Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-27-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-27-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 1
Research article
 | 
06 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 06 Jan 2025

Remote-sensing detectability of airborne Arctic dust

Norman T. O'Neill, Keyvan Ranjbar, Liviu Ivănescu, Yann Blanchard, Seyed Ali Sayedain, and Yasmin AboEl-Fetouh

Viewed

Total article views: 1,276 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,085 149 42 1,276 81 30 31
  • HTML: 1,085
  • PDF: 149
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 1,276
  • Supplement: 81
  • BibTeX: 30
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 31 May 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,276 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,276 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 05 Jun 2025
Download
Short summary
Dust from mid-latitude deserts or from local drainage basins is a weak component of atmospheric aerosols in the Arctic. Satellite-based dust estimates are often overestimated because dust and cloud measurements can be confused. Illustrations are given with an emphasis on the flawed claim that a classic indicator of dust (negative brightness temperature differences) is proof of the presence of airborne Arctic dust. Low-altitude warm-water plumes are the likely source of such negative values.
Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint