the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

The global O2 airglow field as seen by the MATS satellite: strong equatorial maximum and planetary wave influence
Lukas Krasauskas
Linda Megner
Donal P. Murtagh
The Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy (MATS) satellite was launched in November 2022, carrying as its main instrument a limb-viewing telescope with six spectral channels designed to image atmospheric O2 airglow and noctilucent clouds. Although the main objective of the satellite mission is to observe structures in the airglow introduced by propagating smaller-scale waves, the airglow emissions are also subjected to large-scale dynamic disturbances, such as atmospheric tides and planetary waves. This work presents large-scale structures in the airglow field, as observed by the MATS limb imager from February 2023 to April 2023. The ascending (north-going) node in the satellite orbit, corresponding to the local sunset, is dominated by a strong equatorial maximum in the dayglow. In contrast, the descending (south-going) node, corresponding to the local sunrise, indicates an accompanying equatorial minimum. These characteristics align with the expected behaviour of atmospheric tidal movements. Specifically, a downwelling of atomic oxygen is expected over the Equator at local sunset, contributing to airglow chemistry and enhancing the emissions. Another distinct feature in the data is a westward propagating disturbance observed at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, maximising in February, interpreted as the quasi-10 d planetary wave of zonal wavenumber 1.
- Article
(7727 KB) - Full-text XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
The MATS satellite mission (Gumbel et al., 2020) was launched from Te Māhia / the Mahia Peninsula, Aotearoa / New Zealand, in November 2022 to study the activity of gravity waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT). To identify atmospheric waves in the 70–110 km altitude range, the satellite is equipped with a limb imager designed to observe wave perturbations introduced in noctilucent clouds (NLCs) and global atmospheric airglow emissions. During winter and spring 2022/2023, MATS collected more than 4 million atmospheric limb images, distributed over six spectral regions. Through tomography and spectroscopy, these images will be used to retrieve a 3D representation of the MLT temperature field to fully characterise the gravity waves that perturb it.
Gravity waves (GWs) and planetary waves (PWs) originating in the lower atmosphere play crucial roles in the dynamics of the middle atmosphere. As air density rapidly decreases with altitude, the amplitudes of vertically propagating waves become substantial at MLT altitudes and wave breaking results in momentum deposit in the form of wind motion. Atmospheric thermal tides also play a dominant role in shaping the atmospheric state of the MLT. The zonally uniform solar heating during the day, together with the release of latent heat in tropical regions, gives rise to both migrating and nonmigrating tidal waves. These components move upward and influence the dynamics of the middle and upper atmospheres (Hagan and Forbes, 2002). In addition, the diurnal tide interacts with the PWs to generate nonmigrating tidal components (Lieberman et al., 2015) and dissipation of the tide substantially affects the zonal mean wind field (Hagan et al., 2009). Even without dissipation or breaking, these large-scale perturbations of the atmosphere constitute the background in which the smaller-scale waves propagate. To retrieve the wave properties of gravity waves, these large-scale structures must be separated from small-scale perturbations. The vertical flux of the horizontal gravity wave momentum (GWMF) is an important quantity for understanding the wave-driven changes of the MLT since it is directly related to the amount of deposited momentum. The GWMF can be calculated directly from wave parameters derived from wave-induced perturbations of the temperature field (Ern et al., 2004). In this representation, the magnitude is determined by the ratio of the wave amplitude to the temperature of the surrounding atmosphere (inclusive of large-scale perturbations). It is therefore important to separate the different scales with high precision.
The main purpose of this paper is to give a brief overview of the large-scale patterns observed by MATS, highlighting some of the most outstanding features within it, while at the same time providing a better understanding of the background field in which the smaller waves propagate. The study is based on the so-called Level 1b calibrated images (Megner et al., 2025a), from which we have derived profiles of volume emission rate, as the MATS temperature retrieval is still under development.
The MATS satellite operates in a dawn–dusk, sun-synchronous orbit, at ≈585 km altitude, collecting data from the MLT at roughly 17:30 and 05:30 local solar time (LST) at the Equator. The main instrument of MATS is a six-channel (four IR + two UV) imager that targets the atmospheric limb, centred at a tangent altitude of approximately 90 km. MATS was launched on 4 November 2022 and completed its commissioning phase in January 2023. Further improvements were made during early 2023 and data collected from February, resulting in three full months of consequent measurements. The satellite started experiencing issues with its attitude controls in May 2023 and scientific operations have been limited since then. A single day of MATS measurements includes a total of roughly 60 000 images taken by the four IR channels. For a given channel, an image of the atmospheric limb is captured every 6 s. The horizontal (across-track) distance in an image is approximately 200 km; as images are taken at a fast rate, the same atmospheric volume is observed several times. This is exploited in the tomographic analysis to recover three-dimensional fields from the MLT. The limb imager measures atmospheric airglow in the O2 atmospheric A-band, centred around 762 nm. The main channels IR1, centred at 762 nm (3.5 nm bandwidth), and IR2, centred at 763 nm (8 nm bandwidth), capture the central region and full width of the A-band, respectively, while the two background channels, IR3 and IR4, target spectral regions outside the band to quantify the contribution of Rayleigh scattered light in the images. Since the IR1 and IR2 channels will include Rayleigh scattered light along with A-band emissions, the background channels can be used to separate signals that are solely due to airglow emissions.
In this study, we employ the MATS L1b data product, i.e. the calibrated images taken by the limb imager (Megner et al., 2025a; Linder et al., 2025). Specifically, images from the IR2 channel are used to investigate global A-band emissions, as this channel covers the entire A-band. The global structures are further analysed by performing a one-dimensional inversion, after subtracting the Rayleigh background using the background channel IR3. The measurements are known to be affected by stray light but it is believed that the error due to imperfect stray light compensation in the data used for this work is less than 5×1013 photons for the IR2 channel, i.e. less than 11 % of the mean peak radiance of all the MATS image columns used in this paper. As we are mainly interested in the large-scale variations connected to the peak of the emissions, stray light should not substantially impact this study. Stray light removal will be addressed in the ongoing MATS data processing development.
The O2 A-band emission (centred around 762 nm) is separated into dayglow and nightglow, characterised by different chemical reactions, in turn determined by the solar conditions under which they occur. Dayglow emissions in the band are produced through reactions between O(1D) and O2, where the short-lived O(1D) is generated by photolysis of O2 or O3. For nightglow conditions, emissions are produced through reactions initiated by the recombination of atomic oxygen in the O(3P) state, a longer-lived atomic oxygen state. The study of geographical and temporal changes in emissions is thus complicated by the fact that these two types of emission are not directly comparable, not least because the nightglow emissions are approximately an order of magnitude weaker than the dayglow emissions. A particularly strong dependence on the emission strength due to changes in the solar zenith angle (SZA) is observed for angles between 90 and 100°. For readers seeking a more comprehensive introduction, we refer to Li et al. (2020).
The distribution of tangent point SZAs in the studied period, calculated at the central tangent height of the instrument, is presented in Fig. 1. The period is characterised by dayglow conditions during the ascending node (∼17:30 LST at the Equator), while measurements in the descending node (∼05:30 LST at the Equator) are mostly made in the transitional region between nightglow and dayglow (illustrated by the cross-hatched regions of Fig. 1). From the figure, it is clear that, by avoiding SZAs of 90° to 100°, we restrict our study to focus mainly on dayglow emissions in the ascending node. Poles are ignored to avoid contamination by noctilucent clouds and auroras.

Figure 1Geographical distribution of tangent point SZAs between 70 and 70° S in the studied period. Shaded areas highlight nightglow measurements and cross-hatched regions highlight measurements made in the transitional region between nightglow and dayglow.
Global maps of the mean dayglow limb radiance at 85 km, observed at ∼17:30 LST (at the Equator) by the IR2 channel, are shown in Fig. 2 for February (Fig. 2a, b), March (Fig. 2c, d) and April (Fig. 2e, f). Each panel consists of 2 weeks of individual measurements, so that two adjacent passes are separated by 24 h, with the longitude progressing by approximately 10° per orbit. The limb-radiance field is dominated by a large equatorial maximum, particularly prominent during February and March. The transition to nightglow for the ascending node is seen in the southern hemisphere during March and April, illustrated by the reduction in intensity. In April, a secondary peak at ∼30° N becomes visible. The stripes over North America from 15–28 February indicate that, over a large geographical region, a strong signal was registered during multiple orbits (each separated by 10° longitude).

Figure 2MATS ascending-node IR2 measurements of limb radiance at 85 km tangent height, made during February, March and April for SZA < 93°. Each point corresponds to an individual MATS measurement and every map corresponds to 2 weeks of observations. White stripes indicate gaps in the data. The data are collected at approximately 17:30 local solar time (LST) at the Equator. Photons are denoted by “ph” here and in other figures.
Over the Pacific Ocean, the equatorial maximum deviates in part northward and southward from the Equator, while remaining closer to 0°N over the Atlantic and Africa, a pattern that is consistent in the studied period.
Even in the regime of pure dayglow emissions, SZA is expected to have some effect on the measured limb radiance. Figure 3 illustrates how solar conditions at the time of measurement affect the intensity of the limb radiance, depicting its variation with SZA and latitude for the ascending and descending nodes. As measurements in the descending node (morning, ∼05:30 LST) are made in the transition region between day- and nightglow, the visualisation of Fig. 3 helps to distinguish how changes in SZA influence intensity separately from other geographical variations. From Fig. 3, it is clear that the equatorial maximum in the dayglow of the ascending node and the equatorial minimum in the nightglow of the descending node exist independently of the lowest and highest SZAs, respectively.

Figure 3Mean limb radiance observed in MATS IR2 at tangent height 85 km during February as a function of latitude and tangent point SZA. Left: evening dayglow conditions (∼17:30 LST at Equator). Right: morning nightglow conditions (∼05:30 LST at Equator).
For this study, 1D volume emission rate (VER) retrieval was performed. Tomographic 3D data products aimed at studying small-scale phenomena, such as gravity waves, are still in development at the time of writing. 1D retrieval was performed for each IR1 and IR2 image. In each retrieval, a single column of radiances (the mean of five central columns for each image was used) is taken as input and the altitude profile of the VER of the airglow in the corresponding spectral window is returned. The forward model for retrieval assumes that the atmosphere is (locally) homogeneous and accounts for absorption by O2. Emission and absorption are simulated using a line-by-line model, with spectroscopic data from HITRAN (Gordon et al., 2022). These quantities have a significant dependence on temperature. For the purposes of this simple extraction, the temperature of MSIS climatology (Fomichev et al., 2002) was used. The main MATS Level 2 data products will include 3D temperatures retrieved by combining IR1 and IR2 data. Inversions for 1D retrievals were based on the classic Tikhonov regularisation scheme (e.g. Rodgers, 2000), and included the Euclidean norm and first-order Tikhonov operator-based regularisation terms.
Figure 4 presents several examples of the VER collected from tropical regions. The initial two passes are from 7 March, spaced about 6 h apart, while the latter two passes are from 10 and 11 March, respectively. The examples illustrate that the maximum signal occasionally occurs at latitudes lower than and higher than the Equator and that the emission peak height varies slightly. The extent of the maxima also varies, as illustrated in Fig. 4c and d; the first example is characterised by strong and quite variable emission in the northern hemisphere, the second example by elongated signal enhancement in the southern hemisphere.
The geographical extent of the VER observed at 85 km for February, March and April can be seen in Fig. 5, where the mean of the VER is computed in 1°×1° longitude–latitude bins. For this emission height, the geographic location of the maximum is in good agreement with the observations through the atmospheric limb (Fig. 2). From Fig. 5, it is evident that the equatorial maximum still dominates the structure of global emission, with a mean signal remaining fairly constant throughout the studied period, approximately 15×104 photons cm−3 s−1, between 10° S and 10° N.

Figure 5Mean A-band VER at an altitude of 85 km for February, March and April (∼17:30 LST at Equator).
The oxygen A-band equatorial maximum has been observed in several other studies, for example, by HIRDI on the UARS satellite. Burrage et al. (1994) noted that the diurnal tide introduces a semiannual pattern in the equatorial O2 nightglow, peaking around the equinoxes and diminishing around the solstices, speculating that vertical transport of atomic oxygen and density changes play an important role. The mechanism for the increase in emissions was investigated by Ward (1998), who explored the dependence of local solar time by modelling vertical wind motions, emphasising that vertical wind advection plays the most important role in global distributions of oxygen airglow, as changes in temperature and density perturbations should counteract the increase in emissions. Marsh et al. (1999) concluded that nightglow emissions peak in the afternoon, due to changes in atomic oxygen recombination rates, while dayglow increases are due to increased production of O3, and therefore O(1D). To compare the airglow data measured by MATS with the predictions of tidal movements, a tidal model is required.
The Climatological Tidal Model of the Thermosphere (CTMT) serves as a tidal climatology for the MLT, derived from observations made by SABER and TIDI on TIMED from 2002 to 2008 (Oberheide et al., 2011). The model includes the largest tidal components, both semidiurnal and diurnal. Superposing six diurnal components and eight semidiurnal components, the longitudinal and latitudinal distributions of the tidal perturbations are shown for an LST of 17:30 and an LST of 05:30 at the Equator. In Fig. 6, the expected vertical wind perturbations are shown for these two local times for February, March and April, at an altitude of 85 km. The evening wind field is characterised by a strong downdraught at the Equator and updraughts at mid-latitudes. The situation is reversed in the morning, with an updraught at the Equator and a downdraught at the mid-latitudes. The wind patterns are symmetrical around the Equator, apart from a northward stretch over the Pacific Ocean and a slight southward extension over South America, similar to observations made in the MATS VER field. An expected peak at the equinox would imply that March and April would be of similar strengths, while February would be weaker. This is indicated by the wind field in Fig. 6.
Figure 7 allows for an analysis of the changes in the height of the emission peak, the intensity of the emission and their longitudinal distribution. The average equatorial VER is determined between 10° S and 10° N for each of the three months. The figure also illustrates the monthly average of the vertical wind at an altitude of 85 km from CTMT, calculated for the same equatorial region. The plots show that the VER signal is consistently strong over Africa, between 0 and 50° E, but from 60° W to 50° E the peak emission is stronger during March and April and weaker in February. In addition, in February, the emissions in these regions also occur at lower altitudes, particularly noticeably around 20° W and 30° E. Observed longitudinal variations are expected from the nonmigrating tidal components and the vertical advection they introduce. According to the CTMT wind data, around the end of February, a rise in VER is expected over the Indian Ocean (50–100° E), due to increased downwelling. This is confirmed in the emission field of Fig. 7. However, no increase in signal is observed over Southeast Asia, in contrast to the CTMT climatology. Obviously, given that the model is based on 6-year averages and the MATS is derived from a single year's measurements, a detailed direct comparison is of limited relevance.
In Fig. 2, in the limb radiances from February, short periods of high VER are seen at high northern latitudes (apparent as yellow stripes). By comparing Fig. 2a and b, it is observed that these perturbations first occur most prominently over Asia and then dominate the measurements over the Americas. In the latter half of February, over North America, several MATS passes recorded low emissions across the 50–70° N latitudes. Measurements of drastically increased emissions in the same region then followed these passes. These enhancements indicate a periodic change in emission, characteristic of planetary wave activity. To further study this, the VER data between 60 and 70° N were organised into 20° longitude bins and are presented as a Hovmöller diagram in Fig. 8. The figure evidently shows a significant large-scale emission peak migrating westward throughout February. The temporal separation between the maxima of approximately 10 d suggests that the perturbation may be due to the quasi-10 d wave with zonal wave number 1 (Q10DW). This planetary wave has been studied, for example, using TIMED/SABER temperature measurements obtained over 2002–2013 by Forbes and Zhang (2015). The study shows that Q10DW is strongest during winter around 50° N, with typical temperature amplitudes of around 5 K at 100 km. Furthermore, the phase of the wave is approximately constant with height and thus propagates horizontally but hardly in the vertical direction. The study is limited by the latitudinal extent, which only reaches ±50°, but the wave has an expected (theoretical) maximum at 55°. In the same study, the amplitude peaks between 80 and 100 km. The temperature amplitude is thus similar to the corresponding one seen in the CTMT fields at this altitude, which is ≈6 K at the Equator.

Figure 8Hovmöller diagram illustrating the high-latitude VER, grouped into 20° longitude bins, observed at an altitude of 85 km during February.
During the 2018 sudden stratospheric warming (SSW), the influence of warming on Q10DW in the MLT was investigated up to a latitude of 53.5° N using meteor radars. The study illustrated that the SSW amplified the wave amplitude (Luo et al., 2021). In 2023, a smaller SSW occurred during the end of January followed by a major SSW in the middle of February (Vargin et al., 2024). This may have enhanced the effect that the Q10DW had on the airglow emissions and possibly explains why this propagating planetary wave becomes a dominating feature in the MATS measurements.
We here present the first global results of the MATS airglow observations. We have found that tidal dynamics dominate the variations in the airglow emission field observed by MATS around the spring equinox. The tidal downdraught creates a strong equatorial maximum in the dayglow around local sunset, accompanied by local minima at mid-latitudes, due to tidal upwelling. At the local sunrise the picture is reversed, with an updraught and hence a local airglow minimum at the Equator. The structure has significant longitudinal and latitudinal variations during this short 3-month period and tendencies of a seasonal cycle are observed. The observed pattern is in general agreement with observations by previous satellite missions that studied oxygen airglow emissions. Because MATS is in a sun-synchronous orbit, tides and their influence on the dynamics are recorded at just two specific local times and the possibilities to study the general behaviour of the tide are therefore limited. However, temporal and longitudinal variations at these two specific phases can be analysed with a high and consistent sampling rate. Another prominent feature in the dataset is the westward propagating quasi-10 d zonal wavenumber 1 planetary wave (Q10DW), which strongly modulates the airglow field at northern latitudes in February and March. Tidal wind patterns will affect the observed wave field in the collected data in the two phases. Horizontal wind patterns introduce filtering effects that may need to be taken into account if a climatology of MLT waves is to be derived. Clearly, these large-scale patterns affect measurement analysis by controlling the intensity of the airglow; for instance, retrieval at the minimum in nightglow emissions recorded over the Equator is more difficult than at the dayglow maximum. However, the structures themselves are interesting targets for future investigations and, as the development of the MATS 3D temperature is finalised, detailed studies of the effects that planetary waves and tides have on the MLT can be performed. The resulting dataset may enable differentiation between airglow enhancements induced by vertical transport and those resulting from changes in temperature and density.
The analysis scripts are available on request. The MATS Level 1b dataset can be accessed from the Bolin centre database at https://doi.org/10.17043/mats-level-1b-limb-cropd-1.0 (Megner et al., 2025b).
BL: formal analysis, writing, visualisation. LK: performed and introduced the retrieval of volume emission rate. LM & DPM: conceptualisation and discussions.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
The MATS satellite mission is a collaborative effort, and we acknowledge the work of Jörg Gumbel, Ole Martin Christensen, Nicholay Ivchenko, Jacek Stegman, Jonas Hedin and Joachim Dillner, who are members of the MATS science team but are not directly involved in this study. The authors also thank OHB Sweden and AAC Omnisys for their important contributions to realising the mission. AI writing assistance has been used for editing and language polishing during the production of a previous version of the text. Finally, we thank the editor and the two anonymous referees, whose suggestions improved the quality of this article.
This research has been supported by the Swedish National Space Agency (grant nos. 2012-01684, 210/19, 2021-00052 and 2022-00108) and the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 2021-04876).
The publication of this article was funded by the Swedish Research Council, Forte, Formas and Vinnova.
This paper was edited by John Plane and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Burrage, M. D., Arvin, N., Skinner, W. R., and Hays, P. B.: Observations of the O2 atmospheric band nightglow by the high resolution Doppler imager, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 99, 15017–15023, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JA00791, 1994. a
Ern, M., Preusse, P., Alexander, M. J., and Warner, C. D.: Absolute values of gravity wave momentum flux derived from satellite data, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004752, 2004. a
Fomichev, V. I., Ward, W. E., Beagley, S. R., McLandress, C., McConnell, J. C., McFarlane, N. A., and Shepherd, T. G.: Extended Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model: Zonal-mean climatology and physical parameterizations, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107, ACL 9–1–ACL 9–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000479, 2002. a
Forbes, J. M. and Zhang, X.: Quasi-10-day wave in the atmosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 11079–11089, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023327, 2015. a
Gordon, I., Rothman, L., Hargreaves, R., Hashemi, R., Karlovets, E., Skinner, F., Conway, E., Hill, C., Kochanov, R., Tan, Y., Wcisło, P., Finenko, A., Nelson, K., Bernath, P., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K., Coustenis, A., Drouin, B., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R., Hodges, J., Jacquemart, D., Mlawer, E., Nikitin, A., Perevalov, V., Rotger, M., Tennyson, J., Toon, G., Tran, H., Tyuterev, V., Adkins, E., Baker, A., Barbe, A., Canè, E., Császár, A., Dudaryonok, A., Egorov, O., Fleisher, A., Fleurbaey, H., Foltynowicz, A., Furtenbacher, T., Harrison, J., Hartmann, J.-M., Horneman, V.-M., Huang, X., Karman, T., Karns, J., Kassi, S., Kleiner, I., Kofman, V., Kwabia-Tchana, F., Lavrentieva, N., Lee, T., Long, D., Lukashevskaya, A., Lyulin, O., Makhnev, V., Matt, W., Massie, S., Melosso, M., Mikhailenko, S., Mondelain, D., Müller, H., Naumenko, O., Perrin, A., Polyansky, O., Raddaoui, E., Raston, P., Reed, Z., Rey, M., Richard, C., Tóbiás, R., Sadiek, I., Schwenke, D., Starikova, E., Sung, K., Tamassia, F., Tashkun, S., Vander Auwera, J., Vasilenko, I., Vigasin, A., Villanueva, G., Vispoel, B., Wagner, G., Yachmenev, A., and Yurchenko, S.: The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 277, 107949, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949, 2022. a
Gumbel, J., Megner, L., Christensen, O. M., Ivchenko, N., Murtagh, D. P., Chang, S., Dillner, J., Ekebrand, T., Giono, G., Hammar, A., Hedin, J., Karlsson, B., Krus, M., Li, A., McCallion, S., Olentšenko, G., Pak, S., Park, W., Rouse, J., Stegman, J., and Witt, G.: The MATS satellite mission – gravity wave studies by Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 431–455, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-431-2020, 2020. a
Hagan, M. and Forbes, J.: Migrating and nonmigrating diurnal tides in the middle and upper atmosphere excited by tropospheric latent heat release, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001236, 2002. a
Hagan, M., Maute, A., and Roble, R.: Tropospheric tidal effects on the middle and upper atmosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013637 2009. a
Li, A., Roth, C. Z., Pérot, K., Christensen, O. M., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D. A., and Murtagh, D. P.: Retrieval of daytime mesospheric ozone using OSIRIS observations of O2 (a1Δg) emission, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6215–6236, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6215-2020, 2020. a
Lieberman, R., Riggin, D., Ortland, D., Oberheide, J., and Siskind, D.: Global observations and modeling of nonmigrating diurnal tides generated by tide-planetary wave interactions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120, 11419–11437, 2015. a
Linder, B., Gumbel, J., Murtagh, D. P., Megner, L., Krasauskas, L., Degenstein, D., Christensen, O. M., and Ivchenko, N.: Joint observations of oxygen atmospheric band emissions using OSIRIS and the MATS satellite, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4453–4466, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4453-2025, 2025. a
Luo, J., Gong, Y., Ma, Z., Zhang, S., Zhou, Q., Huang, C., Huang, K., Yu, Y., and Li, G.: Study of the Quasi 10-Day Waves in the MLT Region During the 2018 February SSW by a Meteor Radar Chain, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 126, e2020JA028367, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028367, 2021. a
Marsh, D. R., Skinner, W. R., and Yudin, V. A.: Tidal influences on O2 atmospheric band dayglow: HRDI observations vs. model simulations, Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 1369–1372, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900253, 1999. a
Megner, L., Gumbel, J., Christensen, O. M., Linder, B., Murtagh, D. P., Ivchenko, N., Krasauskas, L., Hedin, J., Dillner, J., Giono, G., Olentsenko, G., Kern, L., and Stegman, J.: The MATS satellite: Limb image data processing and calibration, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-265, 2025a. a, b
Megner, L., Gumbel, J., Christensen, O. M., B. Linder, D. Murtagh, N. Ivchenko, L. Krasauskas, J. Hedin, J. Dillner, and Stegman, J.: MATS satellite images (level 1b) of airglow and noctilucent clouds in the mesosphere/lower thermosphere, February–May 2023, Dataset version 1.0, Bolin Centre Database [data set], https://doi.org/10.17043/mats-level-1b-limb-cropd-1.0, 2025b. a
Oberheide, J., Forbes, J. M., Zhang, X., and Bruinsma, S. L.: Climatology of upward propagating diurnal and semidiurnal tides in the thermosphere, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016784, 2011. a
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding, World Scientific, https://doi.org/10.1142/3171, 2000. a
Vargin, P., Koval, A., Guryanov, V., and Kirushov, B.: Large-scale dynamic processes during the minor and major sudden stratospheric warming events in January–February 2023, Atmospheric Research, 308, 107545, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107545, 2024. a
Ward, W.: Tidal mechanisms of dynamical influence on oxygen recombination airglow in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere, Advances in Space Research, 21, 795–805, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00676-5,1998. a