Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
ACP
Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1725-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1725-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 3
Research article
 | 
06 Feb 2025
Research article |  | 06 Feb 2025

Quantification of regional net CO2 flux errors in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) v10 model intercomparison project (MIP) ensemble using airborne measurements

Jeongmin Yun, Junjie Liu, Brendan Byrne, Brad Weir, Lesley E. Ott, Kathryn McKain, Bianca C. Baier, Luciana V. Gatti, and Sebastien C. Biraud

Viewed

Total article views: 926 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
590 240 96 926 118 86 81
  • HTML: 590
  • PDF: 240
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 926
  • Supplement: 118
  • BibTeX: 86
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Oct 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 926 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 909 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Feb 2025
Download
Short summary
This study quantifies errors in regional net surface–atmosphere CO2 flux estimates from an inverse model ensemble using airborne CO2 measurements. Our results show that flux error estimates based on observations significantly exceed those computed from the ensemble spread of flux estimates in regions with high fossil fuel emissions. This finding suggests the presence of systematic biases in the inversion estimates, associated with errors in the fossil fuel emissions common to all models.

Read more
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint