Articles | Volume 25, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16945-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16945-2025
Research article
 | 
27 Nov 2025
Research article |  | 27 Nov 2025

A nitrate photolysis source of tropospheric HONO is incompatible with current understanding of atmospheric chemistry

Matthew J. Rowlinson, Lucy J. Carpenter, Mat J. Evans, James D. Lee, Simone T. Andersen, Tomas Sherwen, Anna B. Callaghan, Roberto Sommariva, William Bloss, Siqi Hou, Leigh R. Crilley, Klaus Pfeilsticker, Benjamin Weyland, Thomas B. Ryerson, Patrick R. Veres, Pedro Campuzano-Jost, Hongyu Guo, Benjamin A. Nault, Jose L. Jimenez, and Khanneh Wadinga Fomba

Viewed

Total article views: 1,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,037 144 33 1,214 49 32 41
  • HTML: 1,037
  • PDF: 144
  • XML: 33
  • Total: 1,214
  • Supplement: 49
  • BibTeX: 32
  • EndNote: 41
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,214 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,214 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
HONO is key to tropospheric chemistry. Observations show high HONO concentrations in remote air, possibly explained by nitrate aerosol photolysis. We use observations to parameterize nitrate photolysis, evaluating simulated HONO against observations from multiple sources. We show improved agreement with observed HONO, but overestimates in NOx and O3, beyond observational constraints. This implies uncertainties in the NOx budget and our understanding of atmospheric chemistry.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint