Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, 210023, China
Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Hengmao Wang
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Zhengqi Zhang
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Mousong Wu
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Wei He
Zhejiang Carbon Neutral Innovation Institute, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, China
Weimin Ju
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and Technology, International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Frontiers Science Center for Critical Earth Material Cycling, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China
Jing M. Chen
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada
School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, China
Viewed
Total article views: 2,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,797
341
238
2,376
77
108
140
HTML: 1,797
PDF: 341
XML: 238
Total: 2,376
Supplement: 77
BibTeX: 108
EndNote: 140
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Jun 2024)
Total article views: 1,604 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,328
236
40
1,604
77
88
114
HTML: 1,328
PDF: 236
XML: 40
Total: 1,604
Supplement: 77
BibTeX: 88
EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Jan 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 22 Jan 2025)
Total article views: 772 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
469
105
198
772
20
26
HTML: 469
PDF: 105
XML: 198
Total: 772
BibTeX: 20
EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 14 Jun 2024)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,376 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,376 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,604 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,604 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 772 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 758 with geography defined
and 14 with unknown origin.
The role of OCO-3 XCO2 retrievals in estimating global terrestrial carbon fluxes is unclear. We investigate this by assimilating OCO-3 XCO2 retrievals alone and in combination with OCO-2 XCO2. The assimilation of OCO-3 XCO2 alone underestimates global land sinks, mainly at high latitudes, due to the lack of observations beyond 52° S and 52° N, large variations in the number of data, and varying observation times, while the joint assimilation of OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 has the best performance.
The role of OCO-3 XCO2 retrievals in estimating global terrestrial carbon fluxes is...