Articles | Volume 25, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13815-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13815-2025
Research article
 | 
27 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 27 Oct 2025

Quantification of anthropogenic and marine sources to atmospheric mercury over the marginal seas of China and impact on the sea–air exchange of mercury

Xiaofei Qin, Hao Li, Jia Chen, Junjie Wei, Hao Ding, Xiaohao Wang, Guochen Wang, Chengfeng Liu, Da Lu, Shengqian Zhou, Haowen Li, Yucheng Zhu, Ziwei Liu, Qingyan Fu, Juntao Huo, Yanfen Lin, Congrui Deng, Yisheng Zhang, and Kan Huang
Abstract

Mercury in the atmosphere is a crucial environmental concern due to its toxicity and its ability to travel long distances. In the marginal seas, the contributions of terrestrial anthropogenic vs. natural sources on atmospheric mercury have rarely been quantified and their roles in mercury sea–air exchange are not well understood. To address this issue, this study integrated observations from island, cruise, and inland campaigns. The mean concentrations of total gaseous mercury (TGM) were 2.32 ± 1.02 ng m−3 (Bohai Sea), 2.55 ± 0.55 ng m−3 (Yellow Sea), and 2.31 ± 0.81 ng m−3 (East China Sea), respectively, with coastal regions exhibiting significantly higher values than open ocean areas due to continental outflows. Positive correlations were observed between TGM concentrations and environmental parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed, indicating the significant influence of natural sources on atmospheric mercury in the marine environment. By utilizing a receptor model and linear regression analysis, a robust method was developed to quantitatively estimate the contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to TGM. Anthropogenic sources accounted for an average of 59 %, 40 %, and 27 % of TGM over the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea, respectively. The sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury were estimated as 0.17 ± 0.38, 1.10 ± 1.34, and 3.44 ± 3.24 ng m−2 h−1 over these three seas, respectively. Stronger anthropogenic mercury emissions in northern China partially explained the suppressed sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury in the Bohai Sea. This study elucidated the role of anthropogenic emissions in shaping the marine atmospheric mercury and the sea–air exchange fluxes, thereby informing valuable assessments regarding the influence of future reduced anthropogenic mercury emissions on the marine mercury cycle and ecosystems.

Share
1 Introduction

Mercury is a ubiquitous toxic pollutant that can cycle among atmospheric, aquatic, and terrestrial environments (Mason et al., 2012; Lamborg et al., 2014). Anthropogenic discharge of mercury can be transported into marine atmospheres, subsequently entering oceans via wet and dry depositions, constituting a primary source of marine mercury (Outridge et al., 2018). A fraction of the mercury that enters oceans can undergo methylation and bioaccumulate in the food chain, thereby posing health risks to humans through the consumption of methylmercury-contaminated seafood; another fraction converts to dissolved gaseous mercury and can escape from surface seawater through sea–air exchange processes (Lavoie et al., 2018; Obrist et al., 2018). This sea–air exchange is pivotal to the biogeochemical cycling of mercury, as it influences mercury concentrations in seawater, oceanic mercury accumulation rates, and methylmercury production (Mason et al., 2017; Ci et al., 2016). Simultaneously, the sea–air exchange of mercury represents the largest flux between different environmental media within the global mercury cycle. Previous estimates indicated that the release of gaseous elemental mercury from the global ocean contributes approximately one-third of the global atmospheric mercury emissions (Horowitz et al., 2017).

Numerous studies have emphasized the impact of anthropogenic sources on marine atmospheric mercury. For instance, one study conducted over the Bohai Sea revealed that the increased concentration of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) resulted from the long-range transport of mercury released from anthropogenic sources (Wang et al., 2020). An island investigation over the East China Sea showed the outflow from mainland China to be the primary contributor to atmospheric GEM (Fu et al., 2018). Cruises campaigns over the East China Sea and South China Sea observed elevated GEM concentrations at sites proximate to mainland China, indicating the prominent influence of terrestrial emissions (Fu et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016a). Additionally, studies in the Gulf of Mexico, North Atlantic Ocean, and Mediterranean Sea also attributed significant portions of atmospheric mercury to anthropogenic emissions (Obrist et al., 2018). Although isotopic signatures have been widely applied to source apportionment of atmospheric mercury, current isotopic methods still exhibit significant uncertainties due to the poor understanding of isotopic compositions of gaseous elemental mercury emitted from various sources and fractionation processes of Hg isotopes during atmospheric transformations (Fu et al., 2018). Additionally, this approach requires specialized isotopic measurements unavailable for routine monitoring. At present, quantitative analyses of anthropogenic contributions to marine atmospheric mercury remain limited. Although annual global anthropogenic atmospheric mercury emissions have been approximated to reach 2300 t, accounting for about one-third of global atmospheric mercury emission (Pirrone et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2016), the specific contributions to marine atmospheric mercury remained poorly delineated, thereby constraining insights into the oceanic mercury cycling dynamics. In this regard, it is imperative to develop methodologies capable of quantifying the contributions from anthropogenic sources to marine atmospheric mercury, particularly in critical marginal seas, which served as essential biogeochemical interfaces between landmasses and open oceans. Previous studies have indicated that the importance of the mercury cycling in offshore ecosystems approximated that within open oceanic environments (Fitzgerald et al., 2007), and that marginal seas function not only as natural sinks for terrestrial mercury but also represent significant sources of atmospheric mercury (Ci et al., 2011). Given that China ranks as the foremost global emitter of anthropogenic atmospheric mercury (Pacyna et al., 2016, 2010; Zhang et al., 2015), its emissions inevitably exert profound influences on adjacent marginal seas.

Anthropogenic inputs influence not only the concentrations of atmospheric mercury but also the dynamics of mercury sea–air exchange. Given that Hg0 in the surface oceanic waters frequently exceeds its saturation levels, the prevailing direction of sea–air exchange is predominantly upward, facilitating the efflux of mercury from the ocean to the atmosphere (Andersson et al., 2008b; Mason et al., 2001; Huang and Zhang, 2021). The sea–air exchange of Hg0 is governed by the concentration gradients at the atmosphere–seawater interface (Soerensen et al., 2013), which are influenced by the spectrum of physical and chemical processes within seawater, as well as meteorological conditions and ambient GEM concentrations (Costa and Liss, 1999; Mason, 2009; Selin, 2009). Previous studies illuminated the direct impact of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in surface waters on Hg0 fluxes, while photochemical reduction of Hg (II) has been identified as the principal mechanism driving DGM generation in marine settings (Amyot et al., 1994; Huang and Zhang, 2021). Field measurements observed nocturnal peaks in DGM and Hg0 fluxes, implying that dark reduction processes may significantly contribute to these dynamics (O'Driscoll et al., 2003; Fu et al., 2013). Hg0 fluxes increased 2–4-fold as a result of strengthened wind speeds coupled with Hg (II) inputs from atmospheric precipitation in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) region (Soerensen et al., 2014). While considerable research has elucidated the factors influencing the mercury sea–air exchange, few studies have comprehensively explored the repercussions of fluctuating GEM concentrations on Hg0 sea–air dynamics. Given the backdrop of observed annual declines in GEM concentrations (−0.011± 0.006 ng m−3 yr−1) across most Northern Hemispheric regions from 2005 to 2020 (Feinberg et al., 2024) and particularly pronounced declines (−0.29 ng m−3) in China from 2013 to 2017 (Liu et al., 2019), conducting such a study in marginal seas is essential.

Under the influence of Chinese mainland emissions, mercury pollution in its adjacent marginal seas, such as the East China Sea, Yellow Sea, and Bohai Sea, exhibits pronounced severity. The East China Sea and Yellow Sea, as semi-enclosed seas, are located in the downwind region of East Asia and serve as a major pathway for the transport of pollutants to the Pacific Ocean. The Bohai Sea, as an inland sea, has received a substantial amount of pollutants from the Chinese mainland, making it one of the most mercury-polluted seas in the world (Luo et al., 2012). By focusing on the marginal seas surrounding China, this study integrates observations from two offshore islands, one research cruise, and a coastal city to reveal the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of total gaseous mercury (TGM) and DGM. The impact of oceanic meteorological conditions on the atmospheric mercury over the ocean is explored, particularly examining the effects of anthropogenic sources transported from the mainland. Furthermore, we develop a method to quantify the contributions from anthropogenic sources to marine atmospheric mercury and ultimately assess how these inputs shape mercury sea–air exchange dynamics.

2 Methods

2.1 Study area

The study area, illustrated in Fig. 1a, encompasses the Bohai Sea (BS), the Yellow Sea (YS), and the East China Sea (ECS). The BS, a shallow inner sea bordered by Liaoning, Hebei, and Shandong provinces, covers around 77×103 km2. The YS, situated between mainland China and the Korean Peninsula, covers around 38×104 km2. The ECS, a semi-enclosed marginal sea positioned downwind of East Asia, extends over 77×104 km2. Field measurements were conducted at Juehua Island (JHI) in the BS, approximately 10 km from Xingcheng City, Liaoning Province. Due to its proximity to the mainland, JHI experienced marked impacts from anthropogenic emissions (Li et al., 2023). Field measurements were also conducted at Huaniao Island (HNI) in the ECS, approximately 80 km from Shanghai. Although local anthropogenic emissions were negligible there, this island was frequently affected by terrestrial transport during winter and spring, when prevailing northwesterly winds dominated (Fu et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2016). A cruise campaign was conducted aboard the research vessel (R/V) Dongfanghong III. The cruise routes, as shown in Fig. 1a, covered most of the YS and ECS regions. Land-based measurements were conducted at a super site (Dianshan Lake, DSL) in the rural Shanghai Qingpu District. This super site is located at the intersection of Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f01

Figure 1(a) The locations of two island sites (JHI and HNI) and one inland site (DSL) denoted by purple stars. The spatial distribution of TGM concentrations over the East China Sea (ECS) and the Yellow Sea (YS) is shown along the cruise routes. The time series of TGM concentrations are measured at (b) JHI, (c) HNI, and (d) ECS+YS, respectively.

2.2 TGM/GEM measurements

TGM measurements were performed utilizing a modified Tekran 2600 instrument across various locations and timeframes, i.e., JHI from 2 December 2020 to 1 January 2021, HNI from 14 October to 4 November 2020, and aboard the R/V Dongfanghong III from 29 December 2019 to 16 January 2020. The Tekran 2600 monitor operated similarly to Tekran 2537B, which is widely used for continuous collection and analysis of atmospheric mercury (Sprovieri et al., 2016; Landis and Keeler, 2002). During the operation of the modified Tekran 2600, atmospheric mercury was adsorbed onto the first gold trap over a 24 min sampling period. After sampling, the mercury on the first gold trap was thermally desorbed and transferred to the second gold trap. The second trap was then analyzed by the detector during a 6 min detection phase, resulting in an overall 30 min sample resolution. To ensure data quality during cruise observations, the instrument was calibrated daily using the external calibration unit Tekran 2505. Samples were pre-dried via a soda lime drying tube prior to detector entry to prevent humidity interference. Additionally, the drying tube and Teflon filter underwent replacement bi-weekly to maintain optimal performance.

GEM measurements were conducted at DSL in Shanghai from October to December 2020, employing the atmospheric mercury monitoring system (Tekran 2537B/1130/1135) as documented in our prior study (Qin et al., 2020). Briefly, GEM was captured utilizing dual gold cartridges at a flow rate of 1.0 L min−1 and 5 min intervals. Subsequently, GEM underwent thermal decomposition for detection via CVAFS. During the sampling process, rigorous quality controls were applied. Prior to sampling, denuders and quartz filters were duly prepared and cleansed adhered to Tekran technical directives. To ensure accuracy, calibration was routinely executed every 47 h using an internal permeation source, alongside manual injections of standard saturated mercury vapor. For the Tekran 2537B, the average duplication rate between the A and B traps is 99 %, with deviations between the two traps consistently below 3 %. To mitigate the impact of high humidity on the instrument, samples are first passed through a soda lime drying tube for dehumidification before entering the detector. Further, the KCl-coated denuder, Teflon-coated glass inlet, and impactor plate were swapped weekly, while the quartz filters underwent monthly replacement.

It is noteworthy that TGM in the atmosphere comprises GEM and gaseous oxidized mercury. Generally, GEM constitutes over 95 % of atmospheric mercury (Mao et al., 2016), particularly in the marine boundary layer, including China's marginal seas (Wang et al., 2016b; Fu et al., 2018; Ci et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2019a). Therefore, this study does not differentiate between TGM and GEM, conforming to analogous treatments in existing research (Fu et al., 2018; Ci et al., 2011).

2.3 DGM measurement

The procedure for DGM collection from seawater adhered to that described in previous studies (Gardfeldt et al., 2003; O'Driscoll et al., 2003). The sampling process involved the following steps. First, 1.5 L of surface seawater was collected in a Teflon bottle and subsequently transferred into a borosilicate glass bottle. An introduction of free-Hg argon at approximately 500 mL min−1 purged the seawater for 60 min to extract the DGM onto a gold trap, aided by a soda lime tube deployed to extract water vapor prior to the gold trap. The gold trap was maintained at  50 °C during extraction to prevent water vapor condensation. The DGM stored in the gold trap was measured using the Tekran 2600 post-sampling. To assure quality, stringent assurance and control measures were enacted through replicated field blank experiments. DGM excised from an equivalent volume of Milli-Q water served as the analytical system blank, encompassing a total of 12 blank experiments during field samplings at JHI and HNI, as well as during the R/V measurements. The mean system blank calculated was 2.5 ± 1.3 pg L−1 (n=20), with a detection limit of 3.4 pg L−1.

2.4 Ancillary data

At JHI, water-soluble ions in PM2.5, including sulfate (SO42-), nitrate (NO3-), ammonium (NH4+), chloride (Cl), sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), and calcium (Ca2+), alongside the soluble gases such as ammonia (NH3) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), were continuously monitored using an in-situ gas and aerosol composition monitoring system (IGAC) (Wang et al., 2022). IGAC operated at a 1 h temporal resolution and consisted of a wet annular denuder (WAD) and ion chromatography (IC) equipped with columns CS17 and CG17 for cations and AG11-HC and AS11-HC for anions. Ambient air was drawn into a PM2.5 cyclone inlet by a built-in pump at a flow rate of 16.7 L min−1. The sampled air was separated by passing it through the vertically placed WAD to capture water-soluble gases, and airborne particles were collected by a steam scrubber and impact aerosol collector placed downstream. Air samples were dissolved by 30 mL ultra-pure water (18.25 MΩ cm−1) and then divided into two steams. Both aqueous samples (including particles and gases) were injected into the IC system by two separated syringe pumps for analyzing the cations and anions. For quality assurance/quality control of IGAC, a standardized lithium bromide (LiBr) solution was continuously introduced into aerosol liquid samples during the campaign to validate sampling and analytical stability. Weekly calibrations were performed for the IC module using certified standard solutions, with linearity (R2>0.99) and detection limits validated. Black carbon (BC) in PM2.5 was measured continuously using a multi-wavelength Aethalometer (AE-33, Magee Scientific, USA). Meteorological parameters were measured using a Vaisala WXT530 surface weather station (Vaisala, Finland). Surface seawater temperature was recorded by a YSI EC300 portable conductivity meter (YSI, USA) with a resolution of 0.1 °C.

At HNI, methods for analyzing meteorological parameters, BC, and surface seawater temperature mirrored those employed at JHI.

During the cruise campaign, the meteorological metrics (e.g., air temperature, wind speed/direction) and surface seawater temperature were collected from the Finnish Vaisala AWS430 shipborne weather station onboard the R/V. AE-33 was also used for BC measurements during the cruise.

At DSL, water-soluble ions in PM2.5 and soluble gases were also measured by the IGAC instrument. Trace metals in PM2.5 (Al, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, As, Sr, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, Tl, Pb, and Bi) were continuously measured using an Xact multi-metals monitor (Model Xact™ 625, Cooper Environmental Services LLT, OR, USA). It operated at a flow rate of 16.7 L min−1 with hourly resolution. Particles in the airflow passed through a PM2.5 cyclone inlet and were deposited onto a Teflon filter tape, then the samples were transported into a spectrometer for analysis via nondestructive energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence.

Planetary boundary layer (PBL) height data were obtained from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) archive maintained by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), available through the READY (Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem) portal (https://www.ready.noaa.gov/archives.php, last access: 11 May 2025). The dataset, featuring 1 h temporal resolution, was processed and extracted using MATLAB R2021b (MathWorks, Natick, MA).

2.5 Positive matrix factorization (PMF)

The PMF model is recognized for its efficacy in elucidating source profiles and quantifying source contributions (Paatero and Tapper, 1994). The underlying principle of PMF posits that sample concentration is dictated by source profiles with disparate contributions, mathematically represented as

(1) X i j = k = 1 P g i k f k j + e i j ,

where Xij represents the concentration of the jth species in the ith sample, gik is the contribution of the kth factor in the ith sample, fkj provides the information about the mass fraction of the jth species in the kth factor, eij is the residual for specific measurement, and P represents the number of factors.

The objective function, defined in Eq. (2) below, represents the sum of the squared differences between measured and modeled concentrations, weighted by concentration uncertainties. Minimizing this function allows the PMF model to determine optimal non-negative factor profiles and contributions:

(2) Q = i = 1 n j = 1 m X i j - k = 1 p A i k F k j S i j 2 ,

where Xij denotes the concentration of the jth pollutant in the ith sample, Aik represents the contribution of the kth factor to the ith sample, Fkj is the mass fraction of the jth pollutant in the kth factor, Sij is the uncertainty of the jth pollutant in the ith sample, and p is the number of factors. A detailed description can be seen in the previous study (Paatero and Tapper, 1994).

TGM, air temperature (unit: Kelvin), gaseous pollutants, and major aerosol chemical species were used as inputs for the PMF model. We tested factor numbers ranging from 3 to 8, with the optimal solution determined by analyzing the slope of the Q-value versus factor count. Model stability was assessed through residual analysis, correlation coefficients between observed and predicted concentrations, and Q-value trends. A six-factor solution at DSL and a five-factor solution at JHI provided the most stable and interpretable results.

At DSL, we selected observational data from October to December 2020 (totaling 1080 valid data points) for PMF modeling to align with the HNI observational campaign. At JHI, observational data from 2 to 30 December 2020 (totaling 675 valid data points) were used for PMF analysis.

2.6 Sea–air exchange flux

The sea–air exchange fluxes of Hg0 were calculated via the following equation (Andersson et al., 2008a; Wanninkhof, 1992; Wangberg et al., 2001):

(3) F = K w ( C w - C a / H ) ,

where F is the sea–air exchange flux, Kw represents the gas exchange velocity, Cw and Ca represent the DGM concentration in seawater and the TGM concentration in the atmosphere, respectively, and H is the dimensionless Henry's law coefficient of Hg0 between the atmosphere and seawater. Then Kw is calculated as follows (Soerensen et al., 2010b; Nightingale et al., 2000):

(4) K w = 0.31 u 10 2 ( Sc Hg / 660 ) - 0.5 ,

where u10 is 10 m wind speed, ScHg is the Schmidt number of Hg0, and 660 is the Schmidt number of CO2 in 20 °C seawater (Poissant et al., 2000). The Schmidt number for Hg (ScHg) was calculated as

(5) Sc Hg = v / D Hg ,

where v is the seawater kinematic viscosity (Wanninkhof, 2014) and DHg is the diffusion coefficient of Hg (Kuss et al., 2009).

Then H is calculated as (Andersson et al., 2008a)

(6) H = exp ( - 2403.3 / T + 6.92 ) ,

where T is the surface seawater temperature in K.

3 Results and discussions

3.1 Characteristics of TGM over Chinese marginal seas

Figure 1b–d shows the time series of TGM concentrations measured during three field campaigns, including 2 December 2020 to 1 January 2021 at Juehua Island (JHI), 14 October to 4 November 2020 at Huaniao Island (HNI), and 29 December 2019 to 16 January 2020 over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (YS/ECS). The mean TGM concentrations during the three periods were 2.32 ± 1.02, 1.85 ± 0.74, and 2.25 ± 0.66 ng m−3, respectively. TGM at JHI exhibited pronounced fluctuations, frequently surpassing high values of 6 ng m−3, which was attributed to the enhanced coal combustion for residential heating in winter (Li et al., 2023). Conversely, TGM at HNI and across the YS/ECS demonstrated fewer fluctuations, with concentrations predominantly remaining below 6 ng m−3. The cruise campaign unveiled the spatial distribution of TGM over the ocean (Fig. 1a), generally showing its decreasing trend with the increased distance away from the continent. Specifically, hot spots were observed in the eastern oceanic region of Jiangsu Province, the Changjiang estuary, and the outer sea close to the Hangzhou Bay. The continental outflows likely explained this phenomenon. The mean TGM concentrations reached 2.36 ± 0.65 and 2.16 ± 0.81 ng m−3 over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, respectively, significantly higher than the background level in the Northern Hemisphere (1.58 ± 0.31 ng m−3) (Bencardino et al., 2024) and also surpassing measurements recorded in the other open ocean areas such as the South China Sea (1.52 ± 0.32 ng m−3), Mediterranean Sea (1.8 ± 1.0 ng m−3), Bering Sea (1.1 ± 0.3 ng m−3), Pacific Ocean (1.15–1.32 ng m−3), and Atlantic Ocean (1.63 ± 0.08 ng m−3) (Laurier and Mason, 2007; Soerensen et al., 2010a; Mastromonaco et al., 2017; Kalinchuk et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019b). Analyses of 72 h air mass backward trajectories revealed that air masses over the YS predominantly originated from Liaoning and Inner Mongolia provinces in northern China, whereas trajectories over the ECS were largely dispersed across the ocean and Eastern China (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). This divergence may be one of the reasons why the TGM concentration in the YS was higher than that in the ECS.

The diurnal variations of TGM concentrations along with ambient temperature and sun flux during the three periods are displayed in Fig. 2. At HNI, TGM commenced increasing at 07:00 LT (UTC+8), peaking at around 2.44 ng m−3 by 12:00 LT, subsequently declining and stabilizing post 06:00 LT. The mean TGM concentration during daytime (06:00–18:00 LT) (2.00 ± 0.80 ng m−3) surpassed that of nighttime (1.66 ± 0.40 ng m−3) (t-test, p<0.001). The TGM diurnal pattern displayed strong concordance with temperature and solar flux (Fig. 2a), indicative of significant impacts from natural sources (Osterwalder et al., 2021; Huang and Zhang, 2021; Mason et al., 2001). At JHI (Fig. 2b), TGM also rose around early morning and peaked at 2.65 ng m−3 by 10:00 LT, with nocturnal levels markedly increasing from 2.12 ng m−3 at 06:00 LT to 2.60 ng m−3 at 11:00 LT. During daytime, TGM generally showed consistent variation with temperature and sun flux, indicating the influence of natural mercury release. However, the notable frequency of nocturnal peaks suggested that in addition to natural sources, TGM measured at JHI was also significantly affected by anthropogenic sources and unfavorable atmospheric diffusion conditions, specifically from coal combustion for the winter residential heating in northern China (Li et al., 2023). The diurnal pattern of TGM throughout the cruise campaign diverged from those of HNI and JHI, lacking a consistent relationship with temperature and sun flux. This was mainly because the cruise sampling was variable in both the temporal and spatial scales.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f02

Figure 2Diurnal variations of TGM, ambient temperature, and sun flux at (a) HNI, (b) JHI, and (c) the YS/ECS cruise, respectively.

Download

Positive correlations between TGM concentrations and ambient temperature at both HNI and JHI were observed, yielding R2 values of 0.53 and 0.60, respectively (Fig. 3a, b). Since temperature played a crucial role in Hg0 release from natural surfaces (Lindberg et al., 1998; Poissant et al., 2000), the evident correlation between TGM and temperature exemplified the significant effects of natural surface emissions.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f03

Figure 3Relationship between TGM concentration and temperature, relative humidity (RH), planetary boundary layer (PBL) height, and wind speed (WS) at (a) HNI, (b) JHI, and (c) YS/ECS, respectively.

Download

Positive correlations were also observed between TGM, relative humidity, and wind speed at both HNI and JHI (Fig. 3). The positive correlation between humidity and TGM may be due to the fact that high humidity is typically associated with the stable atmospheric stratification, which promoted the accumulation of TGM. As for wind speed, it is a key parameter influencing air–sea exchange in the double-membrane theory model (Wanninkhof, 1992). For example, Soerensen et al. (2014) found a 2–4 times greater Hg0 flux due to the high wind speed in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) region.

At HNI, TGM increased concurrently with rising planetary boundary layer (PBL) heights from around 380 to 1000 m, yet decreased with further increase in PBL beyond around 1000 m (Fig. 3a). This observed diurnal pattern of TGM may primarily stem from the interplay between temperature-driven natural surface emissions and atmospheric dilution effects. When the PBL height was below 1 km, its increase coincided with rising temperature. Under these conditions, the enhancement of natural surface emissions due to temperature outweighed the dilution effect caused by the developed PBL, leading to increased TGM concentrations. Afterwards, as the PBL height continued to rise, the dilution effect gradually surpassed the temperature-driven emission enhancement, resulting in a decline of TGM concentrations. In contrast, the similar phenomenon lacked manifestation at JHI, where TGM concentrations decreased with the increase of PBL (Fig. 3b). Due to the significantly lower marine mercury emissions in the BS (Wang et al., 2020) than in the ECS (Wang et al., 2016a), this phenomenon was likely ascribed to the fact that the natural release around JHI was weaker than that around HNI, and thus the dilution effect of elevated PBL overwhelmed the effect of natural surface emissions. Compared to HNI and JHI, the cruise campaign showed almost no relationship between TGM and temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, or PBL height (Fig. 3c), with similar reasons as those discussed for the diurnal variation of TGM.

3.2 Influence of continental outflows on marine TGM

The potential source regions of TGM at HNI and JHI are illustrated in Fig. S2. At HNI, TGM mainly derived from the lands of Jiangsu Province and vast coastal waters of the East China Sea, while at JHI, the hot spots of TGM were mainly located in the southern Mongolia and Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regions. This indicated that the relatively high TGM concentrations at the coastal islands were closely related to the continental outflows. Using HNI as an example, Fig. S3 compares the daily mean TGM concentration at HNI with the daily mean concentrations of CO, SO2, and PM2.5 in nearby coastal cities including Zhoushan, Ningbo, Jiaxing, Shanghai, and Ningbo. Consistently temporal variations were observed between TGM and these pollutants, particularly for the peak concentrations, further confirming that offshore TGM concentrations were significantly influenced by continental outflows.

To assess the impact of anthropogenic sources on marine TGM, the daily TGM concentrations at HNI and DSL (a suburban site in the Yangtze River Delta, Fig. 1a) were compared (Fig. 4a). Their concentration time series exhibited moderate agreement, suggesting potential land-sea interactions. Furthermore, the correlation between TGM and BC at DSL was pronounced (R2=0.56, Fig. 4b). This was expected, as BC primarily originated from fossil fuel combustion (Li et al., 2021; Briggs and Long, 2016), which was also the major anthropogenic source of TGM (Pacyna et al., 2006; Streets et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2019). In contrast, the correlation between TGM and BC at HNI was much weaker (R2=0.34, Fig. 4c). Being an offshore site, HNI could be more strongly influenced by natural sources than DSL.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f04

Figure 4(a) Comparison of the daily TGM concentrations between DSL and HNI; Correlation between TGM and BC at (b) DSL and (c) HNI; (d) Comparison of the TGM/BC ratio between DSL and HNI; (e) Spatial distribution of the TGM/BC ratio along the cruise routes over the ECS and YS.

To evaluate the relative importance of anthropogenic and natural sources to TGM, the ratio of TGM/BC was introduced as a qualitative index. Since TGM and BC shared common anthropogenic sources, and TGM had additional natural sources, an increase in the TGM/BC ratio may indicate the growing importance of natural source contributions, and vice versa. Figure 4d shows that the TGM/BC ratio at DSL (mean of 1.6 ng µg−1) was substantially lower than that at HNI (5.2 ng µg−1). On one hand, lower contribution of anthropogenic sources to TGM in the coastal environment compared to the urban environment was expected. On the other hand, BC deposited more quickly than TGM, thus also elevating the TGM/BC ratios at locations far from emission sources. The cruise measurement illustrated the spatial distribution of the TGM/BC ratio over YS/ECS (Fig. 4e). In the East China Sea, the TGM/BC ratio increased with increasing distances away from the coasts. For instance, the TGM/BC ratio near the coasts ranged from 0.3 to 5.2 ng µg−1, while offshore values generally fluctuated between 8.6 and 22.9 ng µg−1. This indicated the contribution of natural sources to TGM obviously increased over the open ocean waters. However, this spatial trend was not observed in the Yellow Sea. As depicted in Fig. 4e, the very northern, western, and eastern cruise legs in the Yellow Sea showed relatively low TGM/BC ratios compared to the other cruise periods. This phenomenon should be due to the Yellow Sea being a comparatively enclosed basin, as these cruise legs above were geographically close to Liaoning Province in northeast China, the North China Plain, and the Korean Peninsula. Thus, more influences from the terrestrial emissions induced the low TGM/BC ratios.

3.3 Quantification of anthropogenic vs. marine sources to TGM

Based on the discussions above, it is essential to disentangle the anthropogenic and natural sources of atmospheric mercury. Here, the PMF model was employed for the comprehensive dataset obtained at DSL and JHI, respectively. Considering the direct correlation between temperature and the natural release of atmospheric mercury (Wang et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2016) and the indirect correlation between ammonia and the natural release of atmospheric mercury (Qin et al., 2019), we utilized temperature and ammonia as indicators of natural atmospheric mercury sources, which has been proven feasible (Qin et al., 2020). Inputs for PMF also encompassed SO42-, Cl, NO3-, Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, SO2, NO, Pb, Fe, K, Cr, Se, Ca, V, Mn, As, and Ni. While running the PMF model, we tested different numbers of factors from three to eight and determined the optimal solutions through analyzing the slope of the Q values in relation to the number of factors. The analyses revealed that a six-factor solution for DSL and a five-factor solution for JHI produced the most robust and coherent interpretations.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f05

Figure 5Source apportionment of TGM at (a) DSL and (b) JHI; Linear relationship between BC and anthropogenic TGM at (c) DSL and (d) JHI.

Download

As detailed in Fig. 5a, six distinct factors were resolved by PMF at DSL. The factor characterized by high loadings of temperature, NH3, and TGM represented the natural surface emissions of mercury. A second factor with notable loading of V and moderate loading of Ni was ascribed to be shipping emissions, as V has been considered a typical tracer of heavy-oil combustion, which is commonly in marine vessels (Viana et al., 2009). The dust and cement production was associated with a factor exhibiting prominent Ca loading. The factor displaying high loading of Cr and moderate loadings of Fe and Mn was attributed to iron and steel production. Another factor, categorized by elevated NO levels, was linked to vehicle emissions. Finally, the factor with high loadings of SO42-, Pb, K, Se, and As was indicative of coal combustion. PMF results indicated that the contributions of anthropogenic and natural sources to TGM were approximately 48 % and 52 % at DSL, respectively. By applying the same PMF modeling strategy at JHI, the contributions of anthropogenic and natural sources to TGM at JHI were 59 % and 41 %, respectively (Fig. 5b). The source apportionment results signified substantial influences of both human and natural factors on TGM levels, with their contributions being nearly equivalent. Furthermore, correlation analysis was conducted between the absolute contribution of anthropogenic sources to GEM and BC, yielding strong correlations at both DSL (anthropogenic TGM = (0.424 ± 0.014)  BC + (0.171 ± 0.032), R2= 0.88, Fig. 5c) and JHI (anthropogenic TGM = (0.362 ± 0.009)  BC + (0.431 ± 0.044), R2= 0.86, Fig. 5d), respectively. It should be noted that BC was not included in PMF modeling, thus the robust relationship between anthropogenic GEM and BC suggested that BC can serve as a viable indicator for quantifying anthropogenic contributions to TGM.

To validate the robustness of this relationship in different years, we derived the relationship between anthropogenic GEM and BC at DSL before 2020 based on the same methodology. It can be found that the regression equation during the winter of previous years was close to that obtained during this study period (Fig. S5). In fact, the mercury emissions (Feng et al., 2024) and black carbon emissions (Geng et al., 2024) were quite stable in the neighboring years of this study period. For instance, China's anthropogenic GEM emissions in 2019 and 2020 were 194.2 and 191.8 t, respectively, showing negligible changes. Thus, it can be assumed that the relationship between anthropogenic GEM and BC remained relatively constant.

Based on the results above, the regression formulas obtained from DSL and JHI were further applied to the cruise observation for the purpose of differentiating the anthropogenic and natural fractions of TGM over the ocean. The following criteria were applied. If the air mass backward trajectories (purple segments in Fig. S5) primarily originated from northern China, the JHI-derived formula was employed; if the air mass backward trajectories (green segments in Fig. S5) passed through the Yangtze River Delta region or hovered over the East China Sea, the DSL-derived formula was enacted. Due to the uncertainties of regression slopes and intercepts of the regression formulas, this approach caused around 5 % uncertainties on differentiating the anthropogenic and natural fractions of TGM.

Time series of mass concentrations of anthropogenic and natural TGM in different coastal and oceanic regions after applying the above equations are shown in Fig. S6. Concentrations of anthropogenic TGM at HNI, JHI, ECS, and YS were 0.61 ± 0.29, 1.28 ± 0.75, 0.59 ± 0.41, and 0.92 ± 0.25 ng m−3, respectively. And the concentrations of natural TGM were 1.19 ± 0.45, 0.88 ± 0.26, 1.57 ± 0.53, and 1.38 ± 0.51 ng m−3 at the four locations above, respectively. To ensure the reliability of these results, the relationship between natural TGM and temperature was explored, yielding R2 values of 0.92, 0.76, 0.75, and 0.63 at HNI, JHI, ECS, and YS, respectively (Fig. 6). The correlation was significantly stronger than that between the total TGM and temperature, particularly in the ECS and YS regions, where no correlations were observed (Fig. 3c). This proved that the quantitative method established above was reliable.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f06

Figure 6(a–d) Relationship between natural TGM and temperature at HNI, JHI, ECS, and YS, respectively. (e) Spatial distribution of the relative contributions of anthropogenic and natural sources to TGM concentrations along the cruise routes. The mean contributions over JHI, HNI, DSL, ECS, and YS are denoted by the pie charts.

The anthropogenic contributions to TGM along the cruise routes are plotted in Fig. 6e, demonstrating significantly higher values near the coastal zones compared to the open ocean areas. In detail, anthropogenic contributions to TGM near the East China Sea coastal zones reached as high as 60 %–88 %, while the contributions diminished quickly to 15 %–25 % over the open oceans. From the northern oceanic regions to the southern counterparts, the contribution of anthropogenic sources to TGM generally exhibited a decreasing trend, with values of around 59 %, 40 %, 34 %, and 27 % over JHI, YS, HNI, and ECS, respectively. In comparison, previous isotope-based source apportionment studies revealed anthropogenic contributions of 29 % and 42 % to TGM in remote areas like Changbai Mountain and Ailao Mountain (Wu et al., 2023). In general, the isotope-based results indicated that the relative contributions of anthropogenic emissions to surface GEM in remote China and urban China were around 30 % and 49 %, respectively (Fu et al., 2021; Feng et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2023). Notably, the anthropogenic contributions to TGM in this study from the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and Huaniao Island aligned closely with isotope-derived values from China's remote regions, while the DSL findings corresponded with urban isotope results. The elevated contribution observed at JHI (59 %) may be attributed to its proximity to the mainland (only 10 km away) and the sampling period occurring during the winter heating season, where continental transport influences were significant (Li et al., 2023). Furthermore, the values obtained in this study fell within comparable ranges to modeling study estimates (typically 33 % to 41 % on average) (Chen et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018). As shown in Fig. S1, the backward trajectories over the Yellow Sea segment were primarily influenced by air masses from the North China Plain and Liaoning Province. The relatively higher contribution of anthropogenic sources to the Yellow Sea during the cruise was likely attributable to the continental transport from northern China. In addition, during this cruise, the seawater temperature of the Yellow Sea was significantly lower than that of the East China Sea, which was unfavorable for the natural release of mercury.

3.4 Characteristics of sea–air exchange of mercury in various oceans

To determine the sea–air exchange flux of mercury, DGM concentrations in seawater were measured at all sampling sites during the cruise (Fig. S7). Figure S7 delineates the time series of DGM observed at JHI, YS, HNI, and ECS, with mean concentrations of 21.3 ± 4.8, 29.9 ± 6.1, 42.0 ± 9.4, and 39.7 ± 10.9 pg L−1, respectively. The DGM concentrations measured during this winter cruise campaign (22.9–39.7 pg L−1) were significantly lower than those recorded previously during summer and fall in similar regions (52.4–63.9 pg L−1) (Ci et al., 2011; Ci et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2016a), indicating a noticeable seasonal variation in DGM concentrations in the ECS and YS. This seasonal variation pattern of seawater DGM, with lower levels in winter compared to summer and autumn, can be attributed to the dynamic equilibrium between competing redox processes. This equilibrium can be represented as Hg2++ photo-reductants DGM + photo-oxidants (O'Driscoll et al., 2006). During warmer seasons, the higher temperature accelerated the volatilization of DGM from seawater and also drove the equilibrium toward Hg2+ reduction to replenish the lost DGM. Therefore, DGM concentrations in seawater were usually lower in winter due to suppressed redox processes. Spatially, DGM concentrations in the ECS were higher than those in the YS, likely due to the significantly higher sea surface temperature in the ECS (mean: 14.8 °C) compared to the YS (mean: 4.1 °C) during the cruise campaign. Higher temperatures not only favored the production of DGM in seawater (Costa and Liss, 1999; Andersson et al., 2011; Mason et al., 2001) but also promoted the escape of DGM from the water surface into the atmosphere (Osterwalder et al., 2021; Huang and Zhang, 2021). Additionally, we observed that DGM concentrations were higher in coastal waters, particularly near the Yangtze River Estuary, where the concentration reached 51.4 pg m−3. This suggested that continental inputs, such as river discharge, had a significant influence on DGM levels in nearshore waters (Chen et al., 2020; Kuss et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2016).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13815/2025/acp-25-13815-2025-f07

Figure 7(a–c) Sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury at JHI, YS, and ECS, respectively. (d) The spatial distribution of sea–air exchange flux of Hg0 during the cruise.

Figure 7 shows the time series and spatial distribution of sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury within the BS (represented by JHI), YS, and ECS, which were 0.17 ± 0.38, 1.10 ± 1.34, and 3.44 ± 3.24 ng m−2 h−1, respectively (Table S1 in the Supplement). It was evident that the Hg0 fluxes during winter in the ECS were the highest, followed by the YS and the BS. This finding coincided with the discussions above that natural TGM exhibited much higher concentrations in the ECS and YS than in the BS (Sect. 3.3). BS acted as a weak mercury source region and even a mercury sink sometimes (negative flux in Fig. 7a). Due to the higher concentrations and contributions of anthropogenic TGM in the BS, the release of mercury from the ocean was significantly suppressed, which likely explained the relatively low sea–air exchange flux of mercury there.

Overall, mercury fluxes observed during winter were lower than previous studies in other seasons, e.g., 4.6 ± 3.6 ng m−2 h−1 in ECS during summer (Wang et al., 2016a), 3.07 ± 3.03 ng m−2 h−1 in YS during spring (Wang et al., 2020), and 0.59 ± 1.13 ng m−2 h−1 in BS during fall (Wang et al., 2020).

4 Conclusions and implications

This study elucidated the effects of anthropogenic sources on atmospheric mercury concentrations across various marginal seas and the subsequent influence on sea–air exchange dynamics of mercury. Through comprehensive observations across island, cruise, and terrestrial settings, we delineated atmospheric mercury distribution characteristics within the Chinese marginal seas. The relationships between TGM and various environmental parameters suggested the significance of natural sources in constraining oceanic atmospheric mercury levels. Notably, TGM peaks recorded at terrestrial and island sites exemplified the influence of continental outflows on the marine TGM. The introduction of the TGM/BC ratio functioned as a qualitative proxy for assessing the extent of anthropogenic contributions. Furthermore, we articulated a quantitative methodology for assessing anthropogenic contributions to marine atmospheric mercury, revealing that these sources contributed 59 %, 40 %, and 27 % to atmospheric mercury levels across the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea, respectively. The winter sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury in these three seas were estimated as 0.169, 1.100, and 3.442 ng m−2 h−1, respectively, In regions where anthropogenic emissions were intense, sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury were evidently suppressed.

Conducting atmospheric mercury measurements over oceans presented considerable complexities compared to terrestrial observations, further compounded by challenges associated with determining atmospheric mercury sources in the oceanic environment. This study established a quantitative method grounded in extensive observations encompassing terrestrial, island, and marine contexts, facilitating estimations of anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric mercury solely predicated on atmospheric mercury and black carbon data. This methodology may offer valuable insights for analogous analyses of atmospheric mercury and other pollutants across diverse oceanic regions globally. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of the biogeochemical cycle of mercury and enhance our ability to evaluate its impacts on marine ecosystems and human health.

Code and data availability

The EPA PMF model code used in this work is available from https://epa-pmf.software.informer.com/ (last access: 21 October 2025; Paatero and Tapper, 1994). The raw data generated in this study have been uploaded to Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14847622, Huang, 2025).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13815-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

KH designed this study. XQ, HL, JC, XW, GW, CL, DL, JH, and YL performed data collection. XQ and KH performed data analysis and wrote the paper. All have commented on and reviewed the paper.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the Shanghai Environmental Monitoring Center for maintaining the Dianshan Lake supersite.

Financial support

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Plan Programs (2023YFE0102500, 2018YFC0213105), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42175119, 42361144711), and the Joint Research Fund of the “Island Atmosphere and Ecology” Category IV Peak Discipline (ZD202502). Junjie Wei, Hao Ding, and Qiongzhen Wang acknowledge financial support from Central Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund Projects (2023ZY1024).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Aurélien Dommergue and reviewed by three anonymous referees.

References

Amyot, M., Mierle, G., Lean, D. R. S., and McQueen, D. J.: SUNLIGHT-INDUCED FORMATION OF DISSOLVED GASEOUS MERCURY IN LAKE WATERS, Environmental science & technology, 28, 2366–2371, https://doi.org/10.1021/es00062a022, 1994. 

Andersson, M. E., Gårdfeldt, K., Wängberg, I., and Strömberg, D.: Determination of Henry's law constant for elemental mercury, Chemosphere, 73, 587–592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.067, 2008a. 

Andersson, M. E., Sommar, J., Gårdfeldt, K., and Lindqvist, O.: Enhanced concentrations of dissolved gaseous mercury in the surface waters of the Arctic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 110, 190–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.04.002, 2008b. 

Andersson, M. E., Sommar, J., Gårdfeldt, K., and Jutterström, S.: Air–sea exchange of volatile mercury in the North Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Chem., 125, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.01.005, 2011. 

Bencardino, M., D'Amore, F., Angot, H., Angiuli, L., Bertrand, Y., Cairns, W., Diéguez, M. C., Dommergue, A., Ebinghaus, R., Esposito, G., Komínková, K., Labuschagne, C., Mannarino, V., Martin, L., Martino, M., Neves, L. M., Mashyanov, N., Magand, O., Nelson, P., Norstrom, C., Read, K., Sholupov, S., Skov, H., Tassone, A., Vítková, G., Cinnirella, S., Sprovieri, F., and Pirrone, N.: Patterns and trends of atmospheric mercury in the GMOS network: Insights based on a decade of measurements, Environmental Pollution, 363, 125104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125104, 2024. 

Briggs, N. L. and Long, C. M.: Critical review of black carbon and elemental carbon source apportionment in Europe and the United States, Atmospheric Environment, 144, 409–427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.002, 2016. 

Chen, L., Wang, H. H., Liu, J. F., Tong, Y. D., Ou, L. B., Zhang, W., Hu, D., Chen, C., and Wang, X. J.: Intercontinental transport and deposition patterns of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10163–10176, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10163-2014, 2014. 

Chen, Y.-S., Tseng, C.-M., and Reinfelder, J. R.: Spatiotemporal Variations in Dissolved Elemental Mercury in the River-Dominated and Monsoon-Influenced East China Sea: Drivers, Budgets, and Implications, Environmental science & technology, 54, 3988–3995, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06092, 2020. 

Ci, Z., Wang, C., Wang, Z., and Zhang, X.: Elemental mercury (Hg(0)) in air and surface waters of the Yellow Sea during late spring and late fall 2012: Concentration, spatial-temporal distribution and air/sea flux, Chemosphere, 119, 199–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.05.064, 2015. 

Ci, Z. J., Zhang, X. S., Wang, Z. W., Niu, Z. C., Diao, X. Y., and Wang, S. W.: Distribution and air-sea exchange of mercury (Hg) in the Yellow Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2881–2892, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2881-2011, 2011. 

Ci, Z. J., Zhang, X. S., Yin, Y. G., Chen, J. S., and Wang, S. W.: Mercury Redox Chemistry in Waters of the Eastern Asian Seas: From Polluted Coast to Clean Open Ocean, Environmental science & technology, 50, 2371–2380, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05372, 2016. 

Costa, M. and Liss, P. S.: Photoreduction of mercury in sea water and its possible implications for Hg0 air–sea fluxes, Mar. Chem., 68, 87–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00067-5, 1999. 

Feinberg, A., Selin, N. E., Braban, C. F., Chang, K.-L., Custodio, D., Jaffe, D. A., Kyllonen, K., Landis, M. S., Leeson, S. R., Luke, W., Molepo, K. M., Murovec, M., Nerentorp Mastromonaco, M. G., Aspmo Pfaffhuber, K., Rudiger, J., Sheu, G.-R., and St Louis, V. L.: Unexpected anthropogenic emission decreases explain recent atmospheric mercury concentration declines, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121, e2401950121, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401950121, 2024. 

Feng, X., Fu, X., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Jia, L., Zhang, L., Lin, C.-J., Huang, J.-H., Liu, K., and Wang, S.: Combating air pollution significantly reduced air mercury concentrations in China, National Science Review, 11, https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae264, 2024. 

Feng, X., Li, P., Fu, X., Wang, X., Zhang, H., and Lin, C.-J.: Mercury pollution in China: implications on the implementation of the Minamata Convention, Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 24, 634–648, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2em00039c, 2022. 

Fitzgerald, W. F., Lamborg, C. H., and Hammerschmidt, C. R.: Marine Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury, Chemical Reviews, 107, 641–662, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050353m, 2007. 

Fu, X., Yang, X., Tan, Q., Ming, L., Lin, T., Lin, C.-J., Li, X., and Feng, X.: Isotopic Composition of Gaseous Elemental Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer of East China Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028671, 2018. 

Fu, X., Liu, C., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Zhang, H., Li, J., Lyu, X., Zhang, G., Guo, H., Wang, X., Zhang, L., and Feng, X.: Isotopic compositions of atmospheric total gaseous mercury in 10 Chinese cities and implications for land surface emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6721–6734, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6721-2021, 2021. 

Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Zhang, G., Xu, W. H., Li, X. D., Yao, H., Liang, P., Li, J., Sommar, J., Yin, R. S., and Liu, N.: Mercury in the marine boundary layer and seawater of the South China Sea: Concentrations, sea/air flux, and implication for land outflow, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012958, 2010. 

Fu, X. W., Feng, X. B., Yin, R. S., and Zhang, H.: Diurnal variations of total mercury, reactive mercury, and dissolved gaseous mercury concentrations and water/air mercury flux in warm and cold seasons from freshwaters of southwestern China, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 32, 2256–2265, https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2323, 2013. 

Gardfeldt, K., Sommar, J., Ferrara, R., Ceccarini, C., Lanzillotta, E., Munthe, J., Wangberg, I., Lindqvist, O., Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., Pesenti, E., and Stromberg, D.: Evasion of mercury from coastal and open waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, Atmospheric Environment, 37, S73–S84, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(03)00238-3, 2003. 

Geng, G. N., Liu, Y. X., Liu, Y., Liu, S. G., Cheng, J., Yan, L., Wu, N. N., Hu, H. W., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Yin, Z. C., He, K. B., and Zhang, Q.: Efficacy of China's clean air actions to tackle PM2.5 pollution between 2013 and 2020, Nat. Geosci., 17, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01540-z, 2024. 

Horowitz, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y., Dibble, T. S., Slemr, F., Amos, H. M., Schmidt, J. A., Corbitt, E. S., Marais, E. A., and Sunderland, E. M.: A new mechanism for atmospheric mercury redox chemistry: implications for the global mercury budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6353–6371, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6353-2017, 2017. 

Huang, K.: Mercury data in China's marginal seas, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14847622, 2025 

Huang, S. and Zhang, Y.: Interannual Variability of Air-Sea Exchange of Mercury in the Global Ocean: The “Seesaw Effect” in the Equatorial Pacific and Contributions to the Atmosphere, Environmental science & technology, 55, 7145–7156, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00691, 2021. 

Kalinchuk, V. V., Mishukov, V. F., and Astakhov, A. S.: Arctic source for elevated atmospheric mercury (Hg-0) in the western Bering Sea in the summer of 2013, Journal of Environmental Sciences, 68, 114–121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.12.022, 2018. 

Kuss, J., Holzmann, J., and Ludwig, R.: An Elemental Mercury Diffusion Coefficient for Natural Waters Determined by Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Environmental science & technology, 43, 3183–3186, https://doi.org/10.1021/es8034889, 2009. 

Kuss, J., Krüger, S., Ruickoldt, J., and Wlost, K.-P.: High-resolution measurements of elemental mercury in surface water for an improved quantitative understanding of the Baltic Sea as a source of atmospheric mercury, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4361–4376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4361-2018, 2018. 

Lamborg, C. H., Hammerschmidt, C. R., Bowman, K. L., Swarr, G. J., Munson, K. M., Ohnemus, D. C., Lam, P. J., Heimburger, L. E., Rijkenberg, M. J., and Saito, M. A.: A global ocean inventory of anthropogenic mercury based on water column measurements, Nature, 512, 65–68, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13563, 2014. 

Landis, M. S. and Keeler, G. J.: Atmospheric mercury deposition to Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study, Environmental science & technology, 36, 4518–4524, https://doi.org/10.1021/es011217b, 2002. 

Laurier, F. and Mason, R.: Mercury concentration and speciation in the coastal and open ocean boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007320, 2007. 

Lavoie, R. A., Bouffard, A., Maranger, R., and Amyot, M.: Mercury transport and human exposure from global marine fisheries, Scientific reports, 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24938-3, 2018. 

Li, H., Huang, K., Fu, Q., Lin, Y., Chen, J., Deng, C., Tian, X., Tang, Q., Song, Q., and Wei, Z.: Airborne black carbon variations during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Yangtze River Delta megacities suggest actions to curb global warming, Environ. Chem. Lett., 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01327-3, 2021. 

Li, H., Qin, X. F., Chen, J., Wang, G. C., Liu, C. F., Lu, D., Zheng, H. T., Song, X. Q., Gao, Q. Q., Xu, J., Zhu, Y. C., Liu, J. G., Wang, X. F., Deng, C. R., and Huang, K.: Continuous Measurement and Molecular Compositions of Atmospheric Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in the Nearshore Marine Boundary Layer of Northern China: Secondary Formation and Influencing Factors, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023jd038565, 2023. 

Lindberg, S. E., Hanson, P. J., Meyers, T. P., and Kim, K. H.: Air/surface exchange of mercury vapor over forests – The need for a reassessment of continental biogenic emissions, Atmospheric Environment, 32, 895–908, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(97)00173-8, 1998. 

Liu, K., Wu, Q., Wang, L., Wang, S., Liu, T., Ding, D., Tang, Y., Li, G., Tian, H., Duan, L., Wang, X., Fu, X., Feng, X., and Hao, J.: Measure-Specific Effectiveness of Air Pollution Control on China's Atmospheric Mercury Concentration and Deposition during 2013–2017, Environmental science & technology, 53, 8938–8946, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02428, 2019. 

Liu, M., Chen, L., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Tong, Y., Ou, L., Xie, H., Shen, H., Ye, X., Deng, C., and Wang, H.: Mercury export from mainland China to adjacent seas and its influence on the marine mercury balance, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 6224, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04999, 2016. 

Luo, W., Wang, T., Jiao, W., Hu, W., Naile, J. E., Khim, J. S., Giesy, J. P., and Lu, Y.: Mercury in coastal watersheds along the Chinese Northern Bohai and Yellow Seas, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 215–216, 199–207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.052, 2012. 

Mao, H., Cheng, I., and Zhang, L.: Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12897–12924, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016, 2016. 

Mason, R. P.: Mercury emissions from natural processes and their importance in the global mercury cycle, in: Mercury Fate and Transport in the Global Atmosphere: Emissions, Measurements and Models, edited by: Mason, R. and Pirrone, N., Springer US, Boston, MA, 173–191, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93958-2_7, 2009. 

Mason, R. P., Lawson, N. M., and Sheu, G. R.: Mercury in the Atlantic Ocean: factors controlling air–sea exchange of mercury and its distribution in the upper waters, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 48, 2829–2853, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0645(01)00020-0, 2001. 

Mason, R. P., Choi, A. L., Fitzgerald, W. F., Hammerschmidt, C. R., Lamborg, C. H., Soerensen, A. L., and Sunderland, E. M.: Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications, Environmental Research, 119, 101–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013, 2012. 

Mason, R. P., Hammerschmidt, C. R., Lamborg, C. H., Bowman, K. L., Swarr, G. J., and Shelley, R. U.: The air-sea exchange of mercury in the low latitude Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers, 122, 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2017.01.015, 2017. 

Mastromonaco, M. G. N., Gardfeldt, K., Assmann, K. M., Langer, S., Delali, T., Shlyapnikov, Y. M., Zivkovic, I., and Horvat, M.: Speciation of mercury in the waters of the Weddell, Amundsen and Ross Seas (Southern Ocean), Mar. Chem., 193, 20–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2017.03.001, 2017. 

Nightingale, P. D., Malin, G., Law, C. S., Watson, A. J., Liss, P. S., Liddicoat, M. I., Boutin, J., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.: In situ evaluation of air-sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 14, 373–387, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900091, 2000. 

O'Driscoll, N. J., Beauchamp, S., Siciliano, S. D., Rencz, A. N., and Lean, D. R. S.: Continuous Analysis of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury (DGM) and Mercury Flux in Two Freshwater Lakes in Kejimkujik Park, Nova Scotia: Evaluating Mercury Flux Models with Quantitative Data, Environmental science & technology, 37, 2226–2235, https://doi.org/10.1021/es025944y, 2003. 

O'Driscoll, N. J., Siciliano, S. D., Lean, D. R. S., and Amyot, M.: Gross Photoreduction Kinetics of Mercury in Temperate Freshwater Lakes and Rivers: Application to a General Model of DGM Dynamics, Environmental science & technology, 40, 837–843, https://doi.org/10.1021/es051062y, 2006. 

Obrist, D., Kirk, J. L., Zhang, L., Sunderland, E. M., Jiskra, M., and Selin, N. E.: A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use, Ambio, 47, 116–140, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-1004-9, 2018. 

Osterwalder, S., Nerentorp, M., Zhu, W., Jiskra, M., Nilsson, E., Nilsson, M. B., Rutgersson, A., Soerensen, A. L., Sommar, J., Wallin, M. B., Wängberg, I., and Bishop, K.: Critical Observations of Gaseous Elemental Mercury Air-Sea Exchange, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 35, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gb006742, 2021. 

Outridge, P. M., Mason, R. P., Wang, F., Guerrero, S., and Heimbürger-Boavida, L. E.: Updated Global and Oceanic Mercury Budgets for the United Nations Global Mercury Assessment 2018, Environmental science & technology, 52, 11466–11477, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01246, 2018. 

Paatero, P. and Tapper, U.: POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION – A NONNEGATIVE FACTOR MODEL WITH OPTIMAL UTILIZATION OF ERROR-ESTIMATES OF DATA VALUES, Environmetrics, 5, 111–126, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170050203, 1994. 

Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Steenhuisen, F., and Wilson, S.: Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000, Atmospheric Environment, 40, 4048–4063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041, 2006. 

Pacyna, E. G., Pacyna, J. M., Sundseth, K., Munthe, J., Kindbom, K., Wilson, S., Steenhuisen, F., and Maxson, P.: Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020, Atmospheric Environment, 44, 2487–2499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.009, 2010. 

Pacyna, J. M., Travnikov, O., De Simone, F., Hedgecock, I. M., Sundseth, K., Pacyna, E. G., Steenhuisen, F., Pirrone, N., Munthe, J., and Kindbom, K.: Current and future levels of mercury atmospheric pollution on a global scale, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12495–12511, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12495-2016, 2016. 

Pirrone, N., Cinnirella, S., Feng, X., Finkelman, R. B., Friedli, H. R., Leaner, J., Mason, R., Mukherjee, A. B., Stracher, G. B., Streets, D. G., and Telmer, K.: Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5951–5964, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5951-2010, 2010. 

Poissant, L., Amyot, M., Pilote, M., and Lean, D.: Mercury WaterAir Exchange over the Upper St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario, Environmental science & technology, 34, 3069–3078, https://doi.org/10.1021/es990719a, 2000. 

Qin, X., Wang, F., Deng, C., Wang, F., and Yu, G.: Seasonal variation of atmospheric particulate mercury over the East China Sea, an outflow region of anthropogenic pollutants to the open Pacific Ocean, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 7, 876–883, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.004, 2016. 

Qin, X., Wang, X., Shi, Y., Yu, G., Zhao, N., Lin, Y., Fu, Q., Wang, D., Xie, Z., Deng, C., and Huang, K.: Characteristics of atmospheric mercury in a suburban area of east China: sources, formation mechanisms, and regional transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5923–5940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5923-2019, 2019. 

Qin, X., Zhang, L., Wang, G., Wang, X., Fu, Q., Xu, J., Li, H., Chen, J., Zhao, Q., Lin, Y., Huo, J., Wang, F., Huang, K., and Deng, C.: Assessing contributions of natural surface and anthropogenic emissions to atmospheric mercury in a fast-developing region of eastern China from 2015 to 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10985–10996, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10985-2020, 2020. 

Selin, N. E.: Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 34, 43–63, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314, 2009. 

Soerensen, A. L., Skov, H., Jacob, D. J., Soerensen, B. T., and Johnson, M. S.: Global Concentrations of Gaseous Elemental Mercury and Reactive Gaseous Mercury in the Marine Boundary Layer, Environmental science & technology, 44, 7425–7430, https://doi.org/10.1021/es903839n, 2010a. 

Soerensen, A. L., Sunderland, E. M., Holmes, C. D., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Skov, H., Christensen, J. H., Strode, S. A., and Mason, R. P.: An Improved Global Model for Air-Sea Exchange of Mercury: High Concentrations over the North Atlantic, Environmental science & technology, 44, 8574–8580, https://doi.org/10.1021/es102032g, 2010b. 

Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., and Sunderland, E. M.: Drivers of Surface Ocean Mercury Concentrations and Air–Sea Exchange in the West Atlantic Ocean, Environmental science & technology, 47, 7757–7765, https://doi.org/10.1021/es401354q, 2013. 

Soerensen, A. L., Mason, R. P., Balcom, P. H., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Y. X., Kuss, J., and Sunderland, E. M.: Elemental Mercury Concentrations and Fluxes in the Tropical Atmosphere and Ocean, Environmental science & technology, 48, 11312–11319, https://doi.org/10.1021/es503109p, 2014. 

Sprovieri, F., Pirrone, N., Bencardino, M., D'Amore, F., Carbone, F., Cinnirella, S., Mannarino, V., Landis, M., Ebinghaus, R., Weigelt, A., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Martin, L., Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Artaxo, P., Morais, F., Barbosa, H. D. M. J., Brito, J., Cairns, W., Barbante, C., Diéguez, M. D. C., Garcia, P. E., Dommergue, A., Angot, H., Magand, O., Skov, H., Horvat, M., Kotnik, J., Read, K. A., Neves, L. M., Gawlik, B. M., Sena, F., Mashyanov, N., Obolkin, V., Wip, D., Feng, X. B., Zhang, H., Fu, X., Ramachandran, R., Cossa, D., Knoery, J., Marusczak, N., Nerentorp, M., and Norstrom, C.: Atmospheric mercury concentrations observed at ground-based monitoring sites globally distributed in the framework of the GMOS network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11915–11935, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11915-2016, 2016. 

Streets, D. G., Devane, M. K., Lu, Z. F., Bond, T. C., Sunderland, E. M., and Jacob, D. J.: All-Time Releases of Mercury to the Atmosphere from Human Activities, Environmental science & technology, 45, 10485–10491, https://doi.org/10.1021/es202765m, 2011. 

Viana, M., Amato, F., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Moreno, T., García Dos Santos, S., Herce, M. D., and Fernández-Patier, R.: Chemical Tracers of Particulate Emissions from Commercial Shipping, Environmental science & technology, 43, 7472–7477, https://doi.org/10.1021/es901558t, 2009. 

Wang, C., Ci, Z., Wang, Z., and Zhang, X.: Air-sea exchange of gaseous mercury in the East China Sea, Environ. Pollut., 212, 535–543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.016, 2016a. 

Wang, C., Wang, Z., Ci, Z., Zhang, X., and Tang, X.: Spatial-temporal distributions of gaseous element mercury and particulate mercury in the Asian marine boundary layer, Atmospheric Environment, 126, 107–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.036, 2016b. 

Wang, C., Wang, Z., Hui, F., and Zhang, X.: Speciated atmospheric mercury and sea–air exchange of gaseous mercury in the South China Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10111–10127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10111-2019, 2019a. 

Wang, C., Wang, Z., Hui, F., and Zhang, X.: Speciated atmospheric mercury and sea–air exchange of gaseous mercury in the South China Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10111–10127, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10111-2019, 2019b. 

Wang, C., Wang, Z., and Zhang, X.: Characteristics of mercury speciation in seawater and emission flux of gaseous mercury in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea, Environ. Res., 182, 109092, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.109092, 2020. 

Wang, G. C., Chen, J., Xu, J., Yun, L., Zhang, M. D., Li, H., Qin, X. F., Deng, C. R., Zheng, H. T., Gui, H. Q., Liu, J. G., and Huang, K.: Atmospheric Processing at the Sea-Land Interface Over the South China Sea: Secondary Aerosol Formation, Aerosol Acidity, and Role of Sea Salts, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd036255, 2022. 

Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., and Feng, X.: Sensitivity analysis of an updated bidirectional air–surface exchange model for elemental mercury vapor, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6273–6287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6273-2014, 2014. 

Wang, X., Lin, C.-J., Feng, X., Yuan, W., Fu, X., Zhang, H., Wu, Q., and Wang, S.: Assessment of Regional Mercury Deposition and Emission Outflow in Mainland China, 123, 9868–9890, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028350, 2018.  

Wangberg, I., Schmolke, S., Schager, P., Munthe, J., Ebinghaus, R., and Iverfeldt, A.: Estimates of air-sea exchange of mercury in the Baltic Sea, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 5477–5484, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00246-1, 2001. 

Wanninkhof, R.: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WIND-SPEED AND GAS-EXCHANGE OVER THE OCEAN, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 97, 7373–7382, https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc00188, 1992. 

Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited, Limnology and Oceanography-Methods, 12, 351–362, https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.351, 2014. 

Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean, Geophysical Research-Oceans, 97, 7373–7382, https://doi.org/10.1029/92JC00188, 1992. 

Wu, X., Fu, X., Zhang, H., Tang, K., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Deng, Q., Zhang, L., Liu, K., Wu, Q., Wang, S., and Feng, X.: Changes in Atmospheric Gaseous Elemental Mercury Concentrations and Isotopic Compositions at Mt. Changbai During 2015–2021 and Mt. Ailao During 2017–2021 in China, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037749, 2023. 

Zhang, L., Wang, S., Wang, L., Wu, Y., Duan, L., Wu, Q., Wang, F., Yang, M., Yang, H., Hao, J., and Liu, X.: Updated emission inventories for speciated atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic sources in China, Environmental science & technology, 49, 3185–3194, https://doi.org/10.1021/es504840m, 2015. 

Zhang, Y., Jacob, D. J., Horowitz, H. M., Chen, L., Amos, H. M., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Slemr, F., St Louis, V. L., and Sunderland, E. M.: Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 526–531, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516312113, 2016. 

Zhu, W., Lin, C.-J., Wang, X., Sommar, J., Fu, X., and Feng, X.: Global observations and modeling of atmosphere–surface exchange of elemental mercury: a critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4451–4480, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4451-2016, 2016. 

Download
Short summary
Mercury is a persistent toxic pollutant that has equally important anthropogenic and natural sources. This study developed a quantitative method for separating the anthropogenic and natural contributions of total gaseous mercury. The underlying impacts on the sea–air exchange fluxes of mercury are evaluated. The new method developed in this study can be reproduced in other regions, and the findings are innovative in the field of mercury sources and biogeochemical cycles.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint