a function of OH reactivity of VOCs and NO2 to reveal that under typical summertime conditions, German city sites were located in the VOC-limited regime from 1994–2014, and they pointed out that the modelled strong reduction of local ozone production was derived mainly from a much slower reduction of traffic NOx compared to VOC emissions.

Regarding ozone exposure as O3 impacts on human health and vegetation, Sicard et al. (2021) reported the EU-28 urban population was still exposed to O3 levels widely exceeding the WHO limit values for the protection of human health from 2000 to 2017, despite the significant reductions of emissions. The growing risk of potential O3 damage due to increasing stomatal ozone can affect both forest and food plants. Regarding forests, data from 2000–2014 have been investigated by Proietti et al. (2021), and so far in Europe, and even more seriously in central Europe, the target value (5000 ppb) for the protection of vegetation has been exceeded as the AOT40 value, an accumulative dose over a threshold value of 40 ppb.

Overall, chronic O3 levels in Germany continue to be a challenge in terms of air quality and impacts on vegetation and human health. Therefore, the present study focuses on the observed trends of O3 concentrations at 16 measurement stations in the federal state of Saxony in eastern Germany. It contrasts the mean trends of different station types, different concentration levels and different seasons in three time periods and then applies air parcel photochemical modelling to comprehensively evaluate the efficiency of precursor controls on the observed Saxony O3 trend over the past decades. All in all, the present comprehensive analysis aims to aid O3 pollution control policy in the coming years in Germany.

2 Methods and data availability

2.1 O3 and other pollutant observations in Saxony

Hourly values of ground-level O3 concentration between 1997 and 2020 were provided by the air quality monitoring network of the Saxon State Office for the Environment, Agriculture and Geology (LfULG, 2025). Figure 1 shows the location of the measuring stations, colour-coded according to traffic stations, stations in the urban or rural background, and stations on the ridge of the Ore Mountains, situated at altitudes between 785 and 1214 m a.s.l. Stations with less than 10 years of ozone data were excluded and are not shown in Fig. 1. Data analysis was done for 16 stations, including 1 traffic station, 7 urban background stations, 4 rural background stations and 4 stations on the Ore Mountains ridge. The temporal data coverage at the station varies, as some of them were opened after 1997 only. The exact periods of O3 measurements for each station in the air quality monitoring network are shown in Table S1 in the Supplement. Data availability within the measurement periods was very good at all stations, with missing fractions <5 %.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f01

Figure 1Map of ozone measuring stations in the Saxony air quality monitoring network that provided data for the present study. Map produced using the ggmap package (v4.0.0; Kahle and Wickham, 2013) in R (R core team, 2020) with contributions from © Stadia Maps (2024), © Stamen Design (2022), © OpenMapTiles (2024) and © OpenStreetMap contributors (2024). Distributed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0.

In addition to the hourly O3 values, the concentrations of other air pollutants, NO, NO2 and NOx, were provided as well. The data available at the respective station are summarised in Table S2, which include nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2 and NOx) and the meteorological parameters temperature, global radiation, relative humidity, wind direction, wind speed and air pressure.

2.2 Trend analysis

To determine a robust linear trend of O3 concentrations, the nonparametric Theil–Sen estimator according to Sen (1968) was used, which requires no prior assumptions about the statistical distribution of the data and is resistant to outliers. For the calculation, the Theil–Sen function of the package openair (Carslaw and Ropkins, 2012) in R (R Core Team, 2020) was used, which calculates a straight line and its slope between all points in the data. The median of the slopes of all straight lines then represents the linear trend of the data. The trends were calculated based on monthly averages per station. To ignore the typical annual variation in O3 concentration, a seasonal trend decomposition using a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) function is performed within the openair function before the trend calculation when monthly means are used. Furthermore, the openair Theil–Sen function derives p values (probability) and uncertainties by bootstrap simulations. The statistical significance of the calculated trend is represented with symbols as follows: p<0.001=***, p<0.01=**, p<0.05=* and p<0.1=+. In this paper, all trends with a significance level (probability of error) of 5 %, i.e. from p<0.05, which corresponds to at least one asterisk, are considered statistically significant.

2.3 Photochemical model simulations

To understand the role of photochemistry for O3 concentration evolution in Saxony, photochemical simulations were performed with the air parcel box model SPACCIM (SPectral Aerosol Cloud Chemistry Interaction Model). SPACCIM combines a size-resolved multiphase chemistry model with a microphysical model, enabling both to function independently while accounting for their interdependencies. Detailed descriptions of the SPACCIM framework can be found in Wolke et al. (2005). In the present study, only the detailed near-explicit gas-phase chemistry mechanism, MCM v3.3.1, is used, which comprises 17 224 reactions (http://mcm.york.ac.uk/MCM/, last access: 1 August 2025) (Saunders et al., 2003).

Simulations with two sets of meteorological scenarios were performed, i.e. (i) summer (June, July and August) and (ii) winter (December, January and February) conditions. All scenarios were driven by anthropogenic and biogenic emission values, meteorological conditions, initial concentrations, and deposition rates.

The summer and winter emission data (Table S3) were based on anthropogenic and biogenic emission inventories in 2019 from the German Environment Agency (UBA) (https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/, last access: 1 August 2025), the Joint Research Centre (JRC) (https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/, last access: 1 August 2025) and Thürkow et al. (2024), and derived for the whole Saxony area (50.9° N latitude and 14.3° E longitude) (see Fig. S1 in the Supplement showing NOx emissions of the main roads and urban centres). Besides emission values, other initial parameters had to be adjusted to their typical daytime and nighttime levels under rural conditions (see Table S4 for details). For meteorological parameters and trace gas concentrations (except SO2, HONO and PAN), data were derived from measurements in Sect. 2.1. The air temperature was set to 15 °C in summer and 4 °C in winter. The pressure was kept constant at 1000 hPa for both seasons, while the relative humidity was maintained at 70 %. The ratio of solar radiation, defined as the mean value between 10:00 and 13:00 divided by the maximum clear-sky radiation value during the same period, was calculated as 0.7 in summer and 0.4 in winter.

The initial SO2 concentrations in summer and winter were obtained from UBA (https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten, last access: 1 August 2025). CO and CH4 were set to 153.4 and 1700 ppb, respectively, according to the measured data from Zellweger et al. (2009) and Herrmann et al. (2000). Nitrous acid (HONO) and peroxy acetyl nitrate (PAN) concentrations that were not measured at any site were set to the same mixing ratio (0.5 ppb) based on the measurement mean values in Stieger et al. (2018) and Pandey Deolal et al. (2014), respectively. An important aspect of the simulations was to constrain the dry deposition rates of gases, which depends strongly on vegetation cover (Clifton et al., 2020). Considering the different seasonal vegetation covers, different dry deposition velocities (in cm s−1) were considered for NO2, N2O5 and O3 during summer (NO2 of 0.3 cm s−1; Rondón et al., 1993), N2O5 of 100 cm s−1 (considering dry deposition and aerosol uptake; Zhu et al., 2020), and O3 of 0.8 cm s−1 (Clifton et al., 2020), as well as winter (NO2 of 3 cm s−1, N2O5 of 2 cm s−1 and O3 of 0.08 cm s−1) conditions. Dry deposition velocities of other various inorganic gases, such as peroxy acetyl nitrates (PANs), peroxides, carbonyls and acids, were kept the same in both seasonal simulations and are based on the previous urban or rural scenario setup of CAPRAM initialisations (Wu et al., 2012; Hoffmann et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2020). It should be noted that different boundary layer heights (BLHs) were assumed for the calculation of the respective emission value. The BLHs in the simulations were set to 500 m at night and 2000 m during daytime in summer and to 250 m at night and 1000 m during daytime in winter based on previously available measurements in Germany (Wiegner et al., 2006; Brümmer et al., 2012; Kotthaus et al., 2023). The detailed initial input data (including meteorological conditions, deposition rates, BLHs, chemical initial gas-phase concentrations, e.g. NO2, O3, SO2, CO) for the two seasonal cases are summarised in Table S4.

To initialise the model as comprehensively as possible, a pre-run for each seasonal scenario was performed. Each pre-run simulation was run for 10 d to have an almost steady-state system with stabilised intermediate products, e.g. radicals (OH, HO2) and oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) and other VOC (e.g. alkanes and chlorinated VOCs) concentrations that were not measured at the sites of this study. The initial time of both runs was set to 00:00 Central European Time (CET) on 14 July 2019 (summer case) and 14 January 2019 (winter case). The output concentrations from the last day of the pre-run simulations were used as the initial and boundary chemical data for the final 24 h modelling. Dominant initial concentrations are given in Table S5. Moreover, the results of the final 24 h summer and winter scenario simulations (defined as the base case simulations) were used to compare with the measured average diurnal patterns of O3, NO and NOx in both seasons at rural background sites to assess the performance of the model simulations. The good agreement of the base case simulations with measurements (see Sect. 3.3 for details) indicated that the model configuration was able to accurately describe the sensitivities of O3 photochemistry to its different precursors and impact factors.

To gain a deeper understanding of the O3 trend in the studied area over the past two decades, further photochemical sensitivity simulations were used to derive seasonal isopleth plots of the O3 formation rates under typical summer and winter conditions in Saxony. These isopleths should help derive a more effective O3 control strategy by examining O3 photochemical production against varying levels of NOx and total non-methane volatile organic compound (TNMVOC, including NMVOCs and OVOCs) emissions across station types. The sensitivity simulations were done by scaling the base case emissions of TNMVOC and NOx 20 times in each of up to three batch runs for each season; i.e. each combination is considered (Table S6). Three batches were performed to achieve a sensible range of resulting TNMVOC and NOx concentrations in the total of 800 and 1200 model runs for summer and winter, respectively. The averaged instantaneous rate of net ozone production (NetPO3) during noontime of 12:00–13:00 CET for each simulated scenario in both summer and winter conditions was determined for each run. The meteorological conditions and settings for all sensitivity simulations in both summer and winter were identical to those of the base case simulations for each respective season. Upon completion of the simulations, the isopleth plots were generated by interpolating the resulting formation rates to a regular grid in the TNMVOC vs. NOx space and then fitting the O3 isopleths to it. The plots illustrate the NetPO3 in relation to the combined ambient concentrations of NOx and TNMVOCs. Subsequently, leveraging data on NOx and TNMVOC emissions spanning the past two decades (2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2019), we were able to track changes in O3 formation over this period by examining variations in seasonal isopleths among different station types. This allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of precursor controls in Saxony over time.

3 Results

Knowledge of O3 concentrations and trends is important for assessing the effectiveness of existing air pollution control measures and for providing clues for formulating more appropriate control measures in the future. Based on this, first of all, the longer-term changes in the concentration of ground-level O3 at the stations of the Saxony air quality measurement network are examined and presented. Secondly, the mean trends of ozone concentrations in view of different station types, different concentration levels and different seasons are contrasted in three time periods: (i) during the entire period of available measurement data, i.e. from 1997 or later, (ii) during the 15 years from 2006 to 2020, and (iii) during the more recent 10 years from 2011 to 2020. Finally, and third, photochemical modelling was performed and shifts in O3 formation regimes for different station types were then attributed to changing emissions over the past 20 years.

3.1 Ozone concentrations and trends

3.1.1 O3 concentrations

Figure 2 shows the distribution of O3 concentrations at the individual monitoring stations. The highest concentrations were observed on the Ore Mountains ridge. The mean range of O3 concentrations on the mountain ridge was from 69 µg m−3 at Schwartenberg (785 m a.s.l.) to 78 µg m−3 at Fichtelberg (1214 m a.s.l.). The highest single hourly value to date was 282 µg m−3 at Schwartenberg. The lowest mean concentrations were observed at the one traffic station in the dataset (Dresden-Nord, hereinafter referred to as DD-Nord): 32 µg m−3. Urban background stations showed slightly higher means, depending on the station, of between approximately 40 and 55 µg m−3. In the rural background, one station closer to the city, Schkeuditz, showed a somewhat lower mean concentration level, while the other three stations, Collmberg, Niesky and Radebeul-Wahnsdorf, showed slightly higher values of approximately 55–60 µg m−3.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f02

Figure 2Box plots of O3 concentrations at individual monitoring stations, coloured according to their station type. The middle yellow point and the black horizontal line indicate the mean and median, respectively. The ends of the box indicate the lower and upper quartiles and the antennas the 1.5-fold interquartile range (IQR), and individual points are extreme values outside the IQR. Data are shown per station from 1997 or later onward to 2020. The detailed station data are summarised in Table S1.

Download

In Fig. 2, the trend of O3 mean concentrations, which tends to increase from traffic stations towards the Ore Mountains ridge, shows the regional character of O3. On the one hand, O3 was formed in the regional background from anthropogenic and biogenic precursor substances; on the other hand, it is degraded by reaction with NO close to NOx sources such as traffic sites. At the Ore Mountains ridge (>780 m), increased mixing concentration from the free troposphere can also play a role. In general, tropospheric O3 generally shows increasing concentrations with increasing altitude (Davies and Schuepbach, 1994; Cristofanelli and Bonasoni, 2009; Petetin et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018). This is not only due to stronger mixing from higher layers but also due to lower sink strengths, e.g. the reaction with NO or lower deposition fluxes.

3.1.2 O3 trends

Generally, the trends in O3 concentrations do not necessarily change monotonically over different long periods of time, and also, at many of the studied sites, shorter periods of increasing, stagnant or decreasing values were seen (Fig. S2). The magnitudes of linear trend estimates therefore depend on the exact time period considered. In addition, the comparison of mean linear trends across several stations is often complicated by differences in data coverage at the respective stations. Therefore, several Theil–Sen trend calculations were carried out for all stations in three different time periods: (i) during the entire period of available measurement data, i.e. from 1997 or later, (ii) during the 15 years from 2006 to 2020 (with the exception of the DD-Winkelmannstr. station, where O3 measurements only started from 2008), and (iii) during the more recent 10 years from 2011 to 2020. The reasons for selecting these periods were that, on the one hand, O3 measurements at almost all stations were available from 1997 at the earliest, and, on the other hand, the trends of more recent years may reflect future trends better than longer-term trends including earlier decades. Detailed information on trends of the individual stations is shown in Table S7 for each time period in absolute and relative values, and all trends are summarised in Fig. 3.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f03

Figure 3Box plots of observed O3 trends over three time periods until 2020 (given in columns 1–3) at the four station types. Transparent dots indicate statistically non-significant values. Black squares indicate means across all station values.

Download

Traffic-dominated sites

In Fig. 3 and Table S7, the increasing trend at the traffic site DD-Nord in the recent 10 years is roughly 1.20 µg m−3 yr−1 or 3.50 % yr−1 and has nearly doubled compared to 0.65 µg m−3 yr−1 or 2.30 % yr−1 over the whole period since 1997. Similarly, most urban sites have also shown a more rapid O3 increase in the last decade, up to 0.74 µg m−3 yr−1 in DD-Winkelmannstr., corresponding to about 1.75 % yr−1 and ranging from 0.24 to 0.64 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 0.51 to 1.42 % yr−1) at the other urban background stations, although the trends in Plauen-DWD and Zittau-Ost are not statistically significant.

Rural background sites

In the rural background, with the exception of Niesky, an O3 increase from 0.53 to 0.71 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 0.92 to 1.49 % yr−1) is also found over 10 years, while over 15 years the trend is somewhat lower at about 0.30 µg m−3 yr−1 or 0.60 % yr−1, and during the entire period considered the trends at all stations, except Schkeuditz, are stagnant.

Mountain sites

At the four stations of the mountain ridge, the findings are the least consistent. While at Fichtelberg a decreasing O3 trend is consistently derived over all observation periods, amounting to about −0.80µg m−3 yr−1 (or −1.00 % yr−1) over 10 years and about −0.35µg m−3 yr−1 (or −0.40 % yr−1) over 15 or more years, the trends at the stations Schwartenberg and Zinnwald are slightly positive over 10 and 15 years and slightly negative over the total period but not statistically significant in all available periods considered. In Carlsfeld, trends are significant only for the longest observation period of  20 years and at about −0.26µg m−3 yr−1 or −0.35 % yr−1 are similarly high as at Fichtelberg, while over shorter periods they stagnate, in contrast to Fichtelberg. The reasons for the different behaviour of ozone at Fichtelberg are unclear, but it might be related to its altitude of about 1200 m, which is the highest among the mountain stations, and a corresponding higher impact from ozone trends in the lower stratosphere and free troposphere (Oltmans et al., 2013; Trickl et al., 2023).

Ozone concentration decrements

The trends identified for the four station types above suggest that the typical concentration differences between station types also change over time. In order to consider this, “decrements”, i.e. mean annual O3 concentration differences between the different station types, were calculated and are shown as a time series in Fig. 4.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f04

Figure 4Mean yearly O3 concentration differences, i.e. decrements, between different station types. Yellow lines with points represent decrements from mean mountain to mean rural station concentrations, blue lines with points represent rural to urban, and red lines with points represent urban to traffic station decrements.

Download

It can be seen that the rural decrement, i.e. the concentration difference between the Ore Mountains stations and the rural background, decreased from about 15–21 µg m−3 at the turn of the century to values around 12 µg m−3 in more recent years. The urban decrement, i.e. rural to urban background difference, remained rather stagnant around 7 µg m−3 in all years except for the period 1999–2003. The traffic decrement from the urban background to the one long-term O3 traffic station DD-Nord also decreased from about 15 to about 5–7 µg m−3 and is now at a similar level as the urban decrement. If the O3 trends mentioned above continue in a similar way in the future, it can be expected that the typical O3 concentrations at traffic stations will become more similar to those in the urban background, and rural background concentrations will become increasingly similar to those at the mountain sites. The Air Quality Expert Group (2021) reported a gradual convergence of urban and rural O3 levels in the UK from 2000 to 2019, which is in contrast to the stable difference in O3 concentration between urban and rural background observed since 2004 in the present study. The reason for this is the similarly increasing O3 trends at urban and rural background sites in Saxony (Fig. 3), keeping the urban to rural decrement roughly similar. In any case, due to the typical settlement densities, these trends would mean higher O3 exposures for the vast majority of the population.

One recent study by Yan et al. (2018), using a statistical trend model based on the data from 685 sites from the European Environment Agency Airbase system and 93 European rural background sites monitored by the Chemical Coordination Centre of the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) network, has reported statistically significant growth rates of annual mean O3 (0.20–0.59 µg m−3 yr−1) in suburban and urban sites for the period 1995–2014, in contrast to a slight O3 decrease from −0.09 to −0.02µg m−3 yr−1 (without clear statistical significance) over rural background sites. Despite the time period not being directly comparable, this is roughly similar to the trends observed in Saxony between 1997 and 2020, which averaged around 0.20 µg m−3 yr−1 for urban background stations and close to zero for rural background stations. Further, Finch and Palmer (2020) reported that trends in annual mean O3 in the UK over the period 1999–2019 were also rather stagnant at rural background stations, with a mean increase of 0.16 µg m−3 yr−1 (not statistically significant), and slightly higher at urban background sites, with a mean increase of 0.47 µg m−3 yr−1 (statistically significant), than the mean increase of 0.17 µg m−3 yr−1 observed in the comparable 1997–2020 time period in the Saxony urban background. Other analyses of the UK O3 trend over the period 2000 to 2019 (The Air Quality Expert Group, 2021) suggested that only moderate increases in annual mean O3 were observed at rural background sites, with a mean of 0.11 µg m−3 yr−1, which is roughly between the mean values in Saxony (quasi-zero and 0.25 µg m−3 yr−1 for the periods from 1997 and from 2006 to 2020, respectively). In UK suburbs and urban areas, O3 showed upwards trends, sometimes significantly, over the period considered in the study, with an average increase of about 0.26 µg m−3 yr−1, which is also similar to the mean values at urban background stations in Saxony (0.17 and 0.27 µg m−3 yr−1 over the last 24 and 15 years, respectively).

Despite all heterogeneity in detail, these comparisons suggest O3 increases, especially in urban areas and, to a certain extent, also in the rural background not only in Saxony, but in many places in Germany and Europe. The determined increases in the range of a few tenths of µg m−3 yr−1 are not very high compared to the typical O3 concentrations of approximately 40–60 µg m−3 for urban and rural sites (as shown in Fig. 2), but they document O3 still being a problem, at least with regard to chronic exposure, which has not been solved despite the successful reduction of various precursor compounds, and even tends to increase in the future. This conclusion is also supported by the stronger O3 increases in more recent years identified in this study and by Sicard (2021) compared to the longer time periods often considered in other studies.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f05

Figure 5Theil–Sen trend values for different percentiles of O3 concentrations for four station types (given in rows 1–4) and for three time periods until 2020 (given in columns ac). Coloured dots show the values of individual stations, with solid dots for statistically significant trends and transparent dots otherwise. All dots are summarised by the box plots. The black square reflects the mean trend value per percentile.

Download

3.1.3 Trends for different O3 concentration levels

In addition to the trends of mean O3 concentrations considered so far, it is interesting to also investigate concentration changes depending on the absolute O3 concentrations. This can be achieved by calculating the trends of different O3 percentiles. Low percentiles, i.e. 0, 1st, 5th and 10th, indicate the lowest and low concentration levels; medium percentiles, i.e. 25th, 50th and 75th, indicate middle concentration ranges; and high percentiles, i.e. 90th, 95th, 99th and 100th, indicate trends at high and the highest O3 levels.

These trends over four station types within the three periods defined above are shown in Fig. 5.

Traffic site

The traffic-influenced site shows ozone increases for all concentrations (0–1.46 µg m−3 yr−1) and the strongest trends at median concentrations around the 50th percentile combined with nearly no increases at the very low and very high percentiles. This behaviour led to the depicted bell-shaped curves. The longer the considered time frame, the smaller the dynamic range of the ozone trends from the median against more extreme concentration regimes. During the recent decade, the traffic site has exhibited the most pronounced increases across the entire concentration range.

Urban and rural background sites

For the urban and rural background there are quite similarly increasing trends (0–0.77 µg m−3 yr−1) for nearly all concentration levels with the important exception that very high O3 concentrations actually decrease (−0.55 to −0µg m−3 yr−1) and the strongest increases were seen already at the 10th and 25th percentiles, respectively, and not only at the 50th. Each O3 concentration level has also shown a greater increase over the past decade or a more pronounced decrease at the highest concentrations compared to the other two periods. Additionally, the range of differences between peak values in the, again, bell-shaped curves during the recent decade is dampened against the traffic site and amounts to about 1 µg m−3 yr−1.

Mountain sites

For all the mountain sites a monotonous decrease in the O3 is seen with increasing concentration percentiles, and only for the smallest percentiles are O3 increasing trends seen, which switch to O3 decreasing trends at the 5th, 25th and 50th percentiles for all years, 15 years and 10 years, respectively. There is no bell shape anymore but a generally linear change.

Quantitatively, there are increases (0–0.66 µg m−3 yr−1) in percentiles from the minimum to the 10th, turning into decreases (−1.08 to −0.28µg m−3 yr−1) in the higher percentiles (90–100th). The shorter the time frame considered, the more pronounced the stated trend.

Overall, during the recent 10 years, stagnant or even downward trends in the O3 90th, 95th, 99th and maximum in traffic, urban, rural and mountain stations occurred, while at the lower percentiles (minimum, 1st, 5th and 10th), O3 concentrations across all stations seemingly continued to increase (with a mean trend ranging from 0.04–0.90 µg m−3 yr−1). In the range of medium percentiles (from 25 to 75th), all traffic, urban and rural sites showed statistically significant increasing trends (ranging from 0.40 to 1.46 µg m−3 yr−1), whilst at the mountain sites, they were decreasing or stagnant (−0.30–0.03 µg m−3 yr−1).

Quite recently, Finch and Palmer (2020) similarly reported no statistically discernible decreasing trend (−0.49µg m−3 yr−1) in annual maximum O3 on average, while mean concentrations and minimum concentrations increased at 0.41 and 0.09 µg m−3 yr−1, respectively, across rural, suburban and urban background sites in the UK over the period 1999–2019. These findings can, at best, be compared to panels a2 and a3 of Fig. 5 in illustrating O3 trends in a similar period from 1997–2020, with −0.15µg m−3 yr−1 for maximum O3, 0.25 µg m−3 yr−1 for median concentration and 0.03 µg m−3 yr−1 at minimum concentration (as averaged values over panels a2 and a3 in Fig. 5). The results of another study in the UK (The Air Quality Expert Group, 2021) also revealed that the 50th and 25th percentile concentrations of O3 clearly increased (from 0 to 0.94 µg m−3 yr−1) at urban background sites over the period 2000–2019 (cf. panel a2 of Fig. 5 with 0.28–0.29 µg m−3 yr−1 in a similar period from 1997–2020), whilst corresponding increases (from 0 to 0.66) at rural sites (cf. panel a3 of Fig. 5 with 0.18–0.24 µg m−3 yr−1) are in general smaller (and in many cases not statistically significant). In addition, there have been stagnant or significant downward trends (−2.05 to 0.64 µg m−3 yr−1, despite reported positive values are non-statistically significant) in the upper percentiles (99th and 99.9th percentiles) across all 27 sites examined, similar to our result of −0.16 to −0.07µg m−3 yr−1 in the 99th and 100th (as averaged values over panels a2 and a3 in Fig. 5).

Our results are consistent with previous analyses with negative or stagnant trends in the high range of percentiles (99–100th), indicative of fewer extreme O3 episodes over time, which might be related to the reductions in NOx, VOCs and CO emissions (Derwent et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2018, and references therein). The trends in lower and middle percentiles of O3 are almost always positive, corresponding to the increasing baseline level of O3 in the Northern Hemisphere (Jonson et al., 2006; Jenkin, 2008; Dentener et al., 2010; Cooper et al., 2014). Yan et al. (2018) used sensitivity simulations and statistical analysis to report that a decrease in European anthropogenic emissions lowered the 95th percentile of O3 concentrations but enhanced the 5th percentile of O3 in rural, suburban and urban sites during 1995–2014 over Europe. The results described here (decreasing trends in the higher range of percentiles – 95th–100th – of O3 and increasing trends in the lower range of percentiles – 0th–5th – of O3 as shown in Fig. 5a2–a4) may also reflect the effectiveness of emissions reductions in controlling the highest level of ozone for Saxony but also show an opposite effect at low concentration levels.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f06

Figure 6Theil–Sen trend values at different times of the year at the various station types (given in rows 1–4) and within each of the three time spans up to 2020 (given in columns ac). Coloured dots show the values of individual stations, with solid dots for statistically significant trends and transparent dots otherwise. All dots are summarised by the box plots. The black square shows the mean trend value per season.

Download

3.1.4 Trends in annual seasons

The mean trends by season at the different station types within the three time spans as used before are summarised in Fig. 6. For the traffic site, increasing trends are observed in all seasons over all time periods, but they are strongest in summer or spring of the latest period. In urban and rural background areas, a similar seasonal pattern was found for the recent 10 years, but for longer periods, spring and summer show lower increasing trends than autumn or winter. Particularly for mountain sites in spring and autumn, the trends during the longer periods are negative in contrast to the at least partly positive trends for the most recent decade. Yan et al. (2018) reported increasing trends ( 0.10 µg m−3 yr−1) in winter mean O3 and decreasing trends (−0.30µg m−3 yr−1) in summer mean O3 for the period 1995–2014 in suburban, urban and rural sites in Europe, which is similar to the trends observed here for all years (1997–2020); cf. Fig. 6 panels a2 and a3 at around 0.4 and 0.1 µg m−3 yr−1 in winter and summer, respectively.

Gebhardt et al. (2021) also analysed a dataset of O3 concentrations on the Ore Mountains ridge (Carlsfeld, Fichtelberg, Schwartenberg and Zinnwald) and found stagnating trends in the winters from 1997/98 to 2020, which is consistent with the result of mountain stations in this present study; see Fig. 6, panel a4.

3.2 Relationships between trends in O3 and other measured trace gas concentrations and other parameters

In order to examine how the observed O3 trends relate to the trends of other air pollutants, the trends for nitrogen oxides and the “oxidant” (Ox) as the sum of O3 and NO2 (Kley et al., 1994) are shown in Table S8 for the three time periods. Nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2 and NOx) show significantly decreasing trends since 1997 and over the last 10 years, consistent with reports that Europe-wide emissions of O3 precursors (NOx and other air pollutants) have decreased substantially since 1990 (Colette et al., 2015b; The Air Quality Expert Group, 2021). The MACCity inventory shows that anthropogenic NOx emissions in Europe decreased by 35 % between 1995 and 2015 (Yan et al., 2018). This is comparable to the results identified here, which correspond to an average decrease of 31 % at all sites over the last decade (2011–2020). In addition, the inventories reported by the individual European countries can be found in the Air Pollutant Emissions Data Viewer (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/dashboards/air-pollutant-emissions-data-viewer-3, last access: 1 August 2025) of the European Environment Agency (EEA). This database shows that NOx emissions in Germany decreased by about 31 % from 2011 to 2020, which is again consistent with the mean trends of nitrogen oxides reported here.

In addition to the directly measured air pollutants, it is useful to consider the trend of the so-called “oxidant” (Ox), which results from the sum of O3 and NO2 (Kley et al., 1994). In this way, the long-term change of the two oxidants can be better understood and evaluated, taking into account the effect of NO titration (NO + O3= O2+ NO2) in the near-surface atmosphere.

Most stations in Saxony show stagnating or increasing O3 (see Sect. 3.1), but Table S8D shows slightly decreasing Ox trends for all stations, which are, however, with the exception of the traffic station, only statistically significant for the longer period (≧15 years). The traffic station shows decreasing Ox trends of −0.26µg m−3 yr−1 during the last 10 years, which means that NO2 has decreased slightly more than O3 has increased. The Ox trend has tended to be stagnant (non-significant) over the 10 years at urban (−0.10µg m−3 yr−1), rural (−0.03µg m−3 yr−1) and mountain sites (−0.12µg m−3 yr−1), while similar decreasing trends as at the traffic station are observed for the longer period (−0.20µg m−3 yr−1). At a busy road station in London, a local decrease in Ox of about 38 % over the period 2011–2020 was reported (The Air Quality Expert Group, 2021), which is significantly more than the decrease at the traffic site (DD-Nord) of about 0.68 % in the same period.

Overall, the Ox observations show that the increase in O3 observed at some stations in Saxony is probably related to the decreasing NOx. However, the stagnating Ox trends, especially in the more recent 10 years, show that the achieved emission reductions of the O3 precursors obviously did not lead to sustainably and significantly lower Ox concentrations and thus to lower exposure to NO2 and O3 on average.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f07

Figure 7Relationships between O3 trends and NOx trends across all stations for the three different time periods (given in rows 1–3). Coloured dots show the values of individual stations, with solid dots for statistically significant O3 trends and transparent dots otherwise. Also shown are linear fits for O3 trends and NOx trends in different time periods.

Download

To understand the relationship between O3 precursors and O3 trends, the close chemical relationship between O3 and the nitrogen oxides can be first investigated in Figs. 7 and S3 where the trends of NOx, NO and NO2 at all stations and for the different time periods are plotted above the respective trends of O3 at the sites.

Regardless of the time period considered, it can be seen that the more the O3 concentration at a station has been increasing, the more the nitrogen oxide concentrations have generally been decreasing. This pattern applies to all stations and is possibly a direct result of the classical Leighton chemistry, which describes how, during the day, a reduction in nitrogen oxide concentrations leads to a shift in the photostationary equilibrium towards higher O3 concentrations. At night, lower NOx concentrations mean a reduction in the sink strength of O3 via the reaction with NO2 and thus also higher resulting O3 concentrations. In sum, the opposing trends of nitrogen oxides and O3 trends result in the only very slightly decreasing and often stagnating trends of all Ox described above.

3.3 Photochemical model results

In Sect. 3.2 it has been found that there is a consistent increase in O3 levels at monitoring stations, coupled with a noticeable decline in NOx concentrations, particularly evident in many urban regions. Moreover, Figs. S4 and S5 show how the reduction in NOx concentrations has correspondingly led to elevated O3 levels across the four station types, both in summer and winter seasons spanning the period from 2000 to 2019. In this section, seasonal isopleths of O3 formation will be diagnosed to offer insights into the controlling effects of NOx and VOCs on O3 variations across different station types throughout the 2000–2019 time frame. By visualising the station type-to-type variations within two seasonal isopleths (see Sect. 2.3 for detailed information), the present model-based analysis seeks to gauge the efficacy of precursor controls in Saxony over the past two decades and help shed some light on future mitigation strategies targeting O3 pollution.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f08

Figure 8Diurnal profiles of hourly averaged modelled and observed NO and NO2 in Saxony at rural background sites (panels a and c for the summer case; panels b and d for winter cases). Shaded areas indicate nighttime, black lines indicate the modelled values, grey lines represent averaged observed concentrations and coloured lines refer to the observed concentrations at each station. It is noted that all observed NO concentrations below the DL of 1 µg m−3 are not known and cannot be shown.

Download

3.3.1 Simulation setup and comparison with 2019 measurements

As a first step in model development, the performance of the base case simulations for Saxony in 2019 was assessed. The year 2019 was chosen because of the best availability of the required input parameters. As a first set of results, the modelled NO and NO2 diurnal patterns during summer and winter are compared with observed data at rural background stations in Fig. 8. It is noted that all measured NO concentrations below the detection limit (DL) of 1 µg m−3 are unknown and therefore not shown in the figure. Accordingly, the comparison of the NO patterns is only possible for hours with measured NO above the DL. The modelled NO concentrations during the period from 06:00 to 11:00 (CET) demonstrate satisfactory agreement with the observed summer data (Fig. 8a), with the exception of the most polluted Radebeul–Wahnsdorf site. During winter (Fig. 8b), the model seems to underpredict the NO concentrations, maybe because of a mixing layer being considered that is too high. However, the temporal pattern agrees rather well from 09:00–16:00 (CET). Therefore, the linear correlation coefficient (r) exceeds 0.8 from 06:00 to 11:00 in summer and remains above 0.7 from 09:00–16:00 (CET) in winter, indicating a robust correspondence between model outputs and measurements for both seasons. Additionally, the normalised mean bias factor (NMBF) (see its definition in the Supplement) (Jaidan et al., 2018) for model–measurement comparisons of NO is −0.03 during 06:00–11:00 in summer and −0.70 during 09:00–16:00 (CET) in winter, indicating satisfactory agreement of the model with mean measurements.

For NO2 it can be seen that in summer (in Fig. 8c) the simulated NO2 exhibits a 1 h earlier peak at 05:00 in the morning and a 1 h delay in the afternoon at 15:00. For all sites r between modelled and measured averaged NO2 is at least 0.7. During the winter months, there is no correlation for the entire 24 h period, but it should be noted that at all sites it is above 0.7 during daytime hours, specifically between 08:00 and 15:00 (in Fig. 8d). Besides, NMBF values for model–measurement comparisons of NO2 are −0.15 in summer and −0.29 in winter, indicating good agreement of the model with mean measurements. Overall, while the simulation captures the diurnal variations of NO and NO2 reasonably well, a notable discrepancy partly persists between the simulated and observed concentration levels of NOx. This inconsistency likely stems from the inherent uncertainties within the local emission inventory, particularly regarding the accurate estimation of local-site NOx emission rates, or overestimation of the local mixing layer height also influencing the pollutant emissions rates.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f09

Figure 9Diurnal profiles of hourly averaged modelled and observed O3 in Saxony at rural background sites (a and b for summer and winter cases, respectively). Shaded areas indicate nighttime, black lines indicate the modelled O3, grey lines represent averaged observed O3 and other coloured lines refer to the observed O3 at each station.

Download

Figure 9 shows the diurnal profiles of hourly averaged simulated and observed O3 concentrations during summer and winter. The model effectively reproduces both the magnitudes and diurnal patterns of observed O3, demonstrating a strong correlation between observations and simulations (r>0.8). Additionally, NMBF values for model–measurement comparisons of O3 are 0.12 in summer and −0.16 in winter, indicating good model performance. However, noteworthy exceptions include a higher simulated O3 peak occurring after 13:00 and a 1 h delay in its occurrence. These deviations can be attributed to very localised near-site NOx emissions (as depicted in Fig. 8), which cannot be adequately captured by the simulations.

Overall, Figs. 8 and 9 reveal reasonable agreement between the observed and simulated datasets. Therefore, the simulations were found to be generally able to reproduce the O3 photochemistry for the conditions present in Saxony in 2019, enabling further sensitivity simulations of the O3 and its characteristic dependencies on both the NOx and VOC conditions.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f10

Figure 10Isopleth plots for the net O3 production rate (NetPO3 in ppb h−1) during 12:00–13:00 CET as a function of averaged NOx and TNMVOC concentrations (a and b for summer and winter cases, respectively). NetPO3 is shown using a rainbow colour scale. The coloured points represent the conditions in different years with squares showing traffic stations and triangles showing mean urban station conditions. The red dotted arrows represent hypothetical future scenarios with reductions in only one precursor (either TNMVOC or NOx), while the yellow dotted arrows illustrate more plausible future pathways, where NetPO3 slightly decreases through strong VOC emission controls combined with moderate NOx reductions. Note that based on the underlying modelling, these data in Fig. 10 are given as mixing ratios. For better comparability with mass-based concentrations elsewhere in the paper, conversion factors of NOx (µg m−3) 1.5× NOx (ppb) and O3 (µg m−3) 2× O3 (ppb) can be used.

Download

3.3.2 Isopleths for O3 formation

Both Sect. 3.1 and Sect. 3.2 have highlighted a significant increase in O3 levels in recent years. It is essential to elucidate the relationships between O3 and its precursors in order to develop science-based control measures. Therefore, hundreds of sensitivity simulations were performed, incorporating various emission rate multipliers (outlined in Table S6) of TNMVOC and NOx. These simulations of the base cases for Saxony (Sect. 3.3.1) aimed to elucidate the O3 production rate with regards to the ambient concentrations of NOx and TNMVOCs, which is depicted in the ozone isopleths of Fig. 10. A brief description of how these are produced is provided in Sect. 2.3. It can be seen that the diagrams resemble classic ozone isopleths typically produced with models (Sillman et al., 1990; Ehlers et al., 2016). They depict the in situ NetPO3 as a function of NOx and TNMVOC concentrations for both summer and winter scenarios.

In the next step, the measured values of NOx and observed O3 change rate (dO3/dt) for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2019 were used to indicate for each year the location in the isopleth diagram. A key challenge, however, was the lack of measured TNMVOC concentrations in all years. To work around this, three simulation batches (see Sect. 2.3 for details) were performed to achieve a sensible range of resulting TNMVOC and NOx concentrations in the total of 800 and 1200 model runs for summer and winter, respectively. The point distribution of resulting TNMVOC and NOx concentrations is shown in Fig. S6. Besides, the averaged NetPO3 during noontime of 12:00–13:00 CET for each simulated scenario in both summer and winter conditions was obtained for each run. The resulting NetPO3 was interpolated onto a regular 1000×1000 grid in the TNMVOC vs. NOx space to generate Fig. S7. The O3 isopleths (Fig. 10) were then fitted to this high-resolution grid from Fig. S7. At the same time, two tables present summer and winter data obtained after interpolation. From those, one can identify similar NOx values along with their corresponding NetPO3 and TNMVOC concentrations.

As depicted in Fig. S8, measured dO3/dt and modelled NetPO3 agreed reasonably well, particularly from 06:00 to 12:00 in summer and 08:00 to 12:00 in winter. This indicates that the measured dO3/dt during these periods serves as a good proxy for the value of modelled NetPO3, which is why it is considered valid to interchange them in the present application. By picking the known NOx and dO3/dt (finding the close values of NetPO3), the TNMVOC concentration is then identified. For further clarification, in Tables S9 and S10, these TNMVOC estimates are shown together with a comparison of measured and modelled NOx and dO3/dt for the station types.

Notably, simulated TNMVOC concentrations, primarily emitted or locally photochemical in origin, are expected to be similar to or lower than previous measurements (Knobloch et al., 1997) because of lowered anthropogenic emissions through existing European regulations and corresponding mitigation measures. Indeed, unpublished data for a range of NMVOCs observed throughout the year 2022 in Borna, a city south of Leipzig, exhibited remarkably low concentrations of 66 NMVOC species (Table S11) at a near-road measurement site, with hourly mean and maximum total mixing ratios of 3.6 and 29.7 ppb in summer and 6.0 and 204.6 ppb in winter, respectively. Besides, von Schneidemesser et al. (2018) reported that the highest mixing ratios of a total of 57 NMVOC compounds measured during 3 summer months (June–August) at traffic sites in central and western Berlin were found to be 64 and 170 ppb, respectively. Thus, our estimated summer and winter TNMVOC concentrations (Tables S9 and S10) can be considered to lie in a reasonable range. However, for rural and mountain sites, accurate estimations for the TNMVOCs were challenging due to their very low NOx concentrations (<10 ppb in summer, <16 ppb in winter) and dO3/dt (<4 ppb h−1 in summer, <1.3 ppb h−1 in winter) observations (refer to Tables S9 and S10). Especially in the last 10 years, the data are near the lower-left border of simulated NOx and NetPO3 values in Fig. 10, where considerable uncertainty exists in estimating NetPO3 and TNMVOCs. Therefore, only data for traffic and urban background sites are shown in Fig. 10.

The modelled NetPO3 determined in the present study was in the range of 2.74 to 4.88 ppb h−1 in summer (Table S9) and 0.78 to 1.65 ppb h−1 in winter (Table S10) at traffic and urban sites between 2000 and 2019. In rural and mountain sites, the NetPO3 is not given for the different years due to the uncertainty of the estimates, as described above. However, it can be said that measured dO3/dt ranged from 1.16 to 3.89 ppb h−1 in summer and 0.35 to1.30 ppb h−1 in winter from 2000 to 2019. Modelled NetPO3 and measured dO3/dt were comparable to those deduced from other sites in Germany and Europe. For instance, Corsmeier et al. (2002) reported a NetPO3 of 4.0–6.5 ppb h−1 by a model system (KAMM/DRAIS) for a polluted ozone plume from Berlin during the July 1998 BERLIOZ campaign. In relatively clean rural and mountain sites, during the FREETEX'96 study at Mt. Jungfraujoch in April/May 1996, the NetPO3 was calculated using a photochemical box model, yielding rates of 0.27 and 0.13 ppb h−1 (Zanis et al., 2000), and Nussbaumer et al. (2021) reported a maximum midday NetPO3 of 1.5 ppb h−1 based on a photochemical calculation, considering in situ trace gas observations at a boreal forest site in Finland during the July and August 2010 HUMPPA campaign.

As can be seen from Fig. 10, O3 photochemical formation in densely populated regions of Saxony is currently VOC-controlled and has also been VOC-controlled since the year 2000 in both summer and winter. In detail, for the summer case in Fig. 10a, traffic and urban background stations have a clear temporal trend and were in the VOC-limited regime overall from 2000 to 2019, but for the urban background stations the trend line in the recent 10 years is close to the transition regime (from VOC-limited to NOx-limited regime). Detailed analyses (refer to Fig. 10a and Table S9) reveal a different trend line pattern in NetPO3 between traffic and urban stations. At the traffic station, beginning at 2.74 ppb h−1 in 2000, the NetPO3 trend line crossed several isopleths, reaching 3.69 ppb h−1 by 2005. Subsequently, it maintained a nearly parallel course with isopleths, starting with 3.87 ppb h−1 in 2010 and then rising to 4.55 ppb h−1 in 2019 over the recent decade. Concurrently, both NOx and TNMVOC concentrations decreased by two-thirds and one-third, respectively. Conversely, urban background sites depict a slightly different scenario. An increase in NetPO3, from 4.13 ppb h−1 in 2000 to 4.87 ppb h−1 in 2019 is noted within the isopleth plot. This rise occurred alongside substantial reductions in NOx concentrations by 50 % (from 19.02 to 9.61 ppb), contrasting with only a small decrease in TNMVOC by approximately 15 % (54.06 to 46.91 ppb). Given that both traffic and urban sites are characterised by a VOC-limited regime, where NetPO3 increases with decreasing ratios of NOx/ TNMVOC, the observed increase in NetPO3 and O3 levels (as depicted in Fig. S9) confirms the inadequacy of current efforts of TNMVOC emission reductions with respect to O3 pollution. Stronger reduction measures over the next years are needed, particularly in areas with dense population concentrations, to avoid exacerbating rather than mitigating ozone pollution.

In contrast to summer, winter experiences substantially weaker photochemistry, attributed to the lower intensity and shorter duration of solar radiation, which is merely half of that in summer. As illustrated in Fig. 10b and Table S10, traffic and urban background stations have exhibited relatively low NetPO3 (<2.00 ppb h−1) over the past two decades. Nevertheless, a slight increase in NetPO3 has been observed (from approximately 0.80 in 2000 to about 1.60 ppb h−1 in 2019 for traffic stations and from about 1.40 to roughly 1.60 ppb h−1 for urban background sites, respectively), despite halving NOx and TNMVOC emissions. Winter O3 formation at both station types has predominantly occurred in the VOC-limited regime over the past 20 years, indicating that traffic and urban sites still have a considerable way to go in achieving NOx-limited conditions despite significant NOx emission controls. Additionally, it is worth noting that trend lines tend to run more parallel in the recent 5 or 10 years, irrespective of the season, suggesting that O3 formation via photochemistry in densely populated regions under current emission controls has remained more consistent in recent years, contributing to O3 increases (see Figs. S9 and S10).

As described above, NetPO3 trends at rural and mountain sites could not be discussed using the modelled isopleths. Instead, trends in measured dO3/dt are briefly discussed in the following. From summer 2000 to 2019, there was an increase in dO3/dt by 1 and 0.5 ppb h−1 (refer to Table S9) for rural and mountain sites, respectively. The rise in summer O3 levels (refer to Fig. S9) may be attributed to an increase in photochemical production due to more on-site or transported O3 precursors or an increase in the hemispheric background O3 level due to elevated anthropogenic emissions in heavily polluted areas (Derwent et al., 2015; Gaudel et al., 2018; Mertens et al., 2020). The positive trends observed in the lower and middle percentiles of O3 across all sites (see Fig. 5) in the present study further reinforce the assertion that background O3 is rising. During winter from 2000 to 2019, rural sites experienced a slight increase in dO3/dt by 0.2 ppb h−1, while mountainous stations showed a decrease of −0.3 ppb h−1 (refer to Table S10). Notably, winter O3 trends increased at both sites, as depicted in Fig. S10, more likely due to the increase in the background O3 level (Derwent et al., 2015; Gaudel et al., 2018; Mertens et al., 2020), as photochemistry has not changed significantly during the winters of the past 20 years.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/8907/2025/acp-25-8907-2025-f11

Figure 11Anthropogenic emissions of NMVOCs in Saxony for 5 years between 2000 and 2019. Emission data were obtained by averaging values for each year across the approximated area of the entire state of Saxony (see Fig. S1). Details of the emission categories and corresponding emission sectors can be found in Table S13.

Download

3.3.3 Implications for O3 control

In the time frame of the present study, anthropogenic emissions of NMVOCs and NOx have significantly decreased in the whole of Saxony (Figs. 11 and S11), as well as selected traffic (Figs. S12 and S13) and urban background areas (Figs. S14 and S15) over the last 20 years (from 2000 to 2019). Although the biogenic emissions data of year 2019 in overall Saxony (Fig. S16 and Table S12) are comparable to anthropogenic NMVOCs in the same year (Fig. 11a), biogenic emissions of isoprene and alpha-pinene in selected urban stations (Fig. S17 and Table S12) are indeed several orders of magnitude smaller than the anthropogenic emissions data in these areas (Fig. S14a). Limonene, on the other hand, cannot be regarded as solely biogenic but has important anthropogenic sources as well (Borbon et al., 2023; Gu et al., 2024). Thus, in urban sites it is inferred that biogenic emissions have a negligible effect on O3 formation. The seasonal O3 isopleths suggest that current O3 formation regimes across traffic and urban background sites were determined to be overall VOC-limited during the same period. However, what kind of VOCs should be controlled to reach a more effective O3 decrease is still uncertain. Based on the inventory data available for the present study (Fig. 11), it can be noted that the solvent emissions decreased less strongly than the total anthropogenic NMVOC emissions in Saxony, indicating an increased share of this emission category to regional O3 formation. Similar changes in solvent emissions relative to total anthropogenic NMVOC emissions were also observed at traffic (Fig. S12) and urban background stations (Fig. S14). In fact, the percentage of solvent emissions in total anthropogenic NMVOC emissions remained nearly constant from 2010 to 2019, regardless of station types. This consistency suggests that solvent emissions may be a potential contributing factor to the increase in O3 levels over the past decade. A recent study in the UK suggested an increased importance of solvents as well for summertime urban O3 formation by incorporating detailed VOC emission inventories from 1990 to 2019 into a zero-dimensional chemical box model constrained by observational data (Li et al., 2024). Therefore, it is suggested that more strict VOC emission controls be implemented in the future, possibly with more attention to solvent use, in order to alleviate the O3 pollution in Saxony.

However, a scenario that only reduces VOCs (as indicated by red dotted arrows to the left in Fig. 10) is not realistic as it comes with the cost of constant NOx. Therefore, a scenario (as indicated by yellow dotted arrows in Fig. 10) where NetPO3 slightly decreases, achieved through strong VOC emission control with a moderate NOx emission decrease, is more realistic. In view of the detailed effect from diverse NMVOC emissions on O3 pollution, more NMVOC measurements should be implemented to validate emission inventories and better refine modelling studies on O3 formation.

4 Conclusions

Given the importance of surface ground-level O3, long-term observations of O3 concentrations are of utmost importance to understand the O3 formation/depletion trend in a changing environment and climate. The present study compares the observed trends in O3 concentrations across 16 measurement stations in Saxony, categorised into four station types (traffic, urban background, rural background and mountain sites) over three distinct periods: (i) the entire duration of available measurement data, from 1997 or later, (ii) the 15-year span from 2006 to 2020, and (iii) the more recent 10 years from 2011 to 2020. At 15 of the 16 measurement stations, surface O3 exhibits upward or stagnant trends over the recent 15 or 10 years. The strongest O3 trend is observed at the traffic DD-Nord station at roughly 1.2 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 3.5 % yr−1) in the last 10 years. Increasing O3 trends are also observed at urban and rural background stations, with average rates of about 0.5 µg m−3 yr−1 (or 1.1 % yr−1) over the last decade. A more inhomogeneous picture can be seen on the mountain ridge, where over the last decade two stations (Schwartenberg and Zinnwald) have shown slightly positive but with not statistically significant O3 trends. One station (Carlsfeld) was seen with a stagnating trend, and at the highest station of Fichtelberg the concentrations have clearly decreased at −0.79µg m−3 yr−1 (or −0.95 % yr−1). In addition, ground-level NOx measurements at these sites were analysed. Our results highlight that O3 pollution in Saxony has not abated and has, in fact, worsened in the last 10 years, particularly in many urban areas with dense populations despite a reduction of NOx concentrations at all sites. Through detailed photochemical modelling, isopleth plots for O3 formation rates were constructed. Visualisation of year-to year variations per station type using two seasonal isopleth plots allows for assessing the effectiveness of precursor controls in Saxony over the past 20 years and offers insights into potential future O3 pollution mitigation strategies.

It is shown that the O3 formation dynamics across traffic and urban background sites were determined to be predominantly VOC-limited from 2000 to 2019. The observed increases in NetPO3 and O3 levels affirm that current efforts to reduce TNMVOC emissions from various sources are still insufficient. Continuing with a similar magnitude of VOC reductions in densely populated regions over the next years will likely result in further deterioration of O3 pollution rather than its mitigation. Based on anthropogenic and biogenic emission data, we suggest that moderate NOx reduction and additional VOC emission controls should be implemented, with particular attention given to solvent emissions, in order to more effectively alleviate regional O3 formation. Given the detailed effects of various NMVOC emissions on O3 increases and the complete lack of comprehensive NMVOC measurements, it is also strongly recommended to implement such monitoring. This would be of great help to assess emission inventories and improve the robustness of modelling studies on O3 formation to develop prediction capability and undertake scenario calculations as to which path atmospheric ozone pollution will follow.

Data availability

The measurement data used in this study are freely available from the LfULG (https://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/infosysteme/luftonline/recherche.aspx, LfULG, 2025) or can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8907-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

SB, DvP, AT and HaH conceptualised the study. YW, with support from DvP, AT and EHH, curated the data, performed the formal analyses and visualised the results. MH provided the VOC measurements. HaH supervised the entire study. YW drafted the paper, which all authors have reviewed and edited.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the operation of the monitoring network, data provision and logistic support at the Borna station by the Saxon “Betriebsgesellschaft für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft” (BfUL).

Financial support

This research has been funded through the SAXOZONE project (grant no. 51-Z266/20) by the Saxon State Office for the Environment, Agriculture and Geology (LfULG). Certain aspects of the ozone analysis work have also been supported through the DFG project “Coupling and Abatement of atmospheric Ozone and PM in the Chinese Yangtze River Delta (PMO3)” under HE3086/46-1 with project no. 448587068.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Jayanarayanan Kuttippurath and reviewed by Jessica Haskins and one anonymous referee.

References

Agathokleous, E., Feng, Z., Oksanen, E., Sicard, P., Wang, Q., Saitanis, C. J., Araminiene, V., Blande, J. D., Hayes, F., and Calatayud, V.: Ozone affects plant, insect, and soil microbial communities: A threat to terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity, Sci. Adv., 6, eabc1176, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc1176, 2020. 

Beekmann, M. and Vautard, R.: A modelling study of photochemical regimes over Europe: robustness and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10067–10084, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10067-2010, 2010. 

Boleti, E., Hueglin, C., and Takahama, S.: Trends of surface maximum ozone concentrations in Switzerland based on meteorological adjustment for the period 1990–2014, Atmos. Environ., 213, 326–336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.018, 2019. 

Bonn, B., von Schneidemesser, E., Butler, T., Churkina, G., Ehlers, C., Grote, R., Klemp, D., Nothard, R., Schäfer, K., and von Stülpnagel, A.: Impact of vegetative emissions on urban ozone and biogenic secondary organic aerosol: Box model study for Berlin, Germany, J. Clean. Prod., 176, 827–841, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.164, 2018. 

Borbon, A., Dominutti, P., Panopoulou, A., Gros, V., Sauvage, S., Farhat, M., Afif, C., Elguindi, N., Fornaro, A., and Granier, C.: Ubiquity of anthropogenic terpenoids in cities worldwide: Emission ratios, emission quantification and implications for urban atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037566, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037566, 2023. 

Bossioli, E., Tombrou, M., Dandou, A., and Soulakellis, N.: Simulation of the effects of critical factors on ozone formation and accumulation in the greater Athens area, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D02309, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007185, 2007. 

Brümmer, B., Lange, I., and Konow, H.: Atmospheric boundary layer measurements at the 280 m high Hamburg weather mast 1995-2011. Mean annual and diurnal cycles, Meteorol. Z., 21, 319–335, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0338, 2012. 

Cape, J.: Surface ozone concentrations and ecosystem health: Past trends and a guide to future projections, Sci. Total Environ., 400, 257–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.025, 2008. 

Carslaw, D. C. and Ropkins, K.: Openair–an R package for air quality data analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 27, 52-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.008, 2012. 

Clifton, O. E., Fiore, A. M., Massman, W. J., Baublitz, C. B., Coyle, M., Emberson, L., Fares, S., Farmer, D. K., Gentine, P., and Gerosa, G.: Dry deposition of ozone over land: processes, measurement, and modeling, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000670, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000670, 2020. 

Colette, A., Andersson, C., Baklanov, A., Bessagnet, B., Brandt, J., Christensen, J. H., Doherty, R., Engardt, M., Geels, C., and Giannakopoulos, C.: Is the ozone climate penalty robust in Europe?, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 084015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/084015, 2015a. 

Colette, A., Beauchamp, M., Malherbe, L., and Solberg, S.: Air quality trends in AIRBASE in the context of the LRTAP Convention, ETC/ACM, https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-atni/products/etc-atni-reports/etcacm_tp_2015_4_aqtrends (last access: 1 August 2025), 2015b. 

Cooper, O. R., Parrish, D., Ziemke, J., Balashov, N., Cupeiro, M., Galbally, I., Gilge, S., Horowitz, L., Jensen, N., and Lamarque, J.-F.: Global distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone: An observation-based review, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 2, 000029, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000029, 2014. 

Cooper, O. R., Schultz, M. G., Schröder, S., Chang, K.-L., Gaudel, A., Benítez, G. C., Cuevas, E., Fröhlich, M., Galbally, I. E., and Molloy, S.: Multi-decadal surface ozone trends at globally distributed remote locations, Elem. Sci. Anth., 8, 23, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.420, 2020. 

Corsmeier, U., Kalthoff, N., Vogel, B., Hammer, M. U., Fiedler, F., Kottmeier, C., Volz-Thomas, A., Konrad, S., Glaser, K., Neininger, B., Lehning, M., Jaeschke, W., Memmesheimer, M., Rappenglück, B., and Jakobi, G.: Ozone and PAN Formation Inside and Outside of the Berlin Plume – Process Analysis and Numerical Process Simulation, in: Tropospheric Chemistry: Results of the German Tropospheric Chemistry Programme, edited by: Seiler, W., Becker, K. H., and Schaller, E., Springer, 289–321, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0399-5_13, 2002 

Cristofanelli, P. and Bonasoni, P.: Background ozone in the southern Europe and Mediterranean area: influence of the transport processes, Environ. Pollut., 157, 1399–1406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.017, 2009. 

Crutzen, P. J.: Gas-phase nitrogen and methane chemistry in the atmosphere, in: Proceedings of a Symposium Organized by the Summer Advanced Study Institute, Orléans, France, 31 July–11 August, 1972, 110–124, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2542-3_12, 1973. 

Curci, G., Beekmann, M., Vautard, R., Smiatek, G., Steinbrecher, R., Theloke, J., and Friedrich, R.: Modelling study of the impact of isoprene and terpene biogenic emissions on European ozone levels, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1444–1455, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.070, 2009. 

Davies, T. and Schuepbach, E.: Episodes of high ozone concentrations at the earth's surface resulting from transport down from the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere: a review and case studies, Atmos. Environ., 28, 53–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90022-1, 1994. 

Deguillaume, L., Beekmann, M., and Derognat, C.: Uncertainty evaluation of ozone production and its sensitivity to emission changes over the Ile-de-France region during summer periods, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D02304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009081, 2008. 

Dentener, F., Keating, T., Akimoto, H., and Ece, U.: Hemispheric transport of air pollution 2010. Part A, Ozone and particulate matter, United Nations Publication, ISBN 9789211170436, 2010. 

Derwent, R. G. and Parrish, D. D.: Analysis and assessment of the observed long-term changes over three decades in ground-level ozone across north-west Europe from 1989–2018, Atmos. Environ., 286, 119222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119222, 2022. 

Derwent, R., Simmonds, P., Manning, A., and Spain, T.: Trends over a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007 in surface ozone at the atmospheric research station, Mace Head, Ireland, Atmos. Environ., 41, 9091–9098, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.008, 2007. 

Derwent, R. G., Witham, C. S., Utembe, S. R., Jenkin, M. E., and Passant, N. R.: Ozone in Central England: the impact of 20 years of precursor emission controls in Europe, Environ. Sci. Pol., 13, 195–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.02.001, 2010. 

Derwent, R. G., Utembe, S. R., Jenkin, M. E., and Shallcross, D. E.: Tropospheric ozone production regions and the intercontinental origins of surface ozone over Europe, Atmos. Environ., 112, 216–224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.049, 2015. 

Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G., Spain, T. G., and O'Doherty, S.: Long-term trends in ozone in baseline and European regionally-polluted air at Mace Head, Ireland over a 30-year period, Atmos. Environ., 179, 279–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.024, 2018. 

Diaz, F. M. R., Khan, M. A. H., Shallcross, B. M. A., Shallcross, E. D. G., Vogt, U., and Shallcross, D. E.: Ozone Trends in the United Kingdom over the Last 30 Years, Atmosphere, 11, 534, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11050534, 2020. 

EEA: European Union emission inventory report 1990–2021 — Under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention), European Environment Agency (EEA), https://doi.org/10.2800/68478, 2023. 

Eghdami, H., Werner, W., and Büker, P.: Spatio-temporal variation of ozone concentrations and ozone uptake conditions in forests in western Germany, Atmosphere, 11, 1261, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111261, 2020. 

Ehlers, C., Klemp, D., Rohrer, F., Mihelcic, D., Wegener, R., Kiendler-Scharr, A., and Wahner, A.: Twenty years of ambient observations of nitrogen oxides and specified hydrocarbons in air masses dominated by traffic emissions in Germany, Faraday Discuss., 189, 407–437, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5fd00180c, 2016. 

Feldner, J., Ramacher, M., Karl, M., Quante, M., and Luttkus, M.: Analysis of the effect of abiotic stressors on BVOC emissions from urban green infrastructure in northern Germany, Environmental Science: Atmospheres, 2, 1132–1151, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00038E, 2022. 

Finch, D. P. and Palmer, P. I.: Increasing ambient surface ozone levels over the UK accompanied by fewer extreme events, Atmos. Environ., 237, 117627, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117627, 2020. 

Fleming, Z. L., Doherty, R. M., Von Schneidemesser, E., Malley, C. S., Cooper, O. R., Pinto, J. P., Colette, A., Xu, X., Simpson, D., and Schultz, M. G.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 12, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.273, 2018. 

Gabusi, V. and Volta, M.: Seasonal modelling assessment of ozone sensitivity to precursors in northern Italy, Atmos. Environ., 39, 2795–2804, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.041, 2005. 

Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Ancellet, G., Barret, B., Boynard, A., Burrows, J. P., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Cuesta, J., and Cuevas, E.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Present-day distribution and trends of tropospheric ozone relevant to climate and global atmospheric chemistry model evaluation, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 39, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.291, 2018. 

Gebhardt, H., Zimmermann, F., and Matschullat, J.: 1981–2020 winter ozone trends, Erzgebirge, Central Europe, Geochemistry, 81, 125738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2020.125738, 2021. 

Gilge, S., Plass-Duelmer, C., Fricke, W., Kaiser, A., Ries, L., Buchmann, B., and Steinbacher, M.: Ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides time series at four alpine GAW mountain stations in central Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 12295–12316, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-12295-2010, 2010. 

Gu, S., Luo, W., Charmchi, A., McWhirter, K. J., Rosenstiel, T., Pankow, J., and Faiola, C. L.: Limonene Enantiomeric Ratios from Anthropogenic and Biogenic Emission Sources, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 11, 130–135, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00794, 2024. 

Hammer, M. U., Vogel, B., and Vogel, H.: Findings on H2O2/HNO3 as an indicator of ozone sensitivity in Baden-Württemberg, Berlin-Brandenburg, and the Po valley based on numerical simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, LOP 3-1–LOP 3-18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000211, 2002. 

Herrmann, H., Ervens, B., Jacobi, H.-W., Wolke, R., Nowacki, P., and Zellner, R.: CAPRAM2. 3: A chemical aqueous phase radical mechanism for tropospheric chemistry, J. Atmos. Chem., 36, 231–284, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006318622743, 2000. 

Hoffmann, E. H., Tilgner, A., Vogelsberg, U., Wolke, R., and Herrmann, H.: Near-explicit multiphase modeling of halogen chemistry in a mixed urban and maritime coastal area, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 2452–2471, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00184, 2019. 

Huszar, P., Belda, M., and Halenka, T.: On the long-term impact of emissions from central European cities on regional air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1331–1352, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1331-2016, 2016. 

Jaidan, N., El Amraoui, L., Attié, J.-L., Ricaud, P., and Dulac, F.: Future changes in surface ozone over the Mediterranean Basin in the framework of the Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment (ChArMEx), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9351–9373, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9351-2018, 2018. 

Jenkin, M. E.: Trends in ozone concentration distributions in the UK since 1990: Local, regional and global influences, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5434–5445, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.036, 2008. 

Jonson, J. E., Simpson, D., Fagerli, H., and Solberg, S.: Can we explain the trends in European ozone levels?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 51–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-51-2006, 2006. 

Kahle, D. J., and Wickham, H.: ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2, R J., 5, 144–161, https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2013-014, 2013. 

Kalabokas, P., Hjorth, J., Foret, G., Dufour, G., Eremenko, M., Siour, G., Cuesta, J., and Beekmann, M.: An investigation on the origin of regional springtime ozone episodes in the western Mediterranean, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3905–3928, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3905-2017, 2017. 

Kley, D., Geiss, H., and Mohnen, V. A.: Tropospheric ozone at elevated sites and precursor emissions in the United States and Europe, Atmos. Environ., 28, 149–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90030-2, 1994. 

Knobloch, T., Asperger, A., and Engewald, W.: Volatile organic compounds in urban atmospheres: Long-term measurements of ambient air concentrations in differently loaded regions of Leipzig, Fresen. J. Anal. Chem., 359, 189–197, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160050558, 1997. 

Kotthaus, S., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Collaud Coen, M., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Costa, M. J., Cimini, D., O'Connor, E. J., Hervo, M., Alados-Arboledas, L., Jiménez-Portaz, M., Mona, L., Ruffieux, D., Illingworth, A., and Haeffelin, M.: Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 433–479, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-433-2023, 2023. 

Lefohn, A. S., Malley, C. S., Smith, L., Wells, B., Hazucha, M., Simon, H., Naik, V., Mills, G., Schultz, M. G., and Paoletti, E.: Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 28, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.279, 2018. 

Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: High tropospheric ozone in Lhasa within the Asian summer monsoon anticyclone in 2013: influence of convective transport and stratospheric intrusions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17979–17994, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17979-2018, 2018. 

Li, J., Lewis, A. C., Hopkins, J. R., Andrews, S. J., Murrells, T., Passant, N., Richmond, B., Hou, S., Bloss, W. J., Harrison, R. M., and Shi, Z.: The impact of multi-decadal changes in VOC speciation on urban ozone chemistry: a case study in Birmingham, United Kingdom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6219–6231, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6219-2024, 2024. 

Lin, M., Fiore, A. M., Horowitz, L. W., Langford, A. O., Oltmans, S. J., Tarasick, D., and Rieder, H. E.: Climate variability modulates western US ozone air quality in spring via deep stratospheric intrusions, Nat. Commun., 6, 7105, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8105, 2015. 

Lin, M., Horowitz, L. W., Xie, Y., Paulot, F., Malyshev, S., Shevliakova, E., Finco, A., Gerosa, G., Kubistin, D., and Pilegaard, K.: Vegetation feedbacks during drought exacerbate ozone air pollution extremes in Europe, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 444–451, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0743-y, 2020. 

Mar, K. A., Ojha, N., Pozzer, A., and Butler, T. M.: Ozone air quality simulations with WRF-Chem (v3.5.1) over Europe: model evaluation and chemical mechanism comparison, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3699–3728, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3699-2016, 2016. 

Mathur, R., Kang, D., Napelenok, S. L., Xing, J., Hogrefe, C., Sarwar, G., Itahashi, S., and Henderson, B. H.: How Have Divergent Global Emission Trends Influenced Long-Range Transported Ozone to North America?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036926, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036926, 2022. 

Melkonyan, A. and Kuttler, W.: Long-term analysis of NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, Atmos. Environ., 60, 316–326, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.048, 2012. 

Melkonyan, A. and Wagner, P.: Ozone and its projection in regard to climate change, Atmos. Environ., 67, 287–295, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.023, 2013. 

Mertens, M., Kerkweg, A., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., and Sausen, R.: Attributing ozone and its precursors to land transport emissions in Europe and Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7843–7873, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7843-2020, 2020. 

Nussbaumer, C. M., Crowley, J. N., Schuladen, J., Williams, J., Hafermann, S., Reiffs, A., Axinte, R., Harder, H., Ernest, C., Novelli, A., Sala, K., Martinez, M., Mallik, C., Tomsche, L., Plass-Dülmer, C., Bohn, B., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Measurement report: Photochemical production and loss rates of formaldehyde and ozone across Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18413–18432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18413-2021, 2021. 

Oltmans, S., Lefohn, A., Shadwick, D., Harris, J., Scheel, H., Galbally, I., Tarasick, D., Johnson, B., Brunke, E.-G., and Claude, H.: Recent tropospheric ozone changes–A pattern dominated by slow or no growth, Atmos. Environ., 67, 331–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057, 2013. 

Otero, N., Rust, H. W., and Butler, T.: Temperature dependence of tropospheric ozone under NOx reductions over Germany, Atmos. Environ., 253, 118334, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118334, 2021. 

Pandey Deolal, S., Henne, S., Ries, L., Gilge, S., Weers, U., Steinbacher, M., Staehelin, J., and Peter, T.: Analysis of elevated springtime levels of Peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) at the high Alpine research sites Jungfraujoch and Zugspitze, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12553–12571, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12553-2014, 2014. 

Paoletti, E., De Marco, A., Beddows, D. C., Harrison, R. M., and Manning, W. J.: Ozone levels in European and USA cities are increasing more than at rural sites, while peak values are decreasing, Environ. Pollut., 192, 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.04.040, 2014. 

Parrish, D. D., Law, K. S., Staehelin, J., Derwent, R., Cooper, O. R., Tanimoto, H., Volz-Thomas, A., Gilge, S., Scheel, H.-E., Steinbacher, M., and Chan, E.: Long-term changes in lower tropospheric baseline ozone concentrations at northern mid-latitudes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11485–11504, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11485-2012, 2012. 

Petetin, H., Thouret, V., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D., Cousin, J.-M., Gaudel, A., Nédélec, P., and Cooper, O.: Diurnal cycle of ozone throughout the troposphere over Frankfurt as measured by MOZAIC-IAGOS commercial aircraft, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 000129, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000129, 2016. 

Proietti, C., Fornasier, M. F., Sicard, P., Anav, A., Paoletti, E., and De Marco, A.: Trends in tropospheric ozone concentrations and forest impact metrics in Europe over the time period 2000–2014, J. Forest. Res., 32, 543–551, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01226-3, 2021. 

R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 1 August 2025), 2020. 

Ronan, A. C., Ducker, J. A., Schnell, J. L., and Holmes, C. D.: Have improvements in ozone air quality reduced ozone uptake into plants?, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 8, 2, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.399, 2020. 

Rondón, A., Johansson, C., and Granat, L.: Dry deposition of nitrogen dioxide and ozone to coniferous forests, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 5159–5172, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02335, 1993. 

Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie (LfULG): Luftgütedaten – Online-Recherche, Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Energie, Klimaschutz, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft [data set], https://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/infosysteme/luftonline/recherche.aspx, last access: 1 August 2025. 

Salthammer, T., Schieweck, A., Gu, J., Ameri, S., and Uhde, E.: Future trends in ambient air pollution and climate in Germany–Implications for the indoor environment, Build. Environ., 143, 661–670, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.050, 2018. 

Saunders, S. M., Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Pilling, M. J.: Protocol for the development of the Master Chemical Mechanism, MCM v3 (Part A): tropospheric degradation of non-aromatic volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 161–180, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-161-2003, 2003. 

Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric and physics of air pollution, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9780471828570, 1998. 

Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 9781118947401, 2016. 

Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934, 1968. 

Sicard, P.: Ground-level ozone over time: an observation-based global overview, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 19, 100226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2020.100226, 2021. 

Sicard, P., Paoletti, E., Agathokleous, E., Araminienė, V., Proietti, C., Coulibaly, F., and De Marco, A.: Ozone weekend effect in cities: Deep insights for urban air pollution control, Environ. Res., 191, 110193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110193, 2020. 

Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., and Calatayud, V.: Urban population exposure to air pollution in Europe over the last decades, Environmental Sciences Europe, 33, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00450-2, 2021. 

Sillman, S., Logan, J. A., and Wofsy, S. C.: The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 95, 1837–1851, https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD02p01837, 1990. 

Stieger, B., Spindler, G., Fahlbusch, B., Müller, K., Grüner, A., Poulain, L., Thöni, L., Seitler, E., Wallasch, M., and Herrmann, H.: Measurements of PM10 ions and trace gases with the online system MARGA at the research station Melpitz in Germany–A five-year study, J. Atmos. Chem., 75, 33–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-017-9361-0, 2018. 

The Air Quality Expert Group: Ozone in the UK – Recent Trends and Future Projections, UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/library/reports?report_id=1064 (last access: 1 August 2025), 2021. 

Thürkow, M., Schaap, M., Kranenburg, R., Pfäfflin, F., Neunhäuserer, L., Wolke, R., Heinold, B., Stoll, J., Lupaşcu, A., and Nordmann, S.: Dynamic evaluation of modeled ozone concentrations in Germany with four chemistry transport models, Sci. Total Environ., 906, 167665, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167665, 2024. 

Trickl, T., Couret, C., Ries, L., and Vogelmann, H.: Zugspitze ozone 1970–2020: the role of stratosphere–troposphere transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8403–8427, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8403-2023, 2023. 

von Schneidemesser, E., Bonn, B., Butler, T. M., Ehlers, C., Gerwig, H., Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Kerschbaumer, A., Klemp, D., Kofahl, C., Kura, J., Lüdecke, A., Nothard, R., Pietsch, A., Quedenau, J., Schäfer, K., Schauer, J. J., Singh, A., Villalobos, A.-M., Wiegner, M., and Lawrence, M. G.: BAERLIN2014 – stationary measurements and source apportionment at an urban background station in Berlin, Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8621–8645, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8621-2018, 2018. 

Wang, X., Wu, Y., Randel, W., and Tilmes, S.: Stratospheric contribution to the summertime high surface ozone events over the western united states, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 1040a6, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abba53, 2020. 

Wiegner, M., Emeis, S., Freudenthaler, V., Heese, B., Junkermann, W., Münkel, C., Schäfer, K., Seefeldner, M., and Vogt, S.: Mixing layer height over Munich, Germany: Variability and comparisons of different methodologies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D13201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006593, 2006. 

Wolke, R., Sehili, A., Simmel, M., Knoth, O., Tilgner, A., and Herrmann, H.: SPACCIM: A parcel model with detailed microphysics and complex multiphase chemistry, Atmos. Environ., 39, 4375–4388, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.02.038, 2005. 

Wu, Z., Wang, X., Turnipseed, A. A., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Guenther, A. B., Karl, T., Huey, L., Niyogi, D., and Xia, B.: Evaluation and improvements of two community models in simulating dry deposition velocities for peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) over a coniferous forest, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D04310, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016751, 2012. 

Yan, Y., Pozzer, A., Ojha, N., Lin, J., and Lelieveld, J.: Analysis of European ozone trends in the period 1995–2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5589–5605, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5589-2018, 2018.  

Zanis, P., Monks, P. S., Schuepbach, E., and Penkett, S. A.: The role of in situ photochemistry in the control of ozone during spring at the Jungfraujoch (3,580 m asl) – Comparison of model results with measurements, J. Atmos. Chem., 37, 1-27, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006349926926, 2000. 

Zellweger, C., Hüglin, C., Klausen, J., Steinbacher, M., Vollmer, M., and Buchmann, B.: Inter-comparison of four different carbon monoxide measurement techniques and evaluation of the long-term carbon monoxide time series of Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3491–3503, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3491-2009, 2009. 

Zhu, Y., Tilgner, A., Hoffmann, E. H., Herrmann, H., Kawamura, K., Yang, L., Xue, L., and Wang, W.: Multiphase MCM–CAPRAM modeling of the formation and processing of secondary aerosol constituents observed during the Mt. Tai summer campaign in 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6725–6747, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6725-2020, 2020. 

Download
Short summary
Tropospheric ground-level ozone (O3) is a global air quality pollutant and greenhouse gas. Long-term O3 trends from 16 stations in Saxony, Germany, were compared over three periods, revealing worsened O3 pollution over the last decade. O3 formation has been volatile organic compound (VOC)-limited at traffic and urban sites for the past 20 years. To mitigate O3 pollution, moderate nitrogen oxides and additional VOC controls, particularly in solvent use, should be prioritized in the coming years.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint