Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1765-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1765-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 Feb 2025
Research article |
| 07 Feb 2025
| 07 Feb 2025
Hunting for gravity waves in non-orographic winter storms using 3+ years of regional surface air pressure network and radar observations
Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
current address: Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Matthew A. Miller
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Laura M. Tomkins
Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
current address: Karen Clark and Company, Boston, MA 02116, USA
Related authors
Luke R. Allen, Sandra E. Yuter, Declan M. Crowe, Matthew A. Miller, and K. Lee Thornhill
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6679–6701, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6679-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6679-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed in-cloud characteristics using in situ measurements from 42 research flights across two field campaigns into non-orographic, non-lake-effect winter storms. Much of the storm volume contains weak vertical motions (a few centimeters per second), and most updrafts ≥ 0.5 m s-1 are small (< 1 km). Within 2 km of cloud radar echo top, stronger vertical motions and conditions for ice particle growth are more common. Overturning air motions near cloud top appear important for the production of snow particles.
Luke R. Allen, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, and Laura M. Tomkins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 113–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a data set of high-precision surface air pressure observations and a method for detecting wave signals from the time series of pressure. A wavelet-based method is used to find wave signals at specific times and wave periods. From networks of pressure sensors spaced tens of kilometers apart, the wave phase speed and direction are estimated. Examples of wave events and their meteorological context are shown using radar data, weather balloon data, and other surface weather observations.
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, and Luke R. Allen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5515–5525, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5515-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5515-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Locally higher radar reflectivity values in winter storms can mean more snowfall or a transition from snow to mixtures of snow, partially melted snow, and/or rain. We use the correlation coefficient to de-emphasize regions of mixed precipitation. Visual muting is valuable for analyzing and monitoring evolving weather conditions during winter storm events.
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, Mariko Oue, and Charles N. Helms
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 9999–10026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9999-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-9999-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how radar-detected snow bands relate to snowfall rates during winter storms in the northeastern United States. Using over a decade of data, we found that snow bands are not consistently linked to heavy snowfall at the surface, as snow particles are often dispersed by wind before reaching the ground. These findings highlight limitations of using radar reflectivity for predicting snow rates and suggest focusing on radar echo duration to better understand snowfall patterns.
Luke R. Allen, Sandra E. Yuter, Declan M. Crowe, Matthew A. Miller, and K. Lee Thornhill
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6679–6701, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6679-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6679-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed in-cloud characteristics using in situ measurements from 42 research flights across two field campaigns into non-orographic, non-lake-effect winter storms. Much of the storm volume contains weak vertical motions (a few centimeters per second), and most updrafts ≥ 0.5 m s-1 are small (< 1 km). Within 2 km of cloud radar echo top, stronger vertical motions and conditions for ice particle growth are more common. Overturning air motions near cloud top appear important for the production of snow particles.
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, and Matthew A. Miller
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3377–3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3377-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3377-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a new method to better identify enhanced features in radar data from winter storms. Unlike the clear-cut features seen in warm-season storms, features in winter storms are often fuzzier with softer edges. Our technique is unique because it uses two adaptive thresholds that change based on the background radar values. It can identify both strong and subtle features in the radar data and takes into account uncertainties in the detection process.
Luke R. Allen, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, and Laura M. Tomkins
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 113–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-113-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a data set of high-precision surface air pressure observations and a method for detecting wave signals from the time series of pressure. A wavelet-based method is used to find wave signals at specific times and wave periods. From networks of pressure sensors spaced tens of kilometers apart, the wave phase speed and direction are estimated. Examples of wave events and their meteorological context are shown using radar data, weather balloon data, and other surface weather observations.
Laura M. Tomkins, Sandra E. Yuter, Matthew A. Miller, and Luke R. Allen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5515–5525, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5515-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5515-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Locally higher radar reflectivity values in winter storms can mean more snowfall or a transition from snow to mixtures of snow, partially melted snow, and/or rain. We use the correlation coefficient to de-emphasize regions of mixed precipitation. Visual muting is valuable for analyzing and monitoring evolving weather conditions during winter storm events.
Matthew A. Miller, Sandra E. Yuter, Nicole P. Hoban, Laura M. Tomkins, and Brian A. Colle
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1689–1702, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1689-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1689-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Apparent waves in the atmosphere and similar features in storm winds can be detected by taking the difference between successive Doppler weather radar scans measuring radar-relative storm air motions. Applying image filtering to the difference data better isolates the detected signal. This technique is a useful tool in weather research and forecasting since such waves can trigger or enhance precipitation.
Cited articles
Adam, D.: Tonga Volcano Created Puzzling Atmospheric Ripples, Nature, 602, 497, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00127-1, 2022. a
Adams-Selin, R. D.: Impact of Convectively Generated Low-Frequency Gravity Waves on Evolution of Mesoscale Convective Systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3441–3460, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0250.1, 2020. a
Allen, G., Vaughan, G., Toniazzo, T., Coe, H., Connolly, P., Yuter, S. E., Burleyson, C. D., Minnis, P., and Ayers, J. K.: Gravity-wave-induced perturbations in marine stratocumulus: Gravity-Wave-Induced Perturbations in Marine Stratocumulus, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 32–45, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1952, 2013. a, b, c, d
Allen, L.: Data for “Hunting for gravity waves in non-orographic winter storms using 3+ years of regional surface air pressure networks and radar observations”, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11373040, 2024. a
Allen, L. R. and Miller, M. A.: lrallen34/pressure-wave-detection-public: Code for Objective identification of pressure wave events from networks of 1-Hz, high-precision sensors, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10150876, 2023. a
Allen, L. R., Tomkins, L. M., and Yuter, S. E.: 2021/02/18 KOKX radar 4-panel animation, series: Video Supplement to “Objectively identified mesoscale surface air pressure waves in the context of winter storm environments and radar reflectivity features: a 3+ year analysis”, TIB AV-Portal [video], https://doi.org/10.5446/67765, 2024a. a
Allen, L. R., Tomkins, L. M., and Yuter, S. E.: 2023/04/01 KBUF radar 4-panel animation, series: Video Supplement to “Objectively identified mesoscale surface air pressure waves in the context of winter storm environments and radar reflectivity features: a 3+ year analysis”, TIB AV-Portal [video], https://doi.org/10.5446/67635, 2024b. a
Allen, L. R., Tomkins, L. M., and Yuter, S. E.: 2023/04/05 KBUF radar 4-panel animation, series: Video Supplement to “Objectively identified mesoscale surface air pressure waves in the context of winter storm environments and radar reflectivity features: a 3+ year analysis”, TIB AV-Portal [video], https://doi.org/10.5446/67633, 2024c. a
Allen, L. R., Tomkins, L. M., and Yuter, S. E.: Video Supplement to “Objectively identified mesoscale surface air pressure waves in the context of winter storm environments and reflectivity features: a 3+ year analysis”, TIB AV-Portal [video], https://av.tib.eu/series/1721/video+supplement+to+objectively+identified+mesoscale+surface+air+pressure+waves+in+the+context+of+winter+storm+environments+and+radar+reflectivity+features+a+3+year+analysis (last access: 5 February 2025), 2024e. a
Baxter, M. A. and Schumacher, P. N.: Distribution of Single-Banded Snowfall in Central U.S. Cyclones, Weather Forecast., 32, 533–554, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0154.1, 2017. a
Bonilla, M. G., Mark, R. K., and Lienkaemper, J. J.: Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length, and surface fault displacement, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 74, 2379–2411, https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/74/6/2379/118679/Statistical-relations-among-earthquake-magnitude (last access: 5 February 2025), 1984. a
Bosch: BMP388 Data Sheet, https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/products/environmental-sensors/pressure-sensors/bmp388/ (last access: 5 February 2025), 2020. a
Bosch: BME280 Data Sheet, https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/products/environmental-sensors/humidity-sensors-bme280/ (last access: 5 February 2025), 2022. a
Burt, S.: Multiple airwaves crossing Britain and Ireland following the eruption of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha'apai on 15 January 2022, Weather, 77, 76–81, https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.4182, 2022. a
Canavero, F. G. and Einaudi, F.: Time and Space Variability of Spectral Estimates of Atmospheric Pressure, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1589–1604, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1589:TASVOS>2.0.CO;2, 1987. a
Christie, D. R.: The morning glory of the Gulf of Carpentaria: A paradigm for nonlinear waves in the lower atmosphere, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 41, 21–60, 1992. a
Connolly, P. J., Vaughan, G., Cook, P., Allen, G., Coe, H., Choularton, T. W., Dearden, C., and Hill, A.: Modelling the effects of gravity waves on stratocumulus clouds observed during VOCALS-UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 7133–7152, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-7133-2013, 2013. a
Crawford, A. D., Schreiber, E. A. P., Sommer, N., Serreze, M. C., Stroeve, J. C., and Barber, D. G.: Sensitivity of Northern Hemisphere Cyclone Detection and Tracking Results to Fine Spatial and Temporal Resolution Using ERA5, Mon. Weather Rev., 149, 2581–2598, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0417.1, 2021. a, b
Doyle, J. D. and Durran, D. R.: Rotor and Subrotor Dynamics in the Lee of Three-Dimensional Terrain, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 4202–4221, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2352.1, 2007. a
Einaudi, F., Bedard, A. J., and Finnigan, J. J.: A Climatology of Gravity Waves and Other Coherent Disturbances at the Boulder Atmospheric Observatory during March–April 1984, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 303–329, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<0303:ACOGWA>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a
Fovell, R. G., Mullendore, G. L., and Kim, S.-H.: Discrete Propagation in Numerically Simulated Nocturnal Squall Lines, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 3735–3752, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3268.1, 2006. a
Fritts, D. C. and Alexander, M. J.: Gravity wave dynamics and effects in the middle atmosphere, Rev. Geophys., 41, 1003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RG000106, 2003. a, b
Fujiyoshi, Y., Endoh, T., Yamada, T., Tsuboki, K., Tachibana, Y., and Wakahama, G.: Determination of a Z-R Relationship for Snowfall Using a Radar and High Sensitivity Snow Gauges, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 29, 147–152, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029%3C0147:DOARFS%3E2.0.CO;2, 1990. a
Gaffin, D. M., Parker, S. S., and Kirkwood, P. D.: An Unexpectedly Heavy and Complex Snowfall Event across the Southern Appalachian Region, Weather Forecast., 18, 224–235, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0224:AUHACS>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c, d
Grivet-Talocia, S. and Einaudi, F.: Wavelet analysis of a microbarograph network, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 36, 418–432, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.662727, 1998. a
Grivet-Talocia, S., Einaudi, F., Clark, W. L., Dennett, R. D., Nastrom, G. D., and VanZandt, T. E.: A 4-yr Climatology of Pressure Disturbances Using a Barometer Network in Central Illinois, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 1613–1629, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1613:AYCOPD>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b, c, d
Herrmann, R. B.: The use of duration as a measure of seismic moment and magnitude, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65, 899–913, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0650040899, 1975. a, b
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a, b
Houser, J. L. and Bluestein, H. B.: Polarimetric Doppler Radar Observations of Kelvin–Helmholtz Waves in a Winter Storm, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1676–1702, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3566.1, 2011. a, b, c
Houze, R. A.: Orographic effects on precipitating clouds, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG1001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000365, 2012. a
Houze, R. A.: Chapter 12 – Clouds and Precipitation Associated with Hills and Mountains, in: International Geophysics, edited by: Houze, R. A., Cloud Dynamics, vol. 104, Academic Press, 369–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374266-7.00012-3, 2014. a
Keeler, J. M., Jewett, B. F., Rauber, R. M., McFarquhar, G. M., Rasmussen, R. M., Xue, L., Liu, C., and Thompson, G.: Dynamics of Cloud-Top Generating Cells in Winter Cyclones. Part I: Idealized Simulations in the Context of Field Observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1507–1527, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0126.1, 2016. a
Keeler, J. M., Rauber, R. M., Jewett, B. F., McFarquhar, G. M., Rasmussen, R. M., Xue, L., Liu, C., and Thompson, G.: Dynamics of Cloud-Top Generating Cells in Winter Cyclones. Part III: Shear and Convective Organization, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2879–2897, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0314.1, 2017. a
Kingsmill, D. E., Persson, P. O. G., Haimov, S., and Shupe, M. D.: Mountain waves and orographic precipitation in a northern Colorado winter storm, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 836–853, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2685, 2016. a, b
Kjelaas, A. G., Beran, D. W., Hooke, W. H., and Bean, B. R.: Waves Observed in the Planetary Boundary Layer using an Array of Acoustic Sounders, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 2040–2045, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<2040:WOITPB>2.0.CO;2, 1974. a, b, c
Koch, S. E. and Golus, R. E.: A Mesoscale Gravity Wave Event Observed during CCOPE. Part I: Multiscale Statistical Analysis of Wave Characteristics, Mon. Weather Rev., 116, 2527–2544, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1988)116<2527:AMGWEO>2.0.CO;2, 1988. a
Koch, S. E. and Siedlarz, L. M.: Mesoscale Gravity Waves and Their Environment in the Central United States during STORM-FEST, Mon. Weather Rev., 127, 2854–2879, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127%3C2854:MGWATE%3E2.0.CO;2, 1999. a
Leonardo, N. M. and Colle, B. A.: The Development of Snow Multi-Bands in High-Resolution Idealized Baroclinic Wave Simulations, https://ams.confex.com/ams/WAFNWPMS/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/425221 (last access: 5 February 2025), 2023. a
Lilly, J. M. and Olhede, S. C.: Generalized Morse Wavelets as a Superfamily of Analytic Wavelets, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 60, 6036–6041, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2012.2210890, 2012. a
Lindzen, R. S. and Tung, K.-K.: Banded Convective Activity and Ducted Gravity Waves, Mon. Weather Rev., 104, 1602–1617, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<1602:BCAADG>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a, b
Ma, S., Ran, L., Cao, J., Jiao, B., and Zhou, K.: Characteristics for the sources and sinks of gravity waves in an orographic heavy snowfall event, Front. Earth Sci., 17, 604–619, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-021-0961-2, 2023. a
Mapes, B. E.: Gregarious Tropical Convection, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2026–2037, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2026:GTC>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Markowski, P. and Richardson, Y.: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470682104, 2010. a
McAnelly, R. L., Nachamkin, J. E., Cotton, W. R., and Nicholls, M. E.: Upscale Evolution of MCSs: Doppler Radar Analysis and Analytical Investigation, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 1083–1110, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<1083:UEOMDR>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Miller, M. A. and Allen, L. R.: Data for Objective identification of pressure wave events from networks of 1-Hz, high-precision sensors, [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8136536, 2023. a
Nicholls, M. E., Pielke, R. A., and Cotton, W. R.: Thermally Forced Gravity Waves in an Atmosphere at Rest, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1869–1884, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1869:TFGWIA>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: Automated Surface/Weather Observing Systems (ASOS/AWOS), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/automated-surface-weather-observing-systems (last access: 11 July 2024), 2021a. a, b, c
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: Global BUFR Data Stream: Upper Air Reports from the National Weather Service Telecommunications Gateway (NWS TG), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://doi.org/10.7289/V5X63K0Q, 2021b. a, b, c
NOAA National Weather Service Radar Operations Center: NOAA Next Generation Radar (NEXRAD) Level II Base Data, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://doi.org/10.7289/V5W9574V, 1991. a, b, c
Novak, D. R., Bosart, L. F., Keyser, D., and Waldstreicher, J. S.: An Observational Study of Cold Season–Banded Precipitation in Northeast U.S. Cyclones, Weather Forecast., 19, 993–1010, https://doi.org/10.1175/815.1, 2004. a, b
Olhede, S. and Walden, A.: Generalized Morse wavelets, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 50, 2661–2670, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.804066, 2002. a
Rasmussen, R., Dixon, M., Vasiloff, S., Hage, F., Knight, S., Vivekanandan, J., and Xu, M.: Snow Nowcasting Using a Real-Time Correlation of Radar Reflectivity with Snow Gauge Accumulation, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 42, 20–36, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0020:SNUART>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Ruppert, J. H., Koch, S. E., Chen, X., Du, Y., Seimon, A., Sun, Y. Q., Wei, J., and Bosart, L. F.: Mesoscale Gravity Waves and Midlatitude Weather: A Tribute to Fuqing Zhang, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E129–E156, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0005.1, 2022. a, b, c
Tomkins, L., Yuter, S. E., and Miller, M.: Low pressure tracks for northeast US winter storms from 1996–2023, [data set], https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AZ5W2, 2024a. a
Tomkins, L. M.: Synthesis of Radar-Observed Characteristics, Storm Structures, and Surface Snowfall Rates in 10+ Years of Northeast US Winter Storms, PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/items/e59f0b8b-1a9a-4119-b155-bfa58ab694e7 (last access: 5 February 2025), 2024. a
Tomkins, L. M., Mechem, D. B., Yuter, S. E., and Rhodes, S. R.: Regional Flow Conditions Associated with Stratocumulus Cloud-Eroding Boundaries over the Southeast Atlantic, Mon. Weather Rev., 149, 1903–1917, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0250.1, 2021. a
Tomkins, L. M., Yuter, S. E., Miller, M. A., and Allen, L. R.: Image muting of mixed precipitation to improve identification of regions of heavy snow in radar data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5515–5525, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5515-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d
Tomkins, L. M., Yuter, S. E., and Miller, M. A.: Dual adaptive differential threshold method for automated detection of faint and strong echo features in radar observations of winter storms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3377–3399, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3377-2024, 2024b. a
Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J.: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 974–1002, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0840040974, 1994. a
Yuter, S. E., Hader, J. D., Miller, M. A., and Mechem, D. B.: Abrupt cloud clearing of marine stratocumulus in the subtropical southeast Atlantic, Science, 361, 697–701, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar5836, 2018. a
Zhang, F.: Generation of Mesoscale Gravity Waves in Upper-Tropospheric Jet–Front Systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 440–457, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0440:GOMGWI>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b
Zhang, F., Koch, S. E., Davis, C. A., and Kaplan, M. L.: A survey of unbalanced flow diagnostics and their application, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 17, 165–183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-000-0001-1, 2000. a, b
Short summary
Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) are air oscillations in which buoyancy is the restoring force, and they may enhance precipitation under certain conditions. We used 3+ seasons of pressure data to identify GWs with wavelengths ≤ 170 km in the Toronto and New York metropolitan areas in the context of snow storms. We found only six GW events during snow storms, suggesting that GWs on those scales are uncommon at the two locations during snow storms and, thus, do not often enhance snowfall.
Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) are air oscillations in which buoyancy is the restoring force,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint