the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime
Catherine Acquah
Laura Stecher
Mariano Mertens
This study assesses the influence of anthropogenic emission inventories of ozone (O3) precursor species (i.e. NOx, CO, and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs)) prescribed in the simulations of the two phases of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) on tropospheric O3, hydroxyl radical (OH), and the methane (CH4) lifetime. We performed two transient simulations for the period 2000–2010 with the chemistry–climate model EMAC, one prescribing the emission inventory of CCMI-1 and the other that of CCMI-2022. Using the tagging approach, we attribute the differences of O3, OH, and the tropospheric CH4 lifetime to individual emission sectors. It is, to our knowledge, the first application of the tagging approach to attribute changes of the simulated CH4 lifetime to individual emission sectors.
The emission inventory used for CCMI-2022 leads to a 3.7 % larger tropospheric O3 column and to a 3.2 % shorter tropospheric CH4 lifetime compared to CCMI-1 in the Northern Hemisphere. In the Southern Hemisphere, the tropospheric O3 column is 4.5 % larger, and the tropospheric CH4 lifetime 4.3 % shorter. Differences in tropospheric O3 are largely driven by changes of emissions from the anthropogenic non-traffic and land transport sectors in the Northern Hemisphere. In the Southern Hemisphere, the primary contributors are emissions from anthropogenic non-traffic, biomass burning, and shipping. These sectors also play a significant role in reducing the simulated tropospheric CH4 lifetime. However, the contribution of a particular sector to changes in O3 does not necessarily align with its impact on the CH4 lifetime.
- Article
(4288 KB) - Full-text XML
-
Supplement
(2809 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Tropospheric ozone (O3), a greenhouse gas, plays a significant role in influencing both climate and air quality (Haagensmit, 1952; Stevenson et al., 2013). It adversely affects human health and vegetation. Anthropogenic activities, including industry and land transport, release O3 precursors such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), and carbon monoxide (CO), affecting air quality. Model data indicate an increase of about 30 % of the total mass of tropospheric O3 between 1850 and 2010 (Lamarque et al., 2005; Young et al., 2013). As a greenhouse gas in the middle and upper troposphere, O3 contributes to positive radiative forcing and consequently to global warming (Stevenson et al., 2013). Next to its role as a greenhouse gas, tropospheric O3 is one key component of photochemical smog (Haagensmit, 1952). As an air pollutant, during prolonged periods of fair-weather conditions, high ground level O3 concentrations can have adverse effects on human health (Nuvolone et al., 2018). Some studies have already demonstrated an increased mortality after prolonged exposure (Bell et al., 2004; Jerrett et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2013). Concentrations of tropospheric O3 and its precursors are significantly elevated in many regions, not only due to road traffic (Niemeier et al., 2006) but also due to industrial processes, biomass burning, and biogenic emissions (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). Another relevant aspect relates to the phytotoxicity of tropospheric O3, as it is one of the most potent air pollutants for plants (Ashmore, 2005; Wedow et al., 2021). Various studies have demonstrated the reduction of agricultural crop yields (Emberson et al., 2018; Iglesias et al., 2006) and damage to broadleaves (Moura et al., 2014). The photochemical production of O3 in the troposphere is non-linearly dependent on various precursors, such as NOx, CO, and NMHCs (Bourtsoukidis et al., 2019; Crutzen, 1974). NOx emissions from anthropogenic sources originate e.g. from industry, land transport, aviation, and shipping (e.g. Uherek et al., 2010). Natural NOx is emitted from soil and produced by lightning discharges (e.g. Schumann and Huntrieser, 2007; Vinken et al., 2014). According to Seinfeld and Pandis (2016), two-thirds of CO is emitted from anthropogenic activities, including the oxidation of anthropogenically produced methane (CH4). Natural emissions of CO occur during the combustion of biomass, e.g. lightning-induced fires (Zheng et al., 2019), and from the oxidation of hydrocarbons but also from plants and the oceans (Khalil and Rasmussen, 1990). The origin of natural NMHC emissions is marine and terrestrial environments, e.g. vegetation (Guenther et al., 1995). The main anthropogenic sources of NMHC include the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, petroleum from geological reservoirs, and the distillation and distribution of oil and gas products (Pozzer et al., 2010).
An important aspect of tropospheric O3 is its role as a source of the hydroxyl radical (OH), which is a very relevant oxidant in the atmosphere (Monks, 2005) and thus largely determines the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere (Monks et al., 2015). The abundance of OH influences the atmospheric lifetime of the greenhouse gas CH4, as the oxidation with OH represents the most important sink of atmospheric CH4 (Lelieveld et al., 2016; Voulgarakis et al., 2013; Saunois et al., 2020). CH4 decomposition by OH is considered a source of NMHCs (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016), which in turn are part of the tropospheric O3 production process (Crutzen, 1974), and thus the OH formation links the processes of CH4 decomposition and tropospheric O3 production and vice versa. According to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2021) CH4 is the second-most-important greenhouse gas directly emitted by human activity. Different studies demonstrate the wide range of uncertainty of CH4 lifetime estimates, which is the reason that the investigation of the CH4 lifetime remains an important research topic. In particular, neither OH (on the global scale) nor the CH4 lifetime can be observed directly (e.g. Duncan et al., 2024). Therefore, estimates of the CH4 lifetime are derived from observations of species with known emissions, whose main sink is the oxidation with OH, such as methylchloroform (CH3CCl3) (Krol et al., 1998; Prinn et al., 2005; Montzka et al., 2011) or 14CO (Brenninkmeijer et al., 1992; Jöckel et al., 2002; Manning et al., 2005). Estimates of the CH4 lifetime based on observations of CH3CCl3 are, for example, 10.2−0.7 +0.9 years (Prinn et al., 2005) and 9.1 ± 0.9 years (Prather et al., 2012). The CMIP6 AerChemMIP model ensemble as analysed by Stevenson et al. (2020) suggests a whole-atmosphere CH4 lifetime of 8.4 ± 0.3 years for the present day, while the two most recent IPCC Reports state a lifetime of 9.25 ± 0.6 years (Myhre et al., 2013) and 9.1 ± 0.9 years (Szopa et al., 2021), respectively. Anthropogenic emissions of NOx and CO impacting the OH abundance have influenced the development of atmospheric CH4 concentrations in recent decades (Stevenson et al., 2020; Skeie et al., 2023).
To summarize, O3 precursors strongly influence tropospheric O3 and CH4 lifetime. The determination of O3 precursor emissions is not trivial, and emission inventories are subject to large uncertainties. Hoesly et al. (2018) suggest that the uncertainties can range from ±8 %–±176 %. The tropospheric O3, the OH, and the CH4 lifetime simulated by chemistry–climate models (CCMs) largely depends on the choice of the emission inventory. The two phases of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) use different emission inventories (see Eyring et al., 2013, and Plummer et al., 2020). CCMI-1 uses the MACCity emissions inventory (Granier et al., 2011), whereas CCMI-2022 uses the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS; Hoesly et al., 2018), which has also been used by AerChemMIP, which is endorsed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) (Collins et al., 2017). The latter multi-model comparison initiatives form an important groundwork for the IPCC reports (IPCC, 2013, 2021). Comparing the EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry) simulations performed for the two different phases of CCMI, it was noticed that the resulting CH4 lifetime was considerably shorter in the simulations performed for the second phase of CCMI (see Fig. 1). One reason for the shorter lifetime is the changed emission inventory of O3 precursor species.
In this study, we therefore specifically examine the effect of the modified emission inventories on the tropospheric O3 abundance and the CH4 lifetime. For this purpose, we performed targeted simulations with the EMAC model, prescribing either the emission inventory of CCMI-1 or CCMI-2022 for O3 precursor species. The tropospheric CH4 lifetime corresponding to these simulations is shown by the red curves in Fig. 1. The changed prescribed emission inventories can not explain the full difference of tropospheric CH4 lifetime between the EMAC simulations originally performed for CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022 (blue and black curves in Fig. 1). There have been further model developments and set-up changes from CCMI-1 to CCMI-2022 that have, however, all been used for the targeted simulations performed for this study (red curves) and that we address in the Supplement.
Further, we use the tagging approach to attribute the O3 and CH4 lifetime differences caused by the changed prescribed emissions to individual emission sectors. Some previous studies have successfully applied the tagging approach for determining the contributions of specific source categories to the tropospheric O3 (Butler et al., 2020; Grewe et al., 2012, 2010, 2017; Mertens et al., 2018, 2020; Rieger et al., 2018; Kilian et al., 2024), while the tagging method to attribute CH4 lifetime differences has, to our knowledge, been applied only once (Mertens et al., 2024).
The paper is structured as follows: Sect. 2 briefly describes the CCM EMAC and explains the simulation set-up including information about the emission inventories, the tagging method, and the method to calculate the tropospheric CH4 lifetime. Section 3 shows the results, i.e. the impact of the modified emission inventory on tropospheric O3, OH, and the CH4 lifetime. It is followed by a discussion in Sect. 4, including limitations of the applied tagging method and the simulation set-up, as well as a comparison to other studies. We close with a summary of our findings and some concluding remarks in Sect. 5.
Figure 1Tropospheric CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with OH, , for the EMAC simulations performed for phase 1 of CCMI (CCMI-1) in blue; phase 2 of CCMI (CCMI-2022) in black; and the simulations analysed in the present study, EMIS-01 and EMIS-02, in red. See Jöckel et al. (2016) for details of the set-up of the CCMI-1 simulations and Jöckel (2023) for REFD1.
To determine the impact of the two emission inventories on tropospheric O3 and CH4 lifetime, we perform targeted simulations with the EMAC model in which either one or the other inventory is prescribed (see Table 1). In the following sections, the EMAC model and the simulation set-up including information about the emission inventories, the tagging method, and the calculation of the CH4 lifetime, are described. In Sect. 2.4 we also describe the two methods to estimate the contribution of individual tagging categories to the overall change of the CH4 lifetime.
2.1 Model description and simulation strategy
We perform simulations with the global chemistry–climate model EMAC (ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry). The EMAC model is composed of the European Center Hamburg Model version 5 (ECHAM5; Roeckner et al., 2006) as the dynamical base model and the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy; Jöckel et al., 2010). MESSy describes meteorological processes and atmospheric chemistry in a modular framework (Jöckel et al., 2010). The MESSy approach flexibly combines individual submodels with a base model (Jöckel et al., 2005). These submodels describe processes in the troposphere and middle atmosphere and their interaction with oceans, land, and anthropogenic influences (Jöckel et al., 2010).
In this study, EMAC was applied in T42L90MA resolution, i.e. at a triangular (T) truncation at wave number 42 of the spectral dynamical core, corresponding to a quadratic Gaussian grid of approximately 2.8° × 2.8° resolution in latitude and longitude and 90 vertical levels, with the uppermost level centred around 0.01 hPa (≈80 km height) in the middle atmosphere (MA).
Nudging by Newtonian relaxation towards ECMWF ERA-5 reanalysis data (Hersbach et al., 2020) was performed, aiming at a realistic representation of the meteorological situation at a given time. Nudged are the temperature, divergence, vorticity, and the logarithm of surface pressure (Jöckel et al., 2016). Wave zero of the temperature (e.g. the mean temperature) is not nudged.
To decouple dynamics from chemistry, EMAC was operated in quasi chemistry-transport model (QCTM) mode (Deckert et al., 2011). In this mode, mixing ratios of radiatively active constituents are prescribed for the radiation calculations, and the hydrological cycle is decoupled from the chemistry. This ensures that differences of the emission inventories prescribed in the simulations do not affect the model's meteorology, not even numerically. Accordingly, differences of the chemical decomposition between the simulations occur solely due to differences in the emissions and prescribed lower boundary mixing ratios of CH4 and greenhouse gases (GHGs).
For the calculation of lighting NOx emissions we use the parameterization by Grewe et al. (2001). Biogenic C5H8 emissions and soil NOx emissions are calculated with the submodel ONEMIS (Kerkweg et al., 2006), applying the parameterization of Guenther et al. (1995) and Yienger and Levy II (1995), respectively. Due to the identically simulated meteorology in all simulations due to the QCTM mode, these online-calculated, meteorology-dependent emissions are exactly the same in both simulations with no differences, not even numerical noise. In addition to the online-calculated natural emissions, a climatology of biogenic emissions of NMHCs and CO is prescribed from the Global Emissions InitiAtive (GEIA) in all simulations.
Overall, we performed three different simulations as listed in Table 1, EMIS-01, EMIS-02, and EMIS-01-ODS. The simulation set-up is similar to the set-up of the CCMI-2022 REFD1SD simulation (hindcast with specified dynamics), but we deviate from the CCMI naming convention to clarify that we have performed the simulations specifically for this publication and that they are not identical to the simulations originally performed for CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022. The simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 differ between the emission inventories used for shorter-lived chemical species (i.e. NOx, CO, SO2, NH3, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs); see Sect. 2.2 for more details), the prescribed lower boundary mixing ratios of GHGs (in particular also CH4), and the prescribed lower boundary mixing ratios of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) (see Jöckel et al., 2016, for more details). The global mean surface CH4 mixing ratio is about 0.01 ppm larger in the simulation EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 (see Fig. S12 in the Supplement), which is expected to cause a small extension of the CH4 lifetime, which counteracts the overall shortening of the CH4 lifetime. The prescribed lower boundary for N2O is nearly identical, which is also reflected by the total mass of N2O (see Fig. S13 in the Supplement). The influence of the change in the prescribed ODS turned out to have no influence on the tropospheric CH4 lifetime and only a small influence on tropospheric O3 (see Fig. S2 in the Supplement). Therefore, only the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 are further analysed in our study.
We investigated the period 2000–2010, with a spin-up phase for the simulations comprising 1998 and 1999. The model output is originally output in netCDF format with global data coverage as snapshots every 10 h of simulated time on model levels. Based on this, monthly averages are calculated on pressure levels.
2.2 Prescribed emission inventories of ozone precursor species
The emission inventory for CCMI-1 is based on the MACCity emission inventory (Granier et al., 2011), an extension of the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) emissions dataset based on 1960 and 2000, as well as 2005 and 2010 RCP 8.5 emissions (Eyring et al., 2013). The emission inventory for CCMI-1 contains anthropogenic emissions based on the product of estimates for activity data from country records and international organizations and emission factors (Granier et al., 2011). The basis for global biomass burning emissions is satellite data (Granier et al., 2011). The MACCity inventory includes global emissions of CO, NOx, and NMHCs, whereby it considers a monthly resolved seasonal cycle (Granier et al., 2011). The ACCMIP dataset according to Lamarque et al. (2005) was expanded and calculated for emissions from biomass burning on the basis of the annual monthly average trace gas emissions from the spatially and temporally modified RETRO (REanalysis of the TROpospheric chemical composition; Schultz and Rast, 2007) carbon emissions data from GFED-v2 (Global Fire Emissions Database; van der Werf et al., 2006) for 1997 to 2008 (Granier et al., 2011). A detailed description of the implementation of the emission inventory for EMAC is provided in the Supplement of Jöckel et al. (2016).
The basis of the emission inventory for CCMI-2022 is the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) dataset, which includes annual historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions for the species CO, NOx, and NMHCs (Hoesly et al., 2018). The dataset includes existing energy consumption data and regional and country emission inventories. The dataset provides annual emissions at country and sector level with monthly seasonal variations. The biomass burning emissions in CCMI-2022 are according to van Marle et al. (2017).
Time series of the years 2000–2010 of global emissions of NOx, NMHCs, and CO for individual sectors anthropogenic non-traffic, biogenic, land transport, shipping, biomass burning, and aviation, as prescribed in the simulations EMIS-01 or EMIS-02, can be found in the Supplement (Figs. S8, S9 and S10). Global anthropogenic NOx emissions are larger by 9.02 Tg(N) yr−1 on average for the period 2000–2010 for the simulation EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 (see Table 3). In the NH, the sectors anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, and shipping contribute most to the difference in total NOx emissions, with NOx emissions being larger in the EMIS-02 simulation than in EMIS-01. In the SH, the largest contributors to the NOx emission difference are the sectors biomass burning and shipping (see Table 3). The difference of NOx emissions from shipping between EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 peaks in the year 2008 (see Fig. S8 in the Supplement), as the emissions prescribed for EMIS-02 account for the increase in shipping emissions until 2008 and the decline after 2008 (Hoesly et al., 2018).
Global CO emissions are reduced by 28.68 Tg(C) yr−1 on average for the period 2000–2010 for EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 (see Table 3). The reduction is dominated by the biomass burning sector in both hemispheres, whereas CO emissions from the anthropogenic non-traffic and land transport sectors are larger in EMIS-02 (see Table 3).
Global NMHC emissions are enhanced by 57.33 Tg(C) yr−1 on average for the period 2000–2010 for EMIS-02 (see Table 3). The increase is dominated by the anthropogenic non-traffic sector, followed by biomass burning and land transport in the NH. In the SH, differences in the anthropogenic non-traffic and biomass burning sectors contribute most as well.
2.3 TAGGING for source attribution
To understand the effects of the emission changes in O3 precursors, O3, and OH in more detail, we apply the TAGGING submodel, as described in detail by Grewe et al. (2017) and Rieger et al. (2018). The TAGGING submodel, as a technical implementation of the tagging approach (a labelling technique), is used to diagnose contributions of individual source categories (emission sectors and/or regions or other source processes) to the mixing ratio of tropospheric O3 and its precursors (Grewe et al., 2010). For this purpose, the TAGGING submodel distributes the calculated chemical production rates among additional, so-called tagged tracers (Grewe et al., 2012). Each tagged tracer represents the contribution of one source category (emission sector and/or region or other process) to a specific species. The chemical production and loss rates for individual chemical reactions are provided by the submodel Module Efficiently Calculating the Chemistry of the Atmosphere (MECCA; Sander et al., 2019) (Grewe et al., 2017), which solves the non-linear kinetic reaction system mathematically described by an ordinary differential equation system. The distribution of the production and loss rates among the tagged tracers follows a combinatorial approach based on the concentrations of the tagged species.
According to Grewe et al. (2017), tagged species are NOy, NMHCs, CO, PAN, O3, HO2, and OH. According to Rieger et al. (2018), OH and HO2 are treated with a steady-state approach. According to Grewe et al. (2017), “all possible combinations between a tagged NOx species and another tagged HOx species are evaluated and their probability is calculated in accordance with the chemical production rate calculation”. It is important to note that the chosen approach intrinsically takes into account the non-linear nature of the kinetic system. Details are documented by Grewe et al. (2017).
In this study, we use the TAGGING submodel v1.1 according to Rieger et al. (2018), which was updated to be consistent with the used chemical mechanism. Thereby, the changed partitioning of the O3 production rates is the most important adjustment, whereas the TAGGING for OH and HO2 remained unchanged (see Stecher, 2024, Chap. 3.1.6 for more details).
In this study, we investigate 10 source categories (also referred to as tagging categories in the further course of this text) and their contribution to tropospheric O3, OH, and the CH4 lifetime. The latter is derived from the tagged OH, as explained in Sect. 2.4 in more detail. We use the same definition of tagging categories as Grewe et al. (2017), distinguishing between natural and anthropogenic sources. The definition of the 10 tagging categories is listed in Table 2. The term category is used independently of the type of source, e.g. emission, decomposition process, or production in the stratosphere. In contrast, we use the term (emission) sector only for emissions. For example, the category land transport represents the contribution of the land transport emission sector, whereas the category stratosphere represents downward transport of O3 formed in the stratosphere, which is not related to any emission sector.
Table 2Overview of the categories for the tagging source attribution applied in this study. Detailed definitions of the categories are given by Grewe et al. (2017). The anthropogenic non-traffic category contains all non-traffic-related activities, i.e. industry, households, energy, and agriculture including agricultural waste burning.
2.4 Calculation of methane lifetime
In this study, we calculate the (tropospheric) CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with OH according to Jöckel et al. (2016) as
with being the mass of CH4 in [kg], the temperature (T)-dependent reaction rate coefficient of the reaction in [cm3 s−1], cair the concentration of air in [cm−3], and OH the mole fraction of OH in [mol mol−1] in all grid boxes b∈B. B is the region for which the lifetime should be calculated, e.g. all grid boxes below the tropopause for the mean tropospheric lifetime and all grid boxes below the tropopause in each hemisphere to derive a hemispheric CH4 lifetime (denoted as SH and NH for the Southern Hemisphere and Northern Hemisphere, respectively). For the CH4 lifetime calculation, a climatological tropopause, defined as tpclim = 300–215 hPa⋅cos2(ϕ), with ϕ being the latitude in degrees north, is used as recommended by Lawrence et al. (2001).
In analogy, we calculate the CH4-weighted OH (Lawrence et al., 2001) as
The CH4 lifetime corresponding to the oxidation with OH of one tagging category is calculated by substituting the total OH in Eq. (1) by the TAGGING tracer OHi, e.g. OHtra.
Note that for adding the CH4 lifetimes of multiple categories, the inverse of the sum of the reciprocals of individual CH4 lifetimes needs to be calculated. For instance, the CH4 lifetime with respect to the combined OH loss of all categories is calculated as
Since not all source and loss reactions of OH, but a reduced reaction system, are considered by the TAGGING (Rieger et al., 2018), the sum of all OH TAGGING tracers can deviate from the total tracer OH. To quantify the deviation, we calculate the residuum lifetime, i.e. the CH4 lifetime corresponding to CH4 loss with the portion of OH that is unaccounted for by the TAGGING, as
The difference between and excluding the residuum lifetime is about 0.1 years for both simulations. The mean values and the respective standard deviations (due to interannual variations) of are 398.41 ± 40.99 years for EMIS-01 in the NH, 378.74 ± 89.30 years for EMIS-02 in the NH, 434.54 ± 49.52 years for EMIS-01 in the SH, and 339.56 ± 38.97 years for EMIS-02 in the SH, which is notably larger than the respective estimates of the other categories. Since the inverse of determines the influence on the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH (Eq. 4), we conclude that the CH4 loss via oxidation with OH that is unaccounted by the TAGGING is sufficiently small. In particular, it is smaller than the contribution of any of the tagging categories. Note that the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH, , and the lifetime summed over all tagging categories including , , are identical, so that CH4 loss by the total OH tracer is accounted for when is included in Eq. (4).
In the Results section, we attribute the change of the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH between the two simulations to the individual tagging categories. Therefore we calculate , which represents the lifetime reduction attributed to an individual source category i. Note that is not just given by the difference of CH4 lifetimes of the category i between the two simulations, i.e. , because of the fact that the reciprocals of individual CH4 lifetimes need to be added when the sum of individual categories is calculated. We calculate with the following two methods, whose results are compared.
The derivation of the first method is shown in Appendix A. Briefly, we express the lifetime with respect to total OH (Eq. 1) as a function of the lifetime of the category of interest , for which we calculate the derivative with respect to (see Eq. A2 and A3 in Appendix A). Then, we approximate the derivative with the finite change of CH4 lifetime (see Eq. A4 in Appendix A), which results in the following relation for the lifetime reduction attributed to category i:
For example, using the first method, , which represents the contribution to the overall lifetime change attributed to the change of land transport emissions (CCMI-2022 vs. CCMI-1), is calculated as
For the second method, we exchange the CH4 lifetime of the category of interest, , with the CH4 lifetime of this category derived from the other simulation in Eq. (4). Thus, with the second method the contribution of one individual category, e.g. changed land transport emissions, to the overall lifetime change is calculated as
where is calculated as
3.1 Contribution to tropospheric ozone
In this section, we show the difference of total O3 between the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02, as well as the change of the contributions of individual tagging categories. The tropospheric O3 columns (Fig. 2) of the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 in Dobson units (DU), as well as the relative differences between both simulations in percent, are shown for the period 2000–2010. The prognostic tropopause as diagnosed by the model is used as boundary between troposphere and stratosphere. The relative differences are calculated with the EMIS-01 results as the reference. The patterns of the tropospheric O3 columns show the seasonal cycle of O3; i.e. more O3 is present in NH summer than in NH winter. In the NH, EMIS-02 ( DU; STD = 0.59) shows a 1.39 DU (=3.7 %) larger tropospheric O3 column compared to EMIS-01 ( DU; STD = 0.05) for the period 2000–2010. In the SH, EMIS-02 ( DU; STD = 0.43) also shows larger values than EMIS-01 ( DU; STD = 0.32). The absolute difference averaged over the period 2000–2010 is 1.19 DU in the SH, which corresponds to 4.5 %. The tropospheric O3 column is especially large in the NH between 20 and 50°, showing values up to 60 DU. Within the period 2000–2010, the tropospheric O3 column in the EMIS-02 simulation between 10° S and 40° N is up to 12 % higher than in the EMIS-01 simulation. The maximum difference of the tropospheric O3 column occurs in the years 2008 and 2009. Globally and temporally averaged, the simulation with the EMIS-02 emissions shows a 4 % larger tropospheric O3 column compared to EMIS-01.
Figure 2Tropospheric O3 columns (DU) of the EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 simulation results and the relative differences with the EMIS-01 results as the reference. The data are monthly averaged for the period 2000–2010.
Figure 3Relative contributions to total O3 of the tagging categories (a) shipping, (b) anthropogenic non-traffic, (c) land transport, (d) aviation, and (e) biomass burning. The left and middle columns show the contribution of the respective category in the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02, respectively. The right column shows the differences of the relative contributions to O3 between the two simulations in percentage points. Zonal means of the years 2000–2010 are presented. Hatches in the delta plot indicate a p value ≥0.05 from the dependent t test for paired samples.
The zonal mean of the total O3 volume mixing ratio in nmol/mol and the relative differences between EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 are shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. O3 mixing ratios are larger in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 throughout the troposphere, with a maximum relative difference in the lower levels in the tropics. Figure S3 shows that effective production of O3 is enhanced in EMIS-02 most strongly in lower levels. O3 loss is enhanced as well, however less strongly, so that the net effect is to enhance O3 concentration.
Figure 3 shows the relative zonal mean contribution of the categories shipping, anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, aviation, and biomass burning to total O3, as well as the difference of the contribution between the two simulations. A corresponding plot for the categories N2O, lightning, stratosphere, CH4, and biogenic can be found in the Supplement (Fig. S5). The differences between the O3 contributions are a result of the complex interplay between the emission changes and the background chemistry. In the NH, especially land transport, anthropogenic non-traffic and shipping emissions are larger in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 (see Sect. 2.2). However, only for land transport and anthropogenic non-traffic emissions is the contribution to O3 larger in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 in the NH. For shipping emissions, the differences between EMIS-02 and EMIS-01 are not significant over most regions in the NH. The increase in the contributions from land transport and anthropogenic non-traffic emissions lead to a decrease in contributions from biomass burning in the NH in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01, even though the emissions are only slightly lower in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01. In the SH, however, the strong increase in the biomass burning emissions in EMIS-02 led to larger contributions in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01. The contribution of aviation emissions to O3 is lower in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01, partly due to the slightly lower emissions but also due to the artificially shifted aviation emissions from the tropics to the polar regions in the CEDS emission inventory as reported by Thor et al. (2023).
To understand the effects of the changed emissions onto O3 production in more detail, we calculate the O3 burden efficiency with respect to NOx emissions (see also Mertens et al., 2024), which is defined for example for the shipping category as
In this definition, is the annual mean total atmospheric mass of O3 attributed to shipping emissions (in kg), while denotes the global annual mean shipping emissions of NOx (in kg(N) yr−1).
Figure 4 shows the burden efficiency for the tagging categories, for which NOx emissions are either prescribed or calculated online except for the category aviation. The aviation category is shown separately in Fig. S14 because it has a much larger burden efficiency (Mertens et al., 2024). The burden efficiency of the aviation category, χAIR, is larger in the simulation EMIS-02. The maximum difference of χAIR between the two simulations is about 10 % in the year 2010 as χAIR of the simulation EMIS-01 decreases over the 11 analysed years. This is likely due to the different geographical distribution of the aviation emissions as explained above.
For the categories anthropogenic non-traffic and shipping, the burden efficiency is roughly the same in both simulations, indicating that the larger prescribed NOx emissions result in a correspondingly large increase in the O3 production. For the categories biogenic, land transport, and biomass burning the burden efficiency is smaller in the simulation EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01. For the category biogenic, this implies a reduced O3 production from identical biogenic soil NOx emissions as the online calculated emissions are identical per set-up definition (see Sect. 2.1). For the categories land transport and biomass burning, the NOx emissions, as well as the O3 burden, are enhanced in the simulation EMIS-02. However, the emissions and the O3 burden do not increase uniformly with each other, due to the non-linearity of the O3 chemistry. For the category lightning on the contrary, the burden efficiency is larger in the simulation EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01, likely due to the differences in the aviation emissions. The lightning NOx emissions are identical in the two simulations, but O3 is produced more efficiently in the simulation EMIS-02.
3.2 Contribution to OH and methane lifetime
The results of the analyses of the relative contribution to OH and the associated CH4 lifetime of the individual categories are presented in this section.
3.2.1 Contribution to OH
Figure 5 shows the zonal mean mixing ratios of OH in both simulations, as well as their difference. The largest differences are located around the tropical tropopause, where the tropospheric OH mixing ratio is largest and larger OH mixing ratios are shown in the simulation EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01. The OH mixing ratios are also larger in the lower (up to about 500 hPa) tropical troposphere in EMIS-02 but smaller between 500 and 300 hPa. To complement Fig. 5, Fig. S6 in the Supplement shows the zonal mean number concentration of OH weighted by the reaction with CH4 (see Eq. 2). The zonal mean distribution of weighted OH is similar in both simulations with maxima in the tropical tropopause region and in the lower tropical troposphere. The OH concentration is larger in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01 in both of these regions, consistent with the difference of OH mixing ratios shown in Fig. 5.
Figure 6 shows the tropospheric mean OH number concentration of individual tagging categories weighted by the reaction with CH4. Anthropogenic emissions of O3 precursors contribute importantly to OH. The categories anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, shipping, and aviation combined represent 36 % of the global tropospheric CH4-weighted OH for EMIS-01 and 39 % for EMIS-02. Their role is more important in the NH compared to the SH. Biomass burning emissions contribute 5 % to the global tropospheric CH4-weighted OH in EMIS-01 and 6 % in EMIS-02. Emissions of lightning NOx contribute about 25 % to the global tropospheric OH; biogenic emissions about 12 %; transport of O3 formed in the stratosphere about 9 %; and decomposition of CH4 and N2O about 7 % and 4 %, respectively. The contributions of natural emissions, decomposition processes, and transport from the stratosphere are more important in the SH compared to the NH. In particular, emissions of lightning NOx account for about 30 % in the SH and only about 20 % in the NH.
The global tropospheric CH4-weighted OH is enhanced in the categories anthropogenic non-traffic (+0.03 × 106 molec. cm−3), land transport (+0.01 × 106 molec. cm−3), shipping (+0.02 × 106 molec. cm−3), and biomass burning (+0.02 × 106 molec. cm−3) in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01, whereas it is reduced by −0.01 × 106 molec. cm−3 in the categories aviation and biogenic. The global tropospheric OH attributed to the categories stratosphere, N2O, CH4, and lightning remains unchanged in both simulations.
Figure 7 shows the zonal mean contribution of the categories shipping, anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, aviation, and biomass burning to total OH, as well as the difference of the contribution between the two simulations. A corresponding plot for the categories N2O, lightning, stratosphere, CH4, and biogenic can be found in the Supplement (Fig. S7). Zonal means of the year 2000–2010 are presented. The OH contributions from the shipping category show maxima in the lower troposphere in the NH in EMIS-01 and in EMIS-02 in the lower troposphere in the NH and SH. The OH contributions from anthropogenic non-traffic and land transport categories show maxima in the lower troposphere in the NH. The aviation category has its maximum in the upper troposphere and above the tropopause in the NH. In the category biomass burning, the maximum is at the Equator in the lower troposphere and in the tropical tropopause region in both simulations. In the simulation EMIS-01, the contribution from the biomass burning category shows another maximum in the northern mid-latitudes to high latitudes.
The panels in the right column show the differences of the relative contributions of one category to total OH in percentage points between the two simulations. The differences indicate that tropospheric OH contributions are not the same for EMIS-01 and EMIS-02. The difference is predominantly positive in all categories, indicating larger contributions to total OH from these categories in EMIS-02 compared to EMIS-01, except for the aviation category. In the shipping category, the largest increases in relative OH mixing ratio contribution (10 percentage points) between EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 can be located in the NH and SH up to 900 hPa. The contribution of the shipping category is reduced by up to −4 percentage points in a small area in the NH (around 40° N, 1000 hPa). The contribution of the anthropogenic non-traffic category to total OH is overall increased with a maximum difference of 4 percentage points around 50° N close to the surface. This category also shows reduced contributions (up to −3 percentage points) in a small area in the NH (40–70° N, 1000 hPa). For the land transport category, the difference (6 percentage points) between the two simulations is most pronounced between 60 and 80° N at 1000 hPa. The land transport category also shows reduced contributions (−2 percentage point) in the SH (20–80° S, 700–1000 hPa). The contribution of the aviation category is increased by up to 2 percentage points at the tropopause between 70 and 90° N. This category also shows reduced contributions (−2 percentage point) between 10 and 40° N between 250 and 700 hPa. For the biomass burning category, the largest increase in the contribution (4 percentage points) occurs between 0 and 15° S, at 750–950 hPa. The biomass burning category also shows reduced contributions (−7 percentage points) in the NH (around 50–70° N, 700–900 hPa).
Figure 5Multi-annual (2000–2010), zonally averaged OH volume mixing ratio [] and the absolute differences between EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 simulation results.
Figure 6Tropospheric OH number concentration of individual tagging categories weighted by the reaction with CH4 calculated as following Lawrence et al. (2001) (in 106 molec. cm−3). The first two bars show global means corresponding to the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02, respectively. The last four bars show results for the Northern Hemisphere (NH) or Southern Hemisphere (SH) separately.
Figure 7Relative contributions to total OH of the tagging categories (a) shipping, (b) anthropogenic non-traffic, (c) land transport (d) aviation and (e) biomass burning. The left and middle columns show the contribution of the respective category in the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02, respectively. The right column shows the differences of the relative contributions to OH between the two simulation in percentage points. Zonal means of the years 2000–2010 are presented. Hatches in the delta plot indicate a p value ≥0.05 from the dependent t test for paired samples.
The categories shipping, anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, aviation, and biomass burning show the largest positive and the largest negative differences between EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 with respect to the contribution to OH. The other categories show lower positive and/or lower negative changes in the contribution to total OH (see Fig. S7 in the Supplement).
3.2.2 Contribution to methane lifetime
In this section, we attribute the difference of the tropospheric CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with OH in the simulations EMIS-01 and EMIS-02 to individual tagging categories. We show results for the NH and SH separately. The black bars in Fig. 8 show the CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with total OH. In the NH, the absolute difference of the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH between the simulations EMIS-01 (7.86 years) and EMIS-02 (7.61 years) is −0.25 years, which corresponds to −3.2 %. In the SH, the CH4 lifetime of the simulation EMIS-01 (9.40 years) and EMIS-02 (9.00 years) differs by −0.4 years, which corresponds to −4.3 %.
We calculate the contribution of each category to the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH using the two methods, which are explained in Sect. 2.4. The results are shown by the blue and red bars, respectively, in Fig. 8. The relative contributions are consistent for both methods. However, method 1 indicates overall less pronounced CH4 lifetime changes for the individual categories and underestimates the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH. The sum of all individual contributions calculated using method 2 reproduces the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH well in the NH and slightly overestimates it in the SH.
Our results show that the anthropogenic non-traffic, land transport, biomass burning, and shipping categories contribute most to the CH4 lifetime reduction from EMIS-01 to EMIS-02 in the NH. In the SH, also the anthropogenic non-traffic, biomass burning and shipping categories contribute to the lifetime reduction. However, the results indicate that the land traffic category leads to a slight extension of CH4 lifetime in the SH. The impact of the categories N2O, lightning, stratosphere and CH4 to the CH4 lifetime difference between the two simulations is minor. The aviation category leads to an increase in the CH4 lifetime in the NH by 0.06 years. The biogenic category leads to an extension of the CH4 lifetime in both hemispheres.
Figure 8Change of tropospheric CH4 lifetime attributed to individual tagging categories, separately for (a) the Northern Hemisphere and (b) the Southern Hemisphere. The black bars show the CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with total OH, , for the simulations EMIS-01 (CCMI-1) and EMIS-02 (CCMI-2022). The blue and red bars show the contribution of category i to the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH, , calculated using either method 1 (blue) or method 2 (red; see Sect. 2.4 for details on the derivation). The rightmost blue and red bars represent the sum of over all categories.
3.3 Synthesis
We have performed targeted simulations to assess the impact of the changed emission inventories of O3 precursors (CO, NMHCs, NOx) from CCMI-1 to CCMI-2022 over the years 2000–2010. We find that the changed emission inventories lead to an increase in the tropospheric O3 column of 3.7 % and to a shortening of the tropospheric CH4 lifetime with respect to OH by 0.25 years in the NH, which corresponds to 3.2 %. In the SH, the tropospheric O3 column increases by 4.5 %, and the tropospheric CH4 lifetime shortens by 0.4 years, which corresponds to 4.3 %. We further use the TAGGING submodel to estimate the contribution of individual tagging categories to the changes of total O3, total OH, and CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH. In the following, we summarize the categories that contribute most to the O3 and CH4 lifetime differences between the two simulations and compare our results to the changes of prescribed O3 precursor emissions in the corresponding sectors.
Table 3Overview of difference of the prescribed emissions, the tropospheric O3 column, and the tropospheric CH4 lifetime for the individual tagging categories between the simulations EMIS-02 and EMIS-01. For the contribution of tropospheric CH4 lifetime change, the estimates derived using method 2 are shown (see Sect. 2.4).
a Identical online calculated emissions as assured by simulation set-up (see Sect. 2.1). b No CO and NMHC emissions from sector aviation in simulation EMIS-01.
In the NH, the largest changes of both the tropospheric O3 column and the CH4 lifetime are attributed to the anthropogenic non-traffic and land transport categories, which correspond to the sectors with the largest change of NOx emissions between CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022 (see Table 3). NOx emissions from biomass burning are slightly lower by −0.21 Tg(N) in CCMI-2022. This sector contributes nevertheless to a shortening of the CH4 lifetime, which might be explained by the comparable strong reduction (CCMI-2022 compared to CCMI-1) of CO emissions, resulting in an enhanced abundance of OH, as the most important sink of CO is the oxidation with OH (e.g. Nguyen et al., 2020. The corresponding tropospheric O3 column increases slightly. The change of CH4 lifetime attributed to shipping emissions averaged over the analysed 10 years is large compared to the corresponding NOx emission increase of 0.75 Tg(N) between CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022. The difference of NOx emissions from shipping between CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022 has a distinct temporal evolution peaking in the year 2008 (see Fig. S8), when changes of tropospheric O3 and CH4 lifetime of this category are most pronounced. In contrast to the other prescribed emission categories, emissions of NOx from aviation are reduced in CCMI-2022 compared to CCMI-1, which is reflected by a decrease in the tropospheric O3 column and an extension of CH4 lifetime. In addition, the artificially shifted aviation emissions from the tropics to the polar regions in the CEDS emission inventory, as reported by Thor et al. (2023), can play a role here.
In the SH, the anthropogenic non-traffic, biomass burning, and shipping categories contribute most to the changes of the tropospheric O3 column and the CH4 lifetime. In these sectors, the increase (CCMI-2022 vs CCMI-1) in NOx emissions is most pronounced. In addition, CO emissions from biomass burning are also reduced (CCMI-2022 compared to CCMI-1) in the SH. In the SH, the tropospheric O3 column and the CH4 lifetime are more sensitive to emission changes; e.g. anthropogenic non-traffic NOx emission changes are 3.08 Tg(N) in the NH and 0.34 Tg(N) in the SH, which corresponds to increases of the tropospheric O3 column of 0.76 and 0.51 DU, respectively. The land transport and aviation categories play a minor role in the SH. Accordingly, these categories hardly contribute to the tropospheric O3 column and the CH4 lifetime difference between the two simulations.
The biogenic category counteracts the increase in the tropospheric O3 column and the shortening of the CH4 lifetime in both hemispheres, although biogenic NOx, CO, and NMHC emissions are unchanged (see Table 3 and Sect. 2.1). The O3 production efficiency of one category can be affected by emission changes of another category due to non-linear compensation effects (see e.g. Mertens et al., 2018, their Fig. 6). In this case, the diagnosed contribution of the biogenic category to changes of O3 and CH4 lifetime is not caused by emission changes but by a larger O3 burden efficiency (see Fig. 4).
4.1 Limitations
First of all, the used TAGGING method relies on some simplifications, which are discussed in more detail by Grewe et al. (2017), Rieger et al. (2018), and Mertens et al. (2018). As an example, decomposition of PAN from lightning can lead to artificial small contributions of NMHCs from lightning emissions. For the TAGGING of HOx, a reduced set of chemical reactions is considered, compared to the chemical mechanism calculated by MECCA (Rieger et al., 2018). This means that the sum of all tagged OH tracers can deviate from the total OH tracer. The CH4 loss unaccounted by the TAGGING, i.e. represented by the residuum lifetime (see Eq. 5), is, however, less important than any of the tagged categories in our simulations. We calculate the contribution of the unaccounted loss to the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH, which is −0.01 years in the NH and −0.05 years in the SH (see Table 3). Categories with a smaller contribution are not considered to have a meaningful effect on the CH4 lifetime change, i.e. N2O, lightning, and stratosphere in the NH and land transport, N2O, lightning, stratosphere, CH4, and aviation in the SH. Further, we calculate the contribution to the CH4 lifetime change using two methods, which are explained in Sect. 2.4. The relative contributions are consistent for both methods, but only method 2 is closed, meaning that the sum of all individual contributions results in the total change of CH4 lifetime. Therefore, we recommend using method 2 for further studies.
Further, our simulation set-up does not allow us to separate the effects of the individual species, CO, NMHCs, and NOx. We expect that O3 production is mainly NOx limited on the hemispheric scale and therefore that the changes of NOx emissions are most important to explain the increase in tropospheric O3 column and the shortening of the CH4 lifetime. In general, we find that categories with enhanced NOx emissions lead to increased tropospheric O3 column and a shortening of the CH4 lifetime, which is supporting this assumption. One exception is the biomass burning category in the NH, for which the effect of CO reduction seems to dominate (see Sect. 3.3). For a clear assessment of the effect to the individual species, a different simulation set-up, in which only the emissions of either CO, NMHCs, or NOx are changed, would be necessary.
4.2 Comparison to the literature
As we show in the Results section, the updated prescribed emission inventory leads to an increase in the tropospheric O3 column by about 4 %. As tropospheric O3 is generally overestimated by the EMAC model (Jöckel et al., 2016), the use of the CCMI-2022 emission inventory for O3 precursor species brings the model's tropospheric O3 further away from observations. Similarly, the tropospheric CH4 lifetime is generally underestimated by EMAC compared to observations (Jöckel et al., 2016), which means that the use of the CCMI-2022 emission inventory leads to a less good agreement with observations. This is a common issue of many models (see also Prather and Zhu, 2024).
Previous studies analysing simulation results from other chemistry–climate models prescribing the CEDS emission inventory for O3 precursor emissions noted a strong shortening of the CH4 lifetime after the year 1990 as well. For instance, Skeie et al. (2023, their Figure 3) show that the increase in OH is steeper in the AerChemMIP multi-model mean ensemble, which is based on the CEDS emission inventory, compared to the multi-model mean ensemble of CCMI-1. Similarly, the three chemistry–climate models of the AerChemMIP ensemble as analysed by Stevenson et al. (2020) show a drop of the CH4 lifetime after the year 1990 in the historical simulation, which is not apparent when O3 precursor emissions are kept at pre-industrial levels. Thus, these studies indicate that the CEDS emission inventory also leads to similar effects in other CCMs but did not aim at attributing differences to individual emission sectors.
It is noteworthy that both simulations show negative temporal trends of the CH4 lifetime and positive trends of OH over the period 2000–2010, which is in line with the trends simulated by other CCMs (Nicely et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020; Stevenson et al., 2020). In line with this, the study by Morgenstern et al. (2025) indicates a positive trend of OH since 1997 based on SH measurements of 14CO. Conversely, previous observation-based estimates and inversions of OH do not indicate a trend (see IPCC, 2021, Table 6.7, and references therein).
The CEDSGBD-MAPS emission inventory provided by McDuffie et al. (2020) is an update of CEDS (Hoesly et al., 2018), which suggests smaller global emissions of NOx and CO after the year 2006 compared to CEDS. The difference is about 3 Tg(N) for NOx and 10 Tg(C) for CO in the year 2010 (McDuffie et al., 2020, their Fig. 6). The differences of NOx emissions are explained by reduced emissions from the transport sector in India and Africa and by an updated emission estimate for China (Zheng et al., 2018). The reduction of NOx emissions in CEDSGBD-MAPS would compensate about 34 % of the NOx emissions increase from EMIS-01 to EMIS-02, and the increase in CO emissions would compensate about 33 % of the reduction of CO emissions from EMIS-01 to EMIS-02. For NMHCs, McDuffie et al. (2020) suggest 5 % larger global emissions than Hoesly et al. (2018), which result mainly from larger emissions in Africa from the oil and gas sector.
In this study, we analyse the impact of the two different emission inventories for NOx, CO, and NMHCs, as have been used for the CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022 initiatives, on the simulated tropospheric O3, OH, and CH4 lifetime. Therefore, we have performed targeted simulations with the EMAC model over the years 2000–2010 equipped with the diagnostic TAGGING submodel to further attribute differences of O3, OH, and CH4 lifetime to individual emission sectors (Grewe et al., 2017; Rieger et al., 2018).
Our results suggests that the use of the emission inventory of CCMI-2022 enhances the tropospheric O3 column by 3.7 % in the NH and by 4.5 % in the SH in comparison to the emission inventory used for CCMI-1. The tropospheric CH4 lifetime with respect to the oxidation with OH shortens by 0.25 years in the NH and by 0.4 years in the SH.
Using the TAGGING submodel, we attribute these differences to individual emission sectors. In the NH, the sectors contributing most to the change in the tropospheric O3 column are anthropogenic non-traffic (55 %), land transport (46 %), shipping (12 %), and biomass burning (5 %). In the SH, the primary contributors are anthropogenic non-traffic (43 %), biomass burning (30 %), and shipping (31 %). The aviation sector counteracts the increase in the tropospheric O3 column by about 5 % in both hemispheres. Due to the non-linearity of the O3 chemistry, the contributions of tagging categories with unmodified emissions also change. For instance, the O3 production efficiency of biogenic soil NOx emissions decreases, which counteracts the increase in the tropospheric O3 column by 19 % in the NH and by 15 % in the SH.
Our study is to our knowledge the first that uses the tagging approach to attribute the difference of CH4 lifetime between two simulations to individual emission sectors. We find that the sectors, which contribute most to the increase in the tropospheric O3 column, also contribute most to the shortening of the tropospheric CH4 lifetime. However, the contribution of one sector to the change of eitherO3 or CH4 lifetime is not necessarily the same. For instance, in the NH the biomass burning sector contributes about 12 % to the increase in the tropospheric O3 column but about 32 % to the shortening of the CH4 lifetime.
Further, our results demonstrate the dependence of tropospheric O3 and the CH4 lifetime simulated by CCMs on the prescribed emission inventories for NOx, CO, and NMHCs and the resulting uncertainty. The tropospheric O3 column and the CH4 lifetime differ by about 4 % for the two emission inventories used that both aim at representing recent historical conditions. It would be valuable to investigate whether the changes of O3 and CH4 lifetime caused by the modified emission inventory are of similar magnitude in other CCMs. The studies by Skeie et al. (2023) and Stevenson et al. (2020) suggest that the CEDS emission inventory leads to a significant shortening of the CH4 lifetime after the year 1990 in other CCMs as well.
Future research utilizing the tagging method could provide deeper insights into this topic. For example, additional simulations with a revised set-up, where only one chemical species (e.g. NOx) is modified within the emission inventories, would enable a more straightforward comparison of the contributions of NOx, CO, or NMHC emissions to O3, OH, and the CH4 lifetime in the troposphere. Regional tagging would be a valuable addition, enabling closer examination of regional responses.
In this appendix, we explain how we derived Eq. (6) to calculate , the contribution of category i to the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH. The reciprocal of the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH is given by the sum of the reciprocals of the individual lifetimes (see Eq. 4). Here, we use , so that the CH4 loss by the total OH including the residuum is accounted for.
Thus, we can write as a function of
for which the derivative with respect to is given by
The derivative indicates by how much the CH4 lifetime with respect to total OH changes with changing . Thus, we approximate the contribution of category i to the CH4 lifetime change with respect to total OH, , with this derivative:
The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360186, MESSy Consortium, 2025) is continuously further developed and applied by a consortium of institutions. The usage of MESSy and access to the source code is licensed to all affiliates of institutions which are members of the MESSy Consortium. Institutions can become a member of the MESSy Consortium by signing the MESSy Memorandum of Understanding. More information can be found on the MESSy Consortium website (http://www.messy-interface.org, last access: 30 September 2025). The simulation results presented here are based on MESSy version 2.55.2 (MESSy Consortium, 2021). The simulation results are archived at Zenodo and available under the DOIs https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712802 (Acquah et al., 2025a, EMIS-01 simulation), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712940 (Acquah et al., 2025b, EMIS-02 simulation), and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17276193 (Acquah et al., 2025c, EMIS-01-ODS simulation). We used Climate Data Operators (CDO; https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/cdo/, last access: 13 November 2024; Schulzweida, 2023) and netCDF Operators (NCO; Zender, 2024) for data processing. Further, we used Python, especially the packages Xarray (Hoyer and Hamman, 2017) and Matplotlib (Hunter, 2007), for data analysis and producing the figures. Further, datasets provided by MESSy via the DKRZ data pool were used.
The supplement related to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13665-2025-supplement.
CA analysed the data, created most of the plots, and drafted the manuscript. LS, MM, and PJ developed the concept of the study and prepared the simulation set-up. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the model results and to the writing of the manuscript.
At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
This article is part of the special issue “The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.
We thank Alina Fiehn (DLR) for doing the internal review. We furthermore thank all contributors of the project ESCiMo (Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling), which provides the model configuration and initial conditions for the model simulations performed here. This work used resources of the Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ) granted by its Scientific Steering Committee (WLA) under project id0853.
This research has been supported by DLR institutional funding for the internal project MABAK.
The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).
This paper was edited by Qiang Zhang and reviewed by three anonymous referees.
Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-01 simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712802, 2025a. a
Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-02 simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14712940, 2025b. a
Acquah, C., Stecher, L., Mertens, M., and Jöckel, P.: Effects of different emission inventories on tropospheric ozone and methane lifetime, results of EMIS-01-ODS simulation (1.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17276193, 2025c. a
Ashmore, M. R.: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation, Plant Cell and Environment, 28, 949–964, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x, 2005. a
Bell, M. L., McDermott, A., Zeger, S. L., Samet, J. M., and Dominici, F.: Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000, Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 2372–2378, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.19.2372, 2004. a
Bourtsoukidis, E., Ernle, L., Crowley, J. N., Lelieveld, J., Paris, J.-D., Pozzer, A., Walter, D., and Williams, J.: Non-methane hydrocarbon (C2–C8) sources and sinks around the Arabian Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7209–7232, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7209-2019, 2019. a
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Manning, M. R., Lowe, D. C., Wallace, G., Sparks, R. J., and Volz-Thomas, A.: Interhemispheric asymmetry in OH abundance inferred from measurements of atmospheric 14CO, Nature, 356, 50–52, https://doi.org/10.1038/356050a0, 1992. a
Butler, T., Lupascu, A., and Nalam, A.: Attribution of ground-level ozone to anthropogenic and natural sources of nitrogen oxides and reactive carbon in a global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10707–10731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, 2020. a
Collins, W. J., Lamarque, J.-F., Schulz, M., Boucher, O., Eyring, V., Hegglin, M. I., Maycock, A., Myhre, G., Prather, M., Shindell, D., and Smith, S. J.: AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 585–607, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-585-2017, 2017. a
Crutzen, P. J.: Photochemical Reactions Initiated by and Influencing Ozone in Unpolluted Tropospheric Air, Tellus, 26, 47–57, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1974.tb01951.x, 1974. a, b
Deckert, R., Jöckel, P., Grewe, V., Gottschaldt, K.-D., and Hoor, P.: A quasi chemistry-transport model mode for EMAC, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 195–206, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-195-2011, 2011. a
Duncan, B. N., Anderson, D. C., Fiore, A. M., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Li, C., Millet, D. B., Nicely, J. M., Oman, L. D., St. Clair, J. M., Shutter, J. D., Souri, A. H., Strode, S. A., Weir, B., Wolfe, G. M., Worden, H. M., and Zhu, Q.: Opinion: Beyond global means – novel space-based approaches to indirectly constrain the concentrations of and trends and variations in the tropospheric hydroxyl radical (OH), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13001–13023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13001-2024, 2024. a
Emberson, L. D., Pleijel, H., Ainsworth, E. A., van den Berg, M., Ren, W., Osborne, S., Mills, G., Pandey, D., Dentener, F., Buker, P., Ewert, F., Koeble, R., and Van Dingenen, R.: Ozone effects on crops and consideration in crop models, European Journal of Agronomy, 100, 19–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2018.06.002, 2018. a
Eyring, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Hess, P., Arfeuille, F., Bowman, K., Chipperfiel, M. P., Duncan, B., Fiore, A., Gettelman, A., Giorgetta, M. A., Granier, C., Hegglin, M., Kinnison, D., Kunze, M., Langematz, U., Luo, B., Martin, R., Matthes, K., Newman, P. A., Peter, T., Robock, A., Ryerson, T., Saiz-Lopez, A., Salawitch, R., Schultz, M., Shepherd, T. G., Shindell, D., Staehelin, J., Tegtmeier, S., Thomason, L., Tilmes, S., Vernier, J.-P., Waugh, D. W., and Young, P. J.: Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments, http://www.aparc-climate.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/SPARCnewsletter_No40_Jan2013_web.pdf (last access: 12 November 2024), 2013. a, b
Granier, C., Bessagnet, B., Bond, T., D'Angiola, A., van der Gon, H. D., Frost, G. J., Heil, A., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Klimont, Z., Kloster, S., Lamarque, J. F., Liousse, C., Masui, T., Meleux, F., Mieville, A., Ohara, T., Raut, J. C., Riahi, K., Schultz, M. G., Smith, S. J., Thompson, A., van Aardenne, J., van der Werf, G. R., and van Vuuren, D. P.: Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at global and regional scales during the 1980-2010 period, Climatic Change, 109, 163–190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0154-1, 2011. a, b, c, d, e, f
Grewe, V., Brunner, D., Dameris, M., Grenfell, J. L., Hein, R., Shindell, D., and Staehelin, J.: Origin and variability of upper tropospheric nitrogen oxides and ozone at northern mid-latitudes, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 3421–3433, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00134-0, 2001. a
Grewe, V., Tsati, E., and Hoor, P.: On the attribution of contributions of atmospheric trace gases to emissions in atmospheric model applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 487–499, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-487-2010, 2010. a, b
Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Matthes, S., and Steinbrecht, W.: Attributing ozone to NOx emissions: Implications for climate mitigation measures, Atmospheric Environment, 59, 102–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.05.002, 2012. a, b
Grewe, V., Tsati, E., Mertens, M., Frömming, C., and Jöckel, P.: Contribution of emissions to concentrations: the TAGGING 1.0 submodel based on the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy 2.52), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2615–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2615-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Guenther, A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., Fall, R., Geron, C., Graedel, T., Harley, P., Klinger, L., Lerdau, M., McKay, W. A., Pierce, T., Scholes, B., Steinbrecher, R., Tallamraju, R., Taylor, J., and Zimmerman, P.: A Global-Model of Natural Volatile Organic-Compound Emissions, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 100, 8873–8892, https://doi.org/10.1029/94jd02950, 1995. a, b
Haagensmit, A. J.: Chemistry and Physiology of Los-Angeles Smog, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 44, 1342–1346, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50510a045, 1952. a, b
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horanyi, A., Munoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Holm, E., Janiskova, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thepaut, J. N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in Python, Journal of Open Research Software, 5, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148, 2017. a
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 90–95, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55, 2007. a
Iglesias, D. J., Calatayud, A., Barreno, E., Primo-Millo, E., and Talon, M.: Responses of citrus plants to ozone: leaf biochemistry, antioxidant mechanisms and lipid peroxidation, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 44, 125–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2006.03.007, 2006. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1535 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324, 2013. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2391 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021. a, b, c
Jerrett, M., Burnett, R. T., Pope, C. A., Ito, K., Thurston, G., Krewski, D., Shi, Y. L., Calle, E., and Thun, M.: Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality, New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1085–1095, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0803894, 2009. a
Jöckel, P.: CCMI-2022: refD1 data produced by the EMAC-CCMI2 model at MESSy-Consortium, CEDA [data set], https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/9b15ae551fda4035a7940a3adbe31691/ (last access: 30 September 2025), 2023. a
Jöckel, P., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Lawrence, M. G., Jeuken, A. B. M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.: Evaluation of stratosphere–troposphere exchange and the hydroxyl radical distribution in three-dimensional global atmospheric models using observations of cosmogenic 14CO, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107, ACH 12-1–ACH 12-18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001324, 2002. a
Jöckel, P., Sander, R., Kerkweg, A., Tost, H., and Lelieveld, J.: Technical Note: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) – a new approach towards Earth System Modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 433–444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-433-2005, 2005. a
Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Pozzer, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., Riede, H., Baumgaertner, A., Gromov, S., and Kern, B.: Development cycle 2 of the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy2), Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 717–752, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-717-2010, 2010. a, b, c
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Kerkweg, A., Sander, R., Tost, H., and Jöckel, P.: Technical note: Implementation of prescribed (OFFLEM), calculated (ONLEM), and pseudo-emissions (TNUDGE) of chemical species in the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3603–3609, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3603-2006, 2006. a
Khalil, M. and Rasmussen, R.: The global cycle of carbon monoxide: Trends and mass balance, Chemosphere, 20, 227–242, https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(90)90098-E, 1990. a
Kilian, M., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Kerkweg, A., Mertens, M., Zahn, A., and Ziereis, H.: Ozone source attribution in polluted European areas during summer 2017 as simulated with MECO(n), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13503–13523, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13503-2024, 2024. a
Krol, M., van Leeuwen, P. J., and Lelieveld, J.: Global OH trend inferred from methylchloroform measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 103, 10697–10711, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00459, 1998. a
Lamarque, J. F., Hess, P., Emmons, L., Buja, L., Washington, W., and Granier, C.: Tropospheric ozone evolution between 1890 and 1990, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005537, 2005. a, b
Lawrence, M. G., Jöckel, P., and von Kuhlmann, R.: What does the global mean OH concentration tell us?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 1, 37–49, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-1-37-2001, 2001. a, b, c
Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016, 2016. a
Manning, M. R., Lowe, D. C., Moss, R. C., Bodeker, G. E., and Allan, W.: Short-term variations in the oxidizing power of the atmosphere, Nature, 436, 1001–1004, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03900, 2005. a
McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R. V.: A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): an application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 3413–3442, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3413-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Mertens, M., Grewe, V., Rieger, V. S., and Jöckel, P.: Revisiting the contribution of land transport and shipping emissions to tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5567–5588, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5567-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Mertens, M., Kerkweg, A., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., and Sausen, R.: Attributing ozone and its precursors to land transport emissions in Europe and Germany, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7843–7873, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7843-2020, 2020. a
Mertens, M., Brinkop, S., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Hendricks, J., Jöckel, P., Lanteri, A., Matthes, S., Rieger, V. S., Righi, M., and Thor, R. N.: The contribution of transport emissions to ozone mixing ratios and methane lifetime in 2015 and 2050 in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12079–12106, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12079-2024, 2024. a, b, c
MESSy Consortium: The Modular Earth Submodel System (2.55.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360276, 2021. a
MESSy Consortium: The Modular Earth Submodel System, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8360186, 2025. a
Monks, P. S.: Gas-phase radical chemistry in the troposphere, Chemical Society Reviews, 34, 376–395, https://doi.org/10.1039/b307982c, 2005. a
Monks, P. S., Archibald, A. T., Colette, A., Cooper, O., Coyle, M., Derwent, R., Fowler, D., Granier, C., Law, K. S., Mills, G. E., Stevenson, D. S., Tarasova, O., Thouret, V., von Schneidemesser, E., Sommariva, R., Wild, O., and Williams, M. L.: Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8889–8973, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015, 2015. a
Montzka, S. A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl, Science, 331, 67–69, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640, 2011. a
Morgenstern, O., Moss, R., Manning, M., Zeng, G., Schaefer, H., Usoskin, I., Turnbull, J., Brailsford, G., Nichol, S., and Bromley, T.: Radiocarbon monoxide indicates increasing atmospheric oxidizing capacity, Nature Communications, 16, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55603-1, 2025. a
Moura, B. B., Alves, E. S., de Souza, S. R., Domingos, M., and Vollenweider, P.: Ozone phytotoxic potential with regard to fragments of the Atlantic Semi-deciduous Forest downwind of Sao Paulo, Brazil, Environmental Pollution, 192, 65–73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.014, 2014. a
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018, 2013. a
Nguyen, N. H., Turner, A. J., Yin, Y., Prather, M. J., and Frankenberg, C.: Effects of Chemical Feedbacks on Decadal Methane Emissions Estimates, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL085706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085706, 2020. a
Nicely, J. M., Duncan, B. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., Salawitch, R. J., Deushi, M., Haslerud, A. S., Jöckel, P., Josse, B., Kinnison, D. E., Klekociuk, A., Manyin, M. E., Marécal, V., Morgenstern, O., Murray, L. T., Myhre, G., Oman, L. D., Pitari, G., Pozzer, A., Quaglia, I., Revell, L. E., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Stone, K., Strahan, S., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., Westervelt, D. M., and Zeng, G.: A machine learning examination of hydroxyl radical differences among model simulations for CCMI-1, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1341–1361, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1341-2020, 2020. a
Niemeier, U., Granier, C., Kornblueh, L., Walters, S., and Brasseur, G. P.: Global impact of road traffic on atmospheric chemical composition and on ozone climate forcing, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006407, 2006. a
Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., and Voller, F.: The effects of ozone on human health, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 8074–8088, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3, 2018. a
Plummer, D., Nagashima, T., Josse, B., Lamarque, J.-F., Morgenstern, O., Orbe, C., Tai, A., Chipperfield, M., and Kinnison, D.: Proposed Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations in support of the 2022 WMO/UNEP Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, https://bpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.reading.ac.uk/dist/7/201/files/2020/09/CCMI-2022_REF-D1_proposal_20200921.pdf (last access: 12 November 2024), 2020. a
Pozzer, A., Pollmann, J., Taraborrelli, D., Jöckel, P., Helmig, D., Tans, P., Hueber, J., and Lelieveld, J.: Observed and simulated global distribution and budget of atmospheric C2-C5 alkanes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4403–4422, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4403-2010, 2010. a
Prather, M. J. and Zhu, L.: Resetting tropospheric OH and CH4 lifetime with ultraviolet H2O absorption, Science, 385, 201–204, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn0415, 2024. a
Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.: Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440, 2012. a
Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., Cunnold, D. M., Fraser, P. J., Simmonds, P. G., McCulloch, A., Harth, C., Reimann, S., Salameh, P., O'Doherty, S., Wang, R. H. J., Porter, L. W., Miller, B. R., and Krummel, P. B.: Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022228, 2005. a, b
Rieger, V. S., Mertens, M., and Grewe, V.: An advanced method of contributing emissions to short-lived chemical species (OH and HO2): the TAGGING 1.1 submodel based on the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy 2.53), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2049–2066, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2049-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Roeckner, E., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M., Hagemann, S., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Schlese, U., and Schulzweida, U.: Sensitivity of Simulated Climate to Horizontal and Vertical Resolution in the ECHAM5 Atmosphere Model, Journal of Climate, 19, 3771–3791, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3824.1, 2006. a
Sander, R., Baumgaertner, A., Cabrera-Perez, D., Frank, F., Gromov, S., Grooß, J.-U., Harder, H., Huijnen, V., Jöckel, P., Karydis, V. A., Niemeyer, K. E., Pozzer, A., Riede, H., Schultz, M. G., Taraborrelli, D., and Tauer, S.: The community atmospheric chemistry box model CAABA/MECCA-4.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1365–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1365-2019, 2019. a
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020, 2020. a
Schultz, M. and Rast, S.: Emission data sets and methodologies for estimating emissions, REanalysis of the TROpospheric chemical composition over the past 40 years, A long-term global modelling study of tropospheric chemistry funded under the 5th EU frame-work programme, Tech. Rep., EVK2-CT-2002-00170, 2007. a
Schulzweida, U.: CDO User Guide (2.3.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10020800, 2023. a
Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007, 2007. a
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 3rd edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 9781118947401, 2016. a, b, c
Silva, R. A., West, J. J., Zhang, Y. Q., Anenberg, S. C., Lamarque, J. F., Shindell, D. T., Collins, W. J., Dalsoren, S., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G., Horowitz, L. W., Nagashima, T., Naik, V., Rumbold, S., Skeie, R., Sudo, K., Takemura, T., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Josse, B., MacKenzie, I. A., Plummer, D., Righi, M., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Global premature mortality due to anthropogenic outdoor air pollution and the contribution of past climate change, Environmental Research Letters, 8, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034005, 2013. a
Skeie, R. B., Hodnebrog, Ø., and Myhre, G.: Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions, Commun Earth Environ, 4, 317, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00969-1, 2023. a, b, c
Stecher, L. M.: The role of methane for chemistry-climate interactions, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-338123 (last access: 30 September 2025), 2024. a
Stevenson, D. S., Young, P. J., Naik, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Voulgarakis, A., Skeie, R. B., Dalsoren, S. B., Myhre, G., Berntsen, T. K., Folberth, G. A., Rumbold, S. T., Collins, W. J., MacKenzie, I. A., Doherty, R. M., Zeng, G., van Noije, T. P. C., Strunk, A., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Plummer, D. A., Strode, S. A., Horowitz, L., Lee, Y. H., Szopa, S., Sudo, K., Nagashima, T., Josse, B., Cionni, I., Righi, M., Eyring, V., Conley, A., Bowman, K. W., Wild, O., and Archibald, A.: Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3063–3085, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3063-2013, 2013. a, b
Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12905–12920, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e
Szopa, S., Naik, V., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., H. Liao, N. U., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., 817–922, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.008, 2021. a
Thor, R. N., Mertens, M., Matthes, S., Righi, M., Hendricks, J., Brinkop, S., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., and Smith, S.: An inconsistency in aviation emissions between CMIP5 and CMIP6 and the implications for short-lived species and their radiative forcing, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1459–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023, 2023. a, b
Uherek, E., Halenka, T., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Balkanski, Y., Berntsen, T., Borrego, C., Gauss, M., Hoor, P., Juda-Rezler, K., Lelieveld, J., Melas, D., Rypdal, K., and Schmid, S.: Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Land transport, Atmospheric Environment, 44, 4772–4816, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.002, 2010. a
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., and Arellano Jr., A. F.: Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3423–3441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3423-2006, 2006. a
van Marle, M. J. E., Kloster, S., Magi, B. I., Marlon, J. R., Daniau, A.-L., Field, R. D., Arneth, A., Forrest, M., Hantson, S., Kehrwald, N. M., Knorr, W., Lasslop, G., Li, F., Mangeon, S., Yue, C., Kaiser, J. W., and van der Werf, G. R.: Historic global biomass burning emissions for CMIP6 (BB4CMIP) based on merging satellite observations with proxies and fire models (1750–2015), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3329–3357, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3329-2017, 2017. a
Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., Adon, M., and Martin, R. V.: Worldwide biogenic soil NOx emissions inferred from OMI NO2 observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10363–10381, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10363-2014, 2014. a
Voulgarakis, A., Naik, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Shindell, D. T., Young, P. J., Prather, M. J., Wild, O., Field, R. D., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Folberth, G. A., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Stevenson, D. S., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Analysis of present day and future OH and methane lifetime in the ACCMIP simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2563–2587, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2563-2013, 2013. a
Wedow, J. M., Ainsworth, E. A., and Li, S.: Plant biochemistry influences tropospheric ozone formation, destruction, deposition, and response, Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 46, 992–1002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2021.06.007, 2021. a
Yienger, J. J. and Levy II, H.: Empirical model of global soil-biogenic NOx emissions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 100, 11447–11464, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00370, 1995. a
Young, P. J., Archibald, A. T., Bowman, K. W., Lamarque, J.-F., Naik, V., Stevenson, D. S., Tilmes, S., Voulgarakis, A., Wild, O., Bergmann, D., Cameron-Smith, P., Cionni, I., Collins, W. J., Dalsøren, S. B., Doherty, R. M., Eyring, V., Faluvegi, G., Horowitz, L. W., Josse, B., Lee, Y. H., MacKenzie, I. A., Nagashima, T., Plummer, D. A., Righi, M., Rumbold, S. T., Skeie, R. B., Shindell, D. T., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., and Zeng, G.: Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2063–2090, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2063-2013, 2013. a
Zender, C. S.: netCDF Operator (NCO) User Guide, http://nco.sf.net/nco.pdf (last access: 30 September 2025), 2024. a
Zhao, Y., Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Lin, X., Berchet, A., Hegglin, M. I., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Deushi, M., Jöckel, P., Kinnison, D., Kirner, O., Strode, S., Tilmes, S., Dlugokencky, E. J., and Zheng, B.: On the role of trend and variability in the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the global methane budget, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13011–13022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13011-2020, 2020. a
Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018, 2018. a
Zheng, B., Chevallier, F., Yin, Y., Ciais, P., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Deeter, M. N., Parker, R. J., Wang, Y., Worden, H. M., and Zhao, Y.: Global atmospheric carbon monoxide budget 2000–2017 inferred from multi-species atmospheric inversions, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1411–1436, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1411-2019, 2019. a
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods and data
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Appendix A: Derivation of methane lifetime change formula
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Special issue statement
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References
- Supplement
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods and data
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Appendix A: Derivation of methane lifetime change formula
- Code and data availability
- Author contributions
- Competing interests
- Disclaimer
- Special issue statement
- Acknowledgements
- Financial support
- Review statement
- References
- Supplement